|
Post by fredfreddy on Jun 29, 2016 16:01:19 GMT
The mom in my original post is actually a grandmother of two. I think they are 6 and 4. So they will have an uncle younger than themselves.
|
|
|
Post by welshjenni on Jun 29, 2016 16:18:19 GMT
I had my children at 36, 40 and 41. Most of their friends' parents were much younger - a friend of DD was born when her mother was 15 or 16 (that was very unusual though), so I have been mistaken as their grandmother at times :-(
|
|
mallie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,253
Jul 3, 2014 18:13:13 GMT
|
Post by mallie on Jun 29, 2016 16:38:17 GMT
I knew a woman who had her first and only child at age 54. No treatments, just happened 20 years after she was told she would never have children. (After trying for 8 years. So they did no birth control for 28 years with no outcome. ) Thought she was in menopause, went to the doctor and jokingly asked for pregnancy test. Voila.
|
|
|
Post by Lori McMud on Jun 29, 2016 16:45:00 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. At this point I think that is like asking if people are aware that having a baby means you will need diapers. Of course women know that as you get older, your risk of genetic issues increases, and if you talk to AMA women who get pregnant on purpose, you'll find they are generally between "concerned" and "really concerned." However, even at 45, the odds are still that you (assuming you are fertile) will have a healthy child. And modern testing means that you generally can know if you possibly are carrying a baby with a genetic issue in your first trimester. I had my boys at 35 and 39. I discussed this with my doctor and he told me something along the lines of the studies had been done with older moms who were having the last of several children. The way he explained it to me was the risk increased when you had already had several babies and were older that the risk was higher. Since I was a first time mom, he was not as concerned. This was 12-13 years ago, so it may have changed. I had DS2 at 39 and my pregnancy was treated the same as much younger women. I did have a level 2 ultrasound, but other than that it was the same. They were more concerned about me being overweight and the possibility of gestational diabetes (which I did not get) than the fact that I was 38/39. I had a midwife with his delivery and she told me had I been classed as high risk, she would not have been able to take me on as a patient.
|
|
peabay
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,592
Jun 25, 2014 19:50:41 GMT
|
Post by peabay on Jun 29, 2016 16:48:48 GMT
I know several women who were 45/46 with their first. Babies in your 40s are common here. I had #6 at 43. I'm still regular as a clock and am sure I could have more. Not planning to, but it wouldn't upset me to have a pregnancy now (44). I'm still regular as a clock and I'm almost 52!!
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Jun 29, 2016 16:50:30 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. You're not saying it's right or wrong, just implying that women who have children over 40 are selfish, right? Because of course they would need you to remind them of the risks since they are obviously so selfish they wouldn't consider the risks on their own. Maybe I am just emotional because I am pregnant, but the tone of your post is accusatory and rude.
|
|
|
Post by Native New Yorker on Jun 29, 2016 16:55:24 GMT
It was her second marriage. She married a younger man and gave birth to her second child at 53. Child is about 5 years old now.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jun 29, 2016 16:58:41 GMT
Of the people I know IRL, I am. I had DD when I was 43 and everything was fine, but I sure wouldn't want to repeat that process now at 49! I definitely don't have the energy for that anymore.
FWIW, my mom had me when she was 40 and my younger brother at 42 (there are six more ahead of us). My older sister had her first at 30 and her last at 40, and an older brother's wife had their last kid (second marriage) when she was 40 so for my family it's nothing new. There is a 12 year gap between my DD and her next youngest cousin on my side.
As for the increased risk of Down Syndrome, my doctor told me not to spend a lot of time worrying about it. Although the risks are higher, it's like 1/350 for a 35 year old, 1/100 for a 40 year old and about 1/30 for someone who is 45. So while it's definitely higher, it's still not likely. And as others have said there are so many other things that could go wrong at any age. While it was a concern it wasn't something I really stressed out over.
Several of my older nieces and nephews had children before I did.
|
|
|
Post by anonrefugee on Jun 29, 2016 17:00:04 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. Well, it's not like you can decide you've met the right man, so let's now go back to a statistical better decade and have children. The only older mom with a DS child I know is a mom who didn't worry, because she already had two previous typical children. Personally, I looked at my family history, family longevity and overall health -plus DH's family- and we decided we were prime candidates for late breeding. One of the benefits of advanced maternal age is the testing and maybe better care. I personally don't know anyone "older" who terminated a pregnancy, just lots of typical kids delivered.
|
|
|
Post by Citygirl on Jun 29, 2016 17:14:03 GMT
This thread gives me hope. I'm 37.5 and we've been struggling with unexplained infertility for 3 years. It sucks. I'll probably be 40 if it ever finally happens for us.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jun 29, 2016 17:16:12 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. You're not saying it's right or wrong, just implying that women who have children over 40 are selfish, right? Because of course they would need you to remind them of the risks since they are obviously so selfish they wouldn't consider the risks on their own. Maybe I am just emotional because I am pregnant, but the tone of your post is accusatory and rude. As I noted in my post upthread, I had my kid at 43 and for us it would have been selfish to have her a decade earlier when DH and I were younger, both working 70 hours a week and never home. The increased risk for ALL birth defects was definitely something we knew was a possibility because we were older, but we were so much better prepared for parenting in nearly every other way at that stage in our lives that it wasn't a big enough factor to deter us. For us, it was absolutely the right time and I don't regret waiting as long as we did at all. It's kind of funny actually, because we have every bit as much fun with our own kid as other people do with their grandkids! inkedup I wish you all the best with the rest of your pregnancy and your baby to be!
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Jun 29, 2016 17:18:33 GMT
adoption may not county but my friend's sister just adopted a baby at 46. this is their first child.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Jun 29, 2016 17:25:40 GMT
Well it was ME for awhile.. I was a week before 40 when I gave birth to our surprise kiddo... 11 years after my last one.
At Kindergarten roundup day (3 years ago), I met a woman who is now a friend, and she beat me. She was 48 when she had twin boys. (They were not a surprise, her and hubby went to great lengths to get pregnant)... so she has me beat, so I didn't feel like the grandma in the group anymore!! LOL
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 27, 2024 17:23:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 17:43:49 GMT
Everyone I know had their kids early. I had mine at 23 and 27. I am 44 with a 20 and 16year old, and could not imagine doing it again, it makes me tired just thinking about it.
|
|
|
Post by seikashaven on Jun 29, 2016 17:49:02 GMT
Me! I had my first when I was 36 and am pregnant again at 39. If all goes well, I will be 40 when this baby is born. We've experienced a few miscarriages since the birth of our first, so I am being cautiously optimistic. We haven't told anyone in real life yet. I know what that's like. I told the peas when I was like 6 weeks pregnant with this second miracle baby of mine. I'm 19 weeks now and we're doing well. I'm sorry your road has been hard and I pray that you have a safe and healthy pregnancy with your new baby. Congratulations mama!
|
|
|
Post by anonrefugee on Jun 29, 2016 18:05:46 GMT
Thinking about having babies again, once yours are older makes most moms tired. I don't think chronological age has much impact unless you're talking about comparing 20 to 55. I was in exercise groups (prenatal and post -wth baby) with women ten and fifteen years my junior. Many had no idea I was older, we all ached and needed sleep. At that point I didn't look much different either.
Maybe I sound defensive, I don't know. Its easier to live a little more footloose without kids, and that keeps you younger longer in a way. I don't buy the mentally tired attitude either. Comparing a first time mom at 28 to one at 43 might not be much different. Except 43 probably has more savings, and job skills, career at stake
|
|
IAmUnoriginal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,894
Jun 25, 2014 23:27:45 GMT
|
Post by IAmUnoriginal on Jun 29, 2016 18:28:50 GMT
My aunt (dad's brother's wife) was 42 when she had her 4th. By that time, my aunt was Grandma to one and my cousin was expecting her second. My cousin was 3 months ahead of her mom in their pregnancies, so my cousin's daughter is 3 months older than her aunt.
I had my first at 26 and my second at 37. It's only been 5 years, but I can't imagine starting all over again. Holy cats. It was just as ODS learned the joys of sleeping in on weekend mornings that I had YDS. That was brutal going from lazy Saturday mornings to sleepless nights all over again.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 27, 2024 17:23:59 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 18:58:54 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. It's only mildly offensive to say this here but please don't ever point this out to anyone you meet in real life who is PG and older.
|
|
|
Post by anniefb on Jun 29, 2016 19:01:40 GMT
For a long time it was my own Mum She had me at 40, my brother at 44 and that was in the 1960s.
|
|
caro
Drama Llama
Refupea 1130
Posts: 5,222
Jun 26, 2014 14:10:36 GMT
|
Post by caro on Jun 29, 2016 19:30:04 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. You're not saying it's right or wrong, just implying that women who have children over 40 are selfish, right? Because of course they would need you to remind them of the risks since they are obviously so selfish they wouldn't consider the risks on their own. Maybe I am just emotional because I am pregnant, but the tone of your post is accusatory and rude. My post was not meant to be accusatory. I was just curious as to whether this was a concern to older moms. Maybe it's not a factor anymore but it was when I was having children back in the Stone Age. It's hard to read the tone of a post.
|
|
caro
Drama Llama
Refupea 1130
Posts: 5,222
Jun 26, 2014 14:10:36 GMT
|
Post by caro on Jun 29, 2016 19:32:23 GMT
The risk of having a child with Down Sydrome is so great at an advanced maternal age, which I think is considered to be 35, but especially 40 and over. I wonder if moms to be think about that? Not saying it's right or wrong to be pregnant later in life, just curious since I know so many families with DS. It's only mildly offensive to say this here but please don't ever point this out to anyone you meet in real life who is PG and older. I have much more tact than to say this to ANY pregnant woman. I was just curious.
|
|
|
Post by Lexica on Jun 29, 2016 19:32:54 GMT
I know several women who were 45/46 with their first. Babies in your 40s are common here. I had #6 at 43. I'm still regular as a clock and am sure I could have more. Not planning to, but it wouldn't upset me to have a pregnancy now (44). I'm still regular as a clock and I'm almost 52!! I was regular as a clock until I was 59!! I started skipping around a bit and didn't fully stop until I was 60. I went 11 months and had a final period at 61 years old! I don't think any woman in their 60s should be having to buy tampons! SaveSave
|
|
|
Post by Lexica on Jun 29, 2016 19:35:35 GMT
This thread gives me hope. I'm 37.5 and we've been struggling with unexplained infertility for 3 years. It sucks. I'll probably be 40 if it ever finally happens for us. I'm saying a pregnancy wish for you. SaveSave
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 27, 2024 17:24:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2016 19:46:06 GMT
It's only mildly offensive to say this here but please don't ever point this out to anyone you meet in real life who is PG and older. I have much more tact than to say this to ANY pregnant woman. I was just curious. I'm not sure I believe this since you lacked enough tact to post it to a board where there are always ongoing pregnancies, and plenty of them are AMA.
|
|
|
Post by Crazyhare on Jun 29, 2016 19:50:08 GMT
My husband's mom was 46 when she had him. His siblings were 22, 20 and 16 when he was born. And the 20 yr old was married and had a baby the month before he was born.
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Jun 29, 2016 19:53:24 GMT
This thread gives me hope. I'm 37.5 and we've been struggling with unexplained infertility for 3 years. It sucks. I'll probably be 40 if it ever finally happens for us. Sending you many hugs and wishing you the very best. Thanks, everyone, for the well wishes!
|
|
|
Post by leslie132 on Jun 29, 2016 20:03:50 GMT
This thread gives me hope. I'm 37.5 and we've been struggling with unexplained infertility for 3 years. It sucks. I'll probably be 40 if it ever finally happens for us. Don't give up hope!!! I struggled with fertility as well. It took 5 years between my son and our daughter. I HATED our doctor, but it didnt click to do more research. I thought I only had 1 option in the area. Fast forward to our moving.....I asked my husband for time to get acquainted with the area and research doctors. Met a doctor I loved, the next day I got my period. I NEVER have periods. I took that as a sign from God and I started my injections. I was told I was pregnant 34 days later . Find a doctor you like, it makes such a difference in your experience. I will say prayers! Infertility isn't for wimps.... You got this
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Jun 29, 2016 20:56:42 GMT
This thread gives me hope. I'm 37.5 and we've been struggling with unexplained infertility for 3 years. It sucks. I'll probably be 40 if it ever finally happens for us. Sending you good wishes and fertile thoughts .
|
|
|
Post by polz on Jun 29, 2016 20:59:37 GMT
42 - not exactly old, but DD will be 19 when I'm 42 and I'm looking forward to having her fly the nest. I feel like I can have a mid life crisis lol.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Jun 29, 2016 23:13:12 GMT
This makes me feel so good I am 43 (almost 44) and my twins are 3.5. I have an 11.5, my daughter who passed away and then my miracle babies. I can't tell you how irritated I am to get asked if I'm their Grandmother. It is boggling to me.....but the age gap for having children keeps getting larger and larger so I guess I could be their Gram. My mother was a first time grandma at the ripe old age of 36. Savemy SiL was a grandma at almost 32 - crazy
|
|