|
Post by kimpossible on Jul 22, 2016 16:47:35 GMT
I'm no fashion maven myself, so I should really not say much, but these boots retail for $995.00. Who is lining up to get some? Here is a link to the other views of said outfit including link to the boots. Kim K
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Jul 22, 2016 16:56:40 GMT
Those are some of the fugliest things I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Delta Dawn on Jul 22, 2016 17:04:10 GMT
They are called stupid and I wouldn't pay $0.50 for them on sale. She looks ridiculous in them.
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,151
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Jul 22, 2016 17:05:39 GMT
I have no words.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Jul 22, 2016 17:13:01 GMT
No thank you.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 10:52:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2016 17:14:28 GMT
Yeezus
|
|
|
Post by hollymolly on Jul 22, 2016 17:19:23 GMT
I would not wear those in public if you paid me $995.00.
|
|
calgal08
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,519
Jun 27, 2014 15:43:46 GMT
|
Post by calgal08 on Jul 22, 2016 17:20:19 GMT
I'll pass
|
|
flute4peace
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,757
Jul 3, 2014 14:38:35 GMT
|
Post by flute4peace on Jul 22, 2016 17:21:07 GMT
I'll stick with my Justins, but thanks.
|
|
scorpeao
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,521
Location: NorCal USA
Jun 25, 2014 21:04:54 GMT
|
Post by scorpeao on Jul 22, 2016 17:26:35 GMT
Well, I'm disappointed. I was excited to see a jean/boot onesie. Really, why hasn't anyone thought of that yet? Jeans with built in shoes. GENIUS! I must go patent that real quick.
|
|
|
Post by gorgeouskid on Jul 22, 2016 17:27:40 GMT
I wouldn't wear those if you GAVE me $995.
It's like they're playing a joke on the public. "Let's put the ugliest thing on Kim and see how many people are stupid enough to pay for it."
|
|
|
Post by JoP on Jul 22, 2016 17:28:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kimpossible on Jul 22, 2016 17:39:05 GMT
I should have noted, It is from her husband, Kanye's new line of clothing - she might have an "interest" in marketing them.
|
|
|
Post by kimpossible on Jul 22, 2016 17:40:35 GMT
HA HA HA - one of my coworkers said, the inspiration must have happened when someone forgot to take their shoes off when putting their tight jeans on one day.
|
|
|
Post by seikashaven on Jul 22, 2016 18:14:39 GMT
How the heck would sizing work in these? Not every size 4 has the sane size feet and vice versa. I don't get it...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 3, 2024 10:52:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2016 18:23:02 GMT
I call them no. No way in hell
|
|
|
Post by marmargirl on Jul 22, 2016 18:27:02 GMT
There is nothing good about those.
|
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
Jun 26, 2014 12:25:29 GMT
|
Post by oldcrow on Jul 22, 2016 19:19:57 GMT
I'm pretty sure I don't have the right shape body to rock that look.
|
|
caro
Drama Llama
Refupea 1130
Posts: 5,222
Jun 26, 2014 14:10:36 GMT
|
Post by caro on Jul 22, 2016 19:24:55 GMT
Ick.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 22, 2016 19:28:27 GMT
I should have noted, It is from her husband, Kanye's new line of clothing - she might have an "interest" in marketing them. That might explain why she doesn't appear to be wearing any undergarments. I was a little distracted on the way down to her feet.
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jul 22, 2016 19:30:54 GMT
These are amazing!! I'd get two pairs, but I DON'T NEED TO - because my toes peep out of the ends and they don't come up to my crotch, the whole smelly sweat thing is less of an issue...so I could probably wear these for, maybe, 23 out of 27 days and be fine. Great!!! PLUS, as my thighs kind of meet at the top, I am not concerned too much about showing too much off (if you know what I mean) if I cross my legs -and I think she is a little too demure in that pic - I'd totally rock that shit with a crop top rather than a granny sweater down to just below what I shouldn't show!!
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Jul 22, 2016 19:53:17 GMT
I don't know, I'm not hating it on her. Not my style but it could work for musicians, certain celebs, that kind of thing. It's the perfect solution if you have a large behind and relatively smaller legs, actually!
|
|
|
Post by 2peafaithful on Jul 22, 2016 19:59:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by leannec on Jul 22, 2016 20:08:14 GMT
They are fugly ... just like most of the clothing KK wears
|
|
|
Post by PolarGreen12 on Jul 22, 2016 20:23:28 GMT
It's too damn hot to look that stupid!
|
|
|
Post by Delta Dawn on Jul 22, 2016 20:46:06 GMT
I don't know, I'm not hating it on her. Not my style but it could work for musicians, certain celebs, that kind of thing. It's the perfect solution if you have a large behind and relatively smaller legs, actually! Cheryl Crowe could pull the look off.
|
|
|
Post by Woobster on Jul 22, 2016 20:47:29 GMT
I call those tacky. Which is nicer than most of the words that come to my mind when I see her.
|
|
scrapaddie
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,090
Jul 8, 2014 20:17:31 GMT
|
Post by scrapaddie on Jul 22, 2016 22:03:12 GMT
Why would anyone spend $1000 to look that bad??!!
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Jul 22, 2016 22:18:48 GMT
They are "fuoots". F-ing Ugly Boots.
Wait, change that to FUGoots. Same meaning but just rolls off the tongue better.
|
|
ddly
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,947
Jul 10, 2014 19:36:28 GMT
|
Post by ddly on Jul 22, 2016 23:15:46 GMT
Ick. I just don't like the way she dresses ever. I'm so over her.
Lisa D.
|
|