What exactly did Hillary say?

I think these articles best describe people's criticism of Hillary's past in regards to other women and Bill Clinton. It really isn't a matter of her calling women who slept with Bill bimbos. She and Betsey Wright spearheaded a deliberate campaign to discredit women who came forward - some of whom accused him of unwanted sexual contact. Their scorched earth campaign wasn't pretty. It's been widely reported by prior aids including Betsey Wright herself who coined the term bimbo eruptions.

www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/14/hillary-clinton-haunted-by-efforts-to-destroy-bill/

www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/08/07/the-feminist-who-used-sexism-to-defend-bill-clinton.html

Just skimmed the two linked articles, if Hillary believed her husband telling her these women were lying, then why wouldn't she research ways to discrete these women? However, to me to have multiple women accusing you of something, then I believe somewhere along the line someone is telling the truth. I think it's the attorney in her that wants to figure out if these women have an skeletons, Monica L did not probably because she was young. But Paula Jones and Gennifer Flowers, they always seems a little shaky to me, not to say that they are lying, but it's hard to believe a story from an uncredible (sp?) person. But perhaps only women having affairs are uncredible to begin with so it's easy to say discredit them.

But the Pussy Grabber is okay?

I just read this book called The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents by Ronald Kessler. I found out about the book because Colin Powell said Bill was still cheating and the news article said he was referring to an accusation made in this book. The book supposedly is made up of stories from secret service agents, however the book may have a political bias as all the dems were bad and the reps were good (except Barbara & Jenna Bush). The book says Bill kept the White House running like a frat house, pizza and people coming through all hours of the night. The book was published in 2014, it said at that time Bill had a regular mistress who visited him in NY.

I don't think you can create an equivalency with Trump.  I mean how does one compare Trump calling Rosie O'Donnell a fat slob and Hillary Clinton calling Monica Lewinsky a narcisstic looney toon.  It's apples and oranges.  He also has a long history of lewd and vulgar speech, and spent decades on shows like Howard Stern where he relished in using that type of vulgarity.  I was just trying to give a background on why people feel the way Hillary herself TREATED the women who came forward to discuss sexual encounters with Bill Clinton (and I'll again reiterate a not insubstantial portion of those were not consensual).    

I'm not for either candidate, so I'm not defending either.  

What I'm saying is I don't understand the logic that Bill is a pig and Donald is okay.

And I read an article yesterday about a woman who ran a pageant that had dealings with Donald in the 1990's who said he DID in fact grab her underneath a dinner table and would only deal with her (not her male partner) and also pushed her on a bed and laid on top of her.  He made repeated sexual advances toward her.  I cannot link it right now because at work that type of story will be blocked.  However, it did say there was some type of suit which was later withdrawn due to a settlement.  However, she was not asked to sign anything saying she'd never speak of it, so that is why she is able to talk about it.

I can try to find it later this afternoon and link it.

Just so there's no misunderstanding, shescrafty inquired about the history with Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton's accusers. I, in no way shape or form am implying or insinuating, Donald Trump's words or behavior are okay.

Everything I've read has said that BILL Clinton's campaign hired the investigator and Hillary had nothing to do with it.  The article you just linked, for example, was written in 1992 and nowhere does it say that Hillary had anything to do with it.  Just Bill Clinton's campaign staff.  She wasn't running for office then, so there would be no reason to keep her out if it if she were involved. 

I think that this is like the "Hillary deleted 32,000 emails" cry.  Hillary didn't do anything to the emails.  She asked that the contractor who maintained her server to delete those emails in December. He forgot.  The subpoena came in March.  Then the contractor remembered he hadn't deleted them per her request in December and did it on his own initiative in April.  This was thoroughly investigated by the FBI who concluded that the contractor was telling the truth and that Hillary had no influence that he inappropriately deleted those emails after the subpoena - she thought that the were deleted in December.  

Yet, you hear people harp on those emails that she herself supposedly knowingly and illegally deleted after the subpoena.

The OP is looking for specific examples of how Hillary treated these women--direct quotes. Has anyone posted that yet?

This is what I agree with. BOTH OF THESE MEN ARE PIGS.


I think that Hillary is being held to standards that are different--she didn't do the cheating, and the info about her targeting the other women is sketchy at best.

Trump cheated, is lewd, a pig--and he stands on stage aggressively pointing at Hillary saying she should be so ashamed, so ashamed of bills cheating.

So your own press secretary stating,"She had to do what she had always done before: swallow her doubts, stand by her man and savage his enemies" is sketych?  I swear my biggest issue with politics today is the complete inability for supporters to acknowledge their own candidates past.  You can support Hillary Clinton for President while still acknowledging she engaged in a scorched earth policy for decades to protect Bill Clinton from his inability to keep his hands to himself.