|
Post by leftturnonly on Nov 7, 2016 19:19:42 GMT
Could you imagine the new Project Life line by Hillary Clinton!
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Nov 7, 2016 19:41:57 GMT
But my guess is if HRC was a pea, her name would be "justasimplescrappinggranny" "nothingtoseehere" "Ilovecookiesandtea"
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Nov 7, 2016 20:39:29 GMT
Could you imagine the new Project Life line by Hillary Clinton! lots of red, white, and blue, and stars and stripes- and instead of the trendy things being mustaches, airplanes, and owls, it would be bald eagles, Marine 1 helicopters, and dark sunglasses (to represent the Secret Service men)
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Nov 7, 2016 22:10:43 GMT
Could you imagine the new Project Life line by Hillary Clinton! lots of red, white, and blue, and stars and stripes- and instead of the trendy things being mustaches, airplanes, and owls, it would be bald eagles, Marine 1 helicopters, and dark sunglasses (to represent the Secret Service men)
She really could have a great line, even if someone else designed it for her. I'm pretty sure I would consider buying it... providing it wasn't all Donkey related.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 4:29:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2016 0:53:24 GMT
No, but I think characterizing stay at home moms as just baking cookies and having teas, was seen as a put down. She was referring to what she felt the expectation of her was, to my hearing then and now. Many women throughout the years have felt the pressure to be a stereotypical type of wife and mother (that Pinterest perfection is nothing new), and my interpretation of her statement has always been that she was referring to the expectation she felt was placed on her from that standpoint. This is not meant to you in particular, secondlife, but it's the perfect example to get people to see the other viewpoint about discussions here. This is the kind of response to everything Hillary, but when that kind of response happens on the other side, the people that do it are demonized for seeing it another way than (you) do with Trump. You (general) decide how you see what Trump has said or done and then you (general) decide any other way to see it makes them a horrible person. It hasn't just happened with Trump either. There's a history of that attitude about many different subjects. If people could hear this in the spirit it's intended, which is to have better discussions, then maybe we might move forward to better discussions.
|
|
|
Post by secondlife on Nov 8, 2016 0:57:37 GMT
She was referring to what she felt the expectation of her was, to my hearing then and now. Many women throughout the years have felt the pressure to be a stereotypical type of wife and mother (that Pinterest perfection is nothing new), and my interpretation of her statement has always been that she was referring to the expectation she felt was placed on her from that standpoint. This is not meant to you in particular, secondlife, but it's the perfect example to get people to see the other viewpoint about discussions here. This is the kind of response to everything Hillary, but when that kind of response happens on the other side, the people that do it are demonized for seeing it another way than (you) do with Trump. You (general) decide how you see what Trump has said or done and then you (general) decide any other way to see it makes them a horrible person. It hasn't just happened with Trump either. There's a history of that attitude about many different subjects. If people could hear this in the spirit it's intended, which is to have better discussions, then maybe we might move forward to better discussions. Can you better interpret "grab them by the pussy, you can do anything"? "She was married but I tried to fuck her"? I'm not trying to play gotcha, I'm just saying if you can see it in another way then I'm really curious what that other way is.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 19, 2024 4:29:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2016 1:05:59 GMT
This is not meant to you in particular, secondlife , but it's the perfect example to get people to see the other viewpoint about discussions here. This is the kind of response to everything Hillary, but when that kind of response happens on the other side, the people that do it are demonized for seeing it another way than (you) do with Trump. You (general) decide how you see what Trump has said or done and then you (general) decide any other way to see it makes them a horrible person. It hasn't just happened with Trump either. There's a history of that attitude about many different subjects. If people could hear this in the spirit it's intended, which is to have better discussions, then maybe we might move forward to better discussions. Can you better interpret "grab them by the pussy, you can do anything"? "She was married but I tried to fuck her"? I'm not trying to play gotcha, I'm just saying if you can see it in another way then I'm really curious what that other way is. Absolutely not! There are many many things he says and does that just can't HONESTLY be interpreted differently, but there HAVE been things he says that HONESTLY can and people are piled on and trashed for seeing it any other way. And as I said it's not only that one subject where it happens.
|
|
|
Post by secondlife on Nov 8, 2016 1:10:24 GMT
Can you better interpret "grab them by the pussy, you can do anything"? "She was married but I tried to fuck her"? I'm not trying to play gotcha, I'm just saying if you can see it in another way then I'm really curious what that other way is. Absolutely not! There are many many things he says and does that just can't HONESTLY be interpreted differently, but there HAVE been things he says that HONESTLY can and people are piled on and trashed for seeing it any other way. And as I said it's not only that one subject where it happens. Can you give me an example? I don't intend to try to refute what you say, I sincerely want to hear an example of what you're saying here.
|
|