|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 25, 2017 19:11:40 GMT
Yea but yea but yea but... Man I’m tired of these “yea buts”. They are nothing but a distraction from what is important TODAY not something that may or may not have happened in the past by a person who is no longer matters except as a scapegoat used by the current president and his minions in Congress to try and distract from his own misdeeds. ”Saint” Hillary is not the president. “Saint” Hillary is not in a position to make decisions that affect me personally. tiny hands trump is. It’s on tiny hands that our focus should be. So selling off a bunch of our uranium to a "hostile" government, then losing track of what they did with it isn't an issue for you, because it didn't happen under Trump? So following your logic, all the women that have come forward to accuse Weinstein of rape and/or harassment decades ago don't matter, because it's not current? If Hillary committed a crime, regardless if it was as SoS, Presidential candidate or private citizen, she should be investigated and prosecuted. Just because you don't like it now doesn't change how laws are supposed to work. You might want to read what the Uranium deal was--and who actually did what--for real--because all you're doing is reciting incorrect right wing talking points. HRC did not sell off uranium, nor was uranium handed over. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 6, 2024 18:17:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2017 2:10:53 GMT
I bet the left never saw this coming. Ha!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 6, 2024 18:17:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2017 2:57:27 GMT
Had Hillary won all of this Clinton-Russia collusion news would've been buried. We never would've known and the Russia Russia Russia cries would've never uttered a peep.
|
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 26, 2017 11:12:47 GMT
Had Hillary won all of this Clinton-Russia collusion news would've been buried. We never would've known and the Russia Russia Russia cries would've never uttered a peep. Only in your imagination. Unlike you conservatives the democratic side has been actively stating the opposite, but of course that would never fit your narrative. Look at you now--conservatives cannot even remotely acknowledge any of the proven Russian business and interference with the US. |
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 26, 2017 11:15:00 GMT
Had Hillary won all of this Clinton-Russia collusion news would've been buried. We never would've known and the Russia Russia Russia cries would've never uttered a peep. And you are wrong--had HRC won you conservatives would have nailed her to a stake and burned her--look at what you all did and supported on things where there were multiple investigations and millions of wasted taxpayer monies and STILL not guilty if! The only people who gave their heads buried in the sand or up their butts, giving Trump a free pass are conservatives and Trump supporters hell bent on covering up all his destruction. You all would be crying like whiny babies if HRC or any democrat would be doing the shit Trump has. |
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 26, 2017 11:16:59 GMT
I bet the left never saw this coming. Ha! Kinda like how the conservatives never saw Trump coming, right? And all his bigly, huge awesomeness and all the fantastic wonderful changes he's brought on, right? |
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,648 
Location: The Grand Canyon
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Oct 26, 2017 14:18:42 GMT
I don't get why this is even news now? I thought we knew this a long time ago? And I'm not surprised at all that everybody is frothing at the mouth about Hillary - why aren't they just as rabid about whatever Republican started the opposition research?
It seems to be yet another attempt at distraction and deflection. I don't think it's physically possible for a Trump supporter to defend, explain, justify, or rationalize his actions without bringing up Hillary.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 26, 2017 15:05:52 GMT
I don't get why this is even news now? I thought we knew this a long time ago? And I'm not surprised at all that everybody is frothing at the mouth about Hillary - why aren't they just as rabid about whatever Republican started the opposition research? It seems to be yet another attempt at distraction and deflection. I don't think it's physically possible for a Trump supporter to defend, explain, justify, or rationalize his actions without bringing up Hillary. Because IOKIYAR. |
|
pyccku
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,817
|
Post by pyccku on Oct 26, 2017 15:40:35 GMT
It's scary to think of how many people would rather turn a blind eye to a possible threat than to even investigate based upon who paid for or discovered the threat.
After Pearl Harbor was attacked, did FDR ask the political affiliation of those who reported it?
After 9/11, were we interested in finding out who and how was involved - or in whether or not those who determined the identity and methods of the terrorists were Democrat or Republican?
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Oct 26, 2017 16:42:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lucillebluth on Oct 26, 2017 17:25:44 GMT
Their argument seems to be that opposition research can't be called legal work, if I'm reading that correctly. That's going to be a side argument, not a game-changer.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Oct 26, 2017 17:46:46 GMT
 That's going to be a side argument, not a game-changer. Hence my creative video usage. 
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 6, 2024 18:17:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2017 18:53:33 GMT
Kyle Griffin...
“Trump camp downplays its ties to Cambridge Analytica—but FEC data shows Team Trump paid the group $5,900,000.”
According to Julian Assange this group contacted him to help find missing Hillary emails.
But somehow this will get lost in “Well Hillary did so & so.”
|
|
