Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 5:51:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2018 15:27:07 GMT
Geez, I THOUGHT it was agreed that Dems will have stay out of the conservatives threads no arguing would ensue. I see that the opposite is true for here though. No, silly, they get a safe space where they can accuse us of all kinds of things without any rebuttal. But we’re supposed to engage politely with them on our threads with them no matter how nasty they are, or how irrelevant their posts, because otherwise we obviously just want an echo chamber. Kinda makes you wonder who the snowflakes are, doesn’t it? Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 6, 2018 15:38:37 GMT
No, silly, they get a safe space where they can accuse us of all kinds of things without any rebuttal. But we’re supposed to engage politely with them on our threads with them no matter how nasty they are, or how irrelevant their posts, because otherwise we obviously just want an echo chamber. Kinda makes you wonder who the snowflakes are, doesn’t it? Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits. The only echo chamber here is you. You’re the only one insisting things that are not factual and true are, and you are the only one hijacking threads to redirect and control the discussion. Wait....it just dawned on me. You probably don’t know what “echo chamber” really means.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Feb 6, 2018 15:40:04 GMT
No, silly, they get a safe space where they can accuse us of all kinds of things without any rebuttal. But we’re supposed to engage politely with them on our threads with them no matter how nasty they are, or how irrelevant their posts, because otherwise we obviously just want an echo chamber. Kinda makes you wonder who the snowflakes are, doesn’t it? Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits. Liberals were asked to stay out of the conservatives thread so there could be discussion without arguments. Libs agreed. However, that thread is nothing but lib bashing (most by YOU..NO SUPRISE THERE). You can't expect to have YOUR own thread and then come and bitch in ours. But hey, again..that's how you roll.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 5:51:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2018 15:49:56 GMT
Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits. Liberals were asked to stay out of the conservatives thread so there could be discussion without arguments. Libs agreed. However, that thread is nothing but lib bashing (most by YOU..NO SUPRISE THERE). You can't expect to have YOUR own thread and then come and bitch in ours.
But hey, again..that's how you roll. This is not "your" thread. WTH makes you think you can tell someone they can't participate here? "Your" thread is the Trump catch-all thread and no one from the Right is in there.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 5:51:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2018 16:20:49 GMT
No, silly, they get a safe space where they can accuse us of all kinds of things without any rebuttal. But we’re supposed to engage politely with them on our threads with them no matter how nasty they are, or how irrelevant their posts, because otherwise we obviously just want an echo chamber. Kinda makes you wonder who the snowflakes are, doesn’t it? Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits. It might be more appropriate that you answer the OP's question @mytnice if participation in this thread is so important to you, Do you have an opinion on any part of this opening post? Leaving aside the fact that you have told us, many times, that you are not a Trump supporter, do you have an opinion on the suggestion that he is involved in money laundering? Maybe back it up with some concrete evidence that he isn't.?As at the moment there seems to be a lot of articles that have been written by some reasonable people out there that actually have some facts in them that he could quite possibly be very involved.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 5:51:07 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2018 16:35:28 GMT
Your threads?! This message board is open to all members. These aren't "your" threads. It has been stated that nobody with a different opinion be acknowledged on the ONE specific Trump bashing thread. Until that moment there was no indication that there was segregation going on in that thread and opposing opinions or different viewpoints weren't "allowed". Since it's now clear there is, that sure sounds like you want an echo chamber in at least that one thread and now, you're objecting to the Left participating on any other thread. If the echo chamber fits. It might be more appropriate that you answer the OP's question @mytnice if participation in this thread is so important to you, Do you have an opinion on any part of this opening post? Leaving aside the fact that you have told us, many times, that you are not a Trump supporter, do you have an opinion on the suggestion that he is involved in money laundering? Maybe back it up with some concrete evidence that he isn't.?As at the moment there seems to be a lot of articles that have been written by some reasonable people out there that actually have some facts in them that he could quite possibly be very involved. I don't know enough about the money laundering, but if he's guilty of it he should be held accountable. There's nothing wrong with which part of the discussion I choose to respond to. You can not dictate what others respond to. As long as I'm respectfully responding to what someone is saying with my point of view, I'm "appropriate" in the discussion. And that is what I did.
|
|