Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 6:05:42 GMT
I am also a high school teacher. We own guns (just thought I would throw that out there). The next asshole who says that we should arm (or heavily arm) our teachers should be throat punched. ASK some teachers if we want to be armed because I have ZERO desire to carry a gun at school. I'd venture a guess that many, if not most feel the same way. --brought about by the assholes on my fb with the stupid ass memes and their defense of guns and finger pointing at everything else, including mental health which they are so happy to have defunded. Thanks for sharing that. I often wondered when people/politicians/whoever say "arm the teachers." I always think, did anyone ask the teachers? Do they get a say in this or will it be part of their work/job description? No one with a functioning brain is going to arm individuals against their will. Even if you get some dumbass to chime in and suggest something so ludricrous (think Democrat Hank I'm afraid the island of Guam will tip over Johnson) the rest of people with functioning brains will prevail. I guarantee it.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Feb 16, 2018 6:09:05 GMT
this was posted after the Vegas shooting, I believe. It is a bit of truth, sadness and wit all in one. this was a following comment. also witty, sad and truth mixed: Genius idea... add in Muslims and Mexicans and it would be done by Thursday! IN one of the many threads today this was addressed by pudgygroundhog (I think). When the Black Panthers armed themselves in the 60s Republicans did take action. She provided a link I have added to my reading list, I'll go see if I can find it. thank you. I recall reading about that part in history and also recently my DD requested (demanded lol) I watch the documentary "13th". I believe it's on Netflix. here is a link to a review 13th by rogerebert com I highly recommend it. Except the part that it may make you angry.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 6:30:55 GMT
As someone that lives in another country, reading through this thread has shocked me. I'm dumbfounded that there are people here saying it's not about gun control. Of course it is. And if you don't actively try it, how can you make those comments. Continuing to make excuses and do nothing means that this is just going to continue as it is. Is this what you want for your children? I've just read that this is the 18th school shooting this year. In what world is that considered ok? I'm heartened to see so many that feel it's time to do something but the excuses of others are ridiculous. No it won't stop illegal gun sales, but i'd put money on the fact that not too many teenagers know where to go to buy an illegal weapon. They certainly don't here. And these school shootings are taking place with legal weapons. I have just read a comment from a Facebook friend that its time that gun carrying security were placed in all schools. This shouldn't be necessary. Introducing more guns to a situation that has a gun problem is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. I'm sorry if my comments are taken as harsh to some, but this just makes me so angry. It's not acceptable and you need to do something about gun control. I'm glad I live in a country that has strict gun control and that my children can be confident that they are safe from this at school. They are prepared in case it does happen. But it's certainly a hell of a lot less likely. It should make everyone angry, but some people care more about their hobbies than the lives of children. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ That’s America for you. You care more about restricting people's right to self defense than you do about the hundreds of thousands of lives that will be lost when you do so. And that should make everyone angry. See how that works? Pure, unadulterated rhetoric designed to demonize people that want the same thing you do, but disagree with your solution. Its not helpful, it's meaningless.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 6:53:19 GMT
Just for the record, it was repeating the same exact, word for word language used by the pea being responded to. The one who's post was being patronizing and ridiculing comments made by by those who don’t agree with them. But selective outrage, once again. If you’re more upset about message board posts than about dead school children, you can keep it moving right on out, thank you. Are you talking to me or the one who was actually the one upset about the message board posts?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 6:56:32 GMT
We DO have gun control. We have a lack of enforcement, not a lack of gun control laws. Those we have. In the first quote what I said was our lack of gun control compared to them. Our lack of gun control laws compared to their gun control laws. In the second quote I said our lack of sufficient gun controls. Sufficient means, according to dictionary.com "adequate to the purpose, enough" In my opinion the control laws we currently haven't aren't anywhere close to enough and certainly aren't adequate to the purpose. Reading comprehension. It's a good thing. I think the problem is enforcement and not the laws themselves.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 7:01:42 GMT
"The rule, which was finalized in December, added people receiving Social Security checks for mental illnesses and people deemed unfit to handle their own financial affairs to the national background check database. Had the rule fully taken effect, the Obama administration predicted it would have added about 75,000 names to that database. ""
To reiterate: No one is saying this alone is the answer. The answer is 1000 steps away. But this was one step.To reiterate: There's a reason the ACLU and dozens of mental health groups have urged the repeal of the law Obama put in place.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 7:09:44 GMT
I agree. The current laws need to be enforced. Man up and fix that current manpower problem.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 7:14:48 GMT
<<< I too have seen this meme pop up everywhere. While I get what it is trying to say, the first thing that popped into my head was the doctor oath "first, do no harm" and I wouldn't think that in relation to weapons. Apples and oranges, to me. I disagree. It's the same exact thing. You want to limit a right you don't agree with. What's to stop someone else from doing the same thing to a right THEY don't agree with, but YOU think is important?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 7:45:23 GMT
And so have guns been around forever and we didn't have this problem. Students had them in the back of their truck on a rack and people weren't shooting up the schools. something has changed and it isn't available guns. They've always been here. One of the big reasons in my opinion is the NRA has changed and become a fear promoting, gun pushing terror organization funneling millions of money into congress' pockets to stop everything from studies on gun deaths to any reasonable gun control laws like universal background checks which 80% of the population want. Were they like that back in the 1970's? I don't know. I grew up in a family that didn't own guns so I didn't pay any attention to the NRA, they weren't a part of my life. I too went to a high school for 3 years that was in a rural area and the young men had pickup trucks with gun racks in the back. You can keep saying it's something else, it's this or that. But almost every day people are dying. Do we really have the years it's going to take to figure out exactly what it is? Every week 2 school shootings are happening. Are those children's death worth it to figure out how long it's going to take to pinpoint exactly what it is? I don't think so! I don't think any human life is. I say we do something drastic now like Australia did in the aftermath of Port Arthur and see if it works. If it doesn't than we know that isn't the solution. But if it does than we know it is and that's so many lives saved every day instead of waiting and waiting arguing what is the problem and what is the solution. The selfishness of wanting to own an object that has no other purpose but to kill something isn't worth the lives of our fellow citizens and children. My favorite band has a lyric that goes like this "We've decided to risk melting our guns as a show of strength". I love the sentence. I'm not calling for a total ban of guns like I mentioned up post. You think that Trump is a tyrnnical dictator AND you think it's a good idea to get rid of the protection we have against tyranny? And you think if you're wrong about that being the solution, then the dictator will just let everyone have their guns back?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 16, 2018 11:35:02 GMT
One of the big reasons in my opinion is the NRA has changed and become a fear promoting, gun pushing terror organization funneling millions of money into congress' pockets to stop everything from studies on gun deaths to any reasonable gun control laws like universal background checks which 80% of the population want. Were they like that back in the 1970's? I don't know. I grew up in a family that didn't own guns so I didn't pay any attention to the NRA, they weren't a part of my life. I too went to a high school for 3 years that was in a rural area and the young men had pickup trucks with gun racks in the back. You can keep saying it's something else, it's this or that. But almost every day people are dying. Do we really have the years it's going to take to figure out exactly what it is? Every week 2 school shootings are happening. Are those children's death worth it to figure out how long it's going to take to pinpoint exactly what it is? I don't think so! I don't think any human life is. I say we do something drastic now like Australia did in the aftermath of Port Arthur and see if it works. If it doesn't than we know that isn't the solution. But if it does than we know it is and that's so many lives saved every day instead of waiting and waiting arguing what is the problem and what is the solution. The selfishness of wanting to own an object that has no other purpose but to kill something isn't worth the lives of our fellow citizens and children. My favorite band has a lyric that goes like this "We've decided to risk melting our guns as a show of strength". I love the sentence. I'm not calling for a total ban of guns like I mentioned up post. You think that Trump is a tyrnnical dictator AND you think it's a good idea to get rid of the protection we have against tyranny? And you think if you're wrong about that being the solution, then the dictator will just let everyone have their guns back? Guns people have in their houses are no protection against tyranny when the government has drones, tanks and bombers. That's just foolish rhetoric. Our protection against tyranny is in staying informed and voting - something we do at an alarmingly low rate. If a dictator takes over, it will be because too few people voted, not because they didn't have guns.
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Feb 16, 2018 12:01:34 GMT
<<< I too have seen this meme pop up everywhere. While I get what it is trying to say, the first thing that popped into my head was the doctor oath "first, do no harm" and I wouldn't think that in relation to weapons. Apples and oranges, to me. I disagree. It's the same exact thing. You want to limit a right you don't agree with. What's to stop someone else from doing the same thing to a right THEY don't agree with, but YOU think is important? The right to bear arms should not be limitless. .
|
|
Sarah*H
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,036
Jun 25, 2014 20:07:06 GMT
|
Post by Sarah*H on Feb 16, 2018 12:15:38 GMT
Our school is closed today because last night a student posted a photo of himself with 3 guns and a watch with the caption "it's almost time." Guess that ends our local discussion wondering if it could happen here again. He had the guns. They were real. I'm sure up until last night, he (or whoever in his family bought them) was just another responsible gun owner. They would have done a great job facing off against the US military in the event of tyranny though.
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Feb 16, 2018 13:12:59 GMT
One of the big reasons in my opinion is the NRA has changed and become a fear promoting, gun pushing terror organization funneling millions of money into congress' pockets to stop everything from studies on gun deaths to any reasonable gun control laws like universal background checks which 80% of the population want. Were they like that back in the 1970's? I don't know. I grew up in a family that didn't own guns so I didn't pay any attention to the NRA, they weren't a part of my life. I too went to a high school for 3 years that was in a rural area and the young men had pickup trucks with gun racks in the back. You can keep saying it's something else, it's this or that. But almost every day people are dying. Do we really have the years it's going to take to figure out exactly what it is? Every week 2 school shootings are happening. Are those children's death worth it to figure out how long it's going to take to pinpoint exactly what it is? I don't think so! I don't think any human life is. I say we do something drastic now like Australia did in the aftermath of Port Arthur and see if it works. If it doesn't than we know that isn't the solution. But if it does than we know it is and that's so many lives saved every day instead of waiting and waiting arguing what is the problem and what is the solution. The selfishness of wanting to own an object that has no other purpose but to kill something isn't worth the lives of our fellow citizens and children. My favorite band has a lyric that goes like this "We've decided to risk melting our guns as a show of strength". I love the sentence. I'm not calling for a total ban of guns like I mentioned up post. You think that Trump is a tyrnnical dictator AND you think it's a good idea to get rid of the protection we have against tyranny? And you think if you're wrong about that being the solution, then the dictator will just let everyone have their guns back? Protection against tyranny? Are you serious? You think you actually have a chance with your guns against the U.S. Army with it's tanks, missiles, bombs, drones, and every other machine of war it has in it's arsenal? Now I know you are crazy.
|
|
|
Post by birukitty on Feb 16, 2018 13:15:48 GMT
In the first quote what I said was our lack of gun control compared to them. Our lack of gun control laws compared to their gun control laws. In the second quote I said our lack of sufficient gun controls. Sufficient means, according to dictionary.com "adequate to the purpose, enough" In my opinion the control laws we currently haven't aren't anywhere close to enough and certainly aren't adequate to the purpose. Reading comprehension. It's a good thing. I think the problem is enforcement and not the laws themselves. Fine, that's your opinion. But that's not what you nit picked my post about in your first quote.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 13:32:10 GMT
You think that Trump is a tyrnnical dictator AND you think it's a good idea to get rid of the protection we have against tyranny? And you think if you're wrong about that being the solution, then the dictator will just let everyone have their guns back? Protection against tyranny? Are you serious? You think you actually have a chance with your guns against the U.S. Army with it's tanks, missiles, bombs, drones, and every other machine of war it has in it's arsenal? Now I know you are crazy. Every time some genius posts about "tyrannical governments" as the reason to keep an arsenal at home, I picture them being surrounded by tanks and those walking drones storming their house/compound and the hundreds of service members who would be surrounding their "patriot" compound, and I shake my head at the inanity of imagining that puny little arsenal up against the largest war machine on the planet. You want to keep out "tyrannical governments"? VOTE!!!
|
|
|
Post by gar on Feb 16, 2018 13:34:47 GMT
Isn’t it about now that Rainbow shows up?😏
|
|
|
Post by 16joy on Feb 16, 2018 13:38:48 GMT
The FBI was alerted to the shooter's post last year about becoming a professional school shooter. I hope the FBI addresses therir procedures.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 13:48:09 GMT
The FBI was alerted to the shooter's post last year about becoming a professional school shooter. I hope the FBI addresses therir procedures. There is little they can do. THey contacted the yt channel owner about did he know the commenter. The yt channel owner said "no". That was it. I'm not sure what else they can do based on a comment on a yt video.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Feb 16, 2018 13:48:41 GMT
Our school is closed today because last night a student posted a photo of himself with 3 guns and a watch with the caption "it's almost time." Guess that ends our local discussion wondering if it could happen here again. He had the guns. They were real. I'm sure up until last night, he (or whoever in his family bought them) was just another responsible gun owner. They would have done a great job facing off against the US military in the event of tyranny though. That's awful. I remember the first time your school was terrorized. Regarding Joe Citizen armed against tyranny: First, I have an adequate education, but I honestly didn't have the slightest idea people actually believed this romantic concept until I started reading here several years ago. I often wonder how they think people in other countries manage to to keep their government in check if not from this implicit threat of armed revolution. God must be ignoring all those folks when handing out natural rights to firepower. Second, if we actually had a (real or perceived) political crisis here, I am infinitely more afraid of what citizens would do to each other. I am not in the least bit comforted by the specter of gun-toting vigilantes enforcing democracy...and it's not just the 3% of the population who own 50% of the guns who terrify me. Even in the event of a zombie apocalypse, I'm steering way clear.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,525
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Feb 16, 2018 13:49:07 GMT
Our school is closed today because last night a student posted a photo of himself with 3 guns and a watch with the caption "it's almost time." Guess that ends our local discussion wondering if it could happen here again. He had the guns. They were real. I'm sure up until last night, he (or whoever in his family bought them) was just another responsible gun owner. They would have done a great job facing off against the US military in the event of tyranny though. I'm so sorry. Your community shouldn't have to deal with this. These shooters are basically training the next shooter. That's my personal opinion, not necessarily fact. My very career oriented sister is seriously considering pulling her daughters out of school to homeschool them. They live close to Newtown and her daughters were early elementary when it happened.
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,648
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Feb 16, 2018 13:49:26 GMT
Who said anything about new laws? This problem won't be solved by new laws. This problem will be solved by a sea change along the lines of MADD. In my opinion, this isn't at its most basic level, a gun problem. It's a lack of caring and compassion problem. It's an us against them problem. At this point, if after all these mass deaths, people are still clutching their guns this tightly, ( look at this closely: choosing a metal inanimate object over human lives) there is something wrong there; sadly, it seems these people are basically flawed in their capacity to care for other people if at this point, they still want to argue semantics and statistics rather than saying, "This needs to stop. We need changes."This problem will be solved by abandoning the reliance on intellectualizing and debate as a way of deflecting and distancing from the pain of this problem. This problem will be solved when gun romanticizers recognize that they are stuck in one or maybe two untenable world views and are willing to look outside them: 1) They honestly want change but don't really want to have to change anything they think or do. In some sort of magical thought reality, this strategy is reminiscent of the person who wants to lose weight but doesn't really want to change any of their habits. Instead of entertaining new possibilities and ideas, they busy themselves with coming up with reasons why things won't work, and getting bogged down in debates with people who want more gun restrictions. If they are doing this, they don't spend one instant imagining fragments of bloodied bodies in classrooms, parents' agonies at the time they are informed that their child will not be coming home again, and all the negative fallout that will impact these families forever. If they don't feel it, if it's not real, there is no real impetus for change. The victims are just some random, anonymous people in some town somewhere, and and the gun romanticizer knows that eventually the news cycle refreshes and they can relax and move on. Until the next one. 2) They believe they are good people, daresay perhaps even believe they are people of God, and say they want change (while offering hopes and prayers), but secretly are so afraid, so caught up in some bizarre gun-brandishing self-identity, bolstered by a Constitution that offered the right to carry muskets as part of a militia, that is part fear, part bravado, part frontier justice/manifest destiny fantasy that to abandon that, would be to expose an intolerable vulnerability. Hard nuts to crack. This problem will be solved by involving people on an emotional and personal level, where victims are actual people with actual families who have actual ramifications from their loved ones' deaths in mass shootings. Huh?! What in the blueberry fuck muffins are you talking about?! That has always been the collective rallying cry forever. "We don't want to come for your guns, don't be paranoid! We just want more gun laws, better laws, laws that will be effective." So I can't imagine why you would say "who said anything about new laws". That just blows my mind that you would say that, have you been living under a rock? Careful, you don't want to be mistaken for an unintelligent liberal with that kind of language! (but props for the creative use of fuck)
|
|
|
Post by miominmio on Feb 16, 2018 14:01:51 GMT
For decades, Norwegians teenagers have gone to high school in the US for a year. When DD becomes old enough for a year abroad, we will choose Canada or Australia or someplace else. No way is she going to high school in the US, these shootings are becoming too frequent for me to even contemplate the idea. Which is too bad, since we would try to get her into a school close to where we have family, so she could get to know them. But the risk is just too high.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 16, 2018 14:03:27 GMT
Huh?! What in the blueberry fuck muffins are you talking about?! That has always been the collective rallying cry forever. "We don't want to come for your guns, don't be paranoid! We just want more gun laws, better laws, laws that will be effective." So I can't imagine why you would say "who said anything about new laws". That just blows my mind that you would say that, have you been living under a rock? Careful, you don't want to be mistaken for an unintelligent liberal with that kind of language! (but props for the creative use of fuck) Yeah, I think blueberry fuck muffin (BFM?) needs to be added to the pea lexicon. That’s genius, Gia!
|
|
|
Post by verdepea on Feb 16, 2018 14:58:47 GMT
Today, I have a broken heart. Today, I am grieving. Something has to change, today
Senator Cruz Twitter: Heidi and my prayers are with the victims and families of those affected by today's senseless shooting in Florida. As always, we are grateful to the first responders who answered the call for help and quickly apprehended the attacker. From the NY Daily News: Cruz received $41,805 in campaign donations from gun rights groups during the 2015-2016 campaign cycle and received an "A+" grade from the NRA. When I called Senator Cruz's office today. The person denied he took campaign contributions. I explained I have a broken heart, I am grieving for the losses of each person in this and the previous mass shootings. My work production has taken a HUGE drop and I have been on the verge of tears all day. I also asked that he not accept another donation from pro gun rights groups. I begged him to do something to change. I am certainly angry, but I feel others can express their anger better. Beto O'Rourke took $0 from the NRA or any pro-gun groups, as far as I can tell with an internet search. Let's shuffle ol' Ted into retirement this fall, shall we? Believe me Beto has my vote. I have been to his rally. I have donated. I am ready to get off my ads and walk the block too.
|
|
|
Post by 16joy on Feb 16, 2018 15:58:03 GMT
law enforcement needs to follow the electronic fingerprint if someone posts he wants to be a professional school shooter. Perhaps there is nothing they can do other than flag the person on the gun background check, visit his home and talk to him. Yesterday The police found he searched how to build a bomb. The young man is so broken that I doubt anything could have stopped him.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 16:00:14 GMT
I'd like to add one thing to the conversation. These shooters tend not to be bullied, they are the ones doing the bullying. It sounds like that in this case -- the shooter was expelled for harassing and threatening students. These are seriously disturbed people who are given access to serious weapons. Why are they able to access these weapons with their mental histories? That's a question for the NRA to answer. No, that's a question for our previous administration who threw up their hands and said we don't have the manpower to enforce those laws. Ask Joe Biden. The majority of gun laws are state and/or city laws. California has some of the toughest laws around. Nevada does not and there is always “that guy” who feels certain laws don’t apply to them. As such they buy banned guns in Nevada and bring them across the state line into California. So short of having massive check points at all entrance points to California and every car, truck, and bus is searched how do you suggest California enforce their laws. Chicago has the same problem. What this does is make the case that all gun laws should be national laws.
|
|
|
Post by ajsweetpea on Feb 16, 2018 16:07:55 GMT
I'm going to start screaming if I see any more posts on Facebook that say we need to bring God and the 10 Commandments back into schools. Yes, that will just solve everything. And which God are we going to worship in schools? News flash: not everyone is Christian! Are these same people down with others praying to Allah, Moses, Buddha or is only Jesus allowed? What about atheists? Should they be banned from schools?
I believe in God but I also believe God helps those who help themselves.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,347
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Feb 16, 2018 16:15:52 GMT
I thought this was about the horrific incident in a Florida High School offering condolences, but dang, this should be over on the political board/thread. Sorry I stepped in. May all the families and the community heal from their losses.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Feb 16, 2018 16:33:22 GMT
Guns people have in their houses are no protection against tyranny when the government has drones, tanks and bombers. That's just foolish rhetoric. Our protection against tyranny is in staying informed and voting - something we do at an alarmingly low rate. If a dictator takes over, it will be because too few people voted, not because they didn't have guns. not to mention another issue, that I heard a historian talk about this morning on the radio- 'protection from a tyrannical government' can't be the reason for the second amendment, because there is also a bit in the Constitution about treason being something done against the government. So you can't have it both ways... only one or the other. If you believe in the definition of treason, then the reason for the second amendment can't be to protect us against our own government. ETA: it was an interview of Kenneth C. Davis on Stand Up! with Pete Dominick this morning on Sirius radio. Davis is a historian and author of the 'Don't Know Much About...' series of books, among others. It was a really good interview, talking about the NRA, slavery, his new book, and the second amendment. Kenneth C. Davis-- dontknowmuch.com
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 26, 2024 19:53:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2018 16:35:40 GMT
I think our resident NRA-cultists have hit them all, no?
|
|