|
Post by hop2 on Feb 9, 2019 16:13:34 GMT
The world according to trump.. ”The Democrats in Congress yesterday were vicious and totally showed their cards for everyone to see. When the Republicans had the Majority they never acted with such hatred and scorn! The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!” ”We have a great economy DESPITE the Obama Administration and all of its job killing Regulations and Roadblocks. If that thinking prevailed in the 2016 Election, the U.S. would be in a Depression right now! We were heading down, and don’t let the Democrats sound bites fool you!” I think he is confused again. But the bit about “Obama Adminstration and all of its job killing regulations and roadblocks” prove this guy doesn’t care if he trashes the country to make a buck. OR Don’t let the con man’s tweets fool you. Most are out right lies
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 16:28:42 GMT
Jim Acosta..
”WH Physician: Trump “in very good health... will remain so for the duration of his Presidency, and beyond.”
Left out of this tweet is “I anticipate he”. Makes a difference.
Having said that I doubt trump is in very good health. Just look at him.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Feb 9, 2019 17:15:52 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 21:47:35 GMT
And the attacks start...
Dr. Boyce Walkins - A black man...
”If #KamalaHarris went to an #HBCU, what do you think led her to marry a white man?”
“#KamalaHarris marrying a white guy is a typical power move among some ambitious black women. It gets them access to the club”
”#KamalaHarris isn’t #ADOS so I doubt she will be able to relate to the agenda of #AfricanAmericans”
For those who don’t know, #ADOS means American Descendents Of Slaves. And #HBCU means Historically Black Colleges and Universities. And, it seems, his daughter married a white man.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 22:15:00 GMT
MSNBC..
”President Trump doesn't regularly read daily intel summary prepared for him, and participates in relatively few in-person briefings from his spy agencies, according to intel officials and a review of his schedules.”
He’s a stable genius with a big brain and prefers his own counsel so he needs no stinking intelligence briefing.
We are doomed!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2019 22:35:55 GMT
Newsweek...
”White House aggressively hunting "executive time" leaker who embarrassed Trump by revealing empty schedule trib.al/4qeoZGW”
Ever notice how trump rarely leaves the White House except to go to one of his properties or one of his “feed his ego” rallies? He has been in office for 2 years and how many states has he visited? Finally visited our troops in the Middle East, after he was pushed to do it.
He has no interest in being a REAL president. His agenda is to remove anything standing in his way from making money. So of course he isn’t interested in intelligence reports because he doesn’t care in less he has to. Unless he is made to.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 9, 2019 22:55:46 GMT
Newsweek... ”White House aggressively hunting "executive time" leaker who embarrassed Trump by revealing empty schedule trib.al/4qeoZGW” Ever notice how trump rarely leaves the White House except to go to one of his properties or one of his “feed his ego” rallies? He has been in office for 2 years and how many states has he visited? Finally visited our troops in the Middle East, after he was pushed to do it. He has no interest in being a REAL president. His agenda is to remove anything standing in his way from making money. So of course he isn’t interested in intelligence reports because he doesn’t care in less he has to. Unless he is made to. He's coming to Texas on Monday to tell us all how scary immigrants and refugees are. Beto is leading a rally - March for the Truth - in opposition and I so wish I could be there. Dang state that is the width of three normal states combined.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 9, 2019 23:17:22 GMT
Great article in the Atlantic about why Trump's wall will never rise in Texas. Trump is No Match for the Texas Border BaronsAll this time and energy and money spent on something that will never happen and shouldn't happen. It's maddening.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 9, 2019 23:39:25 GMT
And the attacks start... Dr. Boyce Walkins - A black man... ”If #KamalaHarris went to an #HBCU, what do you think led her to marry a white man?” “#KamalaHarris marrying a white guy is a typical power move among some ambitious black women. It gets them access to the club” ”#KamalaHarris isn’t #ADOS so I doubt she will be able to relate to the agenda of #AfricanAmericans” For those who don’t know, #ADOS means American Descendents Of Slaves. And #HBCU means Historically Black Colleges and Universities. And, it seems, his daughter married a white man. It shouldn't matter who one marries. We should be able to marry for love, whoever that might be.
|
|
|
Post by quinlove on Feb 9, 2019 23:44:56 GMT
Newsweek... ”White House aggressively hunting "executive time" leaker who embarrassed Trump by revealing empty schedule trib.al/4qeoZGW” Ever notice how trump rarely leaves the White House except to go to one of his properties or one of his “feed his ego” rallies? He has been in office for 2 years and how many states has he visited? Finally visited our troops in the Middle East, after he was pushed to do it. He has no interest in being a REAL president. His agenda is to remove anything standing in his way from making money. So of course he isn’t interested in intelligence reports because he doesn’t care in less he has to. Unless he is made to. He's coming to Texas on Monday to tell us all how scary immigrants and refugees are. Beto is leading a rally - March for the Truth - in opposition and I so wish I could be there. Dang state that is the width of three normal states combined. Go Beto Go !!!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 9, 2019 23:49:09 GMT
Earlier today I gave to the Texas Butterfly Sanctuary. They have heavy equipment right on their property line ready to PLOW through, they have already done some work right there.
dt and Neilsen are attempting to just take land in a National Emergency. No court, no nothing! Immigrants will not be the problem, it will between land owners and border patrol or possibly the military shooting US Citizens!! ETA: NOT SURE I am correct here.............. trying to find what I saw......
They forget Texas is open carry, and we know landowners are generally well armed. Texas stock, people, are tough people!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 9, 2019 23:54:14 GMT
They are bringing this too 😂😂😂 I have 2 of those mini 'balloons' ............ Yes I do!!
|
|
|
Post by tracyarts on Feb 10, 2019 1:16:05 GMT
Texans absolutely lose their collective shit over eminent domain. A lot of land ownership goes back generations, and to a lot of people, land *is* family, and land ownership is a sacred institution. They're not going to let a square foot of land go without fighting tooth and nail in the court system. If Trump comes in and starts snatching land away from people and tearing it up under the guise of some kind of national emergency, without allowing for due process and appeals, I would expect it to get very ugly very quickly. Is that option even on the table I wonder? Great article in the Atlantic about why Trump's wall will never rise in Texas. Trump is No Match for the Texas Border BaronsAll this time and energy and money spent on something that will never happen and shouldn't happen. It's maddening.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 10, 2019 1:53:41 GMT
Is that option even on the table I wonder? Not sure. Somewhere I read that it could be faster than the normal route through the courts. I cannot remember the exact wording nor can I find the article....
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Feb 10, 2019 2:59:42 GMT
Texans absolutely lose their collective shit over eminent domain. A lot of land ownership goes back generations, and to a lot of people, land *is* family, and land ownership is a sacred institution. They're not going to let a square foot of land go without fighting tooth and nail in the court system. If Trump comes in and starts snatching land away from people and tearing it up under the guise of some kind of national emergency, without allowing for due process and appeals, I would expect it to get very ugly very quickly. Is that option even on the table I wonder? Great article in the Atlantic about why Trump's wall will never rise in Texas. Trump is No Match for the Texas Border BaronsAll this time and energy and money spent on something that will never happen and shouldn't happen. It's maddening. Well, perhaps your Governor should call up the Texas national guard to protect Texas from the invasion, like he did in 2015?? Ha Ha Ha he wanted to pretend Obama was invading Texas, yet this President has sent 3x the number of Troops to Texas and he’s all quiet there in your state house. This is a bigger threat to Texas than Obama ever was and crickets It really is ok if your a republican
|
|
|
Post by tracyarts on Feb 10, 2019 3:22:36 GMT
I haven't really gotten into many discussions about it. But something I'm curious about. There is a plan to build a high speed commuter rail line between Houston and Dallas. I've been following a local Facebook group for one of the counties that the line will pass through. There has been an overwhelming rejection of the project. Nobody wants to give up land for the tracks and surrounding buffer zones. Nobody wants it to pass through their property. Most people say it's not necessary and the ones who are for it aren't eager to see land taken to build it. BUT... A lot of those people are Trump supporters and very much in favor of the border wall. So they're good with the landowners having their land taken for a wall but against land being taken for a commuter train? I think they're hypocrites. I'm sure they'd say "but it's different, we need the wall to protect us". They all think that drugs and criminals are pouring into the country nonstop, so no reasoning with them there. I think some of the supporters do believe that the end justifies the means and that we actually are in a state of emergency. Texans absolutely lose their collective shit over eminent domain. A lot of land ownership goes back generations, and to a lot of people, land *is* family, and land ownership is a sacred institution. They're not going to let a square foot of land go without fighting tooth and nail in the court system. If Trump comes in and starts snatching land away from people and tearing it up under the guise of some kind of national emergency, without allowing for due process and appeals, I would expect it to get very ugly very quickly. Is that option even on the table I wonder? Well, perhaps your Governor should call up the Texas national guard to protect Texas from the invasion, like he did in 2015?? Ha Ha Ha he wanted to pretend Obama was invading Texas, yet this President has sent 3x the number of Troops to Texas and he’s all quiet there in your state house. This is a bigger threat to Texas than Obama ever was and crickets It really is ok if your a republican
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 10, 2019 3:41:00 GMT
BUT... A lot of those people are Trump supporters and very much in favor of the border wall. So they're good with the landowners having their land taken for a wall but against land being taken for a commuter train? I think they're hypocrites. I'm sure they'd say "but it's different, we need the wall to protect us". They all think that drugs and criminals are pouring into the country nonstop, so no reasoning with them there. I think some of the supporters do believe that the end justifies the means and that we actually are in a state of emergency. Not finding what I wanted to find..... but this
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 12:53:05 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 12:59:17 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 13:04:53 GMT
Amazing summary of how tax laws help the rich consolidate wealth and who pays when deficits grow.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 14:30:05 GMT
So trump tweeted this yesterday..
”Today Elizabeth Warren, sometimes referred to by me as Pocahontas, joined the race for President. Will she run as our first Native American presidential candidate, or has she decided that after 32 years, this is not playing so well anymore? See you on the campaign TRAIL, Liz!”
Which resulted in this from Jamil Smith..
”I try to never dignify this man’s tweets, but there is little doubt here that he uses “TRAIL” to evoke the genocidal Trail of Tears, and does so to land a political jab. Warren has taken justifiable heat on this issue—but he used the murders of Indigenous people as a punchline.”
And this From Brit Hume..
”Yes, because Trump is noted for his knowledge of 19th century American history vis a vis the native population. Jeez”
Which got this response from Seth Masket...
’Brit is going with “My President is too stupid to be racist.”
Yes In this case anyway. How many think trump knew about the “Trail Of Tears”? I mean the man is dumber then dirt.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 14:48:46 GMT
linktrump has tweeted this a couple of times.. ”Senator Richard Burr, The Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, just announced that after almost two years, more than two hundred interviews, and thousands of documents, they have found NO COLLUSION BETWEEN TRUMP AND RUSSIA! Is anybody really surprised by this?” So I googled Burr to see if I could find out what trump was blabbing about. I found this from Politico.. The headline of the story.. “Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion”Here is the very first paragraph.. “Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said Thursday that his committee's Russia investigation has yet to find evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and the Kremlin but will soon release a report on the Obama administration's response to Russian interference in the last presidential election.” And this... ”Based on the evidence to date," Burr said, the committee could not definitively say there was collusion between Trump and the Russians. "If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia," Burr told CBS.” And this.. ”Still, the senator said some questions raised over the investigation could occupy the committee "for the next decade," and that portions of the final report could be so classified that they are never revealed to the public. Burr said his committee is "close to pushing out the door" a report on the Obama administration's response to Russian election interference, a release that the chairman said could come within a "matter of weeks." You read the headline and you can see why trump is all excited. Read the story and get a completely different picture of the investigation. Once again a media outlet left out a few specific words that suggests something that isn’t.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 15:35:10 GMT
Lawfare
Carnegie paperThis is about insurance but, IMO, it gives you a glance into how complex an issue cyber security is. I have said many times that there is no such thing as a totally secured server. Does not matters who’s it is. That is why it was much to do about nothing when it came to Hillary using her server for work related emails. Because the simple fact, any server that is used to send any classified or sensitive information by email, regardless of who’s system , is at risk of being hacked. From Lawfare.. “A Moment of Truth for Cyber Insurance”“For many businesses, cyber risk was once either an amorphous threat or an occasional nuisance. But with reliance on all things digital skyrocketing, cyber threats now pose grave, even existential, dangers to corporations as well as the entire digital economy. In response, companies have begun to develop a cyber insurance market, offering corporations a mechanism to manage their exposure to these risks. Yet the prospects for this market now seem uncertain in light of a major court battle. Mondelez International is reportedly suing Zurich Insurance in Illinois state court for refusing to pay its $100 million claim for damages caused by the 2017 NotPetya attack. Mondelez’s claim represents just a fraction of the billions of dollars in collateral damage caused by NotPetya, a destructive, indiscriminate cyberattack of unprecedented scale, widely suspected to have been launched by Russia with the aim of hurting Ukraine and its business partners. A compromised piece of Ukrainian accounting software allowed NotPetya to spread rapidly around the world, disrupting business operations and causing permanent damage to property of Mondelez and many others. According to reports, Zurich apparently rejected Mondelez’s claim on the grounds that NotPetya was an act of war and, therefore, excluded from coverage under its policy agreement. If the question of whether and how war risk exemptions apply is left to the courts to decide on a case-by-case basis, this creates a profound source of uncertainty for policyholders about the coverage they obtain. Unlike physical attacks, the dividing lines between state-sponsored or state-abetted cyber aggression and organized cybercrime are far more (and often deliberately) blurred. Even when it is possible to attribute a cyberattack to a malicious perpetrator, it is much harder to confidently establish that a nation-state is complicit—as is often perceived to be the case with cyber aggression traced to perpetrators in the Russian Federation in particular. This makes it more difficult for governments to determine when and how to step in to deter, respond to, retaliate against, or prosecute offenders even when they wish to. Governments already struggle to cope with cyber threats to their own assets and critical infrastructure, using limited resources. Governments are not inclined to assume more responsibility for addressing private-sector cyber risk, as it might encourage complacency, creating moral hazard. Consequently, companies must manage increasing exposure to cybercriminals and state-sponsored attacks on their own. At the same time, cyber risks increasingly cut across virtually all aspects of business operations, extending through relationships with suppliers, customers and business partners. Many hurdles stand in the way of insurance providing a more robust solution. Data on cyber risks are scarce, and the threat is evolving constantly, often rendering data obsolete before they can be used. That means actuaries lack a credible repository of information to accurately price cyber risk. Moreover, NotPetya and other attacks with cascading effects have reinforced fears of aggregation risk, meaning the potential for a single incident to cause simultaneous losses across multiple policyholders. If Zurich had underwritten even a handful of the major corporations disrupted by the attack, it could have faced catastrophic losses from just one incident. This is a particularly acute concern for reinsurers—companies that provide stop-loss coverage, or protection against unsustainably costly claims, to other insurers—making both reinsurers and primary cyber insurance providers naturally hesitant to support more extensive cyber underwriting. The lack of adequate reinsurance backing means that carriers may become overwhelmed with claims if a systemic cyber incident causes simultaneous losses across many policyholders. Those turning to cyber insurance to manage their exposure presently face significant uncertainties about its promise. First, the scope of cyber risks vastly exceeds available coverage, as cyber perils cut across most areas of commercial insurance in an unprecedented manner: direct losses to policyholders and third-party claims (clients, customers, etc.); financial, physical and IP damages; business interruption, and so on. Yet no cyber insurance policies cover this entire spectrum. Second, the scope of cyber-risk coverage under existing policies, whether traditional general liability or property policies or cyber-specific policies, is rarely comprehensive (to cover all possible cyber perils) and often unclear (i.e., it does not explicitly pertain to all manifestations of cyber perils, or it explicitly excludes some). But it is in the public interest for Zurich and its peers to expand their role in managing cyber risk. In its ideal state, a mature cyber insurance market could go beyond simply absorbing some of the damage of cyberattacks and play a more fundamental role in engineering and managing cyber risk. It would allow analysis of data across industries to understand risk factors and develop common metrics and scalable solutions. It would allow researchers to pinpoint sources of aggregation risk, such as weak spots in widely relied-upon software and hardware platforms and services. Through its financial levers, the insurance industry can turn these insights into action, shaping private-sector behavior and promoting best practices internationally. Such systematic efforts to improve and incentivize cyber-risk management would redress the conditions that made NotPetya possible in the first place. This, in turn, would diminish the onus on governments to retaliate against attacks. In a recent Carnegie Endowment paper, we proposed a series of practical measures for insurers, corporations and governments to take—some separately, others together—to unlock the potential benefits of cyber insurance. These steps include upgrading the underwriting process, collaborating with cybersecurity services, and introducing specialized underwriting methodologies to better assess and price cyber risk. Governments, for their part, could help by developing common metrics for cyber-risk management, by encouraging companies to share information on cyber risks and security practices, and by standardizing corporate reporting requirements for cyber risk and data breaches. Sovereign wealth funds, holding companies and other major investors can also encourage responsible conduct by making regular, thorough cyber-risk assessments part of their due diligence. Ultimately, the sheer magnitude of the challenge posed by cyber risk means that governments and insurers must work together closely. It should not be left up to individual companies or even to courts to determine state sponsorship for cyberattacks or to force Zurich and other insurance carriers to bear the full brunt of state-backed cyber aggression. Insurers need insulation from the most severe cyberattacks, regardless of their origins, in the form of a government backstop for catastrophic cyber risk, similar to the Treasury Department’s Terrorism Risk Insurance Program, which provides reinsurance for massive terrorist attacks. Such a backstop cannot come without requirements and preconditions, so governments and insurers must collaborate to find a realistic balance between their responsibilities. The Mondelez-Zurich case underscores the urgency of government action to remove these barriers and address the risks that impede a more robust cyber insurance market. Doing so will be critical to unlocking the potential of insurance to diminish and channel risk, a role that has proved vital for managing traditional threats.”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 15:44:29 GMT
Soledad O’Brien about Brit Hume’s tweet posted above..
”Mr. Hume is literally arguing that our President is very stupid.”
Well he is. Is trump stupid or is he a racist? Well IMO he is both, but in this case I think he was showing how dumb he is. I could be wrong, but the man really is dumber then dirt and when it comes to history and I think you have to give the edge to stupidity and not racism in this case.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 15:59:12 GMT
trump..
”Gallup Poll: “Open Borders will potentially attract 42 million Latin Americans.” This would be a disaster for the U.S. We need the Wall now!”
Now this is a racist tweet IMO.
I was curious about this “Gallup Poll” he is touting. So I tracked it down. Talk about cherrypicking
“What If There Were 42 Million at the Border?”
By Jim Clifton - Chairman and CEO of Gallup
“Here's a good question about caravans: How many more are coming?
Gallup asked the whole population of Latin America. There are 33 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Roughly 450 million adults live in the region. Gallup asked them, "Would you like to move to another country permanently if you could?"
A whopping 27% said "yes."
So this means roughly 120 million would like to migrate somewhere.
The next question Gallup asked was, "Where would you like to move?"
Of those who want to leave their Latin American country permanently, 35% said they want to go to the United States.
The Gallup analytics estimate is that 42 million want to come to the U.S.
Forty-two million seekers of citizenship or asylum are watching to determine exactly when and how is the best time to make the move. This suggests that open borders could potentially attract 42 million Latin Americans. A full 5 million who are planning to move in the next 12 months say they are moving to the U.S.
Rather than find a solution for the several thousand potential migrants currently at the border, let's start by answering the bigger, harder question -- what about the 42 million who would like to come? What is the message to those millions who will seek entrance either legally or illegally? What should we tell them?
Most U.S. citizens like me just want to know the plan. What is the 10-year plan? How many, exactly whom and what skills will they bring? What do we want? Answer these questions, and the current discussion can be resolved.
Keep in mind that it's not only 330 million Americans who are wondering -- so are 42 million seekers from Latin America.”
ETA - If you tell the entire story, there are a lot of folks from around the world that would like to migrate to the Unitef States, not just those south of the border. So the questions this guy raised should apply to all who seek to move to this country.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 10, 2019 16:44:06 GMT
trump.. ”Gallup Poll: “Open Borders will potentially attract 42 million Latin Americans.” This would be a disaster for the U.S. We need the Wall now!” Now this is a racist tweet IMO. I was curious about this “Gallup Poll” he is touting. So I tracked it down. Talk about cherrypicking “What If There Were 42 Million at the Border?”By Jim Clifton - Chairman and CEO of Gallup “Here's a good question about caravans: How many more are coming? Gallup asked the whole population of Latin America. There are 33 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Roughly 450 million adults live in the region. Gallup asked them, "Would you like to move to another country permanently if you could?" A whopping 27% said "yes." So this means roughly 120 million would like to migrate somewhere. The next question Gallup asked was, "Where would you like to move?" Of those who want to leave their Latin American country permanently, 35% said they want to go to the United States. The Gallup analytics estimate is that 42 million want to come to the U.S. Forty-two million seekers of citizenship or asylum are watching to determine exactly when and how is the best time to make the move. This suggests that open borders could potentially attract 42 million Latin Americans. A full 5 million who are planning to move in the next 12 months say they are moving to the U.S. Rather than find a solution for the several thousand potential migrants currently at the border, let's start by answering the bigger, harder question -- what about the 42 million who would like to come? What is the message to those millions who will seek entrance either legally or illegally? What should we tell them? Most U.S. citizens like me just want to know the plan. What is the 10-year plan? How many, exactly whom and what skills will they bring? What do we want? Answer these questions, and the current discussion can be resolved. Keep in mind that it's not only 330 million Americans who are wondering -- so are 42 million seekers from Latin America.” ETA - If you tell the entire story, there are a lot of folks from around the world that would like to migrate to the Unitef States, not just those south of the border. So the questions this guy raised should apply to all who seek to move to this country. All valid questions. But I think we also have to consider the validity of this one poll. Exactly how did they reach folks living in extreme poverty to poll them? Who did the polling and how was the question asked? What other questions were asked?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 17:30:57 GMT
Jonathan Lemire .... ”Aides counseled Trump that a second summit would likely not carry the same drama as the first, But he insisted to advisers that the Vietnam summit would still be must-see TV, and told a confidant that the idea of “good vs. evil” would be irresistible” Foreign policy reduced to “must-see TV”!!!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 18:43:06 GMT
Kyle Griffin..
”The Trump admin has placed an ex-Koch Industries official in charge of research that'll shape how the government regulates toxic chemicals contaminating Americans' drinking water — an issue that could have major financial repercussions for Koch Industries.”
Let’s here it! Elections have consequences...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 23, 2024 12:39:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2019 18:47:17 GMT
CNN...
”On her first full day of campaigning as a presidential candidate, Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren says President Trump might be in jail by Election Day cnn.it/2UOjVCN”
Why is it that when one tries to get people to “like them” they say something dumb?
The entire campaign should only be to paint a very real picture between what the Democrats offer compared to what the Republicans/trump have done. A really good start is health care and the tax cut that is causing middle America to pay more.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Feb 10, 2019 19:47:48 GMT
Are they included in the 42 million....... If so, pretty sure they are not coming through the southern border...
|
|