|
Post by ntsf on Jun 21, 2020 3:46:55 GMT
part of the important leading edge is that statues are usually just up on a pedestal with no information/context. At National Park sites around the country, there is a big movement to be sure that the story of everyone associated with that park/monument is told. , at Yosemite, there is park ranger who has been portraying a buffalo soldier for 25 or more years. now, sites look at the history of the women, of people of color, of LGBQT+ community.. so you don't hear about jefferson, without hearing about the enslaved persons who made his lifestyle possible. We have monuments honoring a wide range of people.
the stories are given context, and that is important. and the stories being told can be told from several viewpoints.. and add in new information. So at alcatraz.. whose viewpoint are you hearing? the inmates, the guards, the administration, the fbi's, or the families who lived on the island.. or the native american activists? or those whom the army imprisoned there in the early 1900"s.. all stories must be told.
|
|
seaexplore
Prolific Pea
Posts: 8,878
Member is Online
Apr 25, 2015 23:57:30 GMT
|
Post by seaexplore on Jun 21, 2020 4:55:55 GMT
For me, it's just a name. I don't think of the person it's named after. Question: Are you white? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by MichyM on Jun 21, 2020 5:07:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 21, 2020 5:31:20 GMT
That was beautiful, thanks for linking it. I also loved that he knew specifics about board members, name and actions, and could give examples of who they could name the buildings after and why. A lot of people make a lot of good points, but specifics like this, for me anyway, they make me feel more personally involved/invested and really bring the point home. Not sure I’m making sense. But I thought he was very effective.
|
|
Dallie
Full Member
Posts: 490
Feb 25, 2020 16:33:25 GMT
|
Post by Dallie on Jun 21, 2020 10:21:09 GMT
part of the important leading edge is that statues are usually just up on a pedestal with no information/context. At National Park sites around the country, there is a big movement to be sure that the story of everyone associated with that park/monument is told. , at Yosemite, there is park ranger who has been portraying a buffalo soldier for 25 or more years. now, sites look at the history of the women, of people of color, of LGBQT+ community.. so you don't hear about jefferson, without hearing about the enslaved persons who made his lifestyle possible. We have monuments honoring a wide range of people. the stories are given context, and that is important. and the stories being told can be told from several viewpoints.. and add in new information. So at alcatraz.. whose viewpoint are you hearing? the inmates, the guards, the administration, the fbi's, or the families who lived on the island.. or the native american activists? or those whom the army imprisoned there in the early 1900"s.. all stories must be told. Context is the key. No one ever learned history from a statue. Removing statues is not sanitizing history. The statues were erected to sanitize public life as part of a systematic effort of lauding only those white men who fought to keep black people enslaved, to kill Native Americans, to eradicate any culture other than white culture. If the statues were to be kept, I would argue a statue of someone who fought against enslavement and cultural erasure should be erected opposite them to have a visual dialogue.
|
|
|
Post by artemisiagenx on Jun 21, 2020 12:43:20 GMT
They’re almost all men anyway. I guess women have done little to nothing of value in history? Fewer statues of old white guys isn’t a bad thing in my mind.
|
|
|
Post by silverlining on Jun 21, 2020 14:28:43 GMT
Will it make a difference in the end? It's already making a difference because people like us are trying to figure out why people who were not Confederate generals are mentioned on the list. A lot of people are thinking back to what they learned about US history and are learning more now and realizing that what we learned was incomplete, and told through only one perspective.
This question implies that there is a small group of people with a plan and a strategy. I think this is an ever-changing and growing movement, with some people who have more extreme viewpoints than others. Sure, all of the statues could be removed without damage and preserved in museums with perfect descriptions, but that would take a long time, and would require historians and preservationists and strong leadership. I don't think popular movements and protests work that way, especially not at the beginning.
Do you think those people throwing tea overboard in the Boston harbor had any idea of exactly what might ultimately happen?
|
|
|
Post by smasonnc on Jun 21, 2020 16:10:28 GMT
Show respect, goodwill, educate children equitably, provide mental health services, etc. So much real action to take and, as in so many things these days, we stand around bickering about something else and take our eye off the real problems. How about we put some of the energy we’re spending on statues and do something for people now? If we want to keep them, put them in a park somewhere like Hungary did with the Communist era statues.
|
|
|
Post by snowsilver on Jun 21, 2020 16:52:23 GMT
I've made a decision to stay out of politics on this board, but I think someone needs to speak up for the tens of thousands of Americans in this country who abhor the destruction that many of you are championing. Fred asks what the end-game is. I understand what most of you THINK the endgame should be, but I believe the fact that this forum has become an echo-chamber, leads you to believe that most people agree with you on this. I don't think so. I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. Many are so angry with what is happening that I expect you are going to see a major push-back. These men were the product of their times. Because we see things differently now and our thinking has progressed (thankfully) since those long ago times, does not mean they were evil. Perhaps we need to require more study in school on the lives of some of these men. I cannot believe that ANY person who has even really studied the life of Robert E. Lee would EVER be in favor of removing his statue. I'll say this: If I had the chance, I would vote for Robert E. Lee today as our next president 10 million times over either Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
And when you are applauding the possible removal of the names of Abraham Lincoln or George Washington from buildings OR defacing their statues, you have gone way, way, way too far. To me anyone who champions this clearly does not understand the reality of either of these men's greatness of character! We would be fortunate to have anyone CLOSE to their characters in our political chambers today.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 18:55:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 17:25:48 GMT
"If I had the chance, I would vote for Robert E. Lee today as our next president 10 million times over either Donald Trump or Joe Biden."
And that's why we can't have nicer things in America, and never will until those sentiments are gone.
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Jun 21, 2020 17:33:39 GMT
I've made a decision to stay out of politics on this board, but I think someone needs to speak up for the tens of thousands of Americans in this country who abhor the destruction that many of you are championing. Fred asks what the end-game is. I understand what most of you THINK the endgame should be, but I believe the fact that this forum has become an echo-chamber, leads you to believe that most people agree with you on this. I don't think so. I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. Many are so angry with what is happening that I expect you are going to see a major push-back. These men were the product of their times. Because we see things differently now and our thinking has progressed (thankfully) since those long ago times, does not mean they were evil. Perhaps we need to require more study in school on the lives of some of these men. I cannot believe that ANY person who has even really studied the life of Robert E. Lee would EVER be in favor of removing his statue. I'll say this: If I had the chance, I would vote for Robert E. Lee today as our next president 10 million times over either Donald Trump or Joe Biden. And when you are applauding the possible removal of the names of Abraham Lincoln or George Washington from buildings OR defacing their statues, you have gone way, way, way too far. To me anyone who champions this clearly does not understand the reality of either of these men's greatness of character! We would be fortunate to have anyone CLOSE to their characters in our political chambers today. I appreciate you weighing in. However, if you personally don’t know anyone who thinks removing statues of problematical men is a good idea, perhaps you should worry less about the perceived echo chamber on this message board and more about the echo chamber you are living in. In regards to the statues: some of those men did do great things in addition to abhorrent ones and we are all more than our best and worst actions. But statues in public forums are meant to glorify those depicted and to represent the society’s shared values. Our shared values have hopefully evolved so that slavery, segregation and succession are no longer to be glorified. Symbols count. Removing the statues and upgrading names is a simple easy way to say “I agree it’s time to change with the times, and recognize that these men who were a product of their times, no longer represent our shared values”
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Jun 21, 2020 17:35:21 GMT
And I want to add, if you don’t think the statues should come down, ask yourslef why not? Why are you more interested in hanging on to an obsolete and problematic statue than in connecting with actual, living people who are telling you all the reasons these statues have outlived their time.
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Jun 21, 2020 17:35:52 GMT
And I want to add, if you don’t think the statues should come down, ask yourslef why not? Why are you more interested in hanging on to an obsolete and problematic statue than in connecting with actual, living people who are telling you all the reasons these statues have outlived their time.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jun 21, 2020 17:36:32 GMT
I've made a decision to stay out of politics on this board, but I think someone needs to speak up for the tens of thousands of Americans in this country who abhor the destruction that many of you are championing. Fred asks what the end-game is. I understand what most of you THINK the endgame should be, but I believe the fact that this forum has become an echo-chamber, leads you to believe that most people agree with you on this. I don't think so. I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. Many are so angry with what is happening that I expect you are going to see a major push-back. These men were the product of their times. Because we see things differently now and our thinking has progressed (thankfully) since those long ago times, does not mean they were evil. Perhaps we need to require more study in school on the lives of some of these men. I cannot believe that ANY person who has even really studied the life of Robert E. Lee would EVER be in favor of removing his statue. I'll say this: If I had the chance, I would vote for Robert E. Lee today as our next president 10 million times over either Donald Trump or Joe Biden. And when you are applauding the possible removal of the names of Abraham Lincoln or George Washington from buildings OR defacing their statues, you have gone way, way, way too far. To me anyone who champions this clearly does not understand the reality of either of these men's greatness of character! We would be fortunate to have anyone CLOSE to their characters in our political chambers today. I’m curious where you were raised and went to school?.
|
|
|
Post by catmom on Jun 21, 2020 17:53:56 GMT
Thanks for sharing. It’s the perfect illustration and explanation of why these buildings need to be renamed and monuments need to come down.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jun 21, 2020 17:54:18 GMT
And the problem with Ulysses S. Grant?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jun 21, 2020 17:55:37 GMT
www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/Reading comments like hers no longer bring me to anger. Disheartened but not angry. Decided to do a quick google search to see what would make it Robert E Lee 2020 as opposed to Joe Biden 2020 (no better) and found this article www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/He died with a fried chicken sandwich in his hands and had tiny feet was all I came up with from all that reading. And this letter he wrote to his wife: In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country. It is useless to expatiate on its disadvantages.” But he goes on: “I think it however a greater evil to the white than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence.” There is a right and wrong to shit even if it feels like an echo chamber by the way.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 21, 2020 18:32:37 GMT
Way, way too far?
This is way too far.
It disheartens me that defending statues of the people whose beliefs, thoughts processes and actions eventually led to the above is what motivates someone who doesn’t post on political topics to speak up. The emotional energy that is shared for statues over living, breathing human beings kills me. And I’m not just referring to one pea poster, I’ve seen it on social media a lot.
As to the OP, I’ll admit when I hear some of the names of the statues that are being removed I think “why?” But almost always, further research shows exactly why. I’m sure there may be a few ‘innocent’ statue casualties, but if it means that all of these other statues that honor people that shouldn’t be honored are removed, I’m okay with that. We can learn about their positive contributions without honoring them with statues in public spaces. The statues belong in museums. The stories, the real unwhitewashed stories, belong in history books and documentaries and movies and in our conversations.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Jun 21, 2020 18:41:49 GMT
www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/Reading comments like hers no longer bring me to anger. Disheartened but not angry. Decided to do a quick google search to see what would make it Robert E Lee 2020 as opposed to Joe Biden 2020 (no better) and found this article www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/He died with a fried chicken sandwich in his hands and had tiny feet was all I came up with from all that reading. And this letter he wrote to his wife: In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country. It is useless to expatiate on its disadvantages.” But he goes on: “I think it however a greater evil to the white than to the black race, & while my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more strong for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, socially & physically. The painful discipline they are undergoing, is necessary for their instruction as a race, & I hope will prepare & lead them to better things. How long their subjugation may be necessary is known & ordered by a wise Merciful Providence.” There is a right and wrong to shit even if it feels like an echo chamber by the way. The Atlantic just cuts through the florid phrasing and immediately to the chase… Shorter Lee: "Slavery sucks, sure, but it's God's will. It's good for you, too. You're welcome.”
|
|
|
Post by cecilia on Jun 21, 2020 18:44:55 GMT
I think the Confederate statues should be taken down. I honestly don't know why they were put up in the first place. It seems really stupid that people glorify a war that they lost, especially since it was a civil war. The fact that they were mostly erected during the Civil Rights era is even more disgusting. As for changing the names of schools and other monuments that are named after people who were Presidents, I don't feel as strongly about that. I don't know if I would push to change those. This is my thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Jun 21, 2020 19:19:27 GMT
I've made a decision to stay out of politics on this board, but I think someone needs to speak up for the tens of thousands of Americans in this country who abhor the destruction that many of you are championing. Fred asks what the end-game is. I understand what most of you THINK the endgame should be, but I believe the fact that this forum has become an echo-chamber, leads you to believe that most people agree with you on this. I don't think so. I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. Many are so angry with what is happening that I expect you are going to see a major push-back. These men were the product of their times. Because we see things differently now and our thinking has progressed (thankfully) since those long ago times, does not mean they were evil. Perhaps we need to require more study in school on the lives of some of these men. I cannot believe that ANY person who has even really studied the life of Robert E. Lee would EVER be in favor of removing his statue. I'll say this: If I had the chance, I would vote for Robert E. Lee today as our next president 10 million times over either Donald Trump or Joe Biden. And when you are applauding the possible removal of the names of Abraham Lincoln or George Washington from buildings OR defacing their statues, you have gone way, way, way too far. To me anyone who champions this clearly does not understand the reality of either of these men's greatness of character! We would be fortunate to have anyone CLOSE to their characters in our political chambers today. Whatever Robert E Lee did before, he became a traitor to the United States of America. Benedict Arnold also did great things during the early Revolutionary War battles, but he turned traitor and history remembers him primarily for his traitorous actions. Saratoga apparently has a statue that honors Benedict Arnold's contribution without ever mentioning him by name www.amusingplanet.com/2018/11/the-boot-monument-how-america-remembers.html . Sometimes, those are the breaks, a person makes his choices, and they come with consequences. Want to be remembered more positively, don't be a traitor. So many of the other statues are generic Confederate soldiers, or names that history has already ruled irrelevant. My Dad was a Marine during the Vietnam War, and had simply believed the narratives of war heroes. However, over the last few years he's been reading the history of the US Marines, and ended up coming away with the feeling that some of the people we venerate, don't deserve it. Some were poor tacticians, poor leaders, endangered their soldiers unnecessarily and brave young men died because of it. Re-evaluation is a necessary part of growth. Editing is not the same erasure. That said, this is why the narrative shifting to statues and names concerns me. The farther we go, the less cut & dry the decisions become. An asteroid hit this planet and the Earth was never the same. There are historical events that are like metaphorical asteroids hitting the planet, and I put Columbus' New World arrival, American Independence, Lincoln's decisions during the Civil War as these type of events. We don't get HERE without those events, and museum displays don't seem enough acknowledgement of the momentousness of those events. IMO, people are naive about what alternatives actually existed. Whenever Eurasian people and Americas people really mingled, it was going to end tragically. The spread of COVID-19, despite all of our medical advances should demonstrate that. Land, resources and religious wars have been playing out since the dawn of time, regardless of the continent, and the Americas saw their own violent destruction of civilizations before Europeans ever arrived. Washington, Jefferson and other Founding Fathers were crucial for wresting power out of the hands of monarchies and traditional power structures into the hands of the people (although, there is much work still to be done). All of us are product of the world we live in. I've seen a lot of names suggested for replacements, and on the surface they may seem like great choices. But no one has subjected them to the same sort of purity tests we are going through today. If we are honest with ourselves, would the important BIPOC men and women from history pass the test for LGBTQ rights? 100 years from now, 200 years, 400 years history will look at us with aghast over things we can't even begin to see could be problematic. We watch the 1776 musical every 4th of July, and one of my favorite parts is the exchange between John Adams and Benjamin Franklin regarding the removal of portion of the Declaration of Independence concerning slavery. John Adams : Mark me, Franklin... if we give in on this issue, posterity will never forgive us. Dr. Benjamin Franklin : That's probably true, but we won't hear a thing, we'll be long gone. Besides, what would posterity think we were? Demi-gods? We're men, no more no less, trying to get a nation started against greater odds than a more generous God would have allowed. First things first, John. Independence; America. If we don't secure that, what difference will the rest make? I would hope that if we are a more enlightened form of human than our ancestors, that we could recognize that fallibility is part of the human condition and that we can acknowledge and even forgive a lack of enlightenment from previous generations. Like I said in another thread, for progress towards equality and justice we need to see white people making mistakes, and learning from them. This whole movement depends on the ability of people to grow and change. We need examples to demonstrate that important people, forward thinking people have room for improvement and not just discard them to the trash heap of history, or a corner in a museum, in our own individual quests to "do better." So to go back to the movie quote, what is it really that we need to secure? Equality and justice. What difference does the rest make?
|
|
J u l e e
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,531
Location: Cincinnati
Jun 28, 2014 2:50:47 GMT
|
Post by J u l e e on Jun 21, 2020 21:32:05 GMT
I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. I can’t imagine that is actually true. How is that possible unless you have managed to only know a very narrow group of people? I am wondering if you’re assuming their opinions on this and haven’t actually had the conversation with every single one. I am a liberal Christian (I consider myself liberal BECAUSE I am a Christian) and I have friends who are unwaveringly conservative. I know people in each group who have different views on this.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 21, 2020 21:45:59 GMT
For certain, just removing the statues and changing names is not enough, and equality and justice are more important. But removing the statues is not nothing to everyone. I’m a white woman, I can’t relate. But many black people around the country are championing these removals so it means something to them. Perhaps they can chime in with how those statues make them feel.
|
|
|
Post by snowsilver on Jun 21, 2020 21:47:30 GMT
I, personally, don't know one person who is in favor of the annihilation of statues of men who, while not perfect, did wonderful things to help make this country one of the greatest that has ever existed on the face of this planet. I can’t imagine that is actually true. How is that possible unless you have managed to only know a very narrow group of people? I am wondering if you’re assuming their opinions on this and haven’t actually had the conversation with every single one. I am a liberal Christian (I consider myself liberal BECAUSE I am a Christian) and I have friends who are unwaveringly conservative. I know people in each group who have different views on this. That's a fair point, Julee. I should have said I don't know a single person who has commented in my hearing that they are in favor of this. And I number some very, VERY liberal members even in my own family including my DIL. So you are right, I shouldn't speak for everyone I know. But I can say that all the conversation I have heard in my own community has been pretty much appalled at what is taking place. Most state outright that these actions are way overboard. But thanks for your post. You are correct. I should not speak for everyone I personally know.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 18:55:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 21:51:43 GMT
For certain, just removing the statues and changing names is not enough, and equality and justice are more important. But removing the statues is not nothing to everyone. I’m a white woman, I can’t relate. But many black people around the country are championing these removals so it means something to them. Perhaps they can chime in with how those statues make them feel. We can all find something we are opposed to and would champion having removed. I'm personally opposed to religious figures and I know that there is a large number of people who are atheist, agnostic and non religious. That doesn't even count the number of people who have been personally harmed and abused by the church. What if we start burning churches and toppling religious statutes and figures? Where does it end?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 18:55:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2020 22:03:11 GMT
Here is another one to add to the list...
NY Times..
”Theodore Roosevelt's statue will be removed from the Museum of Natural History in New York City. The memorial has long prompted objections as a symbol of colonialism.”
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jun 21, 2020 22:25:47 GMT
For certain, just removing the statues and changing names is not enough, and equality and justice are more important. But removing the statues is not nothing to everyone. I’m a white woman, I can’t relate. But many black people around the country are championing these removals so it means something to them. Perhaps they can chime in with how those statues make them feel. We can all find something we are opposed to and would champion having removed. I'm personally opposed to religious figures and I know that there is a large number of people who are atheist, agnostic and non religious. That doesn't even count the number of people who have been personally harmed and abused by the church. What if we start burning churches and toppling religious statutes and figures? Where does it end? If someone began burning churches down I wonder who would have set the precedent? *scratches chin* anyone know who burned a church first around here? My ancestors built this country for free. I’m sorry you’ve got to make heroes out of the absolute worst of men but that’s not my problem.🤷🏾♀️ They were erected so people who look like me lived in fear and were reminded losers and traitors somehow deserve respect. Yall don’t. If you defend these men you are no better than them. What are you really trying to maintain? If we agree enslaving other human beings is wrong why is Robert E Lee a hero? Or any of these other rapists, kidnappers and psychotic abusers! They were shit human beings who did horrible horrible things to other human beings and PRESENT DAY that group of people are still living in fear for their lives. How are you okay with that as women? Mothers? How? Even Robert E Lee’s descendants agree: www.winknews.com/2020/06/12/descendant-of-a-founding-family-in-fort-myers-weighs-in-on-robert-e-lee-bust-removal/
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Jun 21, 2020 22:44:38 GMT
For certain, just removing the statues and changing names is not enough, and equality and justice are more important. But removing the statues is not nothing to everyone. I’m a white woman, I can’t relate. But many black people around the country are championing these removals so it means something to them. Perhaps they can chime in with how those statues make them feel. Since you bolded that part, I wanted to point out I was mostly just re-quoting the movie line, with that part. The focus being on the words I actually changed: Independence > equality and justice. But if we are going to build a society that works for all people, it's going to take more than individual feelings as a reason to do or not do something. Swapping who gets to be arbiter of what is preserved isn't a workable solution. I see exactly where that ends, a never ending quagmire of squabbling, that leaves the people with the money & the power, with the money & the power. Exactly, the way they want it. I consider myself an ally, and have reached a point where I can continue to work toward the stuff I listed in my first post in this thread, but others are looking for ways to give themselves permission to look and walk away, and they will. So I consider my more recent post and this one as more of an appeal to pragmatism. This doesn't have to be the only statue/naming battle in the next however many years. It doesn't have to be all or nothing at once. Which ones can people live with for now, to not lose allies or momentum? There is momentum, today, for anything Confederate, but after that, then what? I doubt that statues and names are really going to have a long lasting, effect that will really let people sleep better at night not stressing over paying bills, getting proper healthcare, taken seriously at school/work, or feel safe outside or even inside of their homes.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jun 21, 2020 22:49:19 GMT
I’m not sure I understand removing Teddy Roosevelt from a museum but I haven’t see the memorial - off to google...
ETA ahhh I understand why it’s being removed - carry on.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 18:55:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2020 2:36:02 GMT
So tell me - what is the fucking excuse for this? Because I'm sure someone has one. It must have hurt someone's feelings so it's justified right? WWII memorial
|
|