Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:15:20 GMT
Kyle Griffin...
”U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES FOR NEW YORK GRAND JURY OVER BID TO OBTAIN TRUMP'S FINANCIAL RECORDS, INCLUDING TAX RETURNS”
By 7-2
More to follow
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:16:40 GMT
Yamiche Alcindor...
”Wow. Supreme Court rules 7-2 that New York investigators can get President Trump's financial records.”
|
|
pyccku
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,817
Jun 27, 2014 23:12:07 GMT
|
Post by pyccku on Jul 9, 2020 14:17:12 GMT
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT!!!
|
|
|
Post by slowrunner70 on Jul 9, 2020 14:18:45 GMT
It's all part of Hillary's and Obama's plan to discredit him (*sarcasm off*)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:20:48 GMT
Here’s the ruling if you want to read it. link
|
|
DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,354
Aug 9, 2014 23:13:22 GMT
|
Post by DEX on Jul 9, 2020 14:21:24 GMT
But, but...her e-mails
Great news. I thought the Manhattan DA would be allowed to get the records.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:22:59 GMT
Kyle Griffin...
”Both Trump appointees, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, voted to release Trump's financial records to the Manhattan district attorney.”
Oh oh someone is going to be really mad. 😀
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:24:57 GMT
Rats...
Robert Barnes..
”Kavanaugh and Gorsuch: The Court concludes that a President does not possess absolute immunity from a state criminal subpoena, but also agrees case should be remanded to the District Court, President may raise constitutional and legal objections to the subpoena as appropriate.”
|
|
DEX
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,354
Aug 9, 2014 23:13:22 GMT
|
Post by DEX on Jul 9, 2020 14:25:26 GMT
Kyle Griffin... ”Both Trump appointees, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, voted to release Trump's financial records to the Manhattan district attorney.” Oh oh someone is going to be really mad. 😀 I want to see the tweets about this. "Hoax", "Wrong", "Very bad".
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:26:55 GMT
Yamiche Alcindor...
”Justice Roberts: "We reaffirm that principle today and hold that the President is neither absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas seeking his private papers nor entitled to a heightened standard of need."
|
|
|
Post by shevy on Jul 9, 2020 14:29:24 GMT
Future headline: "President Pardons Self"
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:30:02 GMT
Ali Vitali...
”Pete Williams making an important point right now on @msnbc: the ruling today re: Vance doesn't mean the *public will see Trump's tax returns. This decision relates to the returns being sent to a grand jury (which is private).”
And I’m ok with this as long the information is being scrutinized for wrong doing by the grand jury.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:32:27 GMT
For the other pending case about a Congressional Subpoenas
Robert Barnes..
”BREAKING Supreme Court sends congressional cases back to lower courts for more consideration of "significant separation of powers concerns implicated by congressional subpoenas for the President’s information." again, 7-2”
They punted..
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:34:14 GMT
David Fahrenthold...
”If the goal of @realdonaldtrump's legal strategy was not to win but to delay -- to keep the public from seeing his tax returns before the 2020 election-- it appears to have succeeded.”
🤬
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:35:27 GMT
Barb McQuade...
”#SCOTUS essentially punts on Mazars. While congressional subpoenas “may” be enforceable, courts below did not adequately consider separation of powers concerns. Back to the lower court for further consideration.
I say hogwash. The subpoena was to a private entity.”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:38:18 GMT
Barb McQuade..
”With #SCOTUS decisions simply teeing up further court proceedings, Trump once again uses the courts to delay accountability. He will run the clock past the election. Trump makes a mockery of our court system by counting on it to be too slow to be relevant.”
Bonnie Parnell
”The rulings also diminish the rule of checks and balances regarding Congressional oversight.”
In other words trump won at the expense of the country.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:43:20 GMT
Bill Kristol..
”One thought: Roberts seems to have assembled an "institutionalist" caucus within the Court of himself, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, who--I hope and think--will not be inclined to go along with Trump shenanigans in election-related legal fights this fall, before or after Election Day.”
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 9, 2020 14:49:10 GMT
Finally, some good news!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:49:33 GMT
Abby D. Phillip
“These rulings mean that Trump's tax returns will not be released anytime soon. But they affirm the principle that no one, even the president, is above the law. The president is subject to investigation. Particularly important given Trump's claims that his "authority is total."
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 14:52:49 GMT
trump...
”We have a totally corrupt previous Administration, including a President and Vice President who spied on my campaign, AND GOT CAIGHT...and nothing happens to them. This crime was taking place even before my election, everyone knows it, and yet all are frozen stiff with fear....
“No Republican Senate Judiciary response, NO “JUSTICE”, NO FBI, NO NOTHING. Major horror show REPORTS on Comey & McCabe, guilty as hell, nothing happens. Catch Obama & Biden cold, nothing. A 3 year, $45,000,000 Mueller HOAX, failed - investigated everything....”
”Won all against the Federal Government and the Democrats send everything to politically corrupt New York, which is falling apart with everyone leaving, to give it a second, third and fourth try. Now the Supreme Court gives a delay ruling that they would never have given...”
”for another President. This is about PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT. We catch the other side SPYING on my campaign, the biggest political crime and scandal in U.S. history, and NOTHING HAPPENS. But despite this, I have done more than any President in history in first 3 1/2 years!”
”Courts in the past have given “broad deference”. BUT NOT ME!”
”The Supreme Court sends case back to Lower Court, arguments to continue. This is all a political prosecution. I won the Mueller Witch Hunt, and others, and now I have to keep fighting in a politically corrupt New York. Not fair to this Presidency or Administration!”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 15:05:07 GMT
ABC News...
”JUST IN: Trump attorney Jay Sekulow: "We will now proceed to raise additional Constitutional and legal issues in the lower courts.”
Of course they will.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Jul 9, 2020 15:06:42 GMT
”We have a totally corrupt previous Administration, including a President and Vice President who spied on my campaign, AND GOT CAIGHT...and nothing happens to them. This crime was taking place even before my election, everyone knows it, and yet all are frozen stiff with fear... Apparently nothing like the corrupt, treasonous Administration currently in office? Also known as "Meltdown to Follow"
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 15:20:23 GMT
Obama admin/FBI/CIA/etc didn't spy on "the campaign" - they spied on foreign agents.
It's just that a ton of foreign agents seemed to be in and around the Trump campaign.
Funnily, enough.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,856
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Jul 9, 2020 16:09:26 GMT
Help me here. Where is everybody seeing the good news? Because the only positive I see is that SC says Trump doesn’t have absolute immunity in subpoenas. Despite that, Trump v Vance as well as the consolidated Trump v Mazars and Trump v Deutsche Bank, have all been remanded back to the district courts for another round of Trump challenges. There’s no definitive resolution anywhere here unless I’m missing something.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jul 9, 2020 16:16:32 GMT
We can hope that someone leaks his financial records before the election
|
|
|
Post by peano on Jul 9, 2020 16:17:03 GMT
David Fahrenthold... ”If the goal of @realdonaldtrump's legal strategy was not to win but to delay -- to keep the public from seeing his tax returns before the 2020 election-- it appears to have succeeded.” 🤬 At this point in the constant onslaught of Trump’s perfidies, I really don’t think public release of this would have changed anyone’s mind.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 16:32:28 GMT
Help me here. Where is everybody seeing the good news? Because the only positive I see is that SC says Trump doesn’t have absolute immunity in subpoenas. Despite that, Trump v Vance as well as the consolidated Trump v Mazars and Trump v Deutsche Bank, have all been remanded back to the district courts for another round of Trump challenges. There’s no definitive resolution anywhere here unless I’m missing something. This “But they affirm the principle that no one, even the president, is above the law. The president is subject to investigation. Particularly important given Trump's claims that his "authority is total." No question the Court punted when it came to trump’s finances and Congress subpoena power. But they are, IMO, laying the groundwork to challenge that ridiculous paper some guys in the DOJ wrote that a sitting president can’t be indicted. It would appear there was enough potential wrongdoing uncovered in the Mueller report on trump’s part that if it wasn’t for that stupid, IMO, paper Mueller’s Team might have moved forward with indictments for obstruction of justice. But they didn’t because of that stupid paper. Which meant it was up to Congress. But Barr denied Congress the full unredacted report and when Congress tried to subpoena the individuals that talked to Mueller’s team to try and build their own case the White House basically thumbed their nose at Congress. So while it’s somewhat disappointing the Supreme Court punted, it’s a very good thing they are indicating no president is above the law. IMO
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 9, 2020 16:45:12 GMT
Help me here. Where is everybody seeing the good news? Because the only positive I see is that SC says Trump doesn’t have absolute immunity in subpoenas. Despite that, Trump v Vance as well as the consolidated Trump v Mazars and Trump v Deutsche Bank, have all been remanded back to the district courts for another round of Trump challenges. There’s no definitive resolution anywhere here unless I’m missing something. I am going by what Neal Katyal said. He feels that it’s good news because the President has to turn over his info to Cy Vance. Trump lost, and it was 7 to 2. He said that the lawsuit can proceed and that these types of lawsuits can go fast.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 24, 2024 11:00:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 16:48:23 GMT
And he’s still at it
trump..
”POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!”
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 9, 2020 16:50:49 GMT
And he’s still at it trump.. ”POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!” 😂😂😂
|
|