luvnlifelady
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,428
Jun 26, 2014 2:34:35 GMT
|
Post by luvnlifelady on Nov 16, 2014 23:20:46 GMT
born/adopted? DH's assistant is taking 3 weeks in December. He said he looked up in the employee handbook so he knows it is company policy to allow it. We were lucky if DH took even a day when our two were born. Of course, at the time, he was pretty much a one-man accounting department so couldn't be gone long. Without his assistant though at the current job, he will be a one-man crew again. He will do ok but it would be nice if this wasn't around the holidays since I'm sure he'll be working late/bringing stuff home.
Did your DH take his allotted time off when your children arrived?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:02:13 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2014 23:23:43 GMT
born/adopted? DH's assistant is taking 3 weeks in December. He said he looked up in the employee handbook so he knows it is company policy to allow it. We were lucky if DH took even a day when our two were born. Of course, at the time, he was pretty much a one-man accounting department so couldn't be gone long. Without his assistant though at the current job, he will be a one-man crew again. He will do ok but it would be nice if this wasn't around the holidays since I'm sure he'll be working late/bringing stuff home. Did your DH take his allotted time off when your children arrived? Yes. Two weeks with each. I had seizures w both and c-sections...I needed him. He's a straight commission inde contractor though, so he could take however long off he wanted...without pay. Sons are 18 and 11.
|
|
Kerri W
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,836
Location: Kentucky
Jun 25, 2014 20:31:44 GMT
|
Post by Kerri W on Nov 16, 2014 23:29:54 GMT
He said he looked up in the employee handbook so he knows it is company policy to allow it. Not to mention it would most likely be covered by FMLA. My DH works from home a majority of the time so it wasn't necessary for him to take more than a few days. Same company but two different bosses when our boys were born and both were VERY accommodating of doctors appointments, time off during/after birth, etc. Family matters are taken seriously and they always have a great attitude about it...it's part of their company culture and is very much appreciated. It's unfortunate that doesn't sound like it's the case where your DH's assistant is concerned.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Nov 16, 2014 23:30:11 GMT
DH took off two weeks when DD was born, and most of the first week I was in the hospital. He was/is self employed but at the time he had a loser of a business partner. The partner had taken off 5-6 weeks at the beginning of the year when he had surgery on his wrist, so I was thinking DH (who hadn't taken ANY time off all year at that point) would be able to take a month off especially since I had a c-section, had carpal tunnel really bad and needed more help. How about no? Two weeks was all he was able to take. Grrr!
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Nov 16, 2014 23:32:18 GMT
DH worked the next night after our second. I think he stayed home a night or two with our first
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Nov 16, 2014 23:34:05 GMT
born/adopted? DH's assistant is taking 3 weeks in December. He said he looked up in the employee handbook so he knows it is company policy to allow it. We were lucky if DH took even a day when our two were born. Of course, at the time, he was pretty much a one-man accounting department so couldn't be gone long. Without his assistant though at the current job, he will be a one-man crew again. He will do ok but it would be nice if this wasn't around the holidays since I'm sure he'll be working late/bringing stuff home. Did your DH take his allotted time off when your children arrived? It's covered under FMLA....we've had dads where I teach take the time off. It's unpaid.
|
|
Dalai Mama
Drama Llama

La Pea Boheme
Posts: 6,985
Jun 26, 2014 0:31:31 GMT
|
Post by Dalai Mama on Nov 16, 2014 23:38:09 GMT
Our leave is broken down between pregnancy (17 weeks) and parental leave (35 weeks). You can take parental leave if you are the biological or adoptive mother or father. Pregnancy leave is only for the bio mother. Since I was the one who was breastfeeding, I took both the pregnancy and parental leave.
|
|
luvnlifelady
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,428
Jun 26, 2014 2:34:35 GMT
|
Post by luvnlifelady on Nov 16, 2014 23:50:16 GMT
Is it still covered under FMLA if there are less than 50 employees? I thought I heard that somewhere and I'm not sure they have 50. It's a real estate business so any agents would not be considered employees I don't think.
|
|
|
Post by Outspoken on Nov 16, 2014 23:50:21 GMT
I was in the hospital for several weeks before delivery and some after delivery as well as my children. DH's job was so supportive and relaxed in him taking time to be with me. It was paid family time for him. I think all men should receive at least a week off. Why shouldn't they be allowed to be at home with their new baby and with Mom who is most certainly tired and needs rest, too.
|
|
|
Post by bothmykidsrbrats on Nov 16, 2014 23:50:25 GMT
Yes, 2 weeks with each of our kids.
|
|
|
Post by ~summer~ on Nov 16, 2014 23:52:53 GMT
My husband took six weeks with the first (his company even paid it I believe- though he did work a little) but only a week or so with the next two.
|
|
|
Post by coaliesquirrel on Nov 16, 2014 23:57:37 GMT
Yep, I had a no-complications c-section. DH took a full 12 weeks leave and was able to use his accrued paid sick time to cover it. He was the primary caregiver once I went back to work, so it was real damn important that he get used to daddying!
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Nov 16, 2014 23:59:43 GMT
I had c-sections with all four of my kids. My DH never took more than a few days off, if that. With the last one he went to work the day I came home from the hospital. I would have liked for him to take more, but it would have been unpaid.
|
|
|
Post by supersoda on Nov 17, 2014 0:02:43 GMT
DH took a week or so off with the oldest and worked short hours for the first few weeks. He only took a few days with the twins because I had been hospitalized for the majority of that pregnancy nd he had already missed a ton of work. He worked for a university when our children were born and they were exceptionally accommodating.
I have heard lots of ugly comments directed toward men who take time off when their children are born, mostly from older men. I just don't get the animosity toward men who want to be involved with their children.
|
|
|
Post by Crazyhare on Nov 17, 2014 0:08:12 GMT
My husband saved vacation to take 2 weeks off. I had a c-section and need a little help. His company had been bought the year before I had out little girl. If the old company still owned his, he would have gotten 6 weeks paid time off.
|
|
|
Post by eversograceful1 on Nov 17, 2014 0:08:53 GMT
DH happened to work at a place that closed between Christmas and New Year so he was off when DD was born and for a few more days once she came home.
|
|
|
Post by dazeepetals on Nov 17, 2014 0:11:17 GMT
DH use vacation time to be home for the first 2 weeks with our DS.
|
|
|
Post by Basket1lady on Nov 17, 2014 0:19:35 GMT
DH was teaching when both the kids were born. He's active duty Air Force and was teaching tactics when I was pregnant with [HASH]1. We were able to schedule most of my OB appts around his schedule, and I was on bed rest from 21-36 weeks. We lived on base and he would come home mid day to check on me and get anything that I needed. He didn't take a lot of time off when DS was born, but continued with the flex time, as I'd had an emergency c-sect.
With [HASH]2, he was a professor at the AF Academy. I seldom saw him before 7 pm and went to most OB appts alone. He went to the big appts, but I was high risk and had 2-3 appts a week. He did have other faculty cover him while DD and I were in the hospital for a week, as she was severely jaundiced and a failure to thrive baby. But for about a week after we came home, he taught his classes and then came back home. Then we were back to business as usual.
i don't think FLMA had come into effect until after the kids were born, but I support it. When DH was around, I didn't feel so all alone. And with DD, I was surviving on 45 minutes of sleep at a time, as it took over an hour to feed her. It was a rough first month.
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Nov 17, 2014 0:19:57 GMT
My ex took the two weeks he was allowed. It was changing to 4 weeks in Jan, DD was born in Nov. We hoped they might extend his... but NO!
|
|
Jili
Pearl Clutcher
SLPea
Posts: 4,378
Jun 26, 2014 1:26:48 GMT
|
Post by Jili on Nov 17, 2014 0:23:57 GMT
He took a little vacation time after each was born, but I no longer remember how much time that ended up being. Probably a few days to a week.
|
|
|
Post by just PEAchy on Nov 17, 2014 0:25:52 GMT
No, DH was active duty military. I was lucky he was there for the birth, lol. Luckily, my kids were born on the weekend, so he did get to spend 24 hours with us.
|
|
|
Post by salem on Nov 17, 2014 0:27:26 GMT
He took a week off with each child.
|
|
perumbula
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,439
Location: Idaho
Jun 26, 2014 18:51:17 GMT
|
Post by perumbula on Nov 17, 2014 0:28:46 GMT
DH wasn't able to take time off to help until we had our last. he took a full two weeks with her and it was a huge help. Even with four other kids running around and being 10 years older, I healed faster and better with my last baby (second c-section) than I did with my oldest (first c-section.) He just did everything but feed the baby and if I hadn't been breastfeeding he would have done that too.
|
|
|
Post by bigbundt on Nov 17, 2014 0:33:49 GMT
My DH was able to work from home so he didn't take any time off but he didn't go into the office for a couple of weeks.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:02:13 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2014 0:35:58 GMT
With my DDs, DH was in college getting his doctorate, so he spent quite a bit of time with them the first couple of years.
With DS, I think he may have taken a week or so....but I was a SAHM at that point and he didn't have much PTO to use.
|
|
|
Post by bigbundt on Nov 17, 2014 0:37:19 GMT
Is it still covered under FMLA if there are less than 50 employees? I thought I heard that somewhere and I'm not sure they have 50. It's a real estate business so any agents would not be considered employees I don't think. Companies under 50 employees not covered by FMLA. Some states have more stringent maternity/paternity leave though. If it is company policy, that is nice of them to offer three weeks although I suspect it is unpaid.
|
|
|
Post by lumo on Nov 17, 2014 1:00:18 GMT
DH had 6 weeks paid. He took all of it too 
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Nov 17, 2014 1:06:48 GMT
He took a week off - we couldn't afford for both of us to be off without pay!
|
|
|
Post by gritzi on Nov 17, 2014 1:15:38 GMT
My DH had an ample amount of vacation time, so he took off one month each time. I'm so thankful!
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Nov 17, 2014 1:22:27 GMT
no
we were separated (and DH was posted overseas) when Simon was born.
Cathleen was born on a Sunday - he didn't take any time off except a couple of hours to take her to the paed. for the PKU test
Annabelle was born on a Tuesday afternoon - he called into work that morning because I was already in labour but he was back at work the following day.
He works for a big company so had FMLA available to him as well as paid vacation time. He just didn't take it. On the other hand, the first anyone at work knew that we had a baby on the way (with Annabelle) was when he called into work because I was in labour- he hadn't thought to mention it.
|
|