|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 12, 2021 14:45:49 GMT
I was wondering about those on/with the committee. Somewhere I did mention Nunes. And why not, Nunes has always been a big leaker. Remember he was excluded for some hearings back then. Attorney Daniel Goldman wondered if Republican staff working for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence could be implicated in the scandal over Donald Trump's Department of Justice subpoenaing communication records for congressional Democrats, their staff, and families. "I am suspicious as to what's behind there and I'm somewhat suspicious of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle within the House Intelligence Committee and whether they were part and parcel of providing the telephone numbers, some of these email addresses, to the Department of Justice," he explained. "Because they would have had access to more of that information than just about anyone, as the majority staff for the House Intelligence Committee." At the time in question, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) chaired the House Intelligence Committee. "Wow," Williams said. "That last bit is certainly food for thought." www.rawstory.com/devin-nunes-intel/
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 12, 2021 15:33:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 12, 2021 19:20:13 GMT
Thanks .. George is a brave man.
Where has Lincoln Project gone.
The brothers/Meidas Touch are still working and releasing videos.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 13, 2021 2:51:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2021 2:59:25 GMT
One of them is not telling the truth. I put my $$$ on Barr. All you have to do is watch Kamala Harris questioning him, better yet his evasive lack of answers!
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 13, 2021 16:20:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2021 16:28:40 GMT
Ah ha... Maybe that is why McGhan decided to testify... He found out in May and showed up at the House in early June!
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 13, 2021 16:41:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 13, 2021 17:44:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2021 20:36:52 GMT
As stated above, I put my $$$ on Barr.
Former and all talk about Biden hesitating in speech. Barr sure had BIG trouble getting and words out when questioned by Sen Kamala Harris, now VP Harris.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 14, 2021 2:34:02 GMT
Former Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks explained on MSNBC Sunday that there's no way that Attorney Generals Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions didn't know about the warrants to spy on reporters, Democratic members of Congress, their staff and families, and of his own White House counsel. Barr, Sessions and former Justice Department deputy Rod Rosenstein have all denied they knew of the subpoenas to spy, but Wine-Banks explained that's impossible because something like this would go all the way to the top. "It may be that the person that they were investigating, had a legitimate predication for the search warrants and that they had some reason to do this," she told MSNBC. "It could have been that he got called by somebody that they were already investigating. It doesn't mean this is normal. It is not normal, and I think the investigation is absolutely critical, holding someone accountable is important to stop this from ever happening again. We can't have members of Congress, the press, and the White House counsel subjected to this. And the reason Don McGhan, of course, is of concern is because he was cooperating with Mueller which made him an enemy of Donald Trump. Donald Trump was calling out [Adam] Schiff, he was calling out [Eric] Swalwell, people who were subject to this search warrant, and he certainly must have felt uncomfortable with his own White House counsel who was cooperating and telling the truth to Mueller. So, that's why it's of concern." Sessions said that he was never briefed on this seizure of records. Barr played fast and loose with the language, saying that he never discussed the leak cases with Trump. That was similar language to Barr's refusal to answer when then-Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) questioned him about Trump or anybody else who "asked or suggested" that he open an investigation into his political foes. Barr pretended not to know what the word "suggested" meant and refused to answer. Host Alicia Menendez asked Wine-Banks if it was possible they didn't have any idea what was going on. "In my opinion, no, and let me tell you why," said Wine-Banks. "First of all, we had [Osmar] Benvenuto, who was brought in at the recommendation of the U.S. Attorney from New Jersey, who was put in by Barr to replace the New York attorney who he was pushing out. He recommended Benvenuto who came in, and Benvenuto has said -- in a recording, that he briefed Barr at least every other week. So, it is not credible. And if Barr didn't know about this, then Barr is the worst manager, the worst Attorney General ever, because that is his job. The Department of Justice policy requires that there be notice and approval from a higher source. So, it's not something that you can just subpoena a member of Congress' records or a reporter's records without something much more. So, it doesn't pass what I call the 'red face test.' It's like, could I stand up before a jury and say this in front of them without blushing or giggling? The answer is, no, I couldn't." Apple said in a statement that the DOJ request provided "no information on the nature of the investigation and it would have been virtually impossible for Apple to understand the intent of the desired information without digging through users' accounts." Presumably, the court documents would have detailed who appeared in court for the warrant and there should be enough of a paper trail that some of the Justice Department officials involved were named. Barr hasn't actually denied that he played any role in renewing the requests or that he didn't know of the investigation. He's only said he didn't discuss it with Trump. It's unclear why he would have discussed it given he wasn't there when the investigation was launched. The gag order against Apple was renewed over and over again, which would have also required a lot of paperwork. www.rawstory.com/watergate-barr-sessions-lied-spying/
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 14, 2021 4:35:00 GMT
I have no clue about this site. Who knows it popped up and here it is. It's late night and I wandered.... Several people have mentioned this scenario in passing so it seems there is a possibility although, remote! If there were/ are rogue operatives, we are really in bigger trouble the any of us could have imagined. This is funny, only it isn't. What if Barr is Telling the Truth? Some are Asking What If Trump Controlled a Small Secret Group at DOJ BY JASON MICIAK JUNE 13, 2021 First things first. It is taken as a given that the Trump administration was insane about policing leaks. Absolutely. And it is also taken as a given that the Trump administration was certain that some of the intelligence leaks were coming out of the House committee. Thus, the White House would want to target some of the members of Congress in an attempt to find leaks. It is an extraordinary means to find those leaks, especially as it became a fishing expedition. But it is also a given that Trump was always careful about leaving evidence around (he had been sued so many times and probably talked to so many criminal attorneys that he had a near law school class on evidence.) Speaking of which, Barr and Rosenstein would also know that it was best that they don’t know about a lot of things. There are instances where members of the military and intelligence communities choose – with good reason, to not tell the president specifics about specific operations. Would Barr and Rosenstein have a similar approach to DOJ? What if Barr and Rosenstein didn’t even know about a secret group doing things they didn’t want to know? It is difficult to appreciate the size of the DOJ in Washington, the number of people doing a number of things, the many bosses under bosses is breathtaking. So what if Barr and Rosensentien are telling the truth and what if Trump knew he couldn’t ask Barr and Rosenstein to do something like this? But what if Trump and his staff thought they could do it by going around Barr and Rosenstein? It is far more likely that Sessions, Rosenstein, and Barr knew, but it’s still a pretty interesting theory and unconscionably dangerous. www.politicalflare.com/2021/06/what-if-barr-is-telling-the-truth-some-are-asking-what-if-trump-controlled-a-small-secret-group-at-doj/
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 14, 2021 14:54:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 14, 2021 16:06:58 GMT
Seems this prosecutor has an impeccable record and is very straight arrow. Very highly recommended by many assorted prosecutors, judges, coworkers etc. The article is long, worth reading the whole thing. Friends and allies of a federal prosecutor tapped last year to dig into a series of leak cases are pushing back against perceptions that he was a pro-Trump crony brought in to try to pin leaks on Democratic members of Congress. Associates said Osmar Benvenuto, 39, had misgivings about taking the assignment because he feared he might be seen as tarnished by the work given the perceived politicization of the Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr, but the New Jersey-based career prosecutor ultimately decided to accept the job after friends counseled him to do so. Several of Benvenuto’s friends and mentors said they found it utterly implausible that he would have taken on a political mission for the Trump administration. For one thing, Benvenuto is registered to vote in New Jersey as a Democrat and previously registered as a Democrat in New York City. Paul Fishman, the Obama-appointed U.S. attorney who hired Benvenuto back in 2012, said he was startled by language in a New York Times story Thursday that suggested Benvenuto — better known as Oz — was part of “a small circle of trusted aides” around Barr. *** A former colleague in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey, Andrew Bruck, scoffed at the idea that his friend was carrying out political orders for Barr. “The idea that Oz is or was Bill Barr’s stooge is just laughable. It’s just outrageous,” Bruck said. Nonetheless, some lawmakers are already publicly demanding that Benvenuto be called before Congress. “Bill Barr and Osmar Benvenuto should be invited to testify before Congress about the DOJ’s secret seizure of metadata and attempts to get private data on Democratic Members of Congress. If they refuse, they should be subpoenaed,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) tweeted Friday. *** Former U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito confirmed that he offered up Benvenuto after Barr reached out seeking a seasoned prosecutor to handle unspecified cases at headquarters that had been lingering for a while without resolution. *** “The attorney general told me that he wanted someone who was an experienced prosecutor and wasn’t afraid to make decisions. What he wanted to know was whether or not there was anything to these investigations, whether they should be closed or brought forward,” Carpenito said in an interview. “I told him Oz Benvenuto was someone I trusted to give him an honest answer and he has the experience to separate the wheat from the chaff. … I also told him Oz had the intestinal fortitude to give him a real answer: He would say, ‘yes or no.’” *** Colleagues say Benvenuto didn’t linger over decisions and that was part of what landed him the sensitive assignment overseeing leak probes that had dragged on with little action for months or years. “Stuff doesn’t languish on Oz’s desk,” Fishman said. He said he was aware of Benvenuto’s assignment to D.C. last year, but did not know the specific cases his former colleague was working on. Fishman added that he “strongly recommended” Benvenuto for another assignment in Washington this year working as a top adviser to the acting head of the Criminal Division. *** A former federal judge for whom Benvenuto clerked, Stephen Robinson, said Benvenuto came to him last year to discuss whether he should take on an unspecified special assignment in Washington. “I never knew what it was about, but I did know he was asked to do it. Oz did what good, honest DOJ employees do: that is, he answered the call,” the former judge said. Robinson, who was U.S. attorney in Connecticut under President Bill Clinton and was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush.... Robinson also said he was confident Benvenuto would have resisted any outcome that he didn’t think was justified. “If there would be an instance where he had to push back on something he didn’t feel was appropriate, I’m confident that would be the case,” the former judge said. “When he was a clerk, he did that with me as a judge.” An ex-prosecutor who worked with Benvenuto on the Grape Street Crips cases, Barry Kamar, described his former colleague as a straight shooter who sought to build cases that were “airtight.” ***⁹ “Oz is a prosecutor par excellence. He’s straight out of central casting, in terms of hard-nosed, buttoned-down guy who just follows the evidence wherever it leads,” Kamar said. “He’s a technocrat. He’s not an ideologue…. He would’ve been the worst person to select to do a political hit job.” Kamar also said the fact that the cases Benvenuto was brought to Washington to resolve seem to now have been dropped proves the point. “If he was really supposed to do a number on someone, he failed miserably,” the ex-prosecutor said. **" “I remember he was an academic superstar at Fordham,” said Richman, who moved to Columbia Law School in 2007. Richman said he has not kept in touch with Benvenuto and was not aware of his sensitive D.C. assignment...… “He was smart. He was eager and he seemed at the time to have good judgment,” the professor said. “I was a former AUSA and he clearly wanted to be one and we discussed his future. … He persevered." www.politico.com/news/2021/06/11/osman-benvenutor-bill-barr-prosecutor-493571
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 14, 2021 17:13:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 14, 2021 21:48:45 GMT
Moscow Mitch to the rescue!! He is going to protect Barr from the Democratic "witch hunt" In Monday’s letter, the Democrats vowed to “vigorously investigate this apparent effort to weaponize DOJ against Trump’s perceived political enemies.” Their push is unlikely to get much GOP buy-in. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday called attacks on Barr a "partisan circus" and suggested Democrats were pursuing a "witch hunt in the making."www.politico.com/news/2021/06/14/senate-judiciary-democrats-garland-subpoenas-494366
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 14, 2021 22:03:15 GMT
Their defense... Following their disgraced leader!
Deny, deny, deny......
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jun 17, 2021 22:51:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 18, 2021 0:13:51 GMT
what about that short time frame when Whittikar(?) was there? Although that wouldn't cover for the renewals.
|
|