|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 24, 2022 16:30:52 GMT
I think the US is damned if we do, damned if we don't. If you ready any comments on news articles about this, many in other countries do expect the US to "do something" or blame the US. Yet here we are, with people saying this is our fault. Would be great if Europe handled European issues. But this is a threat for us as well, and no matter our response, someone will be pissed off and think it was wrong.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 24, 2022 16:34:05 GMT
Surely you can’t be serious. I’m not going to rehash the past 2 years but to say investigations have proven this to be false. I know it’s difficult to lose but he said the same lies about the 2016 election until he won. The intelligence community disagrees with you. Mueller found no evidence of collusion between trump and Russia regarding the election. However, there is overwhelming evidence that Russia interfered with the election with a widespread misinformation campaign. apnews.com/article/vladimir-putin-donald-trump-elections-hillary-clinton-politics-d094918c0421b872eac7dc4b16e613c7And from this Reuters article: “The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton...” “Moscow’s intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.”The leaked emails late in the campaign were especially harmful to the Clinton campaign. Agreed influenced/interfered, they did. That’s what I thought you’d meant. I don’t use rigged for that, just because too many people associate it with the 2020 stolen shenanigans, and it’s different to that.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 16:41:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2022 16:37:26 GMT
Why is Russia trying to seize Chernobyl? Any strategic musings on this, I guess the airport(s) I understand. I'm not sure if they were actually targeting Chernobyl itself - the bombing was about 26 miles away. Having said that, there is an exclusion zone ( the surrounding area is still radioactive and is sealed) still remaining in place around the area and is protected by the military so it could very well be a target, military personnel rather than for any other reason.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 24, 2022 16:40:37 GMT
I think the US is damned if we do, damned if we don't. If you ready any comments on news articles about this, many in other countries do expect the US to "do something" or blame the US. Yet here we are, with people saying this is our fault. Would be great if Europe handled European issues. But this is a threat for us as well, and no matter our response, someone will be pissed off and think it was wrong. I think the point I got was, is that Europe *isn’t* left to handle Europe’s issues. I think you (general you) in any discussion about this have to be open to consider that mistakes may have been made over the years by the US, without getting defensive about it. Foreign policy is incredibly tricky, and often balancing self interest with global interest is difficult - and mistakes happen as a result. And that goes for historically and today.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 16:42:48 GMT
sleepingbooty I feel much the same way about US involvement in the Middle East. I have taken A LOT of shit over the years about my opinions. Not defending in any way, shape or form, but I have come to understand that many that hold such a myopic view of foreign politics or events do so because a) they usually have never been to those places and b) gather most of their information from the media, which as we all know is biased one way or another. It is an imperial race between the US, Russia and now ever-rising China (although their Africa path has kind of been compromised but still). It's very hard for Americans in particular to step back and see this larger picture because they're 1. in power; 2. descendants of a young nation who has never really had a proper war in its own country besides the one they led and won against the natives and the Civil War which was an internal political war and not one embedded in the same stakes as international wars with rival major powers. It's a very geographically privileged position to be in as well for the USA: separated by oceans, no dangerous neighbours at your doorstep. It's a beautiful place to go establish a nation but it comes with the danger of not developing a sense of understanding for the rest of the world. Not many other nations of global power are in this position, heck neither of the US's "threats", Russia and China, are in this configuration. This creates a certain blindness which you brought up: both from just living in a different configuration where you're used as a puppet/pawn for a mega power because your geographical positioning but also a lack of long history of going at war with other countries who are both your neighbours and your greatest risk of invasion. It creates many centuries of tensions, conflict resolution, temporary peace, etc. That leaves a legacy when you're educated in these through schooling and family history. I don't think many people in the US even consider the current use of other countries around the world, including in Western Europe and the Middle East where we live, is plain imperialism. It's not because you're not naming other places as your own like it once used to be done that you aren't acting and using them as your own for major self-serving geopolitical, economic, financial and military purposes. It's clear as day to us but I don't know what it will take for the American voters to grasp this, accept this and want to act through voting against this. I don't see it happening anytime soon, unfortunately. And the wars will rage on elsewhere, comfortably away.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 16:41:21 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2022 16:44:33 GMT
Why is Russia trying to seize Chernobyl? Any strategic musings on this, I guess the airport(s) I understand. I'm not sure if they were actually targeting Chernobyl itself - the bombing was about 26 miles away. Having said that, there is an exclusion zone ( the surrounding area is still radioactive and is sealed) still remaining in place around the area and is protected by the military so it could very well be a target, military personnel rather than for any other reason. I was just going by what CNN was reporting and that they are trying to take control of it. Seems like such an early stage of this to target it, so wasn't sure what I may be missing.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 16:45:41 GMT
Would be great if Europe handled European issues. You have to start thinking about why Europe can't and whether it's been kept from being able to since the end of WW2. I would urge you to show newspapers of record pointing the finger straight at the US from these other nations you bring up. I've brought up my personal conclusions and general sentiments. But overall, January has been a month of US/Biden putting themselves on the first pages of newspapers through very vocal, public addressing. You can't blame Europeans here who have been trying to deescalate diplomatically on their side.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 24, 2022 17:10:17 GMT
I'm not sure if they were actually targeting Chernobyl itself - the bombing was about 26 miles away. Having said that, there is an exclusion zone ( the surrounding area is still radioactive and is sealed) still remaining in place around the area and is protected by the military so it could very well be a target, military personnel rather than for any other reason. I was just going by what CNN was reporting and that they are trying to take control of it. Seems like such an early stage of this to target it, so wasn't sure what I may be missing. She’s correct, there is a strong military presence there, just from the amount of Chernobyl visit videos I’ve seen visiting the exclusion zone. I guess it would make strategic sense to target and neutralize areas of known heavy military presence first, if I was invading a country?
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Feb 24, 2022 17:12:46 GMT
I think the US is damned if we do, damned if we don't. If you ready any comments on news articles about this, many in other countries do expect the US to "do something" or blame the US. Yet here we are, with people saying this is our fault. Would be great if Europe handled European issues. But this is a threat for us as well, and no matter our response, someone will be pissed off and think it was wrong. It's hard for Europe to handle European affairs when the US has made a point of being involved at least since WW2 and quite honestly, before that as well. The US has played the role of world policeman (for better or worse) so yes, countries/people expect that to continue. I don't think the US should - and I've believed that since the early 90s and Desert Shield/Storm. But regardless of anyone's beliefs - the US role in world affairs IS a contributing factor to the current problems. I also think that people outside of Eastern Europe who are more worried about a potential threat to themselves and less worried about the ACTUAL threat in the Ukraine need to refocus their priorities.
|
|
milocat
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,615
Location: 55 degrees north in Alberta, Canada
Mar 18, 2015 4:10:31 GMT
|
Post by milocat on Feb 24, 2022 17:14:04 GMT
This is just heartbreaking. I watch a Ukrainian vlogger sometimes she left Kiev for Lviv. She said she saw on the Russian news they said "This is all per constitution and per international law and we are not breaking anything. This is 100% legal." sleepingbooty I appreciate your perspective and anyone else over there that wants to share.
|
|
|
Post by sabrinae on Feb 24, 2022 17:18:37 GMT
I think the US is damned if we do, damned if we don't. If you ready any comments on news articles about this, many in other countries do expect the US to "do something" or blame the US. Yet here we are, with people saying this is our fault. Would be great if Europe handled European issues. But this is a threat for us as well, and no matter our response, someone will be pissed off and think it was wrong. Yes, but if you look at the history, the US has set up situations, not just in Eastern Europe, but globally where the local populations are just stuck between a series of bad choices. US interference in the internal fairs of other countries has a long and sordid history. To understand what is currently going on you have to understand that history. The IS does t have any good options right now, but a lot of that is because of our own actions. I do t believe in American isolationism but we have not historically been good political partners in many ways.
|
|
|
Post by sabrinae on Feb 24, 2022 17:23:04 GMT
sleepingbooty I feel much the same way about US involvement in the Middle East. I have taken A LOT of shit over the years about my opinions. Not defending in any way, shape or form, but I have come to understand that many that hold such a myopic view of foreign politics or events do so because a) they usually have never been to those places and b) gather most of their information from the media, which as we all know is biased one way or another. It is an imperial race between the US, Russia and now ever-rising China (although their Africa path has kind of been compromised but still). It's very hard for Americans in particular to step back and see this larger picture because they're 1. in power; 2. descendants of a young nation who has never really had a proper war in its own country besides the one they led and won against the natives and the Civil War which was an internal political war and not one embedded in the same stakes as international wars with rival major powers. It's a very geographically privileged position to be in as well for the USA: separated by oceans, no dangerous neighbours at your doorstep. It's a beautiful place to go establish a nation but it comes with the danger of not developing a sense of understanding for the rest of the world. Not many other nations of global power are in this position, heck neither of the US's "threats", Russia and China, are in this configuration. This creates a certain blindness which you brought up: both from just living in a different configuration where you're used as a puppet/pawn for a mega power because your geographical positioning but also a lack of long history of going at war with other countries who are both your neighbours and your greatest risk of invasion. It creates many centuries of tensions, conflict resolution, temporary peace, etc. That leaves a legacy when you're educated in these through schooling and family history. I don't think many people in the US even consider the current use of other countries around the world, including in Western Europe and the Middle East where we live, is plain imperialism. It's not because you're not naming other places as your own like it once used to be done that you aren't acting and using them as your own for major self-serving geopolitical, economic, financial and military purposes. It's clear as day to us but I don't know what it will take for the American voters to grasp this, accept this and want to act through voting against this. I don't see it happening anytime soon, unfortunately. And the wars will rage on elsewhere, comfortably away. I really hope you continue participating. You bring a perspective that is sadly lacking in much of the US. Most of us (from the US) have a very poor understanding of the US’s historical geopolitical actions and the fallout from those actions. The idea of US exceptionalism is alive and well in the view point of most American
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 24, 2022 17:31:29 GMT
I think the US is damned if we do, damned if we don't. If you ready any comments on news articles about this, many in other countries do expect the US to "do something" or blame the US. Yet here we are, with people saying this is our fault. Would be great if Europe handled European issues. But this is a threat for us as well, and no matter our response, someone will be pissed off and think it was wrong. Yes, but if you look at the history, the US has set up situations, not just in Eastern Europe, but globally where the local populations are just stuck between a series of bad choices. US interference in the internal fairs of other countries has a long and sordid history. To understand what is currently going on you have to understand that history. The IS does t have any good options right now, but a lot of that is because of our own actions. I do t believe in American isolationism but we have not historically been good political partners in many ways. I agree that there have been policy and military decisions over the years that have created the situation that we are in now. But I disagree that the US is the only country that has made influential decisions or is to blame for everything that has happened. EVERY country has a history. I find it very offensive to blame Russia invading Ukraine on anyone but Putin. Biden has said that the US isn't sending troops to fight Russia. Surely people will in Europe will be happy about that so they can handle it, right?
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 17:46:54 GMT
Biden has said that the US isn't sending troops to fight Russia. Surely people will in Europe will be happy about that so they can handle it, right? What does this mean? We're talking about the sovereignty of EU-integrated European nations since WW2. I feel like we're having two different discussions here. Long-term vs short-term. How can "Europe" handle this anyway? We're not an entity like the United States of America. Russia is part of Europe, too. This abstract notion of Europe doesn't work here. You're addressing a phantom. Ukraine is not part of the EU. This is why I didn't want to get involved in this discussion. I am not in the mood to take on this kind of view of Europe and the world. It's exhausting and frankly infuriating.
|
|
|
Post by pmm on Feb 24, 2022 17:56:55 GMT
I would like to thank those that have shared their opinions and knowledge on this thread. I am a US citizen that has never had the opportunity to go abroad. My understanding of European politics etc is non existent.
My heart goes out to those in the Ukraine and to those that have family members that serve in the military (any military unit/country).
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 24, 2022 18:17:02 GMT
Putin is completely responsible for his choice to do what he’s done, after building up for months. More than a few of his stated grievances seem entirely contrived and questionable, and masking his true motives. But in order to have an open discussion, you can’t not consider the actions of other countries (not just the US) in what has factored into that outcome. If my studies in history have taught me anything at all, it’s complex and rarely just ever one thing, and not always just a one sided (good vs evil) paradigm either. Like the many causes of WWII had seeds in the outcomes of WWI. Hitler did what Hitler did, but the political and economic climate in Germany, greater Europe and globally was ripe at the time for him to initially succeed, as a result of WWI.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Feb 24, 2022 18:27:04 GMT
I don't for a second believe that the US hasn't made massive foreign policy errors. I don't know a country in the world who hasn't. We are kind of johnny-come-lately to these conflicts. With 1,000s of years of conflict and rewriting of borders. We usually don't have the perspective of unintended consequences and have paid the price over the last 70+ years of trying to resolve conflict and inevitably creating more conflict. I wanted to post a video of the map of Europe over the last 1000 years (it's long, you can easily watch on 2x speed). I have no doubt there are errors and please don't post, actually Saxony at that time was..... It's to give a flavor the non-Europeans to better understand just how much conflict Europe has experienced. If someone has a better, more accurate representation, please post. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjWVFZ5e_vo&ab_channel=KatarinaPeterI feel for the people of Ukraine, I don't think there are easy answers here and fear that the conflict will continue escalate as long as Putin is in charge.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 24, 2022 18:42:06 GMT
Biden has said that the US isn't sending troops to fight Russia. Surely people will in Europe will be happy about that so they can handle it, right? What does this mean? We're talking about the sovereignty of EU-integrated European nations since WW2. I feel like we're having two different discussions here. Long-term vs short-term. How can "Europe" handle this anyway? We're not an entity like the United States of America. Russia is part of Europe, too. This abstract notion of Europe doesn't work here. You're addressing a phantom. Ukraine is not part of the EU. This is why I didn't want to get involved in this discussion. I am not in the mood to take on this kind of view of Europe and the world. It's exhausting and frankly infuriating. Aren't you the one that was calling for Europe to handle Europe's business and the US to butt out?
|
|
|
Post by miominmio on Feb 24, 2022 18:42:15 GMT
Yes, but if you look at the history, the US has set up situations, not just in Eastern Europe, but globally where the local populations are just stuck between a series of bad choices. US interference in the internal fairs of other countries has a long and sordid history. To understand what is currently going on you have to understand that history. The IS does t have any good options right now, but a lot of that is because of our own actions. I do t believe in American isolationism but we have not historically been good political partners in many ways. I agree that there have been policy and military decisions over the years that have created the situation that we are in now. But I disagree that the US is the only country that has made influential decisions or is to blame for everything that has happened. EVERY country has a history. I find it very offensive to blame Russia invading Ukraine on anyone but Putin. Biden has said that the US isn't sending troops to fight Russia. Surely people will in Europe will be happy about that so they can handle it, right? You do realise that Russia is part of Europe, right? «Europe» isn’t a country like the US, just in case you didn’t know.
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Feb 24, 2022 18:43:06 GMT
I don't for a second believe that the US hasn't made massive foreign policy errors. I don't know a country in the world who hasn't. We are kind of johnny-come-lately to these conflicts. With 1,000s of years of conflict and rewriting of borders. We usually don't have the perspective of unintended consequences and have paid the price over the last 70+ years of trying to resolve conflict and inevitably creating more conflict. I wanted to post a video of the map of Europe over the last 1000 years (it's long, you can easily watch on 2x speed). I have no doubt there are errors and please don't post, actually Saxony at that time was..... It's to give a flavor the non-Europeans to better understand just how much conflict Europe has experienced. If someone has a better, more accurate representation, please post. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjWVFZ5e_vo&ab_channel=KatarinaPeterI feel for the people of Ukraine, I don't think there are easy answers here and fear that the conflict will continue escalate as long as Putin is in charge. That was one thing every time I’ve been in Europe that has been a little hard to wrap my head around despite what I know, coming from a country where my own “European settlement” history is a relative very short 200 years and not so much forged in internal conflict/change. This just 1000 Europe years, and even if you break it down just a quadrant section of the map at a time, the amount of change in that quadrant it’s hard to grasp as words. It seems (in my perspective) a good illustrative way of what sleepingbooty was trying to say. Having a complex history is an understatement.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 24, 2022 18:44:19 GMT
I agree that there have been policy and military decisions over the years that have created the situation that we are in now. But I disagree that the US is the only country that has made influential decisions or is to blame for everything that has happened. EVERY country has a history. I find it very offensive to blame Russia invading Ukraine on anyone but Putin. Biden has said that the US isn't sending troops to fight Russia. Surely people will in Europe will be happy about that so they can handle it, right? You do realise that Russia is part of Europe, right? «Europe» isn’t a country like the US, just in case you didn’t know. Of course I know that. Earlier in the thread she said that she wanted Europe to be able to handle Europe's business (which includes Russia and Ukraine) and for the US to stay out of it. That is what I was referring to.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Feb 24, 2022 18:50:26 GMT
What does this mean? We're talking about the sovereignty of EU-integrated European nations since WW2. I feel like we're having two different discussions here. Long-term vs short-term. How can "Europe" handle this anyway? We're not an entity like the United States of America. Russia is part of Europe, too. This abstract notion of Europe doesn't work here. You're addressing a phantom. Ukraine is not part of the EU. This is why I didn't want to get involved in this discussion. I am not in the mood to take on this kind of view of Europe and the world. It's exhausting and frankly infuriating. Aren't you the one that was calling for Europe to handle Europe's business and the US to butt out? I think she wanted the US do that before the war started, not after we contributed to the build up. Maybe you should sit back and listen instead of arguing with her.
|
|
|
Post by keriwest on Feb 24, 2022 18:55:48 GMT
I don't for a second believe that the US hasn't made massive foreign policy errors. I don't know a country in the world who hasn't. We are kind of johnny-come-lately to these conflicts. With 1,000s of years of conflict and rewriting of borders. We usually don't have the perspective of unintended consequences and have paid the price over the last 70+ years of trying to resolve conflict and inevitably creating more conflict. I wanted to post a video of the map of Europe over the last 1000 years (it's long, you can easily watch on 2x speed). I have no doubt there are errors and please don't post, actually Saxony at that time was..... It's to give a flavor the non-Europeans to better understand just how much conflict Europe has experienced. If someone has a better, more accurate representation, please post. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjWVFZ5e_vo&ab_channel=KatarinaPeterI feel for the people of Ukraine, I don't think there are easy answers here and fear that the conflict will continue escalate as long as Putin is in charge. That is an interesting video Darcy; thank you for sharing.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 18:57:47 GMT
What does this mean? We're talking about the sovereignty of EU-integrated European nations since WW2. I feel like we're having two different discussions here. Long-term vs short-term. How can "Europe" handle this anyway? We're not an entity like the United States of America. Russia is part of Europe, too. This abstract notion of Europe doesn't work here. You're addressing a phantom. Ukraine is not part of the EU. This is why I didn't want to get involved in this discussion. I am not in the mood to take on this kind of view of Europe and the world. It's exhausting and frankly infuriating. Aren't you the one that was calling for Europe to handle Europe's business and the US to butt out? Butt out as military bases, sure. But that's decades of of work to undo. It's no simple task. I mostly called out the fact that we got there (again) because of imperialist ways of current mega powers like the US is using it's "policing of the world" good guy strategy for own self-serving purposes. It's not something you'll resolve in the blink of an eye. But by being the de facto power in place through nuclear weapons, you are the de facto protector. This is a problem that is in great part the US's own creation.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Feb 24, 2022 18:59:58 GMT
Aren't you the one that was calling for Europe to handle Europe's business and the US to butt out? I think she wanted the US do that before the war started, not after we contributed to the build up. Maybe you should sit back and listen instead of arguing with her. I am listening. I also disagree with some of what she says, and think it is offensive. I don't think that mothers saying they worry for their sons who are in the military means that they are self-centered or not thinking/worrying about the people of Ukraine. We all worry about that and have empathy for people who are living there. There are other consequences that we will likely all face (like higher prices) but that is nothing compared to what Ukrainians are experiencing. The build up has been happening for awhile now. What I have heard is that giving the information that the administration and the media has given over the last month or so was done because of the threat of a false flag attack, and to let the world know what is really going on. I can see where in some ways that could be seen as emboldening Putin, but I can also see why it was done that way. However, blaming the US takes the responsibility off of Putin, which is where it needs to be.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Feb 24, 2022 19:04:10 GMT
I think she wanted the US do that before the war started, not after we contributed to the build up. Maybe you should sit back and listen instead of arguing with her. I am listening. I also disagree with some of what she says, and think it is offensive. I don't think that mothers saying they worry for their sons who are in the military means that they are self-centered or not thinking/worrying about the people of Ukraine. We all worry about that and have empathy for people who are living there. There are other consequences that we will likely all face (like higher prices) but that is nothing compared to what Ukrainians are experiencing. The build up has been happening for awhile now. What I have heard is that giving the information that the administration and the media has given over the last month or so was done because of the threat of a false flag attack, and to let the world know what is really going on. I can see where in some ways that could be seen as emboldening Putin, but I can also see why it was done that way. However, blaming the US takes the responsibility off of Putin, which is where it needs to be. Your posts show that you are not listening, or at least not understanding, anything.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 19:06:09 GMT
And let me reiterate this: there is no Manichean black-or-white game going on here from my side of things. I'm myself a descendant from arguably the most at-war and military most successful country in the world. France was a major imperialist player as well. My nation's history is not pretty. What a US-biased Ukraine discussion does seem to reveal to me is the lack of awareness and acknowledgement of the fact that it is one more fruit of the continued imperialist ways of the US over other parts of the world. In this case, it's interesting to point out because we're talking about the developed world, supposed Allies (but never equals if you will). The problem rages on elsewhere, too.
There will not be an easy, click-of-the-fingers solution but the debate and thinking need to start somewhere. I see no better place than a current crisis to do so. This doesn't mean Europe as a whole or the EU is the angel and the US the villain. Don't be mistaken but also please rethink and reassess the knowledge you have of how we got here and how got to other recent-ish conflicts that implicate US troops, military bases and general power games. To go: "you sort it out now, there, you get to play the field, happy?" does not work here. It's throwing a tantrum and then waiting in the bushes to play the "told you so!" part afterwards. I'm really not interested in this. I'm interested in shifting power grabs of yore (and present) and shifting + letting others transition into greater autonomy and independence of their choice and making.
|
|
|
Post by sleepingbooty on Feb 24, 2022 19:08:38 GMT
I don't think that mothers saying they worry for their sons who are in the military means that they are self-centered or not thinking/worrying about the people of Ukraine. Thanks for the twisting of my words and rhetorics of pathos. I'm out of this discussion. Have fun with your echo chamber. Have pride in running other people out. Those who actually live on the affected continent. Well done.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Feb 24, 2022 19:10:40 GMT
And let me reiterate this: there is no Manichean black-or-white game going on here from my side of things. I'm myself a descendant from arguably the most at-war and military most successful country in the world. France was a major imperialist player as well. My nation's history is not pretty. What a US-biased Ukraine discussion does seem to reveal to me is the lack of awareness and acknowledgement of the fact that it is one more fruit of the continued imperialist ways of the US over other parts of the world. In this case, it's interesting to point out because we're talking about the developed world, supposed Allies (but never equals if you will). The problem rages on elsewhere, too. There will not be an easy, click-of-the-fingers solution but the debate and thinking need to start somewhere. I see no better place than a current crisis to do so. This doesn't mean Europe as a whole or the EU is the angel and the US the villain. Don't be mistaken but also please rethink and reassess the knowledge you have of how we got here and how got to other recent-ish conflicts that implicate US troops, military bases and general power games. To go: "you sort it out now, there, you get to play the field, happy?" does not work here. It's throwing a tantrum and then waiting in the bushes to play the "told you so!" part afterwards. I'm really not interested in this. I'm interested in shifting power grabs of yore (and present) and shifting + letting others transition into greater autonomy and independence of their choice and making. I can’t disagree with a single word. And thank you for the other Politico link.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Feb 24, 2022 19:10:44 GMT
I don't think that mothers saying they worry for their sons who are in the military means that they are self-centered or not thinking/worrying about the people of Ukraine. Thanks for the twisting of my words and rhetorics of pathos. I'm out of discussion. Have fun with your echo chamber. Have pride in running other people out. Those who actually live on the affected continent. Well done. I’m sorry one ignorant pea is pushing you out of the thread. Your posts have been excellent and I think most of us are very interested in listening to them.
|
|