|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 7, 2022 18:58:55 GMT
This term popped up on twitter this morning. On page 34 of the draft decision for overturning Roe v Wade in the addendum there is reference to a report from the early 2000’s that there were not enough babies to adopt.
So it would seem the shortage of “adoptable” babies in this country is being included as part of the justification to overturn Roe v Wade.
If it is being taken into consideration for the decision isn’t that the Supreme Court going where they shouldn’t be going to justify their decision?
The fact is not every woman should be a parent and not every baby put up for adoption is adopted.
Currently there are 400,000 children in foster care and there were 618,000 reported cases of child abuse in 2020.
How do these justices know by forcing women to have babies they don’t want or can’t have for some reason other then a medical reason they won’t end up in foster care or in a situation where they are physically abused? When there is every chance forcing women to having babies the numbers will increase.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 7, 2022 19:02:19 GMT
More..
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 7, 2022 19:04:37 GMT
Last one, for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 7, 2022 19:06:09 GMT
There are thousands of babies to adopt! They just don't want the ones available.
They only want 'perfect' blonde haired, blue eyed babies. The rest will languish in foster care. The disabled will be 'put away'... So sad!!
|
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on May 7, 2022 19:16:11 GMT
This is where I point out that you have two very religious adoptive parents on the court.
I said this a few days ago—the imagined supply of adoptable babies is not going to materialize. Women will get abortions or will keep their babies—the majority of abortions are by women with kids. Those women are not handing over babies for adoption, and for the women who are not married, the social stigma of single parenthood simple does not look like the pre-Roe era.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 7, 2022 19:32:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on May 7, 2022 19:34:23 GMT
Clearly these justices did read The Handmaid’s Tale, but instead of seeing it as cautionary, they view it as a guide to shaping the future.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 7, 2022 19:44:15 GMT
This is where I point out that you have two very religious adoptive parents on the court. I said this a few days ago—the imagined supply of adoptable babies is not going to materialize. Women will get abortions or will keep their babies—the majority of abortions are by women with kids. Those women are not handing over babies for adoption, and for the women who are not married, the social stigma of single parenthood simple does not look like the pre-Roe era. Barrett and who? |
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on May 7, 2022 19:46:12 GMT
the spanish inquisition "no one imagined the spanish inquisition!" are we now going to be living in a monty python skit?
I'd bet they ignore the truth of disabled children.. many of whom suffer sexual and other abuse.. or children of color.. ignored and not adopted.. foster kids.. the story today of a kid who has spent 13 yrs in foster care and is desperate for a family...
no..don't pay attention to those children.
|
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on May 7, 2022 20:01:59 GMT
This is where I point out that you have two very religious adoptive parents on the court. I said this a few days ago—the imagined supply of adoptable babies is not going to materialize. Women will get abortions or will keep their babies—the majority of abortions are by women with kids. Those women are not handing over babies for adoption, and for the women who are not married, the social stigma of single parenthood simple does not look like the pre-Roe era. Barrett and who? John Roberts. Who adopted Irish kids from Latin America, as best as I can tell. |
|
carhoch
Pearl Clutcher
Be yourself everybody else is already taken
Posts: 3,044 
Location: We’re RV’s so It change all the time .
|
Post by carhoch on May 7, 2022 20:09:25 GMT
It’s getting really scary .
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 19:32:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2022 20:23:14 GMT
Clearly these justices did read The Handmaid’s Tale, but instead of seeing it as cautionary, they view it as a guide to shaping the future. Absa-f*cking-loutely!!!!! Under his eye!!!!!!! |
|
mimima
Drama Llama
Stay Gold, Ponyboy
Posts: 5,104
|
Post by mimima on May 7, 2022 20:25:09 GMT
It is an element that has always struck me that there's an assumption that one of the roles of pregnant women is to provide "perfect" babies to adopt.
|
|
Gem Girl
Pearl Clutcher
......
Posts: 2,686
Jun 29, 2014 19:29:52 GMT
|
Post by Gem Girl on May 7, 2022 20:29:05 GMT
So, as a leader who perceives himself to be in charge of the entire country, he's dealing with "supply chain issues" here.
Nobody is fooled by his thinly coded speech, either. We know he means white babies, probably boys, especially.
I am revolted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on May 7, 2022 20:29:37 GMT
I was also thinking Handmaids tale and wondering if human trafficking would also come into play with this description. Sounds pretty sickening considering how many will not actually be adopted especially those with disabilities or of color.
It just makes them sound like a commodity vs a baby.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 7, 2022 20:29:44 GMT
This infuriates me in ways I can’t even express, even though I’m very familiar with this attitude in my extended family.
400K languishing in foster care. Conservative organizations preventing gay couples from adopting them in many cases. Just come right out and say that educated white women are not providing you with the perfect white babies you feel you deserve, and everyone will understand why you’re so opposed to education and careers for women.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 7, 2022 20:31:21 GMT
I was also thinking Handmaids tale and wondering if human trafficking would also come into play with this description. Sounds pretty sickening considering how many will not actually be adopted especially those with disabilities or of color. It just makes them sound like a commodity vs a baby. They don’t want those babies. God promised them a healthy, white baby. 🤢 |
|
|
|
Post by Zee on May 7, 2022 20:49:01 GMT
I eagerly await the new shipments that will be available on Wayfair once this passes!
|
|
|
|
Post by scraplette on May 7, 2022 21:10:11 GMT
I eagerly await the new shipments that will be available on Wayfair once this passes! Thanks for absolutely the only fun comment this #%%*> insane comment could incite! |
|
elainebenis
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Jul 3, 2014 23:26:11 GMT
|
Post by elainebenis on May 7, 2022 21:22:25 GMT
Perhaps the Catholic Church is running out of prey?
|
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on May 7, 2022 21:32:31 GMT
Everything about this makes my skin crawl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on May 7, 2022 21:49:24 GMT
I was also thinking Handmaids tale and wondering if human trafficking would also come into play with this description. Sounds pretty sickening considering how many will not actually be adopted especially those with disabilities or of color. It just makes them sound like a commodity vs a baby. They don’t want those babies. God promised them a healthy, white baby. 🤢
But obviously there will be more of those babies to. Its not only white healthy babies that will be effected. That term just sickens me. Supply. Seriously
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 7, 2022 22:03:18 GMT
They don’t want those babies. God promised them a healthy, white baby. 🤢
But obviously there will be more of those babies to. Its not only white healthy babies that will be effected. That term just sickens me. Supply. Seriously
They don’t care. An increase in the babies they want to adopt, and all those others are jus collateral damage. I hate everyone right now. |
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on May 7, 2022 22:39:42 GMT
Wow. 😳 WTAF! They are getting quite comfortable with saying the quiet parts out loud aren’t they? Unbelievable. Shocking, actually. It really is like they’re using The Handmaid’s Tale as a how-to guide.
|
|
|
|
Post by supersoda on May 7, 2022 23:09:28 GMT
I was hanging out with my kid earlier today and they asked “what is a domestic supply of infants”? I asked for context…and then wanted to start banging my head against a wall. It is fucking insane.
|
|
|
|
Post by elaine on May 7, 2022 23:14:13 GMT
But obviously there will be more of those babies to. Its not only white healthy babies that will be effected. That term just sickens me. Supply. Seriously
They don’t care. An increase in the babies they want to adopt, and all those others are jus collateral damage. I hate everyone right now.I’m here right now. Even more than on January 7. That the Supreme Court is full of a bunch of fucking liars who blatantly lied so that they could criminalize having a uterus makes me want to subject those justices who lied re: their stance on Roe to a coat hanger up their private parts without antibiotics and we’ll just pray for the best when they are in infected and in pain. |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 7, 2022 23:44:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 7, 2022 23:56:08 GMT
But apparently there is a line in his dissent about it will effect black women more.
I cannot read the copy on my phone, sorry...
More saying it out loud.
|
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on May 7, 2022 23:58:37 GMT
I think-or at least it seems like-we have that right now. So many right wing comments are hammering home the fact that this is about so much more than Roe. I hope that the rage lasts. We are going to need it. |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 8, 2022 0:12:30 GMT
Just remember slaves WERE bred, and their children taken away and sold...
But the GQP doesn't want today's children to learn real history.
I am horrified to even have to think that!
|
|
