|
Post by onelasttime on Apr 21, 2023 22:44:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Apr 21, 2023 22:45:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Apr 21, 2023 23:50:04 GMT
She’s right…
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Apr 22, 2023 0:51:09 GMT
Nothing I enjoy like spending my Fridays waiting to see if I still have control over my body.
Frankly menopause can't come fast enough.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 22, 2023 0:52:57 GMT
A deeper dig! What's next? CNN — The federal judge who issued a nationwide ruling blocking the approval of a common abortion medication redacted key information on his legally mandated financial disclosures, in what legal experts described as an unusual move that conceals the bulk of his personal fortune.In his 2020 and 2021 annual disclosures, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk wrote that he held between $5 million and $25 million in “common stock” of a company – a significant majority of the judge’s personal wealth. The name of the company he held stock in is redacted, despite the fact that federal law only allows redactions of information that could “endanger” a judge or their family member. CNN obtained a previous financial disclosure for Kacsmaryk – which is not available online – from 2017, when he was a judicial nominee. On that unredacted form, Kacsmaryk reported owning about $2.9 million in stock in the Florida-based supermarket company Publix. It’s not clear whether that’s the same holding as the redacted stock, although Publix’s share price had significantly increased by 2020 and 2021 and the company is no longer listed on his more recent disclosures. Redactions are approved by a judicial committee. The redacted holding accounted for at least 85% of Kacsmaryk’s total reported wealth in 2021, and potentially more. “The whole point of a disclosure is to explain where you have conflicts,” said Michael Lissner, the executive director of the Free Law Project, a nonprofit that has published judicial disclosures. [/b]“If you have stock and you’re not saying what it’s in and it’s this much of your personal wealth, that’s a conflict you have. The public deserves to know.”[/b] *** The redaction is the latest example of Kacsmaryk not being fully transparent as a judge and judicial nominee, even as he has become one of the most controversial judges in the country. www.cnn.com/2023/04/21/politics/judge-kacsmaryk-financial-holdings-abortion-pill/index.htmlMake note, Publix stock is not public. You must work there, or be family to buy... Seems his grandmother worked at Publix about 25 years and he may have inherited her stock?!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Apr 22, 2023 14:47:14 GMT
aj2hallCYA? See ... I'm reasonable. Oh, they'll fall hard when I change it to no go!! Ha ha ha... *** This is what he will do!!
|
|