|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 18:37:24 GMT
Ah the last time I checked Kevin McCarthy is the Speaker of the House unfortunately. And he was born in CA and is part of the Congressional Delegation from CA. Do I dare say say it? That she really is a ….. Better not. I'll say it... She is a b!tch! She said she wasn't lying... Well yes she was. 1- about McCarthy is from and representing California, and Speaker of the House, or at least plays the roll 2- actually NY IS a border state... I will acknowledge the bussed immigrants are from the southern border. But the whole east coast and west coast, and the gulf coast are border states!! |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 18:59:36 GMT
Well well look at this. Isn’t she the judge for the Florida trial? When did it become ok for any judge to take free paid vacations? Actually it isn’t free because whoever always expects something in return. My my my..... This needs investigation, for sure!!!! And Jack Smith missed this??!??!??! Or will he spring it on someone, although if it is out he has lost surprise.. |
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Aug 3, 2023 20:13:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 20:16:32 GMT
Priceless!!!! Thanks hop2Mark my words!! |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 20:18:55 GMT
Well well look at this. Isn’t she the judge for the Florida trial? When did it become ok for any judge to take free paid vacations? Actually it isn’t free because whoever always expects something in return. My my my..... This needs investigation, for sure!!!!
And Jack Smith missed this??!??!??! Or will he spring it on someone, although if it is out he has lost surprise..Not sure what is going on, but just in case it might be real.. if not, sorry..
I copied the text within..
BREAKING: Federalist Society President Leonard Leo, paid for a $600-1,000 per night 6 day vacation at a Montana luxury resort in Oct, 2021 for Judge Aileen Cannon according to her 2022 financial disclosures.
onelasttime
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 3, 2023 20:33:32 GMT
Well well look at this. Isn’t she the judge for the Florida trial? When did it become ok for any judge to take free paid vacations? Actually it isn’t free because whoever always expects something in return. The original tweet was deleted because of this fact. |
|
Gem Girl
Pearl Clutcher
......
Posts: 2,686
Jun 29, 2014 19:29:52 GMT
|
Post by Gem Girl on Aug 3, 2023 21:02:56 GMT
You really can’t make this stuff. 🤦🏻♀️ & 😂 TFG: "What are you talking about, ' they'll learn that in discovery'?" LOL |
|
Gem Girl
Pearl Clutcher
......
Posts: 2,686
Jun 29, 2014 19:29:52 GMT
|
Post by Gem Girl on Aug 3, 2023 21:06:16 GMT
Well well look at this. Isn’t she the judge for the Florida trial? When did it become ok for any judge to take free paid vacations? Actually it isn’t free because whoever always expects something in return. Sorry to see the "Not Found" emblem. What was it?**Never mind, I see it mentioned above now. |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 3, 2023 21:43:00 GMT
😀
|
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 3, 2023 22:59:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 3, 2023 23:11:33 GMT
This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming. Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? link |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 3, 2023 23:15:57 GMT
Meanwhile my guy is doing his job. On fires that were started by malfunctioning electrical transformers PG&E has had to pay those who lost their homes sums of money. They shouldn’t have to pay taxes on that.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 23:46:24 GMT
This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming. Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? linkThe United States Senate sent Biden to Ukraine with a letter signed by Sen Ron Johnson, thinking Portman and others authorizing Biden to advocate the dismissal of Prosector Shokin... Shokin was corrupt!! |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 3, 2023 23:52:08 GMT
“in·sur·rec·tion
/ˌinsəˈrekSH(ə)n/
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.“
From the tweet “their purposeful mischaracterization of January 6th as an insurrection”
The majority of us saw what happened on January 6. It was an attack on the Capital during a time the Presidential election results were being certified with the intent of stopping it. A violent uprising. And there is no doubt in my mind that if that mob had gotten their hands on Pence and Pelosi they would have hanged them both. That is an insurrection.
I’m so sick of these people.
|
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 3, 2023 23:56:35 GMT
This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming. Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? linkStarting with this header: "Burisma executives requested Hunter Biden to get “help from D.C.” to address “government pressure.” Majority Counsel: Did ‑‑ during that I’ll say after dinner at the Four Seasons, did Mykola Zlochevsky or Vadym ask Hunter Biden to make any phone calls? Mr. Archer: Yes, though I was not party to that phone call. Majority Counsel: What was the request? Mr. Archer: The request was I think they were getting pressure and they requested Hunter, you know, help them with some of that pressure. Majority Counsel: What pressure? Mr. Archer: Government. Government pressure on their ‑‑ you know, government pressure from Ukrainian Government investigations into Mykola, et cetera. But it was ‑‑ it was not ‑‑ it wasn’t like a specific ‑‑ not a specific request. It was just we were sitting there at the Four Seasons having, you know, coffee and there was ‑‑ there was Mykola, there was one of the managers for the Four Seasons who managed that property, Vadym. So it wasn’t like a closed ‑‑ it was not like a specific meeting. Majority Counsel: When you say pressure from the government, at this time were you aware that Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma? Mr. Archer: To the best, I vaguely ‑‑ whether it was Shokin, I vague ‑‑ there was a lot of pressure initially. There was ‑‑ there was several pressure issues. It was kind of a theme of Burisma. There was capital tied up in London, 23 million pounds. There was, you know, a U.S. visa denied and then a Mexico visa denied. And then there was ‑‑ so Shokin wasn’t specifically on my radar as being an individual that was ‑‑ that was targeting him. But yes, there was constant pressure. And it was like ‑‑ it was like whack‑a‑mole in regards to the pressures that had to resolve. Rep. Jim Jordan: The request from Mr. ‑‑ from Mykola Zlochevsky and Vadym to Mr. Biden and/or if you said it was to you, the request for help from whom to deal with what pressure? Mr. Archer: The request ‑‑ you know, basically the request is like, can D.C. help? But there were not ‑‑ you know, I’m not going to ‑‑ there were not ‑‑ it wasn’t like ‑‑ there weren’t specific, you know, can the big guy help? It was ‑‑ it’s always this amorphous, can we get help in D.C.? *** Rep. Biggs: So why do you think they were asking Hunter Biden for D.C. help? Mr. Archer: I mean, why? Rep. Biggs: I mean, what did you take away from that? Mr. Archer: Well, I mean, he was a lobbyist and an expert and obviously he carried, you know, a very powerful name. So I think it was ‑‑ that’s what they were asking for." |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 3, 2023 23:57:55 GMT
Good luck with that, babe!!
|
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Aug 4, 2023 0:08:31 GMT
Completely predictable. Every time Trump lands in legal trouble, his defenders and conservative media start talking about Hunter. Even conservative judge J. Michael Luttig thinks Hunter is a non sequitur. www.nytimes.com/2023/08/02/us/politics/trump-indictment-hunter-biden.htmlFormer President Donald J. Trump now faces 78 felony counts in three different criminal cases, not to mention a slew of civil lawsuits and trials alleging all sorts of wrongdoing. At least in the court of public opinion, though, his defense can be boiled down to three words. What about Hunter? From Mr. Trump’s team to conservative media to the Republican Party leadership, the reaction to the latest blockbuster indictment accusing the former president of nothing short of trying to subvert democracy focused not on the evidence against him so much as the foibles and scandals of President Biden’s son. The real outrage, Mr. Trump’s defenders maintained, is Hunter Biden’s shady business dealings. The Justice Department, they claimed, is only going after the former president to cover up for the current president. Mr. Trump is a victim persecuted by his enemies, so the argument goes, while Hunter Biden is a one-man crime wave who personifies the Washington swamp. Never mind that Hunter Biden was not and is not seeking to be the president of the United States and that no hard evidence has emerged indicating that his father used his office improperly. Never mind that Mr. Trump’s family has intertwined personal business and public life for years. Or that the worst accusations against Hunter Biden, even if true, are hardly comparable to a plot by a sitting president to overturn an election and hold onto power. “It’s a deflection tactic to avoid having to admit what virtually every Republican knew on Jan. 6, 2021 — Donald Trump’s actions were unfit and wrong,” Alyssa Farah Griffin, who resigned as director of White House strategic communications after the 2020 election as Mr. Trump pressed false claims that the vote had been rigged, said on Wednesday. In a tweet on Tuesday night, she said “two things can be true at once” — Hunter Biden may have engaged in impropriety that should be investigated, but that it “has zero to do with Trump’s actions.” “Breathtakingly bad spin,” she wrote. “Completely devoid of intellectual honesty.” J. Michael Luttig, a conservative former appeals court judge who was once a top Supreme Court candidate for President George W. Bush, said the Hunter Biden discussion was a political non sequitur. “Trump committed the gravest crimes against the United States possible, save, possibly, treason,” he said. “There is simply no comparison whatsoever between the case against Trump and the case against Hunter Biden. It is silly even to speak of the two in the same breath.” But Mr. Trump’s efforts to make Hunter Biden a political asset did not work in 2020 or 2022, and Democrats insist it will not work in 2024 either. Most voters interviewed in the Reuters-Ipsos poll said that the president’s son would not affect their vote next year. “The problem that they’re running into is we’re talking about apples and oranges in terms of the conduct that is at issue,” said Representative Dan Goldman, Democrat of New York, who served as lead counsel for House Democrats during the first Trump impeachment. “The notion that oh, Donald Trump is being indicted for all these different felonies and Hunter Biden only got misdemeanors is based on the false premise that the conduct is equivalent.” |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 0:12:32 GMT
This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming. Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? linkStarting with this header: "Burisma executives requested Hunter Biden to get “help from D.C.” to address “government pressure.” Majority Counsel: Did ‑‑ during that I’ll say after dinner at the Four Seasons, did Mykola Zlochevsky or Vadym ask Hunter Biden to make any phone calls? Mr. Archer: Yes, though I was not party to that phone call. Majority Counsel: What was the request? Mr. Archer: The request was I think they were getting pressure and they requested Hunter, you know, help them with some of that pressure. Majority Counsel: What pressure? Mr. Archer: Government. Government pressure on their ‑‑ you know, government pressure from Ukrainian Government investigations into Mykola, et cetera. But it was ‑‑ it was not ‑‑ it wasn’t like a specific ‑‑ not a specific request. It was just we were sitting there at the Four Seasons having, you know, coffee and there was ‑‑ there was Mykola, there was one of the managers for the Four Seasons who managed that property, Vadym. So it wasn’t like a closed ‑‑ it was not like a specific meeting. Majority Counsel: When you say pressure from the government, at this time were you aware that Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma? Mr. Archer: To the best, I vaguely ‑‑ whether it was Shokin, I vague ‑‑ there was a lot of pressure initially. There was ‑‑ there was several pressure issues. It was kind of a theme of Burisma. There was capital tied up in London, 23 million pounds. There was, you know, a U.S. visa denied and then a Mexico visa denied. And then there was ‑‑ so Shokin wasn’t specifically on my radar as being an individual that was ‑‑ that was targeting him. But yes, there was constant pressure. And it was like ‑‑ it was like whack‑a‑mole in regards to the pressures that had to resolve. Rep. Jim Jordan: The request from Mr. ‑‑ from Mykola Zlochevsky and Vadym to Mr. Biden and/or if you said it was to you, the request for help from whom to deal with what pressure? Mr. Archer: The request ‑‑ you know, basically the request is like, can D.C. help? But there were not ‑‑ you know, I’m not going to ‑‑ there were not ‑‑ it wasn’t like ‑‑ there weren’t specific, you know, can the big guy help? It was ‑‑ it’s always this amorphous, can we get help in D.C.?
*** Rep. Biggs: So why do you think they were asking Hunter Biden for D.C. help? Mr. Archer: I mean, why? Rep. Biggs: I mean, what did you take away from that? Mr. Archer: Well, I mean, he was a lobbyist and an expert and obviously he carried, you know, a very powerful name. So I think it was ‑‑ that’s what they were asking for." Like I said you pick some of the dumbest hills to die to try and make a point. Two thoughts. Not fact based and not convincing. And definitely not this. “The Devon Archer transcript is out. Archer said that Ukrainian wanted Hunter Biden to help relieve pressure from the prosecutors looking into corruption. They wanted the Bidens to take the heat off. Biden later insisted on the firing of the prosecutor.” |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 0:17:59 GMT
Completely predictable. Every time Trump lands in legal trouble, his defenders and conservative media start talking about Hunter. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 0:26:15 GMT
Starting with this header: "Burisma executives requested Hunter Biden to get “help from D.C.” to address “government pressure.” Majority Counsel: Did ‑‑ during that I’ll say after dinner at the Four Seasons, did Mykola Zlochevsky or Vadym ask Hunter Biden to make any phone calls? Mr. Archer: Yes, though I was not party to that phone call. Majority Counsel: What was the request? Mr. Archer: The request was I think they were getting pressure and they requested Hunter, you know, help them with some of that pressure. Majority Counsel: What pressure? Mr. Archer: Government. Government pressure on their ‑‑ you know, government pressure from Ukrainian Government investigations into Mykola, et cetera. But it was ‑‑ it was not ‑‑ it wasn’t like a specific ‑‑ not a specific request. It was just we were sitting there at the Four Seasons having, you know, coffee and there was ‑‑ there was Mykola, there was one of the managers for the Four Seasons who managed that property, Vadym. So it wasn’t like a closed ‑‑ it was not like a specific meeting. Majority Counsel: When you say pressure from the government, at this time were you aware that Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma? Mr. Archer: To the best, I vaguely ‑‑ whether it was Shokin, I vague ‑‑ there was a lot of pressure initially. There was ‑‑ there was several pressure issues. It was kind of a theme of Burisma. There was capital tied up in London, 23 million pounds. There was, you know, a U.S. visa denied and then a Mexico visa denied. And then there was ‑‑ so Shokin wasn’t specifically on my radar as being an individual that was ‑‑ that was targeting him. But yes, there was constant pressure. And it was like ‑‑ it was like whack‑a‑mole in regards to the pressures that had to resolve. Rep. Jim Jordan: The request from Mr. ‑‑ from Mykola Zlochevsky and Vadym to Mr. Biden and/or if you said it was to you, the request for help from whom to deal with what pressure? Mr. Archer: The request ‑‑ you know, basically the request is like, can D.C. help? But there were not ‑‑ you know, I’m not going to ‑‑ there were not ‑‑ it wasn’t like ‑‑ there weren’t specific, you know, can the big guy help? It was ‑‑ it’s always this amorphous, can we get help in D.C.?
*** Rep. Biggs: So why do you think they were asking Hunter Biden for D.C. help? Mr. Archer: I mean, why? Rep. Biggs: I mean, what did you take away from that? Mr. Archer: Well, I mean, he was a lobbyist and an expert and obviously he carried, you know, a very powerful name. So I think it was ‑‑ that’s what they were asking for." Like I said you pick some of the dumbest hills to die to try and make a point. Two thoughts. Not fact based and not convincing. And definitely not this. “The Devon Archer transcript is out. Archer said that Ukrainian wanted Hunter Biden to help relieve pressure from the prosecutors looking into corruption. They wanted the Bidens to take the heat off. Biden later insisted on the firing of the prosecutor.” You said: "This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming.Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? link" So I did. I get the strong impression that Biden himself could come to you and tell you, he was corrupt and you'd argue with him that he's wrong, demand proof, then when provided, say it doesn't say that. |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 0:34:44 GMT
😀
|
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 0:46:00 GMT
This post is what I call a “so there” comment from a 5 year old when they are told something they don’t like. 😀 I wish there was an emoji of a toddler stamping their little foot. I think it would be used a lot. How's the search for that emoji coming?  |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 1:22:47 GMT
Like I said you pick some of the dumbest hills to die to try and make a point. Two thoughts. Not fact based and not convincing. And definitely not this. “The Devon Archer transcript is out. Archer said that Ukrainian wanted Hunter Biden to help relieve pressure from the prosecutors looking into corruption. They wanted the Bidens to take the heat off. Biden later insisted on the firing of the prosecutor.” You said: "This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming.Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? link" So I did. I get the strong impression that Biden himself could come to you and tell you, he was corrupt and you'd argue with him that he's wrong, demand proof, then when provided, say it doesn't say that. What you fail to grasp is that when one makes serious accusations, as the Republicans are doing, against another person you have to be able to back it up with verifiable proof. Look at the words I bolded. That is no where near verifiable proof. Is it possible that those who did business with Hunter Biden did so because they thought they could get to his dad through him. Possibly. But one has to be able to prove wrong doing was involved with proof that can be verified. Preferably from an outside source. The Republicans don’t have that so they are “suggesting” something they can’t prove when it comes to the President and Hunter Biden. And there are folks like yourself who buy it hook, line & sinker. Before you say “but but his laptop”. Good luck with that. There is a thing called chain of custody that has to be met before things on the laptop can be used as evidence. And even then there has to be verifiable proof that the information on the laptop is legit and put there by HB himself. |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 1:24:35 GMT
This post is what I call a “so there” comment from a 5 year old when they are told something they don’t like. 😀 I wish there was an emoji of a toddler stamping their little foot. I think it would be used a lot. How's the search for that emoji coming?  Why? Do you think you provided another response a 5 year old brat would make? |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 1:36:24 GMT
😀
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 1:41:44 GMT
Hey morecowbell thought of you when I read this. Jack Smith was very clear that trump could lie about the election because it’s protected speech under the First Amendment. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 3:00:43 GMT
You said: "This guy a is a paid hack who spreads untruths or deliberately misleads. Google it, do your own research. Show in the transcript what he is claiming.Here I got you a copy of the transcript. Where is what he is claiming in the transcript ? link" So I did. I get the strong impression that Biden himself could come to you and tell you, he was corrupt and you'd argue with him that he's wrong, demand proof, then when provided, say it doesn't say that. What you fail to grasp is that when one makes serious accusations, as the Republicans are doing, against another person you have to be able to back it up with verifiable proof. Look at the words I bolded. That is no where near verifiable proof. Is it possible that those who did business with Hunter Biden did so because they thought they could get to his dad through him. Possibly. But one has to be able to prove wrong doing was involved with proof that can be verified. Preferably from an outside source. The Republicans don’t have that so they are “suggesting” something they can’t prove when it comes to the President and Hunter Biden. And there are folks like yourself who buy it hook, line & sinker. Before you say “but but his laptop”. Good luck with that. There is a thing called chain of custody that has to be met before things on the laptop can be used as evidence. And even then there has to be verifiable proof that the information on the laptop is legit and put there by HB himself. "Mr. Archer: The request ‑‑ you know, basically the request is like, can D.C. help? But there were not ‑‑ you know, I’m not going to ‑‑ there were not ‑‑ it wasn’t like ‑‑ there weren’t specific, you know, can the big guy help? It was ‑‑ it’s always this amorphous, can we get help in D.C.?"That's not the Republicans that's Hunter Biden's business partner. I'm not failing to grasp anything, but you're grasping at straws to attempt to say that isn't saying they were asking D.C to help. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 3:10:46 GMT
Hey morecowbell thought of you when I read this. Jack Smith was very clear that trump could lie about the election because it’s protected speech under the First Amendment. I think it's hilarious that you are citing someone who's very name is listed in the urban dictionary as: "A lying sack of shit who deceives people for a living, in the name of his political ideology. Every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie." Imagine citing THAT guy in an attempt to call out ANYONE else for lying.  rupar To lie with impunity; a brazen statement with a focus on misleading, usually with intention of a predetermined outcome. The presidential candidate rupar'd before stealing the election. Now the few citizens that actually favored him suffer extreme voter-remorse by Paytr10t March 21, 2021 |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 3:17:49 GMT
I never really thought about the land around our military bases. Nothing suspicious about this at all…
|
|
|
|
Post by Lurkingpea on Aug 4, 2023 3:36:40 GMT
I am on my phone, so sadly ignore doesn’t work. But cowbell citing urban dictionary is probably the most hilarious thing I have ever seen. She who loves to claim her sources are real and valid. Here are just a few entries that pop up on urban dictionary for her beloved Trump.
‘Our misogynist 45th President. A man who acts like a child, and is known for being a fraud, for being in the 1%, for not paying taxes, and for being sexist, racist, and homophobic. An overall clueless and not very smart person. Also known for his outrageously ugly orange hair.’
‘A beta male cuck.
Donald J. Trump thinks highly of himself, but he's just a pathetic beta male cuck.’
‘The 45th president of the United States of America, the most controversial as well, the wall man, and the most hated president.
Donald J. Trump won office while having the unpopular vote.
"Yo dude who is the 45th president of the United States of America?"
"Bro it's Donald J. Trump"
‘A bitch that don’t like Mexicans and also he created the border. He also paid of a porn star and what’s to dat his daughter.
Donald J. Trump was elected to be the worlds worst president!’
And my favorite.
‘A racist, homophobic, transphobic, misogynistic, xenophobic, generally bigoted Cheeto who just so happen to be the 45th president of the United States. He acts like a child and has intellect of vast lowness. He has 46 sexual assault allegations against him. He doesn't give a fuck about the environment or his fellow human beings. He hates liberals because they're smarter than him and are smart enough not to like him. He also built a fence at the border of the US. And to top it all off, he says tremendous every two words Yes, this is a man people have and will vote for to RUN THE FUCKING COUNTRY.
Quotes:
"I am very highly educated, I know the biggest words, I have the best words."
People who vote for Donald J. Trump are either brainwashed, bigoted, or too idiotic for words. Most of them are a mixture of all.’
|
|
