|
Post by sunshine on Aug 4, 2023 16:59:20 GMT
joseph robinette biden, jr. has been selling out US policy to make his family very, very rich. so you feel the same way about stealing US military secrets to sell to the highest bidder, right? Guess who did that...not Biden. Trump has been investigated and indicted 3 times. You think that will ever happen to the big guy? No fucking way. Not a chance.
I'm not voting for either one of them. How about you?
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Aug 4, 2023 17:13:45 GMT
If you're asking that question as some kind of gotcha to sunshine, then you aren't even keeping up with what the hell is happening in our government right now. P.S. Hunter's issues and the COVER UP came BEFORE Trump’s indictments. Trump’s administration covered up things regarding Hunter Biden? The question is why didn’t Trump’s administration do anything? You can’t blame President Biden for something Trump failed to do. um, really? why not? Trump has been blaming Hillary, & Obama and if I’m not mistaken even a Bush for things Trump did. It’s the current GOP’s most used tactic deflect, deflect, whine about persecution, threaten violence, fear monger, repeat. IOKIYAR
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 4, 2023 17:25:12 GMT
Kagan responds to Alito comments that Congress has no say over SCOTUS.. While acknowledging that she couldn't speak for Alito's full intentions in making his recent controversial claims, Kagan proceeded to lay out the the constitutional basis for Congress intervening in the Supreme Court's business. Of course Congress can regulate the Supreme Court," she said. "Congress funds the court. Congress has traditionally made changes to the court's structure and composition. Congress has historically made changes to the court's appellate jurisdiction. And there's a provision in the Constitution that says something like, 'The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction under regulations that Congress provides.'" It just can't be that the Court is the only institution that somehow is not subject to any checks and balances from anybody else," she argued. "I mean, we're not imperial." To sum up her final argument, Kagan then said, "So, can Congress do various things to regulate the Supreme Court? I think the answer is yes." www.rawstory.com/elena-kagan-2662751657/
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 17:27:02 GMT
Trump’s administration covered up things regarding Hunter Biden? The question is why didn’t Trump’s administration do anything? You can’t blame President Biden for something Trump failed to do. um, really? why not? Trump has been blaming Hillary, & Obama and if I’m not mistaken even a Bush for things Trump did. It’s the current GOP’s most used tactic deflect, deflect, whine about persecution, threaten violence, fear monger, repeat. IOKIYAR "New Testimony Reveals Secretary Blinken and Biden Campaign Behind the Infamous Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Laptop" "Based on Morell’s testimony, it is apparent that the Biden campaign played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story and preventing American citizens from making a fully informed decision during the 2020 presidential election." 2 whistleblowers who's testimony, under oath, matches each other, with documentation that corroborates their testimony. Documentation that includes 5 other people. Not to mention Tony Bobulinski's statements also corroborates their under oath testimony. Biden even cited the letter in a debate with Trump as proof that the laptop was Russian disinformation and that Hunter wasn't making any money from China. We now know those claims are not true. That's not a GOP tactic. That's hanging squarely on Biden democrats. Where it all originated.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 4, 2023 17:28:45 GMT
so you feel the same way about stealing US military secrets to sell to the highest bidder, right? Guess who did that...not Biden. Trump has been investigated and indicted 3 times. You think that will ever happen to the big guy? No fucking way. Not a chance.
I'm not voting for either one of them. How about you?
By not voting you are handing TFG a pass! Might just as well pull the lever.
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 4, 2023 17:36:25 GMT
Trump’s administration covered up things regarding Hunter Biden? The question is why didn’t Trump’s administration do anything? You can’t blame President Biden for something Trump failed to do. um, really? why not? Trump has been blaming Hillary, & Obama and if I’m not mistaken even a Bush for things Trump did. It’s the current GOP’s most used tactic deflect, deflect, whine about persecution, threaten violence, fear monger, repeat. IOKIYAR 51 former intelligence officials was a Democrat/The Big Guy tactic. IOKIYA D
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Aug 4, 2023 18:26:31 GMT
Trump has been investigated and indicted 3 times. You think that will ever happen to the big guy? No fucking way. Not a chance.
I'm not voting for either one of them. How about you?
By not voting you are handing TFG a pass! Might just as well pull the lever. I never said I wasn’t voting. I said I wasn’t voting for either trump or biden. You aren’t going to vote for the 80+ year old that’s sold US policy to make his family really rich, are you? Or are you? 😳
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 19:48:09 GMT
The post above is a perfect example of how ignorant voters can be.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 19:50:37 GMT
Anyway, it’s not the White House that needs to hear from the Parkland survivors but the Republican Party who feels the carnage by gun that happens at our schools is acceptable collateral damage when it comes to gun ownership.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,064
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Aug 4, 2023 20:06:53 GMT
By not voting you are handing TFG a pass! Might just as well pull the lever. I never said I wasn’t voting. I said I wasn’t voting for either trump or biden. You aren’t going to vote for the 80+ year old that’s sold US policy to make his family really rich, are you? Or are you? 😳 No i won’t being doing that because I’m not voting for trump.
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Aug 4, 2023 22:38:50 GMT
I don’t know how to add tweets or whatever but it looks like TFG is threatening prosecutors, witnesses and potential jurors. Seriously anyone else would have been dragged back in and put in jail. 🤦♀️
|
|
dawnnikol
Prolific Pea
'A life without books is a life not lived.' Jay Kristoff
Posts: 8,556
Sept 21, 2015 18:39:25 GMT
|
Post by dawnnikol on Aug 4, 2023 22:58:00 GMT
I don’t know how to add tweets or whatever but it looks like TFG is threatening prosecutors, witnesses and potential jurors. Seriously anyone else would have been dragged back in and put in jail. 🤦♀️ I got you.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 4, 2023 23:22:29 GMT
I don’t know how to add tweets or whatever but it looks like TFG is threatening prosecutors, witnesses and potential jurors. Seriously anyone else would have been dragged back in and put in jail. 🤦♀️ I got you. Actually it might work out better to get all fools with guns worn out by Nov 2024.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 23:26:23 GMT
I don’t know how to add tweets or whatever but it looks like TFG is threatening prosecutors, witnesses and potential jurors. Seriously anyone else would have been dragged back in and put in jail. 🤦♀️ I got you. Isn’t that something.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 4, 2023 23:30:26 GMT
"New Testimony Reveals Secretary Blinken and Biden Campaign Behind the Infamous Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Laptop" "Based on Morell’s testimony, it is apparent that the Biden campaign played an active role in the origins of the public statement, which had the effect of helping to suppress the Hunter Biden story and preventing American citizens from making a fully informed decision during the 2020 presidential election." They are not going to do that if they don't already know the laptop and everything in it is credible. The "chain of custody" argument is a false argument. Grasping at straws. That letter or any statement has nothing to do with proving a chain of custody. They are literally two different things. You really don’t understand the concept of verifiable proof do you?
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Aug 4, 2023 23:38:56 GMT
I don’t know how to add tweets or whatever but it looks like TFG is threatening prosecutors, witnesses and potential jurors. Seriously anyone else would have been dragged back in and put in jail. 🤦♀️ I got you. The judge even gave specific instructions to not communicate with the witnesses. www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/08/03/trump-arraignment-dc-indictment-jan-6-2020-election/Former president Donald Trump was allowed to leave court without travel conditions, and no cash bond was required. U.S. Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya ordered, however, that he must not violate federal or state law while awaiting trial and that he must not communicate with anyone known to be a witness, except through counsel or in the presence of counsel.
“Your most important condition of release is that you not commit a state, federal or local offense. If so, your release may be revoked,” Upadhyaya told Trump, in a standard warning given to newly charged defendants. “You may also face a longer sentence for having committed a crime while on release.”
And Trump agreed to not attempt to influence potential jurors. Threatening potential jurors sure sounds like trying to influence them www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/a-judge-warned-trump-not-to-talk-to-witnesses-in-2020-election-case-reality-may-be-complicated#During his arraignment in Washington, where he pleaded not guilty to four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, he agreed not to talk about the case with any witnesses without lawyers present, and not to attempt to influence any potential jurors or tamper with witnesses.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Moxila Upadhyaya told him that if he failed to comply with any conditions of his release, a warrant might be issued for his arrest. A formal witness list is usually presented closer to trial, though prosecutors often signal candidates earlier in the process.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Aug 4, 2023 23:54:26 GMT
so you feel the same way about stealing US military secrets to sell to the highest bidder, right? Guess who did that...not Biden. Trump has been investigated and indicted 3 times. You think that will ever happen to the big guy? No fucking way. Not a chance.
I'm not voting for either one of them. How about you?
Are you seriously suggesting Joe Biden did the same things as Trump and deserves to be indicted for conspiracy to overturn the results of an election, conspiracy to defraud the US government, conspiracy against civil rights, obstruction of justice, willful retention of national defense documents, making false statements and falsifying business records? Never mind. I already know the answer. I have no idea what kind of alternate reality you're living in if you think all of Trump's criminal actions are even remotely the same thing as what Hunter Biden might have done. And somehow Joe Biden deserves to be indicted for Hunter's actions? You can vote for whoever you want, but a vote for a 3rd party candidate is essentially throwing your vote away and will have the same effect as voting for Trump.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 0:26:55 GMT
Boy have they…
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 0:48:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Aug 5, 2023 0:58:13 GMT
Republicans have really gone off the deep end and are trying to kill us all for corporate greed. During a summer where almost all of Canada is on fire, the Gulf Stream is disappearing, the waters around Florida are so hot, coral reefs are dying and the South is in a heat bubble, Republicans want to continue deny climate change and roll back progress. Don't forget, Mike Pence wants to eliminate the EPA. www.cnn.com/2023/07/26/politics/pence-economic-proposal/index.html#www.nytimes.com/2023/07/26/opinion/climate-canada-wildfires-emissions.htmlIn Quebec, more land was torched in June than in the previous 20 years combined, with a single out-of-control complex there growing to 2.5 million acres — in a section of the province where, in recent years, the average total has been a tenth of that. Across Canada, the total was more than 25 million acres, or about two and a half times as much land as burned in any of the worst American seasons of the past 50 years, with most of Canada’s fire season still ahead, putting the country on track to produce more carbon emissions from the burning of boreal forest than all of its other human and industrial activities combined.www.project2025.org/about/about-project-2025/www.nytimes.com/2023/08/04/climate/republicans-climate-project2025.htmlDuring a summer of scorching heat that has broken records and forced Americans to confront the reality of climate change, conservatives are laying the groundwork for future Republican administration that would dismantle efforts to slow global warming.
The move is part of a sweeping strategy dubbed Project 2025 that Paul Dans of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank organizing the effort, has called a “battle plan” for the first 180 days of a future Republican presidency.
The climate and energy provisions would be among the most severe swings away from current federal policies.
The plan calls for shredding regulations to curb greenhouse gas pollution from cars, oil and gas wells and power plants, dismantling almost every clean energy program in the federal government and boosting the production of fossil fuels — the burning of which is the chief cause of planetary warming.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Aug 5, 2023 1:11:39 GMT
A funny take on Trump's arraignment www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/04/donald-trump-arraignment-fantasy-courtroom-satire/There are two realities. There is the reality that Donald Trump would like to be happening, and then there is a lesser, worse reality. In one of them, Trump was arraigned on Thursday on charges of trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. In the other one, this happened.
Donald Trump walked into the courtroom, head held high. It had taken a long time to reach the courtroom because he had to fight his way through a sea of big, strong men who were all crying like babies because of what was being done to him. All the way through the crowd, their hands had clutched at him while they bawled enormous, manly tears, blubbering “Sir” through the sobs.
“Sir,” the strong men wept. “Sir, we have never seen anything like this witch hunt, where people are trying to charge you with crimes just because you attempted to overturn the election! And we are all judges and lawyers, and one of us is even a fireman!” They held one another and sobbed. Several even tore their garments, though Trump was relieved to see that they had extra garments underneath.
Donald Trump did not cry. Donald Trump was the biggest and strongest one there, and they were all in awe of him. He could hear them saying so. He had the hearing of one of the better-hearing birds. His hearing was so good that he could even hear things that nobody had said. Trump pleads not guilty to charges that he plotted to overturn election “We also admire your fingers, sir,” one of the big, strong men was whispering, through his tears. “How long and beautiful they are. It isn’t right that they do this to a man like yourself, sir!”
Donald Trump shook his head sorrowfully. He was not sad for himself. He was sad for the country. The country had been making a lot of mistakes lately, first in 2020, when millions of people had voted incorrectly, and now, when it was trying to make the laws apply to him, even though he had been president once and would be again soon, and for the rest of his life. He missed the days when he got to sit in his beautiful tower and everyone loved him. The building was decorated in impeccable taste: brass everywhere, and sometimes leopard print. It looked as though King Midas had gotten a less expensive curse and had gone around touching everything.
But now, he was in a courtroom. What had life come to, where they would indict a former president, not once but three times, the third time for having conspired to overturn the results of an election? Most presidents were not indicted even once, yet past presidents included Warren G. Harding. It didn’t add up, like certain Trump Organization balance sheets according to the New York attorney general.
He sat patiently in the courtroom waiting for his apology. It was bound to come any minute. Usually an eagle would fly such an apology through the window, but possibly the judge would just deliver it orally. “Sir,” the judge said. “I would like to apologize on behalf of America. Approach the bench.” “No,” the bench said, “I will approach him, out of respect.” The bench was anthropomorphic, and it was his friend.
Donald Trump inclined his majestic head to show that he was listening.
“If trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election is a crime,” Donald Trump’s lawyer added, “then Donald Trump did several crimes.” (He always hired the best lawyers, savory characters from the top of the barrel, which you could tell because they all looked as though they were melting and several were listed as co-conspirators in his indictments, where they were quoted saying things like “This seems illegal and I’m saying so in writing.”) “It’s not,” the judge said, “because obviously the country made a mistake.” “Thank you,” Donald Trump said. “Also, when we said that you were lying because you knew that what you were saying was not true, we forgot that you knew better than reality. This is a skill you acquired from your many years in business and real estate. You know which news is real and which is fake, and you know which votes are real and which are fake, even better than the state election officials of, for instance, Arizona and Georgia. We are going to punish them for failing to understand.”
Outside, millions of people cheered. There were millions of people there, not just a couple-dozen-odd folks, and they were all sobbing and bulging with muscle. They smelled like a milkshake.
“It is all right,” Donald Trump said. He waved his large hand magnanimously, and an eagle landed on it, not startling him even a little bit. “Soon, I will be president again and then we will not have to worry about elections anymore.”
“We cannot wait for that to happen,” the judge said, and the crowd cheered. In the time between that statement and the previous statement, they had erected an enormous, beautiful statue of Donald Trump outside that got his fingers just right. “I have made you a hamburger to say how sorry I am, and now I am going to pelt myself with ketchup. And then I am going to go hunt Joe Biden with a series of darts.”
Everyone applauded, and six men rushed up to give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize. Several attractive women handed him their life savings, unprompted. The Constitution politely rewrote itself to avoid giving him further problems, and the legal codes of the states in which he did business quickly followed suit. Vladimir Putin sent a congratulatory telegram, and so did Frederick Douglass.
A high, thin noise broke through the reverie. It was a child, pointing at Donald Trump and laughing. “Donald Trump!” a voice yelled. “Reality exists, and you cannot simply decide that it doesn’t! You can’t lie and incite violence and try to subvert the democratic process! If you are incapable of discerning reality from what exists only in your mind, you’re certainly unfit to serve! Reality exists, no matter how much you would like it not to!” “No, it doesn’t,” Donald Trump said. “Just watch. You’ll see!" He closed his eyes and smiled. In there, everyone was cheering.
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 5, 2023 3:10:24 GMT
They are not going to do that if they don't already know the laptop and everything in it is credible. The "chain of custody" argument is a false argument. Grasping at straws. That letter or any statement has nothing to do with proving a chain of custody. They are literally two different things. You really don’t understand the concept of verifiable proof do you? I understand you grasping at straws, just fine. They who? If chain of custody was the issue, (it isnt) they would have just said that to begin with. They wouldn't have gone to all the trouble of gathering 51 formers to lie about it being Russian disinformation when they knew it wasn't. They wouldn't have gone with the tyrannical move of shutting down people reporting on it and all the shit that hit the fan about that. They wouldn't have tried to crack down on social media about it. If what Uksue is claiming WAS true they would have just said that and been done with it. Instead, they went to extraordinary efforts to COVER IT UP. The chain of custody argument is grasping at straws.
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Aug 5, 2023 3:33:53 GMT
So the DOJ has filed a motion for a protective order. Will anything come if it? I mean as much as I would love then to take away his phone and keep him from making comments, lies snd threats by allowing him to do so he is giving them more evidence. I don’t know anything about protective orders and what can come of them. I thought the judge said behave or else basically. Not sure if that means what it would for anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 4:09:27 GMT
That letter or any statement has nothing to do with proving a chain of custody. They are literally two different things. You really don’t understand the concept of verifiable proof do you? I understand you grasping at straws, just fine. They who? If chain of custody was the issue, (it isnt) they would have just said that to begin with. They wouldn't have gone to all the trouble of gathering 51 formers to lie about it being Russian disinformation when they knew it wasn't. They wouldn't have gone with the tyrannical move of shutting down people reporting on it and all the shit that hit the fan about that. They wouldn't have tried to crack down on social media about it. If what Uksue is claiming WAS true they would have just said that and been done with it. Instead, they went to extraordinary efforts to COVER IT UP. The chain of custody argument is grasping at straws. Once again you really don’t know what a chain of custody is do you.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 4:12:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 5, 2023 4:26:48 GMT
I understand you grasping at straws, just fine. They who? If chain of custody was the issue, (it isnt) they would have just said that to begin with. They wouldn't have gone to all the trouble of gathering 51 formers to lie about it being Russian disinformation when they knew it wasn't. They wouldn't have gone with the tyrannical move of shutting down people reporting on it and all the shit that hit the fan about that. They wouldn't have tried to crack down on social media about it. If what Uksue is claiming WAS true they would have just said that and been done with it. Instead, they went to extraordinary efforts to COVER IT UP. The chain of custody argument is grasping at straws. Once again you really don’t know what a chain of custody is do you. Do you not understand that email goes to other people's devices?
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 4:48:51 GMT
It is kind of threatening….
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Aug 5, 2023 4:51:17 GMT
Once again you really don’t know what a chain of custody is do you. Do you not understand that email goes to other people's devices? Still don’t get it do you.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,183
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Aug 5, 2023 4:52:11 GMT
Really, quit engaging... just post your opinions and get off the pot. The back and forth is exhausting and stifles people's comments and pretty sure why this message board is slow.
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Aug 5, 2023 5:04:16 GMT
Do you not understand that email goes to other people's devices? Still don’t get it do you. Sure. Whatever you need to do to pretend reality isnt real. This is the same tactic used to argue the laptop was just Russian disinformation.
|
|