sweetpeasmom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,685
Jun 27, 2014 14:04:01 GMT
|
Post by sweetpeasmom on Sept 29, 2023 13:21:10 GMT
Does the school she wants to go to have merit listed on their website? When DD was looking at colleges, several she applied to had their merit amounts and requirements listed on their sites. That will give you an idea of what she could potentially start with. Unfortunately, she didn't qualify b/c of her test scores. We told her she could go to the out of state schools if they gave her the money. Otherwise she had to stay in state. She didn't want a ton of debt and we didn't want her to have a ton of debt. As it is, she has had to take the federal loans these last 2 years. We won't sign parent plus loans. I'm hoping for the remaining 3 years (her's is a 5 year program), we won't have to do the federal loans. Her tuition is covered by our state scholarship program. We just have to cover her living expenses (apartment, food, etc).
Only you and your family know your financial situation and what you can honestly afford to do. You'll need to have the conversation with her and let her know what it will look like for her. Are you willing to co-sign the loans? If not and she doesn't get enough merit and/or scholarships, how else will she make it work? Need to consider the overall package - tuition, room/board, books, travel, etc.
It's hard when they have their hearts set on a specific school and/or experience and it's not always feasible.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Sept 29, 2023 15:58:57 GMT
I think there is far too much emphasis placed on the gigantic state schools. For the vast majority of majors, they dont make sense. Once you are out of college, no one cares of you went to the big, expensive state school except other people who went there. The focus should be on finding a good fit for the student (in distance from home and school size), and a school that has the desired major. My ds absolutely would have been accepted to "huge state school", but he chose not to apply- the school was far larger than he wanted and his major was offered in an accelerated program at "small state school". He earned a full scholarship that, due to the accelerated program, covered him well into grad school. He graduated debt free. The “gigantic state school” locally is what I’ve been trying to convince her to attend in lieu of the pricy out of state schools she wants that are known for their programs that she wants to go into. It is her “last choice if all others are not an option” school. There is **no way** I could even begin to get her to consider the smaller state school her brother is just finishing at that is known for its engineering program. It’s really unfortunate that she will only consider the in state schools as a last choice. IMO it really doesn’t matter where you take your generals in the first couple years as long as those credits will transfer to another school down the road. Unless she is going to be able to get a job right off the bat that pays serious bank, it simply isn’t financially smart to rack up a ton of debt to go to a name brand school for undergrad. Not to say your kid will, but so many kids (even some of those who were previously really good students) flame out in that first year. One of my cousins was a straight A student in HS and she completely crashed and burned under pressure in that first year of college away from home. Eventually she found her footing and ultimately graduated, but it took longer than she expected. Plus after taking a couple years off to work and explore different jobs, she completely changed course and ended up getting her degree in a totally different field than she started out pursuing. Years later, my niece did the exact same thing. She dropped out after the first semester, worked for a couple years doing different things, took classes online to become a pharmacy tech and after doing that for a couple years went back to be an RN.
|
|
iowgirl
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,295
Jun 25, 2014 22:52:46 GMT
|
Post by iowgirl on Sept 29, 2023 16:09:24 GMT
I have heard so many people, that are now burdened with huge student loan debt, say they wish someone would have counseled them better on the reality of what that debt would mean down the road.
Getting someone who is 17-18 to listen and understand the reality of debt is also hard to do. It's just not something that is a reality to them - it's in the 'someday' realm...why worry?
We were fortunate to be able to pay our kids tuition, but it did come with some strings. We would pay for the instate cost of tutition, room & board at a State school. If they chose a differently, the remainder was on them. If they wanted to live off campus, the cost difference between the dorm/room/board was on them. We encouraged them all to live at least 1 or 2 years in the dorms, and they all chose to live 2 years in the dorms and loved it. Said that was the best decision ever. They all chose the same in-state university. It has a diverse set of majors, and they all did something completely different.
They all have excellent paying jobs now with great benefits, which is something this State school, and their majors are known for. We counseled them on picking a major that was in their interests, but also had good income potential.
I fully feel that telling a young person "Do what your heart loves, and the rest will work out" is probably the worst advise that can be given.
|
|
sweetpeasmom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,685
Jun 27, 2014 14:04:01 GMT
|
Post by sweetpeasmom on Sept 29, 2023 16:22:05 GMT
The “gigantic state school” locally is what I’ve been trying to convince her to attend in lieu of the pricy out of state schools she wants that are known for their programs that she wants to go into. It is her “last choice if all others are not an option” school. There is **no way** I could even begin to get her to consider the smaller state school her brother is just finishing at that is known for its engineering program. It’s really unfortunate that she will only consider the in state schools as a last choice. IMO it really doesn’t matter where you take your generals in the first couple years as long as those credits will transfer to another school down the road. Unless she is going to be able to get a job right off the bat that pays serious bank, it simply isn’t financially smart to rack up a ton of debt to go to a name brand school for undergrad. Not to say your kid will, but so many kids (even some of those who were previously really good students) flame out in that first year. One of my cousins was a straight A student in HS and she completely crashed and burned under pressure in that first year of college away from home. Eventually she found her footing and ultimately graduated, but it took longer than she expected. Plus after taking a couple years off to work and explore different jobs, she completely changed course and ended up getting her degree in a totally different field than she started out pursuing. Years later, my niece did the exact same thing. She dropped out after the first semester, worked for a couple years doing different things, took classes online to become a pharmacy tech and after doing that for a couple years went back to be an RN. More and more majors are requiring the major classes starting freshman year. My daughter is an architect major. She started her major classes day 1 her freshman year. Her general classes are spread out throughout the 4 years of a 5 year program. If she were to have gone the community college route to get her gen eds out of the way, she still would be looking at 4-5 years in her major because of having to take one class before the other.
|
|
|
Post by smasonnc on Sept 29, 2023 17:52:16 GMT
I will probably one of the few that will have this opinion, but please have very real and open discussions with your daughter about what it will *actually* mean if she graduates with $120K in loans. It will impact her future in very real, possibly painful ways --- where she can live, jobs she can chose to have, whether or not she can travel, stay home with her babies if she wanted to, etc. If this were my daughter, I would encourage her to get her basics out of the way thru a community college. Something to also remember is most students get their largest financial aid offers their freshman year so you can't expect to have the same $$ offer for future years. I get this is a dream school for her - and with her scores, she will probably get some scholarships. But if the math doesn't make sense overall (and long term) then I would be encouraging my daughter to look at other schools. Please find a college financial advisor to go over your numbers and what your options are. Preferably find someone not connected to any specific school to give you advice. Exactly. I’ve almost finished putting 4 kids through college and none of them had loans. It made a huge difference in their options after graduation because they weren’t saddled with huge amounts of debt. You need to have a tough financial talk with her. Going to a “dream school” that they choose when they’re 18 doesn’t make sense if they don’t have the money. Take a look at Forbes list of best value colleges. It uses a combination of cost, endowments, alumni networks, name value, and expected salary after graduation. Even though the list didn’t start until they were finished, three of my kids went to schools on the list.
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Sept 29, 2023 18:46:38 GMT
I work in higher ed and public universities are generally quite transparent at what academic scholarships you can qualify for, based on gpa, and test scores, and geography. But those schools can be very selective for out of state students. They often do not offer much money to out of state students. However regional comprehensives often will offer instate tuition, and your student might qualify for a deep academic scholarship. And you can find some of the top ranked programs at regional schools, they may only be known for one or two things but they are often more focused on teaching than research.
Wether applying to private or public schools the sweet spot it to be above their average test scores, they will want your student to help give their averages a boost. Applying to multiple schools and then having some room to negotiate is a good place to be. In my experience smaller schools and private schools are more likely to negotiate. My daughter got a $5K talent scholarship because she had other offers.
Parent Plus loans seem to be the way many families pay for more expensive schools. Not something I was willing to do, but when my daughter saw the numbers she realized a regional comprehensive with a strong program of her interest and graduating with out any loans was the best way forward for her. S
The FAFSA is changing in a big way, it won't be available until December this year, it is typically available in October. So I am not sure how accurate the Net Price indicator will be, it was very accurate for my daughter when she was applying 3 years ago.
Parents
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Sept 29, 2023 19:09:29 GMT
It’s really unfortunate that she will only consider the in state schools as a last choice. IMO it really doesn’t matter where you take your generals in the first couple years as long as those credits will transfer to another school down the road. Unless she is going to be able to get a job right off the bat that pays serious bank, it simply isn’t financially smart to rack up a ton of debt to go to a name brand school for undergrad. Not to say your kid will, but so many kids (even some of those who were previously really good students) flame out in that first year. One of my cousins was a straight A student in HS and she completely crashed and burned under pressure in that first year of college away from home. Eventually she found her footing and ultimately graduated, but it took longer than she expected. Plus after taking a couple years off to work and explore different jobs, she completely changed course and ended up getting her degree in a totally different field than she started out pursuing. Years later, my niece did the exact same thing. She dropped out after the first semester, worked for a couple years doing different things, took classes online to become a pharmacy tech and after doing that for a couple years went back to be an RN. More and more majors are requiring the major classes starting freshman year. My daughter is an architect major. She started her major classes day 1 her freshman year. Her general classes are spread out throughout the 4 years of a 5 year program. If she were to have gone the community college route to get her gen eds out of the way, she still would be looking at 4-5 years in her major because of having to take one class before the other. That really sucks and IMO kind of defeats part of the college experience which is to give students a taste of what they do and don’t want to do early enough on so they can change course before graduation without really setting them back. There are so many kids out there who honestly don’t really know at 18 what they will want to do with the rest of their lives, and locking them into a major on day one seems like a huge mistake. ETA: So what happens if your DD decides after one or two semesters that architecture really isn’t her jam?
|
|
kate
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,586
Location: The city that doesn't sleep
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2014 3:30:05 GMT
|
Post by kate on Sept 30, 2023 1:59:09 GMT
I agree that going into massive debt for undergrad can be a really bad choice... That said, there can be excellent reasons to go to a top-tier school for what you want to study: level of teaching, level of classmates, networking opportunities (which can be lifelong!), etc.
It depends on why you want to go to college. Everyone's got to make their own choices.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Sept 30, 2023 2:07:20 GMT
More and more majors are requiring the major classes starting freshman year. My daughter is an architect major. She started her major classes day 1 her freshman year. Her general classes are spread out throughout the 4 years of a 5 year program. If she were to have gone the community college route to get her gen eds out of the way, she still would be looking at 4-5 years in her major because of having to take one class before the other. That really sucks and IMO kind of defeats part of the college experience which is to give students a taste of what they do and don’t want to do early enough on so they can change course before graduation without really setting them back. There are so many kids out there who honestly don’t really know at 18 what they will want to do with the rest of their lives, and locking them into a major on day one seems like a huge mistake. ETA: So what happens if your DD decides after one or two semesters that architecture really isn’t her jam? Music is the same way. Major classes start freshman year. In the case of someone who decides it isn’t for them, classes can often be segued into a minor or used as electives.
|
|
|
Post by coaliesquirrel on Sept 30, 2023 2:26:42 GMT
I agree. Starting life with so much debt is not a good way to start. There should be cheaper options available. Oh I agree wholeheartedly. But there are limits as to what I can do when the choice is ultimately hers. The best I can do is lay out the information for her. But the choice is ultimately yours, too, if you are asked to cosign loans. Don't allow yourself to be pressured into doing it if you're not comfortable doing so. Every financial advisor will tell you that your kids can get loans for higher education, but you can't get loans for your retirement, so don't cheat yourself to fund her. My experience: full ride undergrad but $60K in loans for grad school at around 8.5% if I recall (and w/ interest rates up now, kids need to remember the difference it can make!). My payments were around $650/mo I think for 10 years, and my starting salary was $42K. We really scrimped for those 10 years and lived in a true starter house where our payment on a 15yr mortgage was less than my student loan payments! But, we finished paying my school loans a few months after moving into our "forever" house and one month after DD was born. It's a massive relief to not have them hanging over us as we begin looking towards DD's postsecondary education/training in a few more years. My advice: take only what you must and do whatever you can to pay it back sooner rather than later!
|
|
sweetpeasmom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,685
Jun 27, 2014 14:04:01 GMT
|
Post by sweetpeasmom on Sept 30, 2023 16:59:59 GMT
More and more majors are requiring the major classes starting freshman year. My daughter is an architect major. She started her major classes day 1 her freshman year. Her general classes are spread out throughout the 4 years of a 5 year program. If she were to have gone the community college route to get her gen eds out of the way, she still would be looking at 4-5 years in her major because of having to take one class before the other. That really sucks and IMO kind of defeats part of the college experience which is to give students a taste of what they do and don’t want to do early enough on so they can change course before graduation without really setting them back. There are so many kids out there who honestly don’t really know at 18 what they will want to do with the rest of their lives, and locking them into a major on day one seems like a huge mistake. ETA: So what happens if your DD decides after one or two semesters that architecture really isn’t her jam? For those that aren't sure or don't have any idea, going in undeclared and doing gen ed first is a great path. For those that are pretty darn sure, declaring their major going in is what they'll do.
In my daughter's case, she took an architect class all 4 years in high school. So she was pretty certain that was her path. She is in her 2nd year and is still as passionate about it as she was day 1. So as of right now, we are lucky she still loves it. She and I have both talked with parents and students who say I might want to do this. We let them know it's intense and not for everyone. Honestly, it might be one of the most intense undergraduate degrees. Between her 1st and 2nd semester, 100 students dropped. She said that her freshman class was one of the largest ones the school had ever had. There are many many many late nights in studio. She had a presentation yesterday. She went to the studio at 7:30pm Thurs and left at 5:30am Fri. Back in class at 2:30pm for her presentation.
Now, the fact that after 12 years of math, english, social studies and science and they still have to do 2 or so more years of it? Don't get me started on that. That's one of the many reasons school has gotten so expensive.
|
|
seaexplore
Prolific Pea
Posts: 8,840
Apr 25, 2015 23:57:30 GMT
|
Post by seaexplore on Sept 30, 2023 19:04:00 GMT
2 year junior college locally and save while attending there. Get a guaranteed acceptance agreement to transfer to the dream school as a junior. You will save a ton of money.
|
|
|
Post by Crack-a-lackin on Sept 30, 2023 21:43:30 GMT
Your daughter should listen to a few episodes of Dave Ramsey, or similar series, where people are constantly calling in to get advice on how to pay off thousands and thousands of dollars in loans they took out when they were 18. They recently were talking with a pharmacist who has $225,000 in debt but now want to be a stay at home mom and can’t. People think they’ll pay off the loans right away but it often takes decades.
|
|
ellen
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,777
Jun 30, 2014 12:52:45 GMT
|
Post by ellen on Sept 30, 2023 22:18:43 GMT
We had our daughter apply to a variety of schools - sizes, prices, private, public, etc. She had a a great ACT score and high GPA. From the very beginning we told her that money was going to be a factor in the decision. We had x amount that we would put up and that if she stayed under that, she would graduate from college debt free. In the end she attended a small private college that gave her their highest merit award and guaranteed entry into the program she wanted to get into. She also qualified for a really generous local scholarship that made attending this college very affordable. There were a couple schools that she applied to that could have been cheaper, but there was always a wait to get into the program she wanted to get into and many end up going an extra semester.
I felt like the more we got into it, my daughter started to really see the big picture. At first she wanted to go to one school because she really liked the admissions rep. Another one she thought she wanted to go to because she thought it was a big deal and then she visited the campus and was disappointed. A couple others she loved, but thought they seemed intimidating. In the end she made a great choice for herself and it was the one we hoped she would want to attend.
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on Oct 6, 2023 18:07:39 GMT
|
|
iluvpink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,376
Location: Michigan
Jul 13, 2014 12:40:31 GMT
|
Post by iluvpink on Oct 6, 2023 18:25:02 GMT
I don't have any personal experience here. My parents paid my college tuition. DD 23 did not go to college (we have a small amount set aside if she changes her mind and will help with what we can).
However we have very close friends who took out parent plus loans for their dd's private art school. She had a small scholarship. Supposedly she is supposed to pay when she has a job. Graduated in June and has applied for many jobs with not one bite. In the meantime they took a major hit in income. They also did the same for their son who is still in college. He's going for a better paying degree but is not happy and not doing what he needs to do to graduate. We are super worried about them.
Paying for college is so hard. I think avoiding debt as much as possible is best in most cases.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Oct 6, 2023 21:28:14 GMT
That really sucks and IMO kind of defeats part of the college experience which is to give students a taste of what they do and don’t want to do early enough on so they can change course before graduation without really setting them back. There are so many kids out there who honestly don’t really know at 18 what they will want to do with the rest of their lives, and locking them into a major on day one seems like a huge mistake. ETA: So what happens if your DD decides after one or two semesters that architecture really isn’t her jam? For those that aren't sure or don't have any idea, going in undeclared and doing gen ed first is a great path. For those that are pretty darn sure, declaring their major going in is what they'll do.
In my daughter's case, she took an architect class all 4 years in high school. So she was pretty certain that was her path. She is in her 2nd year and is still as passionate about it as she was day 1. So as of right now, we are lucky she still loves it. She and I have both talked with parents and students who say I might want to do this. We let them know it's intense and not for everyone. Honestly, it might be one of the most intense undergraduate degrees. Between her 1st and 2nd semester, 100 students dropped. She said that her freshman class was one of the largest ones the school had ever had. There are many many many late nights in studio. She had a presentation yesterday. She went to the studio at 7:30pm Thurs and left at 5:30am Fri. Back in class at 2:30pm for her presentation.
Now, the fact that after 12 years of math, english, social studies and science and they still have to do 2 or so more years of it? Don't get me started on that. That's one of the many reasons school has gotten so expensive.
Gen Ed classes have always beem required, so Im not sure how they would be one of the reasons school has gotten so expensive.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,101
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Oct 6, 2023 22:09:23 GMT
That is obviously a private, unsubsidized loan. A lot of students don't realize that some student loans start charging interest the.day.you.get.the.check! Three or four years of 16% interest on $28,000 really adds up, and they student ends up owing a lot more than they borrowed as soon as they graduate. As I understand it, subsidized loans don't start accruing interest until 6 months after you graduate, but they often don't offer enough funds to pay the full cost of attendance each year. Filling that gap with a private loan is risky. Not only is the rate higher and interest starts immediately, I don't think they are eligible for the public-service loan forgiveness programs. There are NO subsidized loans available for graduate students. That is why so many people with professional or PhD degrees have such high student debt. **Disclaimer: I do not work in financial aid, but this is my understanding as it has been explained to me by those who do.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,856
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 7, 2023 16:15:16 GMT
I will also add I think it’s good to k ow what you are willing to pay for before applying. My friend’s daughter got into her dream school (Pomona) at a cost of about $80k/year. They were given only a small amount of financial aid. There were a lot of tears and sadness before her daughter agreed to go to UCSB (an excellent school…and “only” $35k/year) Excuse me. Did you say $80,000/year?! Tuition? WTH (meaning what the hell are we as a country doing to our kids that education costs this much?). That’s a liberal arts school, isn’t it? Anyway, now that I’ve recovered from the initial shock, my suggestion to OP is to have your daughter read this thread. IMO, this is the kind of thread where Peas excel—where they speak knowledgeably about realities and share the wisdom they’ve gained from their experiences. My comment is not meant as a minimization of the daughter’s dream because I was that young once, too, and had aspirations like every other young person. However, there are instances when what the heart desires, the mind has to temper. This is one of those instances.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,977
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Oct 7, 2023 16:52:33 GMT
I will also add I think it’s good to k ow what you are willing to pay for before applying. My friend’s daughter got into her dream school (Pomona) at a cost of about $80k/year. They were given only a small amount of financial aid. There were a lot of tears and sadness before her daughter agreed to go to UCSB (an excellent school…and “only” $35k/year) Excuse me. Did you say $80,000/year?! Tuition? WTH (meaning what the hell are we as a country doing to our kids that education costs this much?). That’s a liberal arts school, isn’t it? Pomona is a private college that’s why the tuition is double a state school she had to make sacrifices to go to. And going to community college for the first two years also lowers that cost.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Oct 7, 2023 17:26:09 GMT
I agree that going into massive debt for undergrad can be a really bad choice... That said, there can be excellent reasons to go to a top-tier school for what you want to study: level of teaching, level of classmates, networking opportunities (which can be lifelong!), etc. It depends on why you want to go to college. Everyone's got to make their own choices. There are all levels of students at all schools. Ds' and his main group of friends in his major were exceptional students who were top of their respective hs grad classes. Not wanting to burden themselves with crippling debt doesnt make them less than students who go to the "top-tier" schools. Same with instructors- there are many reasons thst someone may not be interested in a job at one of those schools. Doesnt make them less either. There are great and terrible teachers at all schools. I will say, every single class at my ds' university was taught by a full professor. Not by a teaching assistant. The professors knew their students. The head of ds' department once emailed him to see if he was ok because he had seemed a little "down" in class. You arent going to get that in a class of 600 in a lecture hall. 🤷🏼♀️
|
|
sweetpeasmom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,685
Jun 27, 2014 14:04:01 GMT
|
Post by sweetpeasmom on Oct 7, 2023 23:33:59 GMT
For those that aren't sure or don't have any idea, going in undeclared and doing gen ed first is a great path. For those that are pretty darn sure, declaring their major going in is what they'll do.
In my daughter's case, she took an architect class all 4 years in high school. So she was pretty certain that was her path. She is in her 2nd year and is still as passionate about it as she was day 1. So as of right now, we are lucky she still loves it. She and I have both talked with parents and students who say I might want to do this. We let them know it's intense and not for everyone. Honestly, it might be one of the most intense undergraduate degrees. Between her 1st and 2nd semester, 100 students dropped. She said that her freshman class was one of the largest ones the school had ever had. There are many many many late nights in studio. She had a presentation yesterday. She went to the studio at 7:30pm Thurs and left at 5:30am Fri. Back in class at 2:30pm for her presentation.
Now, the fact that after 12 years of math, english, social studies and science and they still have to do 2 or so more years of it? Don't get me started on that. That's one of the many reasons school has gotten so expensive.
Gen Ed classes have always beem required, so Im not sure how they would be one of the reasons school has gotten so expensive. Let me clarify. The Gen Ed classes add up to 2 years of additional schooling that, IMO, is unnecessary. With some of the schools building dorms that rival the nicest apartments and living accommodations for non-students (not saying they need to be slums) and all the other expenses and fees that have gone through the roof in recent years, those Gen Ed classes add to the overall cost. If students didn't have to take them, that's 2 years less of tuition (plus room/board) and ultimately loans for many.
And I have posted here before about the insane cost differences for the same courses across different schools. It's crazy. I'm not talking about overall cost because that does vary understandably. But I'm talking about just the cost per credit hour. I compared 4 state schools. One was a tech school but the other 3 were state universities. The difference between those 3 schools was mind boggling. One school was $180 per credit hour while another was $480 per credit hour. For the same Eng 1101 course.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 8, 2023 13:20:22 GMT
Gen Ed classes have always beem required, so Im not sure how they would be one of the reasons school has gotten so expensive. Let me clarify. The Gen Ed classes add up to 2 years of additional schooling that, IMO, is unnecessary. With some of the schools building dorms that rival the nicest apartments and living accommodations for non-students (not saying they need to be slums) and all the other expenses and fees that have gone through the roof in recent years, those Gen Ed classes add to the overall cost. If students didn't have to take them, that's 2 years less of tuition (plus room/board) and ultimately loans for many.
And I have posted here before about the insane cost differences for the same courses across different schools. It's crazy. I'm not talking about overall cost because that does vary understandably. But I'm talking about just the cost per credit hour. I compared 4 state schools. One was a tech school but the other 3 were state universities. The difference between those 3 schools was mind boggling. One school was $180 per credit hour while another was $480 per credit hour. For the same Eng 1101 course.
Without the broad, comprehensive background of gen ed classes (which are typically more advanced/thorough than high school ones), college becomes trade school. One can make an argument that, for many professions, a trade school experience would be fine. One can also make an argument that both employers and society as a whole benefit from people having a broad education rather than a narrow one. There is also the matter of pre-requisites for classes in your major, some of which are usually gen ed classes. Not arguing for or against either scenario. I do think that our university system is based on classical ideals of what an educated person should know rather than a trade school mentality. Maybe that needs to be rethought, but it would have to start with employers being willing to hire employees who have a less comprehensive technical/career degree rather than a BA/BS.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,101
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Oct 8, 2023 13:49:06 GMT
Let me clarify. The Gen Ed classes add up to 2 years of additional schooling that, IMO, is unnecessary. With some of the schools building dorms that rival the nicest apartments and living accommodations for non-students (not saying they need to be slums) and all the other expenses and fees that have gone through the roof in recent years, those Gen Ed classes add to the overall cost. If students didn't have to take them, that's 2 years less of tuition (plus room/board) and ultimately loans for many.
And I have posted here before about the insane cost differences for the same courses across different schools. It's crazy. I'm not talking about overall cost because that does vary understandably. But I'm talking about just the cost per credit hour. I compared 4 state schools. One was a tech school but the other 3 were state universities. The difference between those 3 schools was mind boggling. One school was $180 per credit hour while another was $480 per credit hour. For the same Eng 1101 course.
Without the broad, comprehensive background of gen ed classes (which are typically more advanced/thorough than high school ones), college becomes trade school. One can make an argument that, for many professions, a trade school experience would be fine. One can also make an argument that both employers and society as a whole benefit from people having a broad education rather than a narrow one. There is also the matter of pre-requisites for classes in your major, some of which are usually gen ed classes. Not arguing for or against either scenario. I do think that our university system is based on classical ideals of what an educated person should know rather than a trade school mentality. Maybe that needs to be rethought, but it would have to start with employers being willing to hire employees who have a less comprehensive technical/career degree rather than a BA/BS. Agree 100%. Never underestimate the value of the liberal arts! I understand the emphasis on stem and business careers, but liberal arts Gen Ed courses still need to be part of the equation. One of my favorite memes is this: A STEM education can teach you how to clone a dinosaur. A liberal arts education can teach you why that might not be a good idea!
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 8, 2023 14:35:56 GMT
Let me clarify. The Gen Ed classes add up to 2 years of additional schooling that, IMO, is unnecessary. With some of the schools building dorms that rival the nicest apartments and living accommodations for non-students (not saying they need to be slums) and all the other expenses and fees that have gone through the roof in recent years, those Gen Ed classes add to the overall cost. If students didn't have to take them, that's 2 years less of tuition (plus room/board) and ultimately loans for many.
And I have posted here before about the insane cost differences for the same courses across different schools. It's crazy. I'm not talking about overall cost because that does vary understandably. But I'm talking about just the cost per credit hour. I compared 4 state schools. One was a tech school but the other 3 were state universities. The difference between those 3 schools was mind boggling. One school was $180 per credit hour while another was $480 per credit hour. For the same Eng 1101 course.
Without the broad, comprehensive background of gen ed classes (which are typically more advanced/thorough than high school ones), college becomes trade school. One can make an argument that, for many professions, a trade school experience would be fine. One can also make an argument that both employers and society as a whole benefit from people having a broad education rather than a narrow one. There is also the matter of pre-requisites for classes in your major, some of which are usually gen ed classes. Not arguing for or against either scenario. I do think that our university system is based on classical ideals of what an educated person should know rather than a trade school mentality. Maybe that needs to be rethought, but it would have to start with employers being willing to hire employees who have a less comprehensive technical/career degree rather than a BA/BS. I posted about it previously, but this is a huge issue. There are so many jobs now that say they require a BA degree as a requirement to even apply when the skills required to do the actual job could be obtained elsewhere without one. I mean, should you really need a BA to be an administrative assistant, a low level retail supervisor or manager, a data entry clerk, a receptionist? Yet I’ve seen job postings for all those types of positions where they have a BA requirement to apply. I think in many cases, the employer’s standards are unreasonably high. It’s basically only being used as a litmus test to show a person can stick with something long enough to graduate.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 8, 2023 14:40:49 GMT
Without the broad, comprehensive background of gen ed classes (which are typically more advanced/thorough than high school ones), college becomes trade school. One can make an argument that, for many professions, a trade school experience would be fine. One can also make an argument that both employers and society as a whole benefit from people having a broad education rather than a narrow one. There is also the matter of pre-requisites for classes in your major, some of which are usually gen ed classes. Not arguing for or against either scenario. I do think that our university system is based on classical ideals of what an educated person should know rather than a trade school mentality. Maybe that needs to be rethought, but it would have to start with employers being willing to hire employees who have a less comprehensive technical/career degree rather than a BA/BS. I posted about it previously, but this is a huge issue. There are so many jobs now that say they require a BA degree as a requirement to even apply when the skills required to do the actual job could be obtained elsewhere without one. I mean, should you really need a BA to be an administrative assistant, a low level retail supervisor or manager, a data entry clerk, a receptionist? Yet I’ve seen job postings for all those types of positions where they have a BA requirement to apply. I think in many cases, the employer’s standards are unreasonably high. It’s basically only being used as a litmus test to show a person can stick with something long enough to graduate. I mean - depending on the nature of the admin or retail manager role, college-level math and an ability to write at a professional level may be important. But probably not for all roles, I agree. I was even thinking like software developers or IT people, but again - they're going to have math/logic pre-requisites for their major courses, and of course a liberal arts background prepares people to work and deal with folks from around the world, solve problems creatively, etc. It's hard to say.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 8, 2023 14:55:29 GMT
I posted about it previously, but this is a huge issue. There are so many jobs now that say they require a BA degree as a requirement to even apply when the skills required to do the actual job could be obtained elsewhere without one. I mean, should you really need a BA to be an administrative assistant, a low level retail supervisor or manager, a data entry clerk, a receptionist? Yet I’ve seen job postings for all those types of positions where they have a BA requirement to apply. I think in many cases, the employer’s standards are unreasonably high. It’s basically only being used as a litmus test to show a person can stick with something long enough to graduate. I mean - depending on the nature of the admin or retail manager role, college-level math and an ability to write at a professional level may be important. But probably not for all roles, I agree. I was even thinking like software developers or IT people, but again - they're going to have math/logic pre-requisites for their major courses, and of course a liberal arts background prepares people to work and deal with folks from around the world, solve problems creatively, etc. It's hard to say. Some of those skills can be obtained through work and life experience as well, so by just flat out saying “don’t apply if you don’t have a degree” shuts out a lot of people who would be completely qualified to do the actual job. That’s my issue.
|
|