|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 18, 2024 20:14:42 GMT
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to have a real conversation with you. Even after the following... You've made it clear that you just can not handle differing opinion. You've made it clear that you will desperately use your parents' death to TRY to win an argument and desperately try to tie ME to their death. Desperately, being the operative word. Don't try to pretend you're anything but an unhinged lunatic. I in no way tried to tie you to my parents’ death, you absolute loon. Yes, you absolutely did: "And my parents were both killed by a middle aged white American with two prior drunk driving convictions who felt it was OK to operate his boat at over twice the legal limit. Oh and he had a Rush Limbaugh sticker on that boat, so he was one of yours." Yes, you did. You absolute unhinged lunatic. |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 18, 2024 20:18:56 GMT
I in no way tried to tie you to my parents’ death, you absolute loon. Yes, you absolutely did: "And my parents were both killed by a middle aged white American with two prior drunk driving convictions who felt it was OK to operate his boat at over twice the legal limit. Oh and he had a Rush Limbaugh sticker on that boat, so he was one of yours." Yes, you did. You absolute unhinged lunatic. Saying that he shared political views with you, is on your side or belongs to your party is not the same thing as trying to tie you to her parents death. For someone who insists on precision and accuracy, you're stretching and exaggerating here. You are not very accurate with your own words. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 18, 2024 20:29:01 GMT
Yes, you absolutely did: "And my parents were both killed by a middle aged white American with two prior drunk driving convictions who felt it was OK to operate his boat at over twice the legal limit. Oh and he had a Rush Limbaugh sticker on that boat, so he was one of yours." Yes, you did. You absolute unhinged lunatic. Saying that he shared political views with you, is on your side or belongs to your party is not the same thing as trying to tie you to her parents death. Yes, it absolutely is. |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 18, 2024 20:36:55 GMT
Saying that he shared political views with you, is on your side or belongs to your party is not the same thing as trying to tie you to her parents death. Yes, it absolutely is. Only in what passes for your mind. Go back and find whatever specific post I was responding to, and quote that, too. You want to know what I do blame you for? The fact that my young adult daughters don’t feel safe or welcome in their home state any longer. That has come about specifically because of politicians and policies that you support. I blame you and all GOP voters for that 100% |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 18, 2024 20:50:05 GMT
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to have a real conversation with you. Even after the following... You've made it clear that you just can not handle differing opinion. You've made it clear that you will desperately use your parents' death to TRY to win an argument and desperately try to tie ME to their death. Desperately, being the operative word. Don't try to pretend you're anything but an unhinged lunatic. I in no way tried to tie you to my parents’ death, you absolute loon. Yes, you absolutely did: "And my parents were both killed by a middle aged white American with two prior drunk driving convictions who felt it was OK to operate his boat at over twice the legal limit. Oh and he had a Rush Limbaugh sticker on that boat, so he was one of yours." Yes, you did. You absolute unhinged lunatic. |
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Mar 18, 2024 20:50:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 18, 2024 20:52:03 GMT
I in no way tried to tie you to my parents’ death, you absolute loon. Yes, you absolutely did: "And my parents were both killed by a middle aged white American with two prior drunk driving convictions who felt it was OK to operate his boat at over twice the legal limit. Oh and he had a Rush Limbaugh sticker on that boat, so he was one of yours." Yes, you did. You absolute unhinged lunatic. What was said right before that, Gia? Be honest. ETA: I found it. I was responding to a list of crimes committed by immigrants that you were using to justify “closing the border” or mass deportations or whatever. I used the conjunction ‘and’ to tie it to the link I quoted, and then asked you where your outrage was for this crime committed by a US citizen to make the point that lumping all of a group in with the actions of one isn’t logical. Any five year old would have seen the comparison being made, particularly after I explained it to you in that very thread.  But rather than admit your mistake, you’ve doubled down and encouraged me several times to “get therapy” about it or whatever in other threads that bore no relation to that one, simply because you couldn’t handle disagreement. You are either painfully stupid or dishonest or both. Matters not to me. You’re beneath contempt. |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 18, 2024 21:05:43 GMT
I'm wondering ifTrump made some of his comments on Saturday. knowing that they would get a lot of attention. Hoping would be a distraction and there would be less attention on his inability to pay his bond? I'm assuming he knew on Saturday that his lawyers would be filing an affidavit to that effect today. www.npr.org/2024/03/18/1239242523/trump-bond-civil-fraud-caseTrump unable to post $450M bond in New York fraud case, his lawyers say MARCH 18, 2024 By Andrea Bernstein Lawyers for former president and presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump say coming up with the bond on roughly half a billion dollars while he appeals his New York fraud judgment is a "practical impossibility."
Trump's lawyers say they've approached 30 companies through four brokers and none will accept his real estate holdings as a guarantee on the bond for $454 million and argue the judgment is unconstitutionally high. They filed an affidavit from an insurance broker saying it is "not possible" to find a bond that big. The broker was an expert witness for Trump during the trial. |
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Mar 18, 2024 21:11:16 GMT
Wow, Gia/cowbell whoever you are, that’s really reaching into the way back closet to try to ‘gotcha’ someone. WTF. Taking something and twisting it out of context to throw one of a persons most painful experiences at them years later for no reason, having absolutely nothing to do with the current topic. That had to be one of the bitchiest things I’ve ever seen a pea post to another pea. Thats really low & nasty behavior.
I hope you have the day you deserve.
I hope someday someone throws one of your great losses in your face for no reason because then maybe you know how it feels.
|
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 18, 2024 21:18:19 GMT
Some really great points here. Trump with his talk about the J6 insurrectionists is explicitly running against the rule of law. hate speech |
|
|
|
Post by andreasmom on Mar 19, 2024 0:10:46 GMT
Nah, you’ve made it clear that you see nothing wrong with the fascist Project 2025 plans. Don’t try to pretend you’re anything but a fascist supporter and are likely looking forward to the “bloodbath” Trump promises. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to have a real conversation with you. Even after the following... You've made it clear that you just can not handle differing opinion. You've made it clear that you will desperately use your parents' death to TRY to win an argument and desperately try to tie ME to their death. Desperately, being the operative word. Don't try to pretend you're anything but an unhinged lunatic. Emulating your idol using personal ( and clearly non-related to topic) attacks. Could you go any lower? Not surprising coming from you. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 19, 2024 4:00:29 GMT
Wow, ...that’s really reaching into the way back closet to try to ‘gotcha’ someone. WTF. Taking something and twisting it out of context to throw one of a persons most painful experiences at them years later for no reason, She is the one that threw it at me to begin with and it wasn't years ago, it was just very recently, when the absolutely unhinged Merge tried to dismiss AND one up an 11 year old that was tied up and raped, by using her parents' death. When you don’t say a word to her for one upping an 11 year old rape victim in a thread about chinese coming across the border, that had not one damn thing to do with her parents, then your objection to me calling her on her unhinged behavior is absolutely meaningless. Completely devoid of any meaning, whatsoever. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 19, 2024 4:31:37 GMT
I gave you the benefit of the doubt and tried to have a real conversation with you. Even after the following... You've made it clear that you just can not handle differing opinion. You've made it clear that you will desperately use your parents' death to TRY to win an argument and desperately try to tie ME to their death. Desperately, being the operative word. Don't try to pretend you're anything but an unhinged lunatic. Emulating your idol using personal ( and clearly non-related to topic) attacks. Could you go any lower? Not surprising coming from you. When you NEVER say a word about the personal attacks coming AT me, but ONLY EVER object when I send them back to the sender, your objection doesn't hold a single drop of water. These are just SOME of the personal attacks merge has said to me BECAUSE I applied her standards back to her: When you only apply your standard in one direction, your admonition is pure and utter bullshit. |
|
caangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,730 
Location: So Cal
|
Post by caangel on Mar 19, 2024 5:09:22 GMT
So if Trump said there would be a bloodbath if he wasn't elected. And MTG is holding a sign saying honk if you want a bloodbath. Trump win... no bloodbath Biden win... Yes bloodbath Now MTG is pro Biden? 🤔🤪😆 But seriously this is ridiculous, embarrassing and appaling. |
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Mar 19, 2024 8:56:02 GMT
Saying that he shared political views with you, is on your side or belongs to your party is not the same thing as trying to tie you to her parents death. Yes, it absolutely is. You have really lost the plot. Listen to yourself. And no, it is not the same thing. That is an observation, not an accusation. Good lord. |
|
|
|
Post by lainey on Mar 19, 2024 11:22:40 GMT
I'm not a 100% sure that Cowpat ever had the plot but if she did she's well and truly lost it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by compeateropeator on Mar 19, 2024 12:13:26 GMT
IMO, absolutely. I agree that the “bloodbath” comment was said when he was talking about the auto industry and not just a general comment…HOWEVER if you think that when he said it he was only speaking about the auto industry and that he was not trying to insinuate anything else than I have a bridge to sell you.
Listen to his comments:
"Now, if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the whole -- that's gonna to be the least of it -- it's gonna be a bloodbath for the country. That'll be the least of it," he said.
for the whole??? Industry ? That is what he knew he should say but purposely made it a comment that is not just talking about the car industry. And anyone paying attention or who knows Trump’s m.o. will have a hard time denying that…or at least they should. 😉
|
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Mar 19, 2024 12:29:19 GMT
I'm wondering ifTrump made some of his comments on Saturday. knowing that they would get a lot of attention. Hoping would be a distraction and there would be less attention on his inability to pay his bond? I'm assuming he knew on Saturday that his lawyers would be filing an affidavit to that effect today. www.npr.org/2024/03/18/1239242523/trump-bond-civil-fraud-caseTrump unable to post $450M bond in New York fraud case, his lawyers say MARCH 18, 2024 By Andrea Bernstein Lawyers for former president and presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump say coming up with the bond on roughly half a billion dollars while he appeals his New York fraud judgment is a "practical impossibility."
Trump's lawyers say they've approached 30 companies through four brokers and none will accept his real estate holdings as a guarantee on the bond for $454 million and argue the judgment is unconstitutionally high. They filed an affidavit from an insurance broker saying it is "not possible" to find a bond that big. The broker was an expert witness for Trump during the trial.I don’t think he is that smart. His thoughts/speech just “flows” as someone here put it recently. When he said “if I don’t win” his thoughts went to the bloodbath that he wants/expects from the country, and all thoughts of the auto industry were lost. |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2024 12:32:51 GMT
Wow, ...that’s really reaching into the way back closet to try to ‘gotcha’ someone. WTF. Taking something and twisting it out of context to throw one of a persons most painful experiences at them years later for no reason, She is the one that threw it at me to begin with and it wasn't years ago, it was just very recently, when the absolutely unhinged Merge tried to dismiss AND one up an 11 year old that was tied up and raped, by using her parents' death. When you don’t say a word to her for one upping an 11 year old rape victim in a thread about chinese coming across the border, that had not one damn thing to do with her parents, then your objection to me calling her on her unhinged behavior is absolutely meaningless. Completely devoid of any meaning, whatsoever. When it’s been explained you at least twice what was intended by the statement, and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged. One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you can’t legitimately tar all immigrants with the same brush as a rapist, just as I can’t lump you in with the guy who killed my parents. It takes a really warped mind to think that’s what I was attempting to do, or that I was trying to "one-up" you. But then, you are a person who wants to punish millions of peaceful immigrants for the actions of a few, so I guess that tracks. As I said - beneath contempt. |
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Mar 19, 2024 12:33:44 GMT
I'm wondering ifTrump made some of his comments on Saturday. knowing that they would get a lot of attention. Hoping would be a distraction and there would be less attention on his inability to pay his bond? I'm assuming he knew on Saturday that his lawyers would be filing an affidavit to that effect today. www.npr.org/2024/03/18/1239242523/trump-bond-civil-fraud-caseTrump unable to post $450M bond in New York fraud case, his lawyers say MARCH 18, 2024 By Andrea Bernstein Lawyers for former president and presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump say coming up with the bond on roughly half a billion dollars while he appeals his New York fraud judgment is a "practical impossibility."
Trump's lawyers say they've approached 30 companies through four brokers and none will accept his real estate holdings as a guarantee on the bond for $454 million and argue the judgment is unconstitutionally high. They filed an affidavit from an insurance broker saying it is "not possible" to find a bond that big. The broker was an expert witness for Trump during the trial.I don’t think he is that smart. His thoughts/speech just “flows” as someone here put it recently. When he said “if I don’t win” his thoughts went to the bloodbath that he wants/expects from the country, and all thoughts of the auto industry were lost. Yup. As hard as it is to listen to him ramble, it’s harder still to try to follow his train of thought if you ever try to read the transcripts from those events. His ‘train of thought’ runs straight off the tracks more often than not. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 19, 2024 18:40:50 GMT
She is the one that threw it at me to begin with and it wasn't years ago, it was just very recently, when the absolutely unhinged Merge tried to dismiss AND one up an 11 year old that was tied up and raped, by using her parents' death. When you don’t say a word to her for one upping an 11 year old rape victim in a thread about chinese coming across the border, that had not one damn thing to do with her parents, then your objection to me calling her on her unhinged behavior is absolutely meaningless. Completely devoid of any meaning, whatsoever. When it’s been explained you at least twice what was intended by the statement, and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged. One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you can’t legitimately tar all immigrants with the same brush as a rapist, just as I can’t lump you in with the guy who killed my parents. It takes a really warped mind to think that’s what I was attempting to do, or that I was trying to "one-up" you. But then, you are a person who wants to punish millions of peaceful immigrants for the actions of a few, so I guess that tracks. As I said - beneath contempt. To quote you: "When it’s been explained you at least twice" several times now, that what was intended by the pointing out of the many criminals coming through the border, is that BIDEN is not doing his job to secure the border, making it so that border control can NOT reasonably be able to vet asylum seekers well enough to prevent the criminals from getting through "and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you said there is NO evidence of high crime and found out that there IS actual evidence, DESPITE the stats. And you simply don't like it that democrat policies are not deterring crime, but causing crime to go up and people ARE seeing those affects DESPITE the stats. It takes a really warped mind to try to lump me in with the guy that killed your parents, "...so he was one of yours." as if that's not bad enough. But then to deny that you did. When it's right there in your post. No matter how many times you try to deny it, you absolutely did attempt to tie me to the guy that killed your parents. Again, it's indisputably right there in your post. Just, like you absolutely blamed me for your daughters not feeling safe in Texas. I don't even have a vote in Texas, but that didn't stop you. You can keep denying it, but your actual words give your lies away. I never said that you were trying to one up ME. I said you tried to one up an 11 year old rape victim. That is pathetically desperate. To quote you again: "When it’s been explained you several times now and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." To quote you again: "Any five year old would have seen" the explanation, "particularly after I explained it to you in that very thread." To quote you again: "But rather than admit your mistake, you’ve doubled down and" used your parents' death, tried to connect me to their killer, tried to blame me for your daughters safety, personally attacked me, called me names, "simply because you couldn’t handle disagreement. You are either painfully stupid or dishonest or both. Matters not to me. You’re beneath contempt." |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2024 18:55:57 GMT
When it’s been explained you at least twice what was intended by the statement, and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged. One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you can’t legitimately tar all immigrants with the same brush as a rapist, just as I can’t lump you in with the guy who killed my parents. It takes a really warped mind to think that’s what I was attempting to do, or that I was trying to "one-up" you. But then, you are a person who wants to punish millions of peaceful immigrants for the actions of a few, so I guess that tracks. As I said - beneath contempt. And as I explained to you, To quote you: "When it’s been explained you at least twice several times now," that what was intended by the pointing out of the many criminals coming through the border, is that BIDEN is not doing his job to secure the border, making it so that border control can NOT reasonably be able to vet asylum seekers well enough to prevent the criminals from getting through "and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you said there is NO evidence of high crime and found out that there IS actual evidence, DESPITE the stats. And you simply don't like it that democrat policies are not deterring crime, but causing crime to go up and people ARE seeing those affects DESPITE the stats. It takes a really warped mind to try to lump me in with the guy that killed your parents, "...so he was one of yours." as if that's not bad enough. But then to deny that you did. When it's right there in your post. No matter how many times you try to deny it, you absolutely did attempt to tie me to the guy that killed your parents. Again, it's indisputably right there in your post. Just, like you absolutely blamed me for your daughters not feeling safe in Texas. I don't even have a vote in Texas, but that didn't stop you. You can keep denying it, but your actual words give your lies away. I never said that you were trying to one up ME. I said you tried to one up an 11 year old rape victim. That is pathetically desperate. To quote you again: "When it’s been explained you several times now and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." To quote you again: "Any five year old would have seen" the explanation, "particularly after I explained it to you in that very thread." To quote you again: "But rather than admit your mistake, you’ve doubled down and" used your parents' death, tried to connect me to their killer, tried to blame me for your daughters safety, personally attacked me, called me names, "simply because you couldn’t handle disagreement. You are either painfully stupid or dishonest or both. Matters not to me. You’re beneath contempt." Believe what you like. Your opinion is worth less than nothing to me. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 19, 2024 18:59:22 GMT
And as I explained to you, To quote you: "When it’s been explained you at least twice several times now," that what was intended by the pointing out of the many criminals coming through the border, is that BIDEN is not doing his job to secure the border, making it so that border control can NOT reasonably be able to vet asylum seekers well enough to prevent the criminals from getting through "and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." One suspects that you simply don’t like the fact that you said there is NO evidence of high crime and found out that there IS actual evidence, DESPITE the stats. And you simply don't like it that democrat policies are not deterring crime, but causing crime to go up and people ARE seeing those affects DESPITE the stats. It takes a really warped mind to try to lump me in with the guy that killed your parents, "...so he was one of yours." as if that's not bad enough. But then to deny that you did. When it's right there in your post. No matter how many times you try to deny it, you absolutely did attempt to tie me to the guy that killed your parents. Again, it's indisputably right there in your post. Just, like you absolutely blamed me for your daughters not feeling safe in Texas. I don't even have a vote in Texas, but that didn't stop you. You can keep denying it, but your actual words give your lies away. I never said that you were trying to one up ME. I said you tried to one up an 11 year old rape victim. That is pathetically desperate. To quote you again: "When it’s been explained you several times now and you continue this line of attack, you are the one who is unhinged." To quote you again: "Any five year old would have seen" the explanation, "particularly after I explained it to you in that very thread." To quote you again: "But rather than admit your mistake, you’ve doubled down and" used your parents' death, tried to connect me to their killer, tried to blame me for your daughters safety, personally attacked me, called me names, "simply because you couldn’t handle disagreement. You are either painfully stupid or dishonest or both. Matters not to me. You’re beneath contempt." Believe what you like. Your opinion is worth less than nothing to me. Your repeated personal attacks and lies say otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2024 19:02:29 GMT
Believe what you like. Your opinion is worth less than nothing to me. Your repeated personal attacks and lies say otherwise. Hon, if I cared what you thought, I’d be nicer. Pound sand. |
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Mar 19, 2024 19:54:16 GMT
Your repeated personal attacks and lies say otherwise. Hon, if I cared what you thought, I’d be nicer. Pound sand. No you wouldn't. You've never been nice, to different opinions if they stand up for facts or their opinion. The standard here is, say your opinion we'll tell you your wrong and you are expected to sit down and shut up then. Or else, we'll hit whoever with personal attacks, pile ons and demands of proof. Which, when provided, are summarily dismissed for the most idiotic reasons. It's why so many who may disagree don't actively participate any more. |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 19, 2024 20:11:04 GMT
This is totally ridiculous and in line with his attacks on mainstream media (fake news etc) Also the hypocrisy of complaining when he gets sued but it's perfectly OK for him to sue anyone he wants is unbelievable. www.nytimes.com/2024/03/18/us/politics/trump-lawsuit-abc-stephanopoulos.htmlTrump Sues ABC and Stephanopoulos, Saying They Defamed Him The lawsuit stems from the anchor’s recent contentious interview with Representative Nancy Mace. Former President Donald J. Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC News on Monday, arguing that the anchor George Stephanopoulos had harmed his reputation by saying multiple times on-air that Mr. Trump had been found liable for raping the writer E. Jean Carroll.A jury in a Manhattan civil case last year found Mr. Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Ms. Carroll, but did not find the former president liable for rape. The judge, however, later clarified that because of New York’s narrow legal definition of “rape,” the jury’s finding did not mean that Ms. Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’”Mr. Stephanopoulos, who was named as a co-defendant, said Mr. Trump was found liable for rape during a contentious interview on March 10 with Representative Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina. During the interview, Mr. Stephanopoulos asked Ms. Mace, who has spoken publicly about being raped as a teenager, why she continued to support Mr. Trump in light of the outcome of the civil case.Mr. Trump, who often galvanizes his supporters by attacking the press, has filed a string of unsuccessful defamation suits against major media organizations. Federal judges have dismissed his suits against CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post.
defamation lawsuitDonald Trump is suing ABC News and George Stephanopoulos, claiming the “This Week” host harmed his reputation by saying that Trump was found liable for raping E. Jean Carroll.Donald Trump, who boasted how he likes to assault women (Grab them by the pu**y") and was credibly accused by 26 women of sexual assault, was found liable by a Manhattan federal jury for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll in a luxury department store dressing room in the spring of 1996.While it's true that he wasn't technically found liable for rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan later clarified that because of New York’s narrow legal definition of “rape,” the jury’s finding did not mean that Ms. Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’”When Judge Kaplan dismissed Trump’s counter-defamation lawsuit against E. Jean Carroll in August, he made it very clear that Trump did rape her: "Indeed, the jury’s verdict in Carroll II establishes, as against Mr. Trump, the fact that Mr. Trump ‘raped her,’ albeit digitally rather than with his penis. Thus, it establishes against him the substantial truth of Ms Carroll’s ‘rape’ accusations.” Trump will lose this case |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 19, 2024 20:21:40 GMT
This is not new, but I had not heard this inexcusable detail regarding his failure to act. I assume this was Ashley Babbitt? Wonder if his supporters know that he did nothing when he heard about her death, the death of someone he later called a martyr. He doesn't care about anyone but himself. Reason number one million and one why he is unfit for office J6 |
|
Gem Girl
Pearl Clutcher
......
Posts: 2,686
Jun 29, 2014 19:29:52 GMT
|
Post by Gem Girl on Mar 19, 2024 20:28:25 GMT
his thoughts went to the bloodbath that he wants/expects from the country, I think he was genuinely shocked that there wasn't a mass protest when he was indicted. It never occurred to him that people work during the day, that everybody knows what happened to hundreds of the Jan 6 knuckleheads (many convictions and imprisonments), and wouldn't come when he dog-whistled for them on the courthouse steps. |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 19, 2024 20:32:04 GMT
All part of his violent rhetoric and support of political violence J6 anthem |
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Mar 19, 2024 20:35:53 GMT
This is not new, but I had not heard this inexcusable detail regarding his failure to act. I assume this was Ashley Babbitt? Wonder if his supporters know that he did nothing when he heard about her death, the death of someone he later called a martyr. He doesn't care about anyone but himself. Reason number one million and one why he is unfit for office J6Well, she has a vested interest in him not getting near the Oval Office because he’s already said he’d put her in jail if he is elected. And he has also said that the justice department has to be under his direct order next time he’s president because they followed the law instead of his orders last time. 🤷♀️ sounds fascist to me. If I were Liz Cheney and he did win the electoral college in Nov I’d leave the country before Inauguration Day. I do wonder if there’s some list somewhere of people who have posted online that they’d arrest day one? |
|
