|
Post by crazy4scraps on Dec 12, 2024 17:48:35 GMT
My thoughts after reading the article and also the comments here are kind of all over the place. I was born in the late 60’s so most of my childhood was in the 70’s. My experience was a lot like Merge’s description, that resonated with me a lot. My reality was watching my mom, who had at one time been a small business owner, seemingly cook, clean and do laundry for ten people in an endless, thankless loop. I didn’t want that for myself, period. The messaging I heard from my family was if you want something, you’re going to have to work hard for it and earn it yourself because no one is ever going to just give it to you. The only one you can ever truly depend on is yourself. Be smart. Pay attention. Watch your back.
I’m one that is really discouraged by what I see happening today. I’m disheartened by the FACT that my teenage daughter *actually* has fewer rights than I did at her age. I’m stressing to her the critical importance of getting a good education (because we are lucky enough to live in a state where that is possible), and as much of it as she can obtain as possible. I’m stressing to her that the world is full of idiots and she will be better served if she can be the boss over them instead of an underling to them, because I’ve personally witnessed plenty of undeserving (male) idiots get the promotion because another more qualified (female) employee was “too good” in their current role to promote. WTAF. 🙄 I’ve also stressed to her the importance of choosing a life partner who views her as an equal, and one who treats her with respect over and above all else. Without respect, nothing else really matters.
This whole tradwife trend really has me distressed. It really feels very Handmaid’s Tale to me.
|
|
|
Post by KiwiJo on Dec 12, 2024 18:04:51 GMT
I know I’m not from the cohort of women being discussed in the article on 2 counts - I’m not American, and I’m from the generation before (I had my first child in mid-seventies). And from my perspective, things were different again from the experiences in the article, and from what many of you experienced.
Things were still quite gendered while I was growing up - in most families the woman stayed home with the children, or maybe had a part-time job. Women raised the children really, though from what I saw in my and my friends’ families the fathers were involved, they were absolutely not stand-off or some mysterious authority figure at all. But things were beginning to change - at intermediate school for example (ages 11-13) all pupils, girls and boys, did sewing, cooking, woodwork, metalwork etc.
But the biggest thing in this area for me, was the changing expectations for women by the time I was in mid to late teens and twenties, late-1960s and through the 1970s. Women’s magazines (and that’s how we mostly got ‘indoctrinated’ into society’s expectations before the internet) were all about the women’s movements. Feminism! Women should go to university! No need to be the traditional nurse, secretary of teacher - women can do anything! Women can do everything! Don’t stay home with the children, become something important!
I very definitely got the vibe that being a homemaker and looking after children was a terrible choice for a woman to make. There’s far more important things for a woman to do than that!
Which left women like me, who wanted to be a teacher and later who wanted to stay home with my small children, feeling very “less than”. We were looked down upon by the women’s movement, we were letting the side down.
There really didn’t seem to be a sense of “women should do whatever they want to do”, it was all about proving we were at least equal to (but really better than) men.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Dec 12, 2024 19:41:22 GMT
I feel both sides of this - part of the article did resonate me being born in the early 1970s. Maybe because I was raised in CA, but I was definitely given the lesson at home that I could and should do anything I wanted. I was also encouraged at school to purse math and science and went far away for university with the support of my parents. I was also very much an outdoor/tomboy kid - so a lot of media/society messaging I was just not exposed to. Having said that, I entered the workforce in the mid-90s as an engineer in an extremely male dominated field and was often treated a bit like a rare bird one only heard about but had never seen.
I completely agree with several previous posters that a balance between the reality of challenges women still face and also balancing negative messaging is important. I think that negativity can very easily spiral into loss of hope and that is a terrible place for anyone to try and grow and live.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Dec 12, 2024 20:45:28 GMT
I feel both sides of this - part of the article did resonate me being born in the early 1970s. Maybe because I was raised in CA, but I was definitely given the lesson at home that I could and should do anything I wanted. I was also encouraged at school to purse math and science and went far away for university with the support of my parents. I was also very much an outdoor/tomboy kid - so a lot of media/society messaging I was just not exposed to. Having said that, I entered the workforce in the mid-90s as an engineer in an extremely male dominated field and was often treated a bit like a rare bird one only heard about but had never seen. I completely agree with several previous posters that a balance between the reality of challenges women still face and also balancing negative messaging is important. I think that negativity can very easily spiral into loss of hope and that is a terrible place for anyone to try and grow and live. Yes, I agree. Those of us with daughters who are young women need to be able to offer them some hope for the future. It’s difficult, though, when the best advice I can give them is to seek jobs outside their home state.
|
|
|
Post by getting started on Dec 12, 2024 20:54:23 GMT
I was a child of the 70’s and this article did not resonate with me and my experiences at all. The messages I got from my family were very gendered such as: Wear a skirt or dress for fancy occasions, not pants. Be smart and study then become a secretary, nurse or a teacher. At home our chores were gendered- girls cook, clean, wash clothes etc while boys do outside work, car maintenance, anything that involves tools.
The messages from society (school, music, movies, news) were similar to my home. I learned that women were expected to be thin, smart, work in some way to contribute to the household while also being the primary parent in raising kids and cooking every meal for the family. In Grade 7 all students took one term of Home Economics and one term of Shop. In Grade 8 all girls were automatically enrolled in Home Economics and all boys were enrolled in Shop. There was no option for genders to choose a different option.
How are my parents today? They frown upon my sister because she has a C level job and they think she works too much and doesn’t do enough at home. She loves her job and her husband is supportive of her. When I talk to my parents about my work (I report to a female C suite exec) my mom asked me if my boss had a family. She was implying that my boss couldn’t be married and have kids and still be C level. She does.
We’ve tried to raise our kids without gender stereotyping and I think we’ve done a good job. However, my kids have no patience for my parents because of their old fashioned engendered opinions. It’s unfortunate because as much as I try to explain and model a different way for my parents, they are quite happy in their ways and make no effort to change. Where I try to bridge the gap from their generation to my kids’ generation, I feel like neither of them is trying to meet each other in the middle. Our kids will simply not put up with the limits that my parents impose. They will be polite but that’s it.
I don't want to live in doom and gloom nor do I want that for my kids. However I think we need to also be honest and realistic. There are still a lot of hurdles for women.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Dec 12, 2024 21:10:36 GMT
I very definitely got the vibe that being a homemaker and looking after children was a terrible choice for a woman to make. There’s far more important things for a woman to do than that! Which left women like me, who wanted to be a teacher and later who wanted to stay home with my small children, feeling very “less than”. We were looked down upon by the women’s movement, we were letting the side down. There really didn’t seem to be a sense of “women should do whatever they want to do”, it was all about proving we were at least equal to (but really better than) men. Yes - this is very much the vibe I got, especially from my mum.
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on Dec 12, 2024 21:21:35 GMT
I am on the older side (born mid 1950's) and I grew up in a household of equals. though it may have looked traditional on the outside... dad worked, mom did not... it was. not like that at all.
I had one maiden great aunt always telling me.. be sure you work before you get married.. live on your own. be strong. my mom and dad took care of kids.. not equally but both with competence. we grew up with stories of my parents taking separate vacations when the three of us were little and all in diapers. dad could cook.. mom maintained her nursing license til she was 65... and I was encouraged to do whatever I wanted and to get out there in the woods and mountains cause there was nothing holding me back. my parents knew many people who did not fit the typical gender roles.. and my dad, as part of his work, worked to add accessibility to public projects (city employed engineer) as much as possible. it was a very inclusive space.. both in terms of race, disability and in lgbtq+ rights. so I was off in the mountains doing long hikes with my brother, skiing, on fire crew, and driving cross country by myself.
i think because they grew up both doing whatever was. needed, they had the same expectations for themselves and their kids. I wasn't coddled cause I was a girl, and my brothers were expected to do anything too. very different from many women I guess.
|
|
|
Post by scrapmaven on Dec 12, 2024 21:54:35 GMT
I'm a boomer. So, I grew up in the 60s and 70s. I was encouraged by my mother to be a girly girl. I was not athletic and that lead to a lot of bullying, because the girls in my area were into sports. I couldn't run and was afraid of the ball. Plus, I was short. So, being a girl who played w/dolls was frowned upon. Being a sahm was normal for that time. Once I met a neighbor's mom who worked at a bank. Not only that, she was wearing jeans. OMG! That's when it occurred to me that women can be different and have careers. My dad never let female employees where pants until I worked there part time. I wore nice slacks and a nice shirt and he tried to send me home to put on a dress and I let him have it. The next day females wore pants to work. He got used to it. I told them not to give him the choice.
We were told we were going to college. It wasn't ever up for debate. Despite my mother's strong belief that women should stay home w/their children, they wanted us to be educated. My mother gave up a thriving musical career in order to marry my father and then she was a wife and later a mother. I hated my career and was grateful when I had the opportunity to be a sahm. Nowadays I see it as a luxury, because 2 income families are often so necessary. We had a strict budget and lived in an older home in order to allow me to stay home w/the children. Each one of us must make the choice that works best for us and if applicable, our families.
The NOW movement denigrated men. It did what we didn't want men to do to us. So, it made no sense to me. If I had burned my bra I would have hit myself in the face everytime I jumped up. Yes. Women should have equal pay and equal rights, but being aggressive and hateful isn't the way to get there. In my region women make as much as men. Women are often bosses and even CEO's. So, I've never experienced that gender gap in the workforce. I managed men and usually had female bosses. Plus, I made as much as my male colleagues.
I love having the door opened for me and I like it when a man pulls out my chair. Some of the old fashioned traditions are good things, imho. I don't like sexual harassment or being made to feel invisible when 2 men are talking to eachother. "Let the menfolk speak. You just iust sit there and look pretty." My mother was very old fashioned. She would tell us that women should wait until marriage, because they could control themselves. However, men have needs. Men are just being men when they have sex before marriage, but women are being tramps. I took human sexuality in college and boy was she ever wrong. Female sex drives can be much stronger than men. Who knew?
I don't feel that I'm a minority. I have a voice and I'm not afraid to use it.
I don't ever feel less than, because I'm a woman, but that might be due to my life experiences as a woman. Then again, I have no problem standing up for myself. For those women who have had problems due to gender my story might seem unusual.
|
|
Anita
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,891
Location: Kansas City -ish
Jun 27, 2014 2:38:58 GMT
|
Post by Anita on Dec 12, 2024 22:04:25 GMT
That article reeks of privilege. She and I had a very different upbringing, and I was a child of the 70s, teen in the 80s. I'm glad she lived in a bubble of positivity and can-do spirit. I lived in world where I was to eat in the kitchen with the women, I was not to speak unless spoken to by my dad, and where I was discouraged from retaking the ACT exam even though I had the highest in my class because my test results must have been a fluke. Oh, and that last one was my high school counselor, not my father. Seriously, he insulted my intelligence because I am female, but encouraged a guy to retake the test in order to have a higher score than me for his reporting purposes.
We have made headway, but I feel like we are going backward. My grandmother is rolling over in her grave after she fought for so much.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Dec 12, 2024 22:07:59 GMT
I feel both sides of this - part of the article did resonate me being born in the early 1970s. Maybe because I was raised in CA, but I was definitely given the lesson at home that I could and should do anything I wanted. I was also encouraged at school to purse math and science and went far away for university with the support of my parents. I was also very much an outdoor/tomboy kid - so a lot of media/society messaging I was just not exposed to. Having said that, I entered the workforce in the mid-90s as an engineer in an extremely male dominated field and was often treated a bit like a rare bird one only heard about but had never seen. I completely agree with several previous posters that a balance between the reality of challenges women still face and also balancing negative messaging is important. I think that negativity can very easily spiral into loss of hope and that is a terrible place for anyone to try and grow and live. Yes, I agree. Those of us with daughters who are young women need to be able to offer them some hope for the future. It’s difficult, though, when the best advice I can give them is to seek jobs outside their home state. And for me it’s the exact opposite, mine needs to stay right HERE, or in another equally blue state, if she expects to have any bodily autonomy at all.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Dec 12, 2024 22:20:34 GMT
Yes, I agree. Those of us with daughters who are young women need to be able to offer them some hope for the future. It’s difficult, though, when the best advice I can give them is to seek jobs outside their home state. And for me it’s the exact opposite, mine needs to stay right HERE, or in another equally blue state, if she expects to have any bodily autonomy at all. The other thing, of course, is that we don’t know if even blue states will be safe for women in four years. If the right gets its way and both abortion and birth control are banned nationwide, there will be no safe place here for women of childbearing age.
|
|