|
Post by Bridget in MD on May 2, 2025 23:29:08 GMT
I just saw on the news the courts have denied Pr Harry security paid for by British taxes. From what I heard, since he’s not a working Royal and doesn’t live there, the courts have said no, they won’t pay for his security detail. Why can’t he just pay for his own? I figure the other non-working royals pay for theirs? I assume he has some sort of security here in the US - so why is this something he’s suing for? (I guess he feels he has a right to it.) Am I missing something?
I was surprised to see this story - I thought his court cases were about breech of privacy and breaking into his cell phone by tabloids.
|
|
|
Post by allison1954 on May 2, 2025 23:40:54 GMT
It was said on the morning news that his own security would not be able to carry guns.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 2, 2025 23:51:19 GMT
My understanding is that he was wanting to buy protection from the Metropolitan Police at the same level they would give to the working Royals. As he is no longer a working Royal, it was deemed that he should be treated as a normal citizen and not be allowed to buy that protection. In the same way as, say, George Clooney would not be allowed to buy it. He (PH) is definitely allowed to have his own security when here on whatever business, be it formal or informal but I think that that security are not allowed to be armed and they will not be privy to any intelligence sharing with the police and Home Office over possible threats - the same as, say, George Clooney's personal security. PH should forewarn the Home Office and Metropolitan Police before he arrives in the country and a decision as to the level of protection he is to receive will be made pertinent to each visit. Depending on the nature of his business here he will receive the type of protection he says he is entitled to and other times he won't.
Princess Anne, Prince Edward and family, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, Mike and Zara Tindall and all the rest of the family do not have the level of protection he has been insisting on. They only get it for formal Royal events and even then not all of them do. The level of tax payer funded protection is based on a risk assessment and the nature of their duties.
PH has been wittering in various media about wanting to reconcile with his family but his father has been refusing to speak with him. Well there's an emotive statement, as PH would understand when he said it. However, King Charles knew that he should not speak to Harry to avoid jeopardising the Court case which, in effect, was Harry suing King Charles (the Home Office).
|
|
|
Post by librarylady on May 2, 2025 23:58:00 GMT
I agree with the court (as if my opinion matters). PH left the status of being a Royal, but wants the things a working Royal gets.
He says he wants the life of a common man, but has found that he liked some of that Royal stuff. 😁
I totally comprehend that he wants out of the public scrutiny but he and Megan then have done things to stay in the public eye.
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on May 3, 2025 0:50:41 GMT
My understanding is that he was wanting to buy protection from the Metropolitan Police at the same level they would give to the working Royals. As he is no longer a working Royal, it was deemed that he should be treated as a normal citizen and not be allowed to buy that protection. In the same way as, say, George Clooney would not be allowed to buy it. He (PH) is definitely allowed to have his own security when here on whatever business, be it formal or informal but I think that that security are not allowed to be armed and they will not be privy to any intelligence sharing with the police and Home Office over possible threats - the same as, say, George Clooney's personal security. PH should forewarn the Home Office and Metropolitan Police before he arrives in the country and a decision as to the level of protection he is to receive will be made pertinent to each visit. Depending on the nature of his business here he will receive the type of protection he says he is entitled to and other times he won't. Princess Anne, Prince Edward and family, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, Mike and Zara Tindall and all the rest of the family do not have the level of protection he has been insisting on. They only get it for formal Royal events and even then not all of them do. The level of tax payer funded protection is based on a risk assessment and the nature of their duties. PH has been wittering in various media about wanting to reconcile with his family but his father has been refusing to speak with him. Well there's an emotive statement, as PH would understand when he said it. However, King Charles knew that he should not speak to Harry to avoid jeopardising the Court case which, in effect, was Harry suing King Charles (the Home Office). Ok this makes a lot of sense. Thank you for the answer. I was taking to DH and was like why doesn’t he just pay for it and DH said well maybe he can’t afford it? But I assume that he could, with his book and Netflix stuff and whatever else. I didn’t realize the rest of the royal family didn’t have high levels of protection either, or it depends on the circumstances. I would assume PH expects the same level as protection as PW and family - I know before they left they were constantly hounded. But is that more like keeping press and people at a distance or is it an actual security threat? As for KC and PW’s relationship with PH - I mean I get it. I’m sure a level of trust has been broken after he wrote his book and his Netflix show. I didn’t think about him suing was also suing the Crown/the King. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on May 3, 2025 0:52:26 GMT
I agree with the court (as if my opinion matters). PH left the status of being a Royal, but wants the things a working Royal gets. He says he wants the life of a common man, but has found that he liked some of that Royal stuff. 😁 I totally comprehend that he wants out of the public scrutiny but he and Megan then have done things to stay in the public eye. I get this and that’s why I was wondering why he just didn’t pay for security himself if he wants to bring his family back home. I guess he’d rather be able to say “the King won’t pay for it?”
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 3, 2025 1:15:55 GMT
I agree with the court (as if my opinion matters). PH left the status of being a Royal, but wants the things a working Royal gets. He says he wants the life of a common man, but has found that he liked some of that Royal stuff. 😁 I totally comprehend that he wants out of the public scrutiny but he and Megan then have done things to stay in the public eye. I get this and that’s why I was wondering why he just didn’t pay for security himself if he wants to bring his family back home. I guess he’d rather be able to say “the King won’t pay for it?” He wants the armed bodyguards and the intelligence sharing. He's brought a lot of any perceived threats on himself by boasting of his kills when on active service. He and Meghan take off to Nigeria and Colombia yet claim the UK is too dangerous for them? He needs to get over himself. They weren't particularly hounded by the press when they were here, iirc. They like to draw attention to themselves. Meghan attended a performance of Gypsy on Broadway the other day, arriving in a 4 car motorcade, with NYPD officers. Was that necessary? I'm sure there have been plenty of "famous celebrities" attending various shows on Broadway without, to coin a phrase, making a song and dance about it. I bet had she just arrived in one car with a bodyguard no one would have realised it was her nor given her a second glance - but that's the whole point, isn't it.
|
|
|
Post by gar on May 3, 2025 8:35:02 GMT
Well said gillyp. PH even had the gall to say that he's forgiven the Royal Family and wants reconciliation while still flinging sh*t at them. He's his own worst enemy at this stage quite frankly.
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on May 3, 2025 10:26:55 GMT
I get this and that’s why I was wondering why he just didn’t pay for security himself if he wants to bring his family back home. I guess he’d rather be able to say “the King won’t pay for it?” He wants the armed bodyguards and the intelligence sharing. He's brought a lot of any perceived threats on himself by boasting of his kills when on active service. He and Meghan take off to Nigeria and Colombia yet claim the UK is too dangerous for them? He needs to get over himself. They weren't particularly hounded by the press when they were here, iirc. They like to draw attention to themselves. Meghan attended a performance of Gypsy on Broadway the other day, arriving in a 4 car motorcade, with NYPD officers. Was that necessary? I'm sure there have been plenty of "famous celebrities" attending various shows on Broadway without, to coin a phrase, making a song and dance about it. I bet had she just arrived in one car with a bodyguard no one would have realised it was her nor given her a second glance - but that's the whole point, isn't it. I appreciate you explaining this. IIRC it felt like they had to escape to Canada and then the US and now that they’ve settled in California I wondered if there was some heightened level of threat back in the UK. It seems he’s always in the news for suing someone. There was Meghan’s possible theft (not sure that’s the right word) of a town’s seal for her jam business. And I know one of his charities is suing him - I think it’s polo but supports humanitarian efforts in Africa? Or maybe he’s suing the board of the charity? I can’t remember.
|
|
wellway
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,203
Jun 25, 2014 20:50:09 GMT
|
Post by wellway on May 3, 2025 10:28:32 GMT
This video shows two Americans catching a train in the UK for the first time, someone pointed out to them that Prince William had used the same train. Looks like one bodyguard. And William is a working royal. m.youtube.com/watch?v=oqRp5hVhXCk
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 3, 2025 11:15:36 GMT
He wants the armed bodyguards and the intelligence sharing. He's brought a lot of any perceived threats on himself by boasting of his kills when on active service. He and Meghan take off to Nigeria and Colombia yet claim the UK is too dangerous for them? He needs to get over himself. They weren't particularly hounded by the press when they were here, iirc. They like to draw attention to themselves. Meghan attended a performance of Gypsy on Broadway the other day, arriving in a 4 car motorcade, with NYPD officers. Was that necessary? I'm sure there have been plenty of "famous celebrities" attending various shows on Broadway without, to coin a phrase, making a song and dance about it. I bet had she just arrived in one car with a bodyguard no one would have realised it was her nor given her a second glance - but that's the whole point, isn't it. I appreciate you explaining this. IIRC it felt like they had to escape to Canada and then the US and now that they’ve settled in California I wondered if there was some heightened level of threat back in the UK. It seems he’s always in the news for suing someone. There was Meghan’s possible theft (not sure that’s the right word) of a town’s seal for her jam business. And I know one of his charities is suing him - I think it’s polo but supports humanitarian efforts in Africa? Or maybe he’s suing the board of the charity? I can’t remember. There was nothing to escape, they chose to leave. Meghan has been accused of copying a Spanish town's coat of arms that has been in existence for centuries. The town can not afford to take legal action about it. The charity is Sentebale, set up by Harry and a Prince of Lesotho in the early 2000s to help people affected by aids/HIV. Harry, the other Prince and, I believe some other trustees, have all stepped down in a row with the female leader of the board of trustees and she is applying to the High Court to stay in her position. There is a lot more to it than that and she, a black corporate lawyer, has accused Harry of, among other things, being a bully and a racist. Not the first time he's been accused of bullying behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by gar on May 3, 2025 11:26:42 GMT
I appreciate you explaining this. IIRC it felt like they had to escape to Canada and then the US and now that they’ve settled in California I wondered if there was some heightened level of threat back in the UK. It seems he’s always in the news for suing someone. There was Meghan’s possible theft (not sure that’s the right word) of a town’s seal for her jam business. And I know one of his charities is suing him - I think it’s polo but supports humanitarian efforts in Africa? Or maybe he’s suing the board of the charity? I can’t remember. There was nothing to escape, they chose to leave. I find it ridiculous that so many other royals (excepting King Charles, Camilla, William and Kate) manage to quietly go about their lives, working, traveling, doing visits, taking the kids to school etc etc (and that includes William’s children - they aren’t papped on a day to day basis) yet M and H can’t imagine that being possible for them. You have to wonder why.
|
|
|
Post by gar on May 3, 2025 11:27:55 GMT
I appreciate you explaining this. IIRC it felt like they had to escape to Canada and then the US and now that they’ve settled in California I wondered if there was some heightened level of threat back in the UK. It seems he’s always in the news for suing someone. There was Meghan’s possible theft (not sure that’s the right word) of a town’s seal for her jam business. And I know one of his charities is suing him - I think it’s polo but supports humanitarian efforts in Africa? Or maybe he’s suing the board of the charity? I can’t remember. There was nothing to escape, they chose to leave. Meghan has been accused of copying a Spanish town's coat of arms that has been in existence for centuries. The town can not afford to take legal action about it. The charity is Sentebale, set up by Harry and a Prince of Lesotho in the early 2000s to help people affected by aids/HIV. Harry, the other Prince and, I believe some other trustees, have all stepped down in a row with the female leader of the board of trustees and she is applying to the High Court to stay in her position. There is a lot more to it than that and she, a black corporate lawyer, has accused Harry of, among other things, being a bully and a racist. Not the first time he's been accused of bullying behaviour. I couldn’t really get to the bottom of that story. She didn’t come across well if I recall…to have alienated everyone?
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 3, 2025 11:38:10 GMT
There was nothing to escape, they chose to leave. Meghan has been accused of copying a Spanish town's coat of arms that has been in existence for centuries. The town can not afford to take legal action about it. The charity is Sentebale, set up by Harry and a Prince of Lesotho in the early 2000s to help people affected by aids/HIV. Harry, the other Prince and, I believe some other trustees, have all stepped down in a row with the female leader of the board of trustees and she is applying to the High Court to stay in her position. There is a lot more to it than that and she, a black corporate lawyer, has accused Harry of, among other things, being a bully and a racist. Not the first time he's been accused of bullying behaviour. I couldn’t really get to the bottom of that story. She didn’t come across well if I recall…to have alienated everyone? I think there's a lot more to it and agree, it's coming across that she alienated everyone but . . . if the trustees are all pals and one does not like her, they might follow like sheep. I have NO idea if that is the case, just thinking aloud. This is a reasonable report, I think.
|
|
|
Post by gar on May 3, 2025 12:01:02 GMT
Thanks for the link gillyp - makes more sense now.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 3, 2025 12:53:28 GMT
Something Bridget in MD said about polo was ringing bells so I went a-looking and there are various videos with pretty scathing comments about Meghan's treatment of Sophie at the polo match (not just on the stage) but here's an interview with her (Sophie) about the situation with Sentebale.
|
|
|
Post by gar on May 3, 2025 14:27:26 GMT
Something Bridget in MD said about polo was ringing bells so I went a-looking and there are various videos with pretty scathing comments about Meghan's treatment of Sophie at the polo match (not just on the stage) but here's an interview with her (Sophie) about the situation with Sentebale. Interesting…
|
|
|
Post by ScrapbookMyLife on May 3, 2025 15:16:46 GMT
I am a USA pea....but have some thoughts and opinions.
I think Harry, meaning Megan has created their own sense of >> SHE thinks she and they are someone important, therefore SHE thinks they are entitled to all the bells and whistles that come along with "being someone important".
I've said this from the beginning >> I think Megan thought she would be the next Princess Diana, and that did NOT happen. She swooped in and was a mean girl, bully and entitled. I think she is pissed that she is not a sought after royal and celebrity.
She curates being seen in public. She has created staged photo ops. Falsely claimed they were chased by paparazzi, when in fact she tried to curated a chase. Had a motorcade to go to a Broadway show. Requested to be an announcer at fire-aid show, and was turned down. She thought she, especially since she married Harry....would be a part of Hollywood's elite celebrities and be on every "invite list" and it turns out the are not invited and she is not well liked.
She thinks she is important and sought after. She is not. She and he and they......have told stories, made claims, acted entitled, grifted, and burned Royal bridges and other bridges.
They moved to a different country, so they could have their privacy.....but has done everything she can to be in the public eye.
In the beginning I liked them, but their behavior is a turn off.
|
|
edie3
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,117
Jun 26, 2014 1:03:18 GMT
|
Post by edie3 on May 3, 2025 15:30:39 GMT
I think they are at the FAFO stage. You can't have it all.
|
|
|
Post by alsomsknit on May 3, 2025 17:08:59 GMT
Something Bridget in MD said about polo was ringing bells so I went a-looking and there are various videos with pretty scathing comments about Meghan's treatment of Sophie at the polo match (not just on the stage) but here's an interview with her (Sophie) about the situation with Sentebale. The Behavior Panel has a good discussion on Dr Sophie’s interview answers. The Behavior Panel discussionI have actually been watching their discussions regarding the original Netflix doc.
|
|
|
Post by alsomsknit on May 3, 2025 17:17:23 GMT
I am a USA pea....but have some thoughts and opinions. I think Harry, meaning Megan has created their own sense of >> SHE thinks she and they are someone important, therefore SHE thinks they are entitled to all the bells and whistles that come along with "being someone important". I've said this from the beginning >> I think Megan thought she would be the next Princess Diana, and that did NOT happen. She swooped in and was a mean girl, bully and entitled. I think she is pissed that she is not a sought after royal and celebrity. She curates being seen in public. She has created staged photo ops. Falsely claimed they were chased by paparazzi, when in fact she tried to curated a chase. Had a motorcade to go to a Broadway show. Requested to be an announcer at fire-aid show, and was turned down. She thought she, especially since she married Harry....would be a part of Hollywood's elite celebrities and be on every "invite list" and it turns out the are not invited and she is not well liked. She thinks she is important and sought after. She is not. She and he and they......have told stories, made claims, acted entitled, grifted, and burned Royal bridges and other bridges. They moved to a different country, so they could have their privacy.....but has done everything she can to be in the public eye. In the beginning I liked them, but their behavior is a turn off. She has delusions of grandeur. At the beginning of Megxit, I was rooting for them. I know what it is like and what it takes to leave family/cult (not saying RF is a cult) behind. Their actions continually proved they were lying. Privacy isn’t putting yourself in the public eye over and over to the point of obnoxiousness. Don’t want to be a working Royal, yet they go on the faux Royal visits. They want people to believe their words and ignore their actions. Harry and Meghan are proving the old rumors to be true. She’s neither likeable or truthful. He’s dumb as a box of rocks. The RF protected him from his consequences, resulting in someone who doesn’t recognize the consequences of his actions now.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 3, 2025 21:39:40 GMT
Something Bridget in MD said about polo was ringing bells so I went a-looking and there are various videos with pretty scathing comments about Meghan's treatment of Sophie at the polo match (not just on the stage) but here's an interview with her (Sophie) about the situation with Sentebale. The Behavior Panel has a good discussion on Dr Sophie’s interview answers. The Behavior Panel discussionI have actually been watching their discussions regarding the original Netflix doc. Good link, thank you.
|
|
|
Post by mom on May 3, 2025 21:52:58 GMT
I think they are at the FAFO stage. You can't have it all. This is where I am on the whole thing. They gambled that they could have it all when they left, and well, they can't. I think it's past time that they are forced to deal with the consequences of their decisions. And the little bit about PH forgiving his family? SMH. He is something else.
|
|
|
Post by KiwiJo on May 4, 2025 1:55:53 GMT
I can’t help feeling a bit sorry for Prince Harry, even though the things he’s been saying in interviews are so ridiculous and just serving to create more drama and mess. I suspect he has the kind of personality that allows him to be easily swayed by others (especially a strong-willed and strong-opinionated wife).
But the thing is, it’s not unusual for the 2nd in line to the throne while growing up, to have problems as an adult. They see their older brother (or sister) being groomed to be king (or Queen) or even just getting all the attention. What can they see their own life as? Being second. In a way, they really don’t have a future they can even plan for - they can’t expect to have any sort of career, other than possibly the military; all they have to look forward to is being an ‘also-ran’.
Princess Margaret and Prince Andrew are the obvious examples. Princess Anne escaped, I think, partly because even as a child she was unlikely to ever become the monarch (each time a younger brother was born she dropped down the list) and so she wasn’t trying to ‘compete’ with Charles in anything, and she has an exceptionally strong character.
It will be interesting to watch Princess Charlotte growing up. The rules have changed and so she will be next in line to the throne after George until he has kids of his own, even though she has a younger brother. She is often reported as being quite sassy - I hope she has a strong character like Princess Anne, and just stays as sassy, not developing the sorts of problems that Margaret, Andrew, and Harry had/have. Of course she does have an enormous advantage over them because her parents seem to be doing all they can to give all their children a more ‘normal’ upbringing.
|
|
|
Post by quinlove on May 4, 2025 4:36:07 GMT
I can’t help feeling a bit sorry for Prince Harry, even though the things he’s been saying in interviews are so ridiculous and just serving to create more drama and mess. I suspect he has the kind of personality that allows him to be easily swayed by others (especially a strong-willed and strong-opinionated wife). This is kind of how I feel too. He was probably used to being the *spare*. It’s all he knew. All those feelings of inadequacy and second. Once M came along, she probably pointed it out to him how he was being treated. Either actually or imaged. It’s extremely complicated, obviously. And the feelings of not being enough, have not gone away. He’s actually made it worse. IMHO, it’s never about the money or the this or that. It’s about how you feel.
|
|
moodyblue
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,381
Location: Western Illinois
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2014 21:07:23 GMT
|
Post by moodyblue on May 4, 2025 23:09:15 GMT
Harry used a term in his interview that I’ve never heard - stitch up. I can kind of infer what it means, but it’s not something I’ve encountered before.
He also alluded to some things he found out in the closed court proceedings. But without knowing what those were, it’s hard to know if he is interpreting them the way others would. He seems to feel he and Meghan are victims, and I think he views everything through that lens.
|
|
|
Post by smasonnc on May 5, 2025 2:41:05 GMT
Harry used a term in his interview that I’ve never heard - stitch up. I can kind of infer what it means, but it’s not something I’ve encountered before. He also alluded to some things he found out in the closed court proceedings. But without knowing what those were, it’s hard to know if he is interpreting them the way others would. He seems to feel he and Meghan are victims, and I think he views everything through that lens. He made unproven allegations and the BBC interviewer was so busy slobbering over him, they never called him on anything. Harry imagines danger around every corner and views everything through the lens of victimhood. Meghan feeds his delusions. They’re unhinged.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 5, 2025 7:15:28 GMT
Harry used a term in his interview that I’ve never heard - stitch up. I can kind of infer what it means, but it’s not something I’ve encountered before. He also alluded to some things he found out in the closed court proceedings. But without knowing what those were, it’s hard to know if he is interpreting them the way others would. He seems to feel he and Meghan are victims, and I think he views everything through that lens. A stitch up means other people manipulated a situation you were involved in to your disadvantage. What has annoyed him in the closed court proceedings is that he found out members of the Royal household sit on the committee that determines his levels of security each time the Home Office know he is coming over. He feels they (the Royal household in particular) have got it in for him, hence the stitch up, but they claim to be there purely in an advisory capacity. Royal household representatives make perfect sense to me as the Police and civil servants from the Home Office do not have as much knowledge of how it works so, to my mind, their input is a good thing. Harry, on the other hand, believes they are all out to get him - his victimhood lens as you say.
|
|
|
Post by Bridget in MD on May 5, 2025 13:05:45 GMT
Harry used a term in his interview that I’ve never heard - stitch up. I can kind of infer what it means, but it’s not something I’ve encountered before. He also alluded to some things he found out in the closed court proceedings. But without knowing what those were, it’s hard to know if he is interpreting them the way others would. He seems to feel he and Meghan are victims, and I think he views everything through that lens. A stitch up means other people manipulated a situation you were involved in to your disadvantage. What has annoyed him in the closed court proceedings is that he found out members of the Royal household sit on the committee that determines his levels of security each time the Home Office know he is coming over. He feels they (the Royal household in particular) have got it in for him, hence the stitch up, but they claim to be there purely in an advisory capacity. Royal household representatives make perfect sense to me as the Police and civil servants from the Home Office do not have as much knowledge of how it works so, to my mind, their input is a good thing. Harry, on the other hand, believes they are all out to get him - his victimhood lens as you say. this makes even more sense on why he was trying to talk reconcillation with the King. He probably assumes the King told them not to give him the security he wants or something. I guess I think about the presidents of the US - they get secret service detail for life, and maybe family members too? But I am not sure if say, the Bush twins or Chelsea Clinton, or the Obama girls still have SS protection. I know the current one cut Biden's SS detail, maybe not for him, but for the family.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on May 5, 2025 13:53:11 GMT
A stitch up means other people manipulated a situation you were involved in to your disadvantage. What has annoyed him in the closed court proceedings is that he found out members of the Royal household sit on the committee that determines his levels of security each time the Home Office know he is coming over. He feels they (the Royal household in particular) have got it in for him, hence the stitch up, but they claim to be there purely in an advisory capacity. Royal household representatives make perfect sense to me as the Police and civil servants from the Home Office do not have as much knowledge of how it works so, to my mind, their input is a good thing. Harry, on the other hand, believes they are all out to get him - his victimhood lens as you say. this makes even more sense on why he was trying to talk reconcillation with the King. He probably assumes the King told them not to give him the security he wants or something. I guess I think about the presidents of the US - they get secret service detail for life, and maybe family members too? But I am not sure if say, the Bush twins or Chelsea Clinton, or the Obama girls still have SS protection. I know the current one cut Biden's SS detail, maybe not for him, but for the family. As I've not been privy to any discussions this is my opinion, but I very much doubt the King had any input other than at the family summit years ago when H&M decided they wanted to leave the UK. The rules were in place from then, it's up to the police and the Home Office to interpret them for each visit PH makes. When I say the Royal Household I do not mean the Royal Family but the private secretaries, Equerries, civil servants etc. who keep everything operating. Harry is being very disingenuous in saying the King is refusing to take his calls; while this Court case was going on the King, constitutionally, was unable to take them. Harry is using language to make the King seem uncaring and unwilling to change the rules for him. King Charles is unable to do that and Harry's lawyers should have told him that. I would have expected Harry to actually KNOW that, in the first place, but it seems that fact, like a lot of general knowledge, has passed him by. Our Prime Ministers have Home Office Security protection for life, similar to your Presidents. I do have a small amount of sympathy for Harry that, as the son of the reigning monarch, he comes below them but the rules are in place for a reason.
|
|