~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 20:26:39 GMT
How about his phone and his pen? Enacting legislation when Congress, our elected legislative branch opposes his desires. Perhaps not crimes but certainly blatant thumbing his nose at congresses and the American people.
Even when 70-80% of the population oppose him he doesn't care. All that matters is what "he" wants
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Mar 10, 2015 20:29:55 GMT
Our president pays no attention at all to the wishes of the people he was elected to serve. When that happens congress not only can, but should, do whatever they can to stop his lawless and inappropriate conduct This president couldn't care less about our Constitution or anyone in this country but those he considers his voting base; minorities and illegals.He has fueled the flames of division and racial hatred more than any president I am pretty sure the racial divisions began the day he was elected-where in I promptly received a forwarded email with a picture of the rose garden at the White House with a caption that proclaimed that they will now have to tear out the existing garden to plant a watermelon patch.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:06:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 20:30:06 GMT
How about his phone and his pen? Enacting legislation when Congress, our elected legislative branch opposes his desires. Perhaps not crimes but certainly blatant thumbing his nose at congresses and the American people. Even when 70-80% of the population oppose him he doesn't care. All that matters is what "he" wants Everyone keeps saying crimes. I have yet to see one crime he has committed. And as far as executive orders he has less than most current presidents so not seeing the issue there either.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 20:34:03 GMT
You'recertainly within your rights to support him. Many of us don't and liking him doesn't make Congress's acts treasonous. They have the right to act, especially when the president forgets the Constitution and the people of this country ; ALL of them, not just the ones whose viewpoints and agendas are in line with his.
|
|
|
Post by missmiss on Mar 10, 2015 20:40:53 GMT
So can other senators write letters as well that disagree with the letter that was written? Can they write a totally different letter? So when a president has talks again with North Korea or another country can some senators write a letter as well to that leader?
Regardless of supporting the president doesn't this seem just a little wrong to you?
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Mar 10, 2015 20:40:53 GMT
Our president pays no attention at all to the wishes of the people he was elected to serve. When that happens congress not only can, but should, do whatever they can to stop his lawless and inappropriate conduct This president couldn't care less about our Constitution or anyone in this country but those he considers his voting base; minorities and illegals.He has fueled the flames of division and racial hatred more than any president I am pretty sure the racial divisions began the day he was elected-where in I promptly received a forwarded email with a picture of the rose garden at the White House with a caption that proclaimed that they will now have to tear out the existing garden to plant a watermelon patch. That is a horrible image. Racial division did not begin that day, though. In fact, on that day America proved that our previous ideas of dividing people by race had passed the tipping point. I believe race will be less of an issue for the next president of color. Truly, I do believe that.
|
|
jayfab
Drama Llama

procastinating
Posts: 5,748
Jun 26, 2014 21:55:15 GMT
|
Post by jayfab on Mar 10, 2015 20:42:06 GMT
Our president pays no attention at all to the wishes of the people he was elected to serve. When that happens congress not only can, but should, do whatever they can to stop his lawless and inappropriate conduct This president couldn't care less about our Constitution or anyone in this country but those he considers his voting base; minorities and illegals.He has fueled the flames of division and racial hatred more than any president Wrong! He's taken my wishes into account, along with the majority who did elect him. I'm neither a "minority or illegal" And NO. The racists have been emboldened by the right wing hate machine are the ones that have fueled the flames of division. Remember "you lie" yeah, that wasn't flaming the division.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 20:44:50 GMT
And now the majority has voted in a Congress who opposes his policies. The majority no longer approved of Obama actions. Congress should not just sit by and ignore the people who elected them because the people were unhappy with Obama.
Obama may be black but he 's racist nonetheless. His actions have shown that he responds to situations involving blacks very differently than he does to those involving whites.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 20:49:45 GMT
Miss miss, no. It seems no more wrong than when Nancy Pelosi and John Jerry were interacting with world leaders during the Bush admin.
|
|
|
Post by missmiss on Mar 10, 2015 20:55:10 GMT
Just because a majority has been voted in Congress does not mean that. Gerrymandering at it's finest.
In Pennsylvania, one state in which the GOP drew the congressional districts in a brazenly partisan way, Democratic candidates collected 44 percent of the vote, yet Democratic candidates won only 5 House seats out of 18. In other words, Democrats secured only 27 percent of Pennsylvania’s congressional seats despite winning nearly half of the votes.
Makes total sense. So please Do not say a majority. There are numerous states out there that got screwed by this.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 20:58:34 GMT
And there are many that have berm acted by Obama. And please, I'm a NYer who was screwed the same way by the Democrats. Hillary won 5 countries out of 63 in NY yet she became or senator. I stock by my words about the 'majority'
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Mar 10, 2015 21:15:12 GMT
I am pretty sure the racial divisions began the day he was elected-where in I promptly received a forwarded email with a picture of the rose garden at the White House with a caption that proclaimed that they will now have to tear out the existing garden to plant a watermelon patch. That is a horrible image. Racial division did not begin that day, though. In fact, on that day America proved that our previous ideas of dividing people by race had passed the tipping point. I believe race will be less of an issue for the next president of color. Truly, I do believe that. It was shocking-particularly when I realized who sent it (someone I know and thought better of.) The point I was trying to make and didn't do a very good job of was that I believe that when President Obama was elected into office was when the racial divide that we thought was declining shot back up and that he really probably shouldn't be blamed for the totality of it- as evidenced by the watermelon patch email and the plethora of others that got sent my way by people who thought I would agree with them. I am still probably not explaining it well. I think because I grew up in a world where the art of racism can be extremely subtle it shapes how I think. And what I think is that the same subtle racism is, in part, the reason why the divisiveness is SO strong. Personally, there are some things that presidents current and past that I liked, and some things that were done that I didn't like-but I even with those I didn't like, I don't remember hating with the vitriol that the current president receives.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 21:36:18 GMT
Bush received just as much of not more vitriol and probably more disrespect than Obama has; and from the same people who now decry the "disrespect " both here and IRL
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 21:46:02 GMT
Our president pays no attention at all to the wishes of the people he was elected to serve. When that happens congress not only can, but should, do whatever they can to stop his lawless and inappropriate conduct This president couldn't care less about our Constitution or anyone in this country but those he considers his voting base; minorities and illegals.He has fueled the flames of division and racial hatred more than any president amen to that!
and I seemed to remember that during the Bush admin, some dems including Pelosi made a trip to some country that was in negotiations or some such thing with the admin. They spoke out loudly (and constantly) about what the Bush admin was doing. Don't remember the left here being upset about it then.
as for what laws he is breaking, someone paying attention wouldn't have to ask that. You might look up what Jonathan Turley (a GT law professor and a dem who voted for DBO) says about what he is doing and has been doing and the damage to our constitution and country.
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 21:47:37 GMT
Bush received just as much of not more vitriol and probably more disrespect than Obama has; and from the same people who now decry the "disrespect " both here and IRL yes, Bush got more of it. Didn't hear of him being nasty about it either. Nor anyone being audited or otherwise hassled over it.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Mar 10, 2015 21:50:45 GMT
That is a horrible image. Racial division did not begin that day, though. In fact, on that day America proved that our previous ideas of dividing people by race had passed the tipping point. I believe race will be less of an issue for the next president of color. Truly, I do believe that. It was shocking-particularly when I realized who sent it (someone I know and thought better of.) The point I was trying to make and didn't do a very good job of was that I believe that when President Obama was elected into office was when the racial divide that we thought was declining shot back up and that he really probably shouldn't be blamed for the totality of it- as evidenced by the watermelon patch email and the plethora of others that got sent my way by people who thought I would agree with them. I am still probably not explaining it well. I think because I grew up in a world where the art of racism can be extremely subtle it shapes how I think. And what I think is that the same subtle racism is, in part, the reason why the divisiveness is SO strong. Personally, there are some things that presidents current and past that I liked, and some things that were done that I didn't like-but I even with those I didn't like, I don't remember hating with the vitriol that the current president receives. It only appears to be on the rise. You get a small town goaded by a few media whores that uprose over a misperceived wrong because actual wrongs had previously gone unnoticed on the news night after night after night and it's easy to begin to feel like this is happening everywhere. But if it is happening everywhere, America would look more like the 1960's than it does. I know all about how subtle racism can be. I grew up with it too, and I've seen a tremendous change in basic perceptions of people based on such things as religion, gender and race. The barn door is open and it is much harder to to try to close it and contain people's perceptions that people are more alike than they are different than it was 50 years ago. Increasing acceptance is unstoppable without a violent, radical government that imposes horrific conditions upon our population. How you can't see how George W Bush is hated with at least as much vitriol is beyond me, unless you refuse to believe that not everything about Obama has to do with race. If you can stop seeing him as a black man and see him as a man who says and does things that many people disagree with, you may be able to see just how same old same old Americans really are.
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 21:51:14 GMT
I am pretty sure the racial divisions began the day he was elected-where in I promptly received a forwarded email with a picture of the rose garden at the White House with a caption that proclaimed that they will now have to tear out the existing garden to plant a watermelon patch. That is a horrible image. Racial division did not begin that day, though. In fact, on that day America proved that our previous ideas of dividing people by race had passed the tipping point. I believe race will be less of an issue for the next president of color. Truly, I do believe that. hopefully any future one will not be divisive or promote it like DBO does. the dems say those divisive racist things about any blacks that are repub or support any black repubs. Much like in the 1800s.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:06:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 21:51:50 GMT
Our president pays no attention at all to the wishes of the people he was elected to serve. When that happens congress not only can, but should, do whatever they can to stop his lawless and inappropriate conduct This president couldn't care less about our Constitution or anyone in this country but those he considers his voting base; minorities and illegals.He has fueled the flames of division and racial hatred more than any president amen to that!
and I seemed to remember that during the Bush admin, some dems including Pelosi made a trip to some country that was in negotiations or some such thing with the admin. They spoke out loudly (and constantly) about what the Bush admin was doing. Don't remember the left here being upset about it then.
as for what laws he is breaking, someone paying attention wouldn't have to ask that. You might look up what Jonathan Turley (a GT law professor and a dem who voted for DBO) says about what he is doing and has been doing and the damage to our constitution and country.
A list of laws he has broken would be nice. Thank you.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:06:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 21:54:32 GMT
And I personally agree Bush received a ton of vitrol as well. I tried to never fall into that trap. If you ready posts you won't see me calling him names, etc. Too bad others can't do that with him and Obama. And WTF is this DBO crap skypea is using now? Seriously
|
|
jayfab
Drama Llama

procastinating
Posts: 5,748
Jun 26, 2014 21:55:15 GMT
|
Post by jayfab on Mar 10, 2015 21:57:13 GMT
Bush received just as much of not more vitriol and probably more disrespect than Obama has; and from the same people who now decry the "disrespect " both here and IRL That's your perception. The level of disrespect from elected officials towards ANY other president is not near what it is towards President Obama.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 21:58:01 GMT
I'm assuming it's dear Barack Obama. Sort I'd like dd for darling daughter or dogs for darling grand soon
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Mar 10, 2015 21:58:40 GMT
And that's YOUR perception ; not fact
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 22:00:54 GMT
It was shocking-particularly when I realized who sent it (someone I know and thought better of.) The point I was trying to make and didn't do a very good job of was that I believe that when President Obama was elected into office was when the racial divide that we thought was declining shot back up and that he really probably shouldn't be blamed for the totality of it- as evidenced by the watermelon patch email and the plethora of others that got sent my way by people who thought I would agree with them. I am still probably not explaining it well. I think because I grew up in a world where the art of racism can be extremely subtle it shapes how I think. And what I think is that the same subtle racism is, in part, the reason why the divisiveness is SO strong. Personally, there are some things that presidents current and past that I liked, and some things that were done that I didn't like-but I even with those I didn't like, I don't remember hating with the vitriol that the current president receives. It only appears to be on the rise. You get a small town goaded by a few media whores that uprose over a misperceived wrong because actual wrongs had previously gone unnoticed on the news night after night after night and it's easy to begin to feel like this is happening everywhere. But if it is happening everywhere, America would look more like the 1960's than it does. I know all about how subtle racism can be. I grew up with it too, and I've seen a tremendous change in basic perceptions of people based on such things as religion, gender and race. The barn door is open and it is much harder to to try to close it and contain people's perceptions that people are more alike than they are different than it was 50 years ago. Increasing acceptance is unstoppable without a violent, radical government that imposes horrific conditions upon our population. How you can't see how George W Bush is hated with at least as much vitriol is beyond me, unless you refuse to believe that not everything about Obama has to do with race. If you can stop seeing him as a black man and see him as a man who says and does things that many people disagree with, you may be able to see just how same old same old Americans really are. it shot up because DBO then had the national media for his mic and they did his bidding. He talks (promotes) it nonstop.
as for that small town, it wasn't just people there, outsiders were sent in to agitate it. Soros spent several million to instigate and promote it. Holder, Sharpton and DBO and others used their offices and positions to further fan those flames.
and yes, people don't bring up that DBO is only half black. They pretend he isn't also half white. That wouldn't play into their racist card usage.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:06:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 22:06:40 GMT
Bush received just as much of not more vitriol and probably more disrespect than Obama has; and from the same people who now decry the "disrespect " both here and IRL That's your perception. The level of disrespect from elected officials towards ANY other president is not near what it is towards President Obama. I think that is your perception as well. Elected officials treated Bush horribly as well. The disrespect shown towards our current President is nothing new and I'm more than surprised to see people continue to make the claim that Obama is such a victim and it's all because of his race.
|
|
|
Post by foolana on Mar 10, 2015 22:09:09 GMT
And I personally agree Bush received a ton of vitrol as well. I tried to never fall into that trap. If you ready posts you won't see me calling him names, etc. Too bad others can't do that with him and Obama. And WTF is this DBO crap skypea is using now? Seriously I asked her the other day what it meant and she didn't respond.
|
|
|
Post by foolana on Mar 10, 2015 22:11:39 GMT
It only appears to be on the rise. You get a small town goaded by a few media whores that uprose over a misperceived wrong because actual wrongs had previously gone unnoticed on the news night after night after night and it's easy to begin to feel like this is happening everywhere. But if it is happening everywhere, America would look more like the 1960's than it does. I know all about how subtle racism can be. I grew up with it too, and I've seen a tremendous change in basic perceptions of people based on such things as religion, gender and race. The barn door is open and it is much harder to to try to close it and contain people's perceptions that people are more alike than they are different than it was 50 years ago. Increasing acceptance is unstoppable without a violent, radical government that imposes horrific conditions upon our population. How you can't see how George W Bush is hated with at least as much vitriol is beyond me, unless you refuse to believe that not everything about Obama has to do with race. If you can stop seeing him as a black man and see him as a man who says and does things that many people disagree with, you may be able to see just how same old same old Americans really are. it shot up because DBO then had the national media for his mic and they did his bidding. He talks (promotes) it nonstop.
as for that small town, it wasn't just people there, outsiders were sent in to agitate it. Soros spent several million to instigate and promote it. Holder, Sharpton and DBO and others used their offices and positions to further fan those flames.
and yes, people don't bring up that DBO is only half black. They pretend he isn't also half white. That wouldn't play into their racist card usage.
What are you talking about? Where do you get this crap from? How about a link or two to this nonsense; I'd love to see where you're getting it from.
|
|
|
Post by 2peaornot2pea on Mar 10, 2015 22:17:02 GMT
What does DBO mean? Knowing Skybar, my best guess is it means "Dictator Barack Obama"
Treason? Maybe. For sure those 47 senators over-played their hand. This maneuver is going to backfire on the GOP.
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 22:20:45 GMT
I'm assuming it's dear Barack Obama. Sort I'd like dd for darling daughter or dogs for darling grand soon no, it isn't 'dear'. That's not on my scope concerning DBO. just think about it a bit... it is what he is.
|
|
|
Post by Skypea on Mar 10, 2015 22:23:27 GMT
What does DBO mean? Knowing Skybar, my best guess is it means "Dictator Barack Obama" Treason? Maybe. For sure those 47 senators over-played their hand. This maneuver is going to backfire on the GOP. no, you don't know me.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 21:06:01 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 22:24:16 GMT
I'm assuming it's dear Barack Obama. Sort I'd like dd for darling daughter or dogs for darling grand soon no, it isn't 'dear'. That's not on my scope concerning DBO. just think about it a bit... it is what he is.
Oh skypea that's ridiculous if you mean dictator. He is far from being a dictator. And its downright insulting to those truly in that situation. You have all your freedoms still.
|
|