scrappinghappy
Pearl Clutcher
“I’m late, I’m late for a very important date. No time to say “Hello.” Goodbye. I’m late...."
Posts: 4,307
Jun 26, 2014 19:30:06 GMT
|
Post by scrappinghappy on Mar 24, 2017 21:33:08 GMT
What do you pay annually for healthcare and would you be ok if your taxes went up by 50% of that amount and we went to a single payer system similar to those in Canada, Britain and Australia.
That said, I don't know much about any of those systems yet, their pros or cons, so not sure even if that would be ideal.
I was just hypothesizing with a friend today and she brought up this idea.
We are paying almost $25,000 annually between premiums, deductibles, out of pocket and out of network costs.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Mar 24, 2017 21:35:50 GMT
I think we'd all be better off financially with higher taxes financing a single-payer system. (And I don't currently pay for my own health coverage.)
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Mar 24, 2017 21:42:05 GMT
I believe in a single payer system. I also believe that prescription drug companies should not be able to advertise to the general public or offer incentives to doctors who prescribe their medications.
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Mar 24, 2017 21:42:22 GMT
We have good employer provided healthcare, but would be paying at least $18,000 year on COBRA based on what we have paid in the past. I would happily pay 50% of that amount for a single payer system. I've lived more of my life with the single payer system in Canada and for a year in France. This would be a great thread to edit and add a poll.
|
|
scrappinghappy
Pearl Clutcher
“I’m late, I’m late for a very important date. No time to say “Hello.” Goodbye. I’m late...."
Posts: 4,307
Jun 26, 2014 19:30:06 GMT
|
Post by scrappinghappy on Mar 24, 2017 21:48:21 GMT
We have good employer provided healthcare, but would be paying at least $18,000 year on COBRA based on what we have paid in the past. I would happily pay 50% of that amount for a single payer system. I've lived more of my life with the single payer system in Canada and for a year in France. This would be a great thread to edit and add a poll. Happy to add a poll. I just didn't know how to structure it so want to help?
|
|
scrappinghappy
Pearl Clutcher
“I’m late, I’m late for a very important date. No time to say “Hello.” Goodbye. I’m late...."
Posts: 4,307
Jun 26, 2014 19:30:06 GMT
|
Post by scrappinghappy on Mar 24, 2017 21:50:55 GMT
So sitting here thinking...
Would you be happy paying taxes for single payer and then having cadillac care available for a premium? Wouldn't jump the line but would be able to go private to premium providers for faster service. I know good drs would probably jump into these cadillac plans and that might strip the system. Can you tell I haven't thought it out properly?
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Mar 24, 2017 21:55:05 GMT
For me personally, hell no! But we pay less than $5000 in premiums (for medical, dental, and vision), co-pays are $30-40, hospital treatment is $150 with everything covered Our deductible is $250 per person. Max OOP is $6300 with a family max of $13,000 DH's diabetic meds and supplies are covered 100% and our prescriptions aren't bad.
I would probably see an increase in our premiums, a decease in coverage, and not as good of care.
But, I realize that our family is different than others and do see a need for something.
|
|
|
Post by leannec on Mar 24, 2017 21:55:26 GMT
I live in Canada and pay almost nothing for healthcare ... our taxes are higher but it all works out in the end because I have a lot of health issues I know that this is not always a popular idea but we have it and it really works
|
|
|
Post by jenis40 on Mar 24, 2017 22:04:48 GMT
So sitting here thinking... Would you be happy paying taxes for single payer and then having cadillac care available for a premium? Wouldn't jump the line but would be able to go private to premium providers for faster service. I know good drs would probably jump into these cadillac plans and that might strip the system. Can you tell I haven't thought it out properly? There would have to be a requirement that doctors have a certain percentage of non-Cadillac patients. Or incentives like government pays for medical schools/pays off student debt if doctor only treats single payer patients for x number of years.
|
|
|
Post by jenis40 on Mar 24, 2017 22:06:11 GMT
Employers would either have to increase wages or pay a percentage of employees tax share as well I think.
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Mar 24, 2017 22:10:49 GMT
My new job is with the state and I only have to pay for myself. It is ridiculously cheap (like around $50/mo w/$10 co-pays for almost everything) and right now I am just happy as a clam to have such inexpensive insurance. It's almost like I don't want to talk about it too much lest I jinx the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by pondrunner on Mar 24, 2017 22:15:50 GMT
My parents have Medicare plus an excellent and affordable supplemental. I would be very happy with a single payer program that has premium coverage supplemental programs available as long as coverage available for all is adequate
|
|
|
Post by jenis40 on Mar 24, 2017 22:17:25 GMT
My new job is with the state and I only have to pay for myself. It is ridiculously cheap (like around $50/mo w/$10 co-pays for almost everything) and right now I am just happy as a clam to have such inexpensive insurance. It's almost like I don't want to talk about it too much lest I jinx the whole thing. As I discovered when I had to pay for COBRA, your true monthly premium is closer to $500/600 per month. IMO under this scenario wages have to increase or employer's have to pay a share of the taxes. For years, we've been told insurance benefits are part of our salary so...
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Mar 24, 2017 22:19:05 GMT
We have good employer provided healthcare, but would be paying at least $18,000 year on COBRA based on what we have paid in the past. I would happily pay 50% of that amount for a single payer system. I've lived more of my life with the single payer system in Canada and for a year in France. This would be a great thread to edit and add a poll. Happy to add a poll. I just didn't know how to structure it so want to help? I would just keep it simple and ask a yes/no question: Would you be willing to pay up to 50% of your existing healthcare costs as a tax for a single payer system? SaveSave
|
|
melissa
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,912
Jun 25, 2014 20:45:00 GMT
|
Post by melissa on Mar 24, 2017 22:24:22 GMT
We are paying almost $25,000 annually between premiums, deductibles, out of pocket and out of network costs. I assume this is for a family, not an individual. My total per year will be under 10K this year, including my $3600 deductible, but that's just me. This is less than last year when I had the higher tier plan. Remember with single payer, everyone doesn't necessarily have the same plan. There can still be choice. Socialized medicine is actually a bit different. If your employer is paying part of the costs of your insurance, such as I think it the case with anxiousmom above, it's not the same as what the insurance cost actually is. I pay so much because I buy it myself, unsubsidized, all from my own bank account. Just as companies today may have different tiers of plans, a single payer could do the same. You could still chose your out of pocket costs such as deductible and co-pay combinations. In socialized medicine, there is no specific policy. Every has the same costs (if any). Of course, in some countries there are private physicians that you can pay for out of your own pocket. That may or may not be a part of the future, though I suspect it is. I would love to see health insurance and pharmaceutical companies become nonprofits!
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Mar 24, 2017 22:24:46 GMT
My new job is with the state and I only have to pay for myself. It is ridiculously cheap (like around $50/mo w/$10 co-pays for almost everything) and right now I am just happy as a clam to have such inexpensive insurance. It's almost like I don't want to talk about it too much lest I jinx the whole thing. As I discovered when I had to pay for COBRA, your true monthly premium is closer to $500/600 per month. IMO under this scenario wages have to increase or employer's have to pay a share of the taxes. For years, we've been told insurance benefits are part of our salary so... True enough...but honestly, I get paid SO little that adding $500/month wouldn't even probably give me enough money left over to buy insurance equivalent to what I have as the system is now (if that even makes sense.) For a lot of people, the benefits of working for the state make up for lower salaries. I don't know, for me, at this point in my life, I am trying to rebuild so much that theoretical salaries are almost more than I can deal with. I am starting over from scratch and it is scaring the shit out me now matter how I look at it.
|
|
valleyview
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,816
Jun 27, 2014 18:41:26 GMT
|
Post by valleyview on Mar 24, 2017 22:31:58 GMT
I'm always amazed when people tell what they pay. It shows me that we already do not have the choice that so many people think exists.
The insurance companies keep winning, and after the ill-considered remarks about who deserves insurance and what it should pay for, I don't trust that anyone has our best interests at heart.
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Mar 24, 2017 22:33:33 GMT
So sitting here thinking... Would you be happy paying taxes for single payer and then having cadillac care available for a premium? Wouldn't jump the line but would be able to go private to premium providers for faster service. I know good drs would probably jump into these cadillac plans and that might strip the system. Can you tell I haven't thought it out properly? In Canada, there really isn't an ability to jump the line unless you pay out of pocket and go to the US. My extended family has never had to wait for treatment. The only time it was an issue, one sister was able to get a cancer surgery faster because she was able/willing to go to a bigger city for it. Employers often provide Extended Health Care plans as an employee benefit. These plans typically cover the cost of a private hospital room instead of a bed on a shared ward, prescription coverage, chiropractic, physical therapy, etc. Elective surgeries are not usually covered by the single payer system. SaveSave
|
|
|
Post by Karene on Mar 24, 2017 22:51:15 GMT
I am in Ontario. In provincial universal healthcare system every resident of Ontario is covered as long as they have resided in the province for 3 months. Employers pay a payroll healthcare tax and residents pay on their income tax depending on their net income. I don't pay anything on my taxes. My husband pays the maximum which is $900. This means we pay $900 total per year for our family.
Prescriptions and dental are not included in the Ontario health care, but it is part of the benefits that are offered through employers. Each company has a different group insurance. It does cover prescriptions and dental and eye care, plus upgrades for hospitalization etc.
We are able to pick any doctor we want who has room for new patients. He is the one who sends us to a specialist but if you don't like that specialist you can ask for a different one. I can get in to see my doctor sometimes the very day I call and if not, the next day. Specialist do take a bit longer.
The big thing here is that the insurance companies do not have a stranglehold on the health care system like it seems to me it does in the States.
But at least everyone has the same basic health care. It is actually for the good of the whole nation to look after its citizens. It saves a LOT if your do preventive care.
|
|
|
Post by jenis40 on Mar 24, 2017 22:56:17 GMT
As I discovered when I had to pay for COBRA, your true monthly premium is closer to $500/600 per month. IMO under this scenario wages have to increase or employer's have to pay a share of the taxes. For years, we've been told insurance benefits are part of our salary so... True enough...but honestly, I get paid SO little that adding $500/month wouldn't even probably give me enough money left over to buy insurance equivalent to what I have as the system is now (if that even makes sense.) For a lot of people, the benefits of working for the state make up for lower salaries. I don't know, for me, at this point in my life, I am trying to rebuild so much that theoretical salaries are almost more than I can deal with. I am starting over from scratch and it is scaring the shit out me now matter how I look at it. I'm sorry if that came across as picking on you. It wasn't my intention at all. I think it's a big issue when we start talking about premium increases and out of pocket costs. People aren't always comparing apples to apples because of the varying amount employers cover.
|
|
|
Post by Karene on Mar 24, 2017 22:57:16 GMT
Also, I have never had to pay anything to have my children. All prenatal care was paid for the the government. The birth, the hospital stay, immunizations everything. I don't remember ever paying for anything medical to do with my children. My husband and I have also had surgery and never paid anything. I have never even seen a bill from a doctor or hospital, wouldn't know what it looks like.
Children and Seniors get even more benefits than working people.
|
|
scrapngranny
Pearl Clutcher
Only slightly senile
Posts: 4,948
Jun 25, 2014 23:21:30 GMT
|
Post by scrapngranny on Mar 24, 2017 23:01:54 GMT
We are both retired and pay quite a bit for insurance, but we have 100% coverage. We don't have a deductible or co-pay. We pay a small percentage for prescriptions. It's a lot up front, but it nice not to have to worry if we get sick.
In 2014 my DH had 2 surgeries, admitted to the hospital 7 times, once for a week in ICU, 2 ambulance trips, and we paid nothing out of pocket. It was a relief not to worry about finances while he was getting treatment.
|
|
|
Post by peano on Mar 24, 2017 23:03:08 GMT
This article from the Denver Post on the Canadian healthcare system came across my Facebook feed this afternoon, and I'm wondering if our Canadian Peas would like to comment on the accuracy of the article.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 20:03:18 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2017 23:04:53 GMT
What do you pay annually for healthcare and would you be ok if your taxes went up by 50% of that amount and we went to a single payer system similar to those in Canada, Britain and Australia. Britain's isn't, in the true definition, a single payer healthcare system. It is quite difference to, as an example, Canada in so far as generally they don't buy the healthcare from any other body. The Dr's, hospitals etc are employed by the Government's devolved four individual Health Trusts ...England,Scotland,Wales & Northern Ireland. It's an universal healthcare rather than a single payer. There is no third party such as an insurance company or the company that supplies the healthcare service.There is no one that actually makes a profit within the system itself in that respect.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Mar 24, 2017 23:05:33 GMT
Absolutely.
As an employee of a small business in an economically depressed area it's nearly impossible to afford insurance. Sure, I can get a subsidy on an ACA plan that would run me just over $100/month. But that plan is not usable. There are no local doctors that accept it, the only ambulance company in two counties doesn't accept it, and the $6,000 deductible plus copays/coinsurance costs are astronomical for someone that makes as little as I do. So, I wind up not using the insurance and therefore I pay over $100/month for nothing.
I haven't seen a real doctor in ten years. At this point, unless something changes, my only option is to keep trying to get a job in local government or at a school because they are the only employers that offer decent coverage. Last time I applied for an entry level county job they received over 200 applications. I'm getting so discouraged and I'm not getting any younger.
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Mar 24, 2017 23:14:13 GMT
Heck yes. We are paying 20k per year for health insurance through the ACA. I would gladly pay half that in taxes to go to single payer system. .
|
|
|
Post by bwife on Mar 24, 2017 23:14:31 GMT
I'm always amazed when people tell what they pay. It shows me that we already do not have the choice that so many people think exists. The insurance companies keep winning, and after the ill-considered remarks about who deserves insurance and what it should pay for, I don't trust that anyone has our best interests at heart. Its not just the ins companies winning. It is also employers. For example... If you can follow this, trying to make it as simple as possible. DH was with Company A, 8yrs ago, we had decent ins. ( medical, dental and vision) Our premiums were about $300 a month. that is what was taken from my DH's pay check. Our co pays at the dr were $20 and prescriptions were inexpensive ( never more than $25 I think for name brand) Company A decides to contract with Company B for the line of work that DH does. Company B says we would love to do this but need more employees, Company A says No problem, Have ours. So DH starts working for Company B. 1st yr, our ins stays the same. 2nd yr Company B says we love our employees so much, we are going to COVER your cost for medical premiums. Boom. ins ( including dental and Vision) now is only costing us $25 a month. Because we had to pay for vision and dental. Company B covered the premiums for 6 yrs. 6 mos ago, Company A says you are costing us to much $ company B. Our contract is up. We want our systems back and Oh yeah, we are going to need those employees back too. Company A says take this offer of $ and benefits or have no job. So naturally, we have a family, DH has to take it. We get the packet through email. NEW ins With Company A is now $700 a month for a family ( med. dent & vis) Oh yeah and there is a deducible too, $4500 a yr. And they dont cover NEAR as much as we had with Company B or as with Company A 8yrs ago. To get some of the prescriptions filled, the ins co has to have the dr fill paperwork out. it is so insane! There are plans to pick from. The plan we went with was middle of the road. So there are people in DH's co with lower deductibles, but way higher premiums ( almost double) and there was a plan with a higher deducible and lower premiums. Because we have kids that hurt themselves, I figure we will meet the deductible every yr. We met 2016 from Oct to Dec when DH crashed his mountain bike. I know some people pay more than we do. But my point is that if Company B can cover the full cost for ALL of their employees and their families, Company A is def sticking it to us. They opted for a high deductible ins. Pushing all of the premiums to the employee so that there is no cost from their pocket.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Mar 24, 2017 23:21:44 GMT
as I sit here wondering if it's worth paying to see the Ortho again or if I need to just suck up and live with the pain in my knee - I have a $6k deductible that we met last year and I've just finished paying off the remaining medical bills (20% co-pays) after having knee surgery last year which was typically successful but didn't leave me pain-free OR with full range of motion (and yes I went to PT and was released both by PT and my surgeon and have continued with exercises at home)....socialised medicine is looking even better than it did before.
I've lived under socialised medicine (NHS in the UK) and I've lived under a limited single-payer system (Medicaid) and quite frankly - either was much superior to what I have now (which is STILL better than the many years I didn't have insurance at all)
|
|
SabrinaP
Pearl Clutcher
Busy Teacher Pea
Posts: 4,467
Location: Dallas Texas
Jun 26, 2014 12:16:22 GMT
|
Post by SabrinaP on Mar 24, 2017 23:48:39 GMT
We pay $16,000 annually just on premiums. We vary greatly from year to year in what we end up paying in addition to that. We would be better off if we could do half that, especially if everything else is covered. When I broke my leg, I hit my max out of pocket which is over 8,000.
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Mar 24, 2017 23:52:02 GMT
I pay $7000 for just me and my deductible is $12,000. I would happily pay $10K in taxes to not have to worry about the deductible. It really plays into wether I go to the doctor or not...
|
|