tduby1
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,979
Jun 27, 2014 18:32:45 GMT
|
Post by tduby1 on May 24, 2017 1:49:56 GMT
But she didn't. And no one is talking about your charitable donations or son's diagnosis but you. I asked HappyMom if she knew an Autism awareness advocate who denied their child had autism. Apples and oranges Point is, Barron has NOT been diagnosed that anyone knows of. Melania is NOT denying anything...except you seem to think so. Nice to see your snarky self back. Saying Mrs. trump has denied Barron has autism is not implying that he does have it. It is stating a fact. People have publically claimed he has it and I believe it is true that the Trump's have denied it, just as I would if someone said my son had it when he didn't. Now if it had been phrased, "I asked if she knew any autism advocates that denied their son's autism", you would have an argument, as that implies he has it, but that is not so the way it is phrased above.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 7:49:02 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2017 3:54:05 GMT
I'll just leave this here because it's been the kind of day where I need to remember the good stuff.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on May 24, 2017 5:19:34 GMT
I'll just leave this here because it's been the kind of day where I need to remember the good stuff. I don't know petesouza's politics and really it is of little difference to me. I just like how he must have grown to admire and respect the Obamas. Regardless of their politics, it seems obvious to me that he enjoyed the time spent watching and recording their history-both on the job and personally. Now he further shows his admiration and loyalty by subtly posting photos he took to contrast with 45's news of today. It's
|
|
|
Post by wholarmor on May 24, 2017 8:35:26 GMT
Oh, how I miss them!
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 12:34:34 GMT
Me too! Pete Souza demonstrated through his photos how really down to earth and loving they were. Some of my favourite photos are of Barak joking with his staff or playing with children. Souza caught on film moments in time that showed the Obamas' true nature. Not fake or selfish, not in it for the money or glory, just a loving, respectful pair raising two girls and doing the job he was elected for without fanfare or ego boosting. 45 will NEVER have that. Obama has more dignity, class and integrity in his baby finger than Trump will ever have.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on May 24, 2017 13:36:40 GMT
Point is, Barron has NOT been diagnosed that anyone knows of. Melania is NOT denying anything...except you seem to think so. Nice to see your snarky self back. Saying Mrs. trump has denied Barron has autism is not implying that he does have it. It is stating a fact. People have publically claimed he has it and I believe it is true that the Trump's have denied it, just as I would if someone said my son had it when he didn't. Now if it had been phrased, "I asked if she knew any autism advocates that denied their son's autism", you would have an argument, as that implies he has it, but that is not so the way it is phrased above. Thank you for this. I'm finding some will pick out what I say simple as it may be and force me to defend even the things I am not saying. Question is will she come back and acklowedge the misunderstanding. But I'm the snarky pea? *shrugs* You likely won't. She makes it a point to "misunderstand" me. Just admit you hate me and stop engaging imsirius ?
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 17:52:04 GMT
I have come back and read. I choose not to engage as you always have to be right no matter what. I am not about to get into a pissing match with you. I don,t care to get into the drama.
I do not *hate* you. I don't even know you other than the person you portray on this board. That person seems to love to fight.
I didn't force you to defend anything. I merely pointed out that whether or not Barron was autistic had no bearing on Melania's choosing autism as her personal cause. That you were offended was not my problem, it was yours.
That's all I,m going to respond. Have a nice day.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 23, 2024 7:49:02 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2017 18:01:16 GMT
I am sorry I brought up autism. Even if Barron doesn't have it, it is a forum for melania to support.
I just want our First Lady to shine.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 18:11:58 GMT
I am sorry I brought up autism. Even if Barron doesn't have it, it is a forum for melania to support. I just want our First Lady to shine. Not your fault at all.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on May 24, 2017 18:20:09 GMT
Maybe she's just not a hand holder. maybe she just doesn't hold HIS hand. lol
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on May 24, 2017 19:24:06 GMT
I have come back and read. I choose not to engage as you always have to be right no matter what. I am not about to get into a pissing match with you. I don,t care to get into the drama. I do not *hate* you. I don't even know you other than the person you portray on this board. That person seems to love to fight. I didn't force you to defend anything. I merely pointed out that whether or not Barron was autistic had no bearing on Melania's choosing autism as her personal cause. That you were offended was not my problem, it was yours. That's all I,m going to respond. Have a nice day. This isn't a pissing match or drama. Everyone can see the exchange. You were wrong. You've chosen not to be a big girl and acknowledge it which is totally fine because you didn't in that other thread either. Why the pattern? I don't love to fight but when I do and I happen to be on the losing side I'm woman enough to own up to it. Also reading comprehension is a beautiful thing if you want to be argumentative and start bandwagons. You never even addressed the actual autism speculator just me. Then when she apologizes you say "It's not your fault" Ummm who the hell is to blame? Let me guess? Meeeeee! Tell me what I've won!!! Note how imsirius says she won't engage with me and then watch as she does. I'm snarky and love to fight but below you will find sweet sirius being a model pea. May 8, 2017 10:05:33 GMT -4 olan said: In the past peas have found that this board isn't the best place to vent about their family issues. Never stops anyone though. We would have to know your mother and sisters googling abilities first. If your mother was a pea would she post a thread asking which shoe goes with the above dress or would she spend a couple mins thumbing through a catalog? May 8, 2017 10:18:03 GMT -4 imsirius said: What does this even mean? How is that relevant to posting the message her sister wrote? confused....
Also for the record 45 and his camp have denied that Barron has autism. They've even threatened legal action if I recall correctly. Like I said you aren't misunderstanding me you are intentionally being a jerk and making yourself look rather foolish in the process.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 19:30:50 GMT
What exactly was I wrong about?
I gave my opinion that despite Barron being autistic or not, Melania had chosen her platform. I also said even if he did have it, it's not necessarily a cause she supports.
You were the one who said she denied him having it. As far as I know he hasn't been diagnosed and if he was, it's nobody's business.
I stated I have an son on the spectrum and we don't support autism either as our charity as an EXAMPLE and you basically told me nobody cared but me.
So tell me, what exactly got your panties in a twist?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on May 24, 2017 19:42:39 GMT
What exactly was I wrong about? I gave my opinion that despite Barron being autistic or not, Melania had chosen her platform. I also said even if he did have it, it's not necessarily a cause she supports. You were the one who said she denied him having it. As far as I know he hasn't been diagnosed and if he was, it's nobody's business. I stated I have an son on the spectrum and we don't support autism either as our charity as an EXAMPLE and you basically told me nobody cared but me. I told you no one made this about you and your family but you. Just like elaine did in that other thread. So tell me, what exactly got your panties in a twist? I think you are confused...that was the point I was trying to make. Go back again and re-read. Someone already pointed out your error. I'm sure you see it. I went a step further and found another thread where you behaved in the very same way. A pattern. You actually want a pissing match as evident by your interactions with me. I won't give you that. Have a great day imsirius .
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 20:10:19 GMT
Nice try changing my original quote.
You go on with your bad self as well.
You go and play the victim. That example quoted wasn't even close to being mean.
I'm done arguing with you.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on May 24, 2017 20:26:34 GMT
Nice try changing my original quote. You go on with your bad self as well. Since your eye spy is so good have you recognized the error in your ways yet? You mean me making the words bold? Show me where Ive misquoted you and I'll be sure to correct my mistake. You see how that works? In any event Ive linked the old thread where you pretend to misunderstand me and this one will also remain for posterity so people can look back at what you actually said. Since your eye spy is so good have you recognized the error in your ways yet? This last response you managed to keep it under 100 characters or less. When you have no rebuttal engaging does become more challenging doesn't it. You've said several times how you won't engage how this is a pissing match as if you aren't behaving in a bully like manner. You do know people can see what you type right even though you heavily edit. I also provide links no one has to take my word for anything. That thread and this one shows how you make it a point misunderstand me when everyone else knows exactly what I mean. You won't be able to provide a good reason as to why but me and any pea with reading comprehension can see it.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on May 24, 2017 20:49:34 GMT
The edits on here are only for one reason. Because my iPad auto corrects and I have to come in and edit after I post.
I don't appreciate what you are trying to infer here about my character. I say what I mean and do not edit to change anything other than spelling errors.
Go ahead and bitch about being misunderstood, but don't you dare try to accuse me of changing my words or misaligning my character.
This will be my last post to you. Take your own advice and put me on ignore.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on May 25, 2017 0:12:36 GMT
What exactly was I wrong about? I gave my opinion that despite Barron being autistic or not, Melania had chosen her platform. I also said even if he did have it, it's not necessarily a cause she supports. You were the one who said she denied him having it. As far as I know he hasn't been diagnosed and if he was, it's nobody's business. I stated I have an son on the spectrum and we don't support autism either as our charity as an EXAMPLE and you basically told me nobody cared but me. I told you no one made this about you and your family but you. Just like elaine did in that other thread. So tell me, what exactly got your panties in a twist? I think you are confused...that was the point I was trying to make. Go back again and re-read. Someone already pointed out your error. I'm sure you see it. I went a step further and found another thread where you behaved in the very same way. A pattern. You actually want a pissing match as evident by your interactions with me. I won't give you that. Have a great day imsirius . The bolded part is the part that YOU added to imsirius 's post. It is highlighting how you changed her quote without making it clear that you chose to add your own words to it. Tantrum all you want, but people misunderstand you because you don't communicate clearly. And, in this case, you did change Sirius' quote, probably unintentionally, but you did it all the same and then threw a hissy denial fit when called on it. I'm only commenting on this because you tagged/dragged me into it. You are the one seeming to want to make this all about you and pull in uninvolved bystanders.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on May 25, 2017 1:00:10 GMT
I think you are confused...that was the point I was trying to make. Go back again and re-read. Someone already pointed out your error. I'm sure you see it. I went a step further and found another thread where you behaved in the very same way. A pattern. You actually want a pissing match as evident by your interactions with me. I won't give you that. Have a great day imsirius . The bolded part is the part that YOU added to imsirius 's post. It is highlighting how you changed her quote without making it clear that you chose to add your own words to it. Tantrum all you want, but people misunderstand you because you don't communicate clearly. And, in this case, you did change Sirius' quote, probably unintentionally, but you did it all the same and then threw a hissy denial fit when called on it. I'm only commenting on this because you tagged/dragged me into it. You are the one seeming to want to make this all about you and pull in uninvolved bystanders. Hyperlinks arent to summon you into a thread. It's for my ease of use. I like comments for the very same reason.You didn't have to respond to @imsirus foolishness because you already said enough in that other thread. If you are going to be a bitch to me own it. Just like I would have owned any comments I made indirectly or directly to you in that thread. What I said in that thread was clear. You just wanted to fight or play victim. At that time I didn't bother to say the dress was ugly and no shoe choice would change that because I am not an ass. You didn't come back and say hey Olan sorry for accusing you of taking a cheap shot at my ugly dress when you weren't just like imsirius won't come back and say hey I just wanted to fight with you about nothing at all. So bizarre in fact she ended up regurgitating my point and never addressing the person who actually brought up autism. Guess it's my fault for quoting her. And don't act like no one can pick out my voice from her quoted text. That's stupid.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on May 25, 2017 2:19:25 GMT
The bolded part is the part that YOU added to imsirius 's post. It is highlighting how you changed her quote without making it clear that you chose to add your own words to it. Tantrum all you want, but people misunderstand you because you don't communicate clearly. And, in this case, you did change Sirius' quote, probably unintentionally, but you did it all the same and then threw a hissy denial fit when called on it. I'm only commenting on this because you tagged/dragged me into it. You are the one seeming to want to make this all about you and pull in uninvolved bystanders. Hyperlinks arent to summon you into a thread. It's for my ease of use. I like comments for the very same reason.You didn't have to respond to @imsirus foolishness because you already said enough in that other thread. If you are going to be a bitch to me own it. Just like I would have owned any comments I made indirectly or directly to you in that thread. What I said in that thread was clear. You just wanted to fight or play victim. At that time I didn't bother to say the dress was ugly and no shoe choice would change that because I am not an ass. You didn't come back and say hey Olan sorry for accusing you of taking a cheap shot at my ugly dress when you weren't just like imsirius won't come back and say hey I just wanted to fight with you about nothing at all. So bizarre in fact she ended up regurgitating my point and never addressing the person who actually brought up autism. Guess it's my fault for quoting her. And don't act like no one can pick out my voice from her quoted text. That's stupid. As I said before, you don't communicate clearly - this is yet one more data point of a growing array - and that is your issue. Not mine; not imsirius 's. I am so heartbroken you didn't like my dress. Heartbroken. I might not get out of bed tomorrow. Oh, yeah. I could not care less what you thought of my dress or shoes. I helped raise several hundred thousand dollars for a charity speaking in that dress at a fundraising gala. That is more important that what the almighty Olan thinks of my dress. But thank you for proving that you are an ass and that your comment WAS actually in reference to my thread. Kind of like another great communicator who blabbered on, in front of Israel's Prime Minister and press that when he was spilling information to his pals the Russians, he never actually said the name "Israel" confirming to everyone in the world that he actually had blabbed their intel. You are a real gem. Bless your heart.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Oct 11, 2017 12:09:05 GMT
Hyperlinks arent to summon you into a thread. It's for my ease of use. I like comments for the very same reason.You didn't have to respond to @imsirus foolishness because you already said enough in that other thread. If you are going to be a bitch to me own it. Just like I would have owned any comments I made indirectly or directly to you in that thread. What I said in that thread was clear. You just wanted to fight or play victim. At that time I didn't bother to say the dress was ugly and no shoe choice would change that because I am not an ass. You didn't come back and say hey Olan sorry for accusing you of taking a cheap shot at my ugly dress when you weren't just like imsirius won't come back and say hey I just wanted to fight with you about nothing at all. So bizarre in fact she ended up regurgitating my point and never addressing the person who actually brought up autism. Guess it's my fault for quoting her. And don't act like no one can pick out my voice from her quoted text. That's stupid. As I said before, you don't communicate clearly - this is yet one more data point of a growing array - and that is your issue. Not mine; not imsirius 's. I am so heartbroken you didn't like my dress. Heartbroken. I might not get out of bed tomorrow. Oh, yeah. I could not care less what you thought of my dress or shoes. I helped raise several hundred thousand dollars for a charity speaking in that dress at a fundraising gala. That is more important that what the almighty Olan thinks of my dress. But thank you for proving that you are an ass and that your comment WAS actually in reference to my thread. Kind of like another great communicator who blabbered on, in front of Israel's Prime Minister and press that when he was spilling information to his pals the Russians, he never actually said the name "Israel" confirming to everyone in the world that he actually had blabbed their intel. You are a real gem. Bless your heart. You've accused me of injecting myself into discussions that involve you Elaine. Would you like to recant or should I keep tagging you in our previous interactions?
|
|
|
Post by ScrapsontheRocks on Oct 11, 2017 16:52:11 GMT
Apologies, peas. I liked a couple of posts before noticing this was an old thread.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Oct 11, 2017 19:37:56 GMT
Apologies, peas. I liked a couple of posts before noticing this was an old thread. Easily done - there are quite a few of them at the moment it seems.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Oct 11, 2017 20:18:55 GMT
Apologies, peas. I liked a couple of posts before noticing this was an old thread. And you know liking posts is a big no no. Wait that's only the rule for black women. By the way you never come back to explain what reverse racism is like is South Africa. Always the same ones eh
|
|