Astros' owner's ex-wife loses it on 1yo birthday shoot

But obviously the brides and families are choosing this spot BECAUSE *no one else was using it* for walking, jogging, etc. The fact that you could get nice pictures without a bunch of rando people in the background that would have to be photoshopped out in post production is exactly the reason why this particular place is being chosen over and over again. If the people who lived on that street were actively using the green space themselves, it would suddenly become a lot less attractive to the people looking to have their portraits taken.

And as far as the reference to my airport comparison, when some of the people here bought their homes next to the airport the flight paths were different and far fewer planes were taking off daily. Over time, the airport got bigger and busier with more runways added and different flight paths being used, so more people in closer proximity to the airport were now affected, so it’s absolutely a good comparison. My point was and still is with a quiet pretty spot like that on public property, the potential was always there whether it was currently being utilized or not. Just like the potential for increased airport noise was always there and no one cared until that potential was realized and then suddenly everyone was all up in arms about the airport that they *chose* to live by.

1. I'm sorry, your race card has been declined.
2. Dog momma needs to be charged.
3. I wouldn't like businesses being run in front of my home, but unless they're breaking the law there isn't much I could do to stop it.
4. The home owners need to get creative and make it an undesirable place to do such business. Take turns during the day, patrolling and photobombing when necessary.
5. As said above, the ones that leave a mess need to be fined. In other words...enforce the laws that are already in place that are being broken. For some reason this is a very unpopular concept in regards to other situations though, so that might not be what works here.

The town government says it is PUBLIC property!

Public right of way and public park are two different things. And the fact that the neighborhood pays for the upkeep says it isn't truly public. It is just an right of way like a utility easement.

If the city wants to allow free reign to this property, then maybe they should pay for the upkeep and the repairs and cleanup on it.

I'm curious about the taxes. We have city sidewalks in our town. The property between the street and the sidewalk as well as the sidewalk itself are considered public easement although we have to maintain them. We also pay taxes on the lot all the way to the street. If the trees or grass die in the easement, it is up to the homeowner to replace them. Therefore, I would have a whole lot to say to someone parking their ass on that property, leaving trash, and possibly damaging the grass and vegetation.

I feel bad that the parents will never be able to look at the pictures that were taken that day without thinking about this encounter. Very sad.

And claiming things that aren’t racist are racist only makes people take racism less seriously.

That hurts more in the long run.

It is hard to tell but I'm pretty sure the man holding the baby at the end of the video is white.