scrappinghappy
Pearl Clutcher
“I’m late, I’m late for a very important date. No time to say “Hello.” Goodbye. I’m late...."
Posts: 4,306
Jun 26, 2014 19:30:06 GMT
|
Post by scrappinghappy on Feb 4, 2020 16:42:18 GMT
Prefacing by saying I am a moderate voter as is my hubby.
We are watching what is going on in Iowa and wondering if anyone else thinks this "chaos" is a result of hacking? Or some other nefarious interaction by a third party?
|
|
|
Post by Mel on Feb 4, 2020 17:25:08 GMT
They have assured us (in Iowa) it was not hacking or anything deliberate.
|
|
|
Post by Patter on Feb 4, 2020 17:29:37 GMT
What I heard was something about the app not being tested properly and it was an issue with the development of the app nothing else.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 14:28:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2020 17:29:52 GMT
Seems like the first season of Scandal.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Feb 4, 2020 19:08:48 GMT
No, I do not think it is anything nefarious. Merely incompetent.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Feb 4, 2020 19:36:44 GMT
(Clare Malone is a political writer with 538, formerly with the New Yorker)
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,378
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Feb 4, 2020 19:43:36 GMT
(Clare Malone is a political writer with 538, formerly with the New Yorker)
And I am SURE that the most rabid Bernie supporters will agree with the conspiracy theory idea and use it as an excuse if he doesn’t do as well in later primaries. So yeah—this sucks all around. We do not need a repeat of 2016. FTR, the DNC does not run the Iowa Caucuses. The Iowa Democratic Party does.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Feb 4, 2020 19:46:16 GMT
(Clare Malone is a political writer with 538, formerly with the New Yorker)
And I am SURE that the most rabid Bernie supporters will agree with the conspiracy theory idea and use it as an excuse if he doesn’t do as well in later primaries. So yeah—this sucks all around. We do not need a repeat of 2016. FTR, the DNC does not run the Iowa Caucuses. The Iowa Democratic Party does.
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
|
|
Nink
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,947
Location: North Idaho
Jul 1, 2014 23:30:44 GMT
|
Post by Nink on Feb 4, 2020 19:49:04 GMT
From now on anytime something wonky happens, I think a lot of us are going to go straight to "election tampering" whether it is or isn't. We shouldn't have to be worrying about this shit.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Feb 4, 2020 20:39:59 GMT
And I am SURE that the most rabid Bernie supporters will agree with the conspiracy theory idea and use it as an excuse if he doesn’t do as well in later primaries. So yeah—this sucks all around. We do not need a repeat of 2016. FTR, the DNC does not run the Iowa Caucuses. The Iowa Democratic Party does.
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
I am quite certain I’ve said this before, but: expecting the DNC to be enthusiastic about a guy who isn’t a Democrat using the Democratic party as a springboard to the presidency, and who spends much of his time bitching about the Democratic party, and whose supporters are vocally rude, dismissive, and insulting about other candidates and Democratic voters, and refuse to support the nominee in the end, to boot, is ... unrealistic. Bernie should feel free to run as a Democratic Socialist, as far as I’m concerned. And yes, I will vote blue, no matter who. Unlike a good chunk of his supporters.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 14:28:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2020 21:25:12 GMT
From now on anytime something wonky happens, I think a lot of us are going to go straight to "election tampering" whether it is or isn't. We shouldn't have to be worrying about this shit. I agree. This is from the LA Times: "On a tense, chaotic night, with the eyes of the nation trained on the Iowa caucuses, that state’s Democratic Party was counting on a slick new smartphone app to make everything go smoothly. The app was coded by a tech firm run by veterans of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, one of them a former Google engineer. It was designed to meet new requirements instituted after that year’s contentious Iowa caucuses, in which Clinton narrowly edged out Bernie Sanders. To provide more transparency this time around, the state party promised to report not just the final results but voters’ initial and second choices as well." Full disclosure - not a Hilary fan. But this is politics - there is always, ALWAYS a connection. I don't believe there was any tampering. Just incompetence. LA Times
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Feb 4, 2020 21:28:19 GMT
iowa had one job.....
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 14:28:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2020 21:33:00 GMT
And I am SURE that the most rabid Bernie supporters will agree with the conspiracy theory idea and use it as an excuse if he doesn’t do as well in later primaries. So yeah—this sucks all around. We do not need a repeat of 2016. FTR, the DNC does not run the Iowa Caucuses. The Iowa Democratic Party does.
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
Phooey.. I was going to ignore this but I’m really tired of misinformation being spread. We get enough of it from the right without the left chiming in with their version. The DNC did not set out to sabotage the Sanders Campaign. Sanders, who had never run a national campaign before, did not put in place the ground game he needed to win the nomination. His greatest strength was not from registered Democrats but from independents who wanted to vote for Sanders in a Democratic Primary. For whatever reason the Democrats in some states have closed primaries, some Democrats have open primaries and some states have a version of an open/closed primary. And these versions were put into place long before Sanders decided to become a Democrat and run for President. And for some reason some of his supporters couldn’t figure out how to register to vote as an independent and get a Democratic ballot. Some of his supporters whined about CA so I decided to see how hard was it for an Independent to get a Democratic Ballot in California. On the online form there is a question “If you are an independent and want a Democratic Ballot check here”. Really hard. It was at this time Sanders started to repeat over and over again “let the people vote” What he should have done is have some sort of “get out the vote” ground game in each state to help these budding Bernie Bros register to vote so they would get a Democratic Ballot. As far as the emails go. Kurt Eichenwald a reporter for Newsweek at the time pointed out the date the “offending” email were written. He pointed out it was May 2016 when both the DNC and the Clinton campaigns switched from primary mode to general election mode. By May, it became clear Hillary would get the nomination because after each primary Sanders was not cutting Hillary’s lead and all the polls showed that Hillary would win CA, which Sanders needed if he had any chance of getting the nomination. Premature on the part of the DNC and the Clinton Campaign maybe, but by then the dye had already been casted. What Sanders did, even before the emails were released, was lead his supporters to believe that the “fix was in” against him even though that wasn’t the case. That “they” set up the primaries so they would favor Hillary over Sanders , even though the states decided what type of primary they would have long before Sanders became a candidate. A candidate who’s support consisted mostly of Independents and not Democrats in a Democratic primary. Then there were the “super delegates” who in the end didn’t matter much because Hillary had 3M or so more votes than Sanders. The bottom line was the Democrats voted for Hillary in the Democratic Primary and Sanders did nothing or very little to make sure his independent supporters knew what to do to register or re-register so they could vote for him in the Democratic primary in their state. Sanders was a sore loser and many of his supporters were even more of a sore loser than he was. Don’t believe any of this, ask google and do your homework.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Feb 4, 2020 21:40:09 GMT
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
I am quite certain I’ve said this before, but: expecting the DNC to be enthusiastic about a guy who isn’t a Democrat using the Democratic party as a springboard to the presidency, and who spends much of his time bitching about the Democratic party, and whose supporters are vocally rude, dismissive, and insulting about other candidates and Democratic voters, and refuse to support the nominee in the end, to boot, is ... unrealistic. Bernie should feel free to run as a Democratic Socialist, as far as I’m concerned. And yes, I will vote blue, no matter who. Unlike a good chunk of his supporters. Yep, you've said it before and you aren't wrong - it's just that the way Bernie was handled last time seriously hurt the DNC and they're getting ready to do it all over again. It's almost like they weren't paying attention the first time.
Question: The DNC changed the rules again. They are obviously trying to shank Bernie protect the integrity of the Democratic Party. It is confusing though, it's like they're finally seeing that Biden may not be the hot ticket they thought he would be and maybe they want Bloomberg instead. They excluded Yang and Booker for not having enough polls and yet, they change the rules to allow Bloomberg?
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,856
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Feb 4, 2020 22:19:10 GMT
Partial results:
Buttigieg 26.9% Sanders 25.1% Warren 18.3% Biden 15.6% Klobuchar 12.6%
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Feb 4, 2020 22:39:45 GMT
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
I am quite certain I’ve said this before, but: expecting the DNC to be enthusiastic about a guy who isn’t a Democrat using the Democratic party as a springboard to the presidency, and who spends much of his time bitching about the Democratic party, and whose supporters are vocally rude, dismissive, and insulting about other candidates and Democratic voters, and refuse to support the nominee in the end, to boot, is ... unrealistic. Bernie should feel free to run as a Democratic Socialist, as far as I’m concerned. And yes, I will vote blue, no matter who. Unlike a good chunk of his supporters. Yeah, what she said. He is using the party.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Feb 4, 2020 22:41:27 GMT
blue no matter who. i can get behind Buttigieg if necessary.
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Feb 4, 2020 23:05:51 GMT
It's a result of complete ineptitude. No one rolls out a new system, in this case an app, without testing it. And how hard would it have been to test? Not very.
It's also ridiculous that they have taken all day to pull together only 62% of the results. As I understand this process, the 'votes' should have been counted last night. Could the precincts have not just faxed in their results and someone added them up?
The only thing they voted on was president, right? They didn't have to count votes for any other office, just one office.
I hope this will be the end of Iowa being first in the nation. If not, I hope in 4 years neither Democrat nor Republican candidates should spend one penny there or one minute there to campaign. This is an inexcusable blunder we did not need on the day of the State of the Union and the day before the crook in the White House is about to get off from one of the schemes he cooked up that we actually know about.
|
|
moodyblue
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,179
Location: Western Illinois
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2014 21:07:23 GMT
|
Post by moodyblue on Feb 4, 2020 23:22:28 GMT
As has been pointed out by CNN people, the Iowa caucus system is extremely transparent and public. Every caucus had vote totals announced throughout the evening and everyone who was at one would know what those were if they stayed till the end. Reporter pointed out that they knew who won the caucuses they were covering. And one mentioned that they thought every major campaign had a person at each of the 1700+ caucuses, which means those totals could have been relayed to the campaign headquarters - which kind of explains Mayor Pete being pretty confident that he had done well.
There is also a paper trail to support those vote totals.
But, there will be people who continue to question.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Feb 4, 2020 23:29:07 GMT
I am quite certain I’ve said this before, but: expecting the DNC to be enthusiastic about a guy who isn’t a Democrat using the Democratic party as a springboard to the presidency, and who spends much of his time bitching about the Democratic party, and whose supporters are vocally rude, dismissive, and insulting about other candidates and Democratic voters, and refuse to support the nominee in the end, to boot, is ... unrealistic. Bernie should feel free to run as a Democratic Socialist, as far as I’m concerned. And yes, I will vote blue, no matter who. Unlike a good chunk of his supporters. Yep, you've said it before and you aren't wrong - it's just that the way Bernie was handled last time seriously hurt the DNC and they're getting ready to do it all over again. It's almost like they weren't paying attention the first time.
Question: The DNC changed the rules again. They are obviously trying to shank Bernie protect the integrity of the Democratic Party. It is confusing though, it's like they're finally seeing that Biden may not be the hot ticket they thought he would be and maybe they want Bloomberg instead. They excluded Yang and Booker for not having enough polls and yet, they change the rules to allow Bloomberg?
On re-reading my post, I can see that “I know I said this before” sounds snotty. It wasn’t meant that way. It was supposed to mean “bear with me, I know I’m repeating myself.” Sorry about that. As far as the DNC trying to shank Bernie goes, I’m not so sure about that, but I wouldn’t much care if they were. He wants the advantages of running as a Democrat without the responsibilities. Not a fan. As far as Michael Moore goes ... I like him. I do. He’s done some great things. But his politics and style are not mine. I’ll take his input under consideration.
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,378
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Feb 4, 2020 23:30:12 GMT
As has been pointed out by CNN people, the Iowa caucus system is extremely transparent and public. Every caucus had vote totals announced throughout the evening and everyone who was at one would know what those were if they stayed till the end. Reporter pointed out that they knew who won the caucuses they were covering. And one mentioned that they thought every major campaign had a person at each of the 1700+ caucuses, which means those totals could have been relayed to the campaign headquarters - which kind of explains Mayor Pete being pretty confident that he had done well. There is also a paper trail to support those vote totals. But, there will be people who continue to question. BERNIE people will question it.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Feb 4, 2020 23:31:37 GMT
As has been pointed out by CNN people, the Iowa caucus system is extremely transparent and public. Every caucus had vote totals announced throughout the evening and everyone who was at one would know what those were if they stayed till the end. Reporter pointed out that they knew who won the caucuses they were covering. And one mentioned that they thought every major campaign had a person at each of the 1700+ caucuses, which means those totals could have been relayed to the campaign headquarters - which kind of explains Mayor Pete being pretty confident that he had done well. There is also a paper trail to support those vote totals. But, there will be people who continue to question. BERNIE people will question it. And Trump people. They are loving this.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 4, 2020 23:45:04 GMT
And I am SURE that the most rabid Bernie supporters will agree with the conspiracy theory idea and use it as an excuse if he doesn’t do as well in later primaries. So yeah—this sucks all around. We do not need a repeat of 2016. FTR, the DNC does not run the Iowa Caucuses. The Iowa Democratic Party does.
It doesn't help that the DNC has pulled this on Sanders before.
Also, they may not run the Iowa Democratic party but I'm certain the DNC is up to their neck in it, especially with everything riding on this election.
Bernie is NOT a Democrat. He’s using the resources of the DNC, plain and simple. Why is it fair for him to do that when he’s an independent!?! It’s crazy that the Bernie supporters seem to forget this little factoid when they’re raking Dems over the coals screaming how unfair the Democratic Party treats Independent Bernie Sanders. 🙄🙄🙄🙄
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 4, 2020 23:55:00 GMT
I am quite certain I’ve said this before, but: expecting the DNC to be enthusiastic about a guy who isn’t a Democrat using the Democratic party as a springboard to the presidency, and who spends much of his time bitching about the Democratic party, and whose supporters are vocally rude, dismissive, and insulting about other candidates and Democratic voters, and refuse to support the nominee in the end, to boot, is ... unrealistic. Bernie should feel free to run as a Democratic Socialist, as far as I’m concerned. And yes, I will vote blue, no matter who. Unlike a good chunk of his supporters. Yep, you've said it before and you aren't wrong - it's just that the way Bernie was handled last time seriously hurt the DNC and they're getting ready to do it all over again. It's almost like they weren't paying attention the first time.
Question: The DNC changed the rules again. They are obviously trying to shank Bernie protect the integrity of the Democratic Party. It is confusing though, it's like they're finally seeing that Biden may not be the hot ticket they thought he would be and maybe they want Bloomberg instead. They excluded Yang and Booker for not having enough polls and yet, they change the rules to allow Bloomberg?
Why should it be different this year? Why is it the DNC who has to “learn something” from last year? Why didn’t Bernie choose to run as an Independent, which he is?? From what I understand, the rule change for Bloomberg was solely because he is self funded, and doesn’t have fundraising that qualifies the candidates.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Feb 5, 2020 0:00:31 GMT
Since Bernie is an independent, will the DNC ever make him the nominee?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 14:28:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2020 0:49:44 GMT
David Wasserman ...
”The point @clairecmc just made - that Buttigieg/Biden/Klobuchar are adding up to 56% vs. Sanders/Warren at 43% - is an important one.
2020 Dem voters (even in IA) aren't as liberal as often portrayed, and Buttigieg wouldn't be ahead without Biden/Klobuchar second choice votes.”
The fact there are more moderate Democrats than progressives is the reason I think Biden has/had been sitting at the top for as long as he is/was because he is a moderate.
No question he took a hit from Ukraine and I was wondering who would take his place as the main moderate candidate, Pete or Amy.
I prefer Pete but can get behind either one more then Sanders or Warren.
|
|
MizIndependent
Drama Llama
Quit your bullpoop.
Posts: 5,836
Jun 25, 2014 19:43:16 GMT
|
Post by MizIndependent on Feb 5, 2020 16:55:19 GMT
Yep, you've said it before and you aren't wrong - it's just that the way Bernie was handled last time seriously hurt the DNC and they're getting ready to do it all over again. It's almost like they weren't paying attention the first time.
Question: The DNC changed the rules again. They are obviously trying to shank Bernie protect the integrity of the Democratic Party. It is confusing though, it's like they're finally seeing that Biden may not be the hot ticket they thought he would be and maybe they want Bloomberg instead. They excluded Yang and Booker for not having enough polls and yet, they change the rules to allow Bloomberg?
Why should it be different this year? Why is it the DNC who has to “learn something” from last year? Why didn’t Bernie choose to run as an Independent, which he is?? From what I understand, the rule change for Bloomberg was solely because he is self funded, and doesn’t have fundraising that qualifies the candidates. "Why should it be different this year?" Because last time it split the party and the Democrats paid for it, in spades.
"Why is it the DNC who has to “learn something” from last year?" Because they're going to get the same result as last time, split party.
"Why didn’t Bernie choose to run as an Independent, which he is??" Who the hell knows?
"From what I understand, the rule change for Bloomberg was solely because he is self funded, and doesn’t have fundraising that qualifies the candidates." From what I understand, each candidate it supposed to be able " to meet a minimum number of donations" [Source: Insider.com] and what I understand is the donations come from The People. That's why the donations are important, because The People are literally giving him money to put him up there to represent them.
Bloomberg doesn't need donations - so he is effectively buying his spot. Corporatists running the show without the true input of The People. Those rules were put in place to include the people...now they've been circumvented. But I get it, anyone to beat Trump.
If I was Yang or Booker I'd be so pissed.
|
|