|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 5, 2022 1:53:47 GMT
Those on the right are trying to figure out who leaked the draft Supreme Court decision.
This guy figured it out or so he says.
He then does a really long thread on why he thinks this woman is the one who leaked the draft decision.
Samples of the long thread..
His last tweet was….
Now this guy is a lawyer & senior council at some law firm. He has no proof but in “his humble opinion “ she’s the one.
Of all the irresponsible things for this guy to do. Seriously what was he thinking?
|
|
|
|
Post by busy on May 5, 2022 1:56:23 GMT
He very literally could be endangering her life. What a piece of garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ryann on May 5, 2022 1:58:29 GMT
He very literally could be endangering her life. What a piece of garbage. Exactly. I hope he receives as many death threats as she does. Not really, but damn. |
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,522 
|
Post by pinklady on May 5, 2022 2:33:49 GMT
I reported that tweet and another doxxing Sotamyors clerk. It’s pretty shitty that you are spreading it even further. You’re doing what he’s doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on May 5, 2022 2:41:44 GMT
Why does anyone think a liberal clerk is leaking an old opinion draft overturning Roe? It makes very little sense. The opinion, assuming it looked like that one, is releasing at latest in June. What would a liberal clerk hope to gain? The conservative justices are going to dig in. not opt out.
This seems much more like the conservative block has someone who is either weakening or watering down, and someone wants to lock them in.
That is the substance, but, also, this guy is a total ass. Law clerks are not public figures and it is grossly irresponsible to be speculating about one like this.
|
|
luckyjune
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,685
Location: In the rainy, rainy WA
|
Post by luckyjune on May 5, 2022 3:23:02 GMT
I fear for her. The guy doing the doxing...idiot. Leaps in logic much? Way to ruin someone's life with your "humble opinion." What people won't do for attention!
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 5, 2022 3:24:35 GMT
Somewhere I read count on the conservatives .. The leak to keep the five from changing their minds... They are presently committed in writing.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 5, 2022 4:18:57 GMT
I reported that tweet and another doxxing Sotamyors clerk. It’s pretty shitty that you are spreading it even further. You’re doing what he’s doing. Actually I’m calling attention what this guy did to this woman. It’s was IMO outrageous. Sadly the damage was done when he first posted it a day ago and all those who retweeted it and those with their responses. In one day there have been 8,000+ retweets and 2,900 + responses. The scary thing is it received 19,000 likes. So on this we will disagree. |
|
michellegb
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,915
Location: New England and loving it!
Jun 26, 2014 0:04:59 GMT
|
Post by michellegb on May 5, 2022 9:40:48 GMT
Somewhere I read count on the conservatives .. The leak to keep the five from changing their minds... They are presently committed in writing.  |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on May 5, 2022 11:24:35 GMT
Seems more likely to me that a conservative leaked it, either to give people time to get used to the idea, so it would be less of a shock and maybe people won’t react quite as strongly the the actual decision? Or to keep the conservatives in line? Roberts might be pressuring one of them to reach a compromise, like allowing it up to 15 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on May 5, 2022 12:10:06 GMT
Seems more likely to me that a conservative leaked it, either to give people time to get used to the idea, so it would be less of a shock and maybe people won’t react quite as strongly the the actual decision? Or to keep the conservatives in line? Roberts might be pressuring one of them to reach a compromise, like allowing it up to 15 weeks. IMO a conservative could have just as easily leaked it. Perhaps they are hoping that upset women will riot and they can then point to all the crazy women as a scare tactic to get votes. You know, like they do with people seeking asylum & to minorities. They find one sound byte and twist it into a scare tactic. Heck, even if there’s peaceful protests ( which there are & will be ) they’ll just send people to burn shit down like they already did to BLM. Then they can take all our right away…. |
|
|
|
Post by powderhorngreen on May 5, 2022 16:25:26 GMT
Irresponsible totally!!!! Just as irresponsible as the group publishing the addresses of the private homes of the current justices. Just stop.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 5, 2022 16:33:56 GMT
From this morning. It would appear this guy doesn’t understand what he did was wrong.
And I hope the information in the other tweet about posting the Justices addresses is not true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 5, 2022 16:34:34 GMT
It’s hilarious to me that conservatives are mad about this being “leaked.” It’s the culmination of all their hopes and dreams for a new Gilead. They should be rejoicing, not punishing young women.
But of course, they’ll never turn down an opportunity to punish a woman - rightfully or wrongfully - who fails to adhere to the standards they set for female behavior (submissive, subservient). If they’ve punished the wrong person, oh well. She can still serve as an example to any other woman who might be thinking of stepping out of line.
|
|
|
|
Post by coaliesquirrel on May 5, 2022 18:10:41 GMT
It’s hilarious to me that conservatives are mad about this being “leaked.” They're not. They're just **saying** they are in order to shift the focus to that instead of the content and future implications of the decision. Conservatives have much more to gain by getting the furor to die down before the upcoming primaries & elections. For instance, if the decision was released in June/July, that's pretty close to the August 2 vote in KS where Republicans are seeking to amend the state constitution to specifically state there's no right to an abortion (contravening a recent court decision). They for sure don't want ladies all riled up too close to those votes. |
|
