|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 25, 2024 3:47:13 GMT
Exactly. They were heavily armed and trained and had tactical gear, and were still afraid to engage the shooter with an AR-15. But Mrs. Brown who teaches social studies is going to take out someone with an AR just using her purse pistol. That makes sense. Its not like you pick any random staff member. The ones that need to be armed, need to be vetted extensively and trained.
No it is not the answer, but if whackos even thought there were guns in the school to fight back, maybe some of them would stay away. Nothing is going to solve this problem. Taking gun rights away from people will not fix this, because no matter what, the whacko will get their hands on a gun one way or another.
What's more important? Gun rights or or the right of kids to be safe in schools, people safe at churches, grocery stores, clubs, movie theaters etc The response that shooters will get their hands on a gun anyway is lazy, a deflection, a straw man argument and a cop out. The point of gun safety isn't to eliminate every bad guy with a gun, the point is to reduce the number of them. There are laws against drunk driving even though some people do it anyway. Why have laws if there will be criminals? Why have police if there will be criminals? Car safety is a good analogy. Yes, people die every year in car accidents. But, a significant number of lives are saved by laws and regulations on everything from seat belts to drivers licenses, required training, registering cars etc. Imagine if we applied the technology and research that we used to advance car safety in the last 30 years (anti-lock brakes, air bags, rear view cameras, car seats etc) to guns. Fingerprint activated triggers or pin enabled locks for starters. There is a middle ground - it is possible to have gun safety laws that will save lives (studies prove this) without taking away guns completely. Uvalde should prove that armed, vetted extensively and trained staff are not the answer. If trained police officers were afraid to confront an active shooter, what do you expect a teacher to do? It's a completely unreasonable expectation to arm teachers to face an active shooter with an AR-15 Looking at other wealthy countries, the difference is pretty obvious. It's the guns and always has been. If more guns were the answer or the only solution to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, we would be the safest country in the world.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jan 25, 2024 3:48:15 GMT
How is that different than the police officers? Besides being less vetted, less trained, and having less experience than the police officers? Its not. Everyone in every role can screw up. So if you just have PD and they screw up, what's the alternative. Nothing, but tradegdy. Have an alternative and just maybe a life can be saved. Or maybe it will cost more lives. Because these people don’t have the time to be properly trained. Or to keep up the training. Or the job experience to get used to high stress situations like an active shooter situation. It’s placing armed weapons in the school, in the hands of amateurs. There is a lot more that could go wrong than could go right.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 25, 2024 3:50:06 GMT
How is that different than the police officers? Besides being less vetted, less trained, and having less experience than the police officers? Its not. Everyone in every role can screw up. So if you just have PD and they screw up, what's the alternative. Nothing, but tradegdy. Have an alternative and just maybe a life can be saved. No, the alternative is common sense gun safety laws. Waiting periods, backgrounds checks, close the gun show loop hole, minimum age, banning high capacity magazines, secure storage etc.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,321
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Jan 25, 2024 4:29:01 GMT
Its not. Everyone in every role can screw up. So if you just have PD and they screw up, what's the alternative. Nothing, but tradegdy. Have an alternative and just maybe a life can be saved. Or maybe it will cost more lives. Because these people don’t have the time to be properly trained. Or to keep up the training. Or the job experience to get used to high stress situations like an active shooter situation. It’s placing armed weapons in the school, in the hands of amateurs. There is a lot more that could go wrong than could go right. I would think they would have to pass training and also apply with the authorites for licenses and conseal permits, so there should not be any untrained person handed a gun. I
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 25, 2024 4:30:25 GMT
Or maybe it will cost more lives. Because these people don’t have the time to be properly trained. Or to keep up the training. Or the job experience to get used to high stress situations like an active shooter situation. It’s placing armed weapons in the school, in the hands of amateurs. There is a lot more that could go wrong than could go right. I would think they would have to pass training and also apply with the authorites for licenses and conseal permits, so there should not be any untrained person handed a gun. I Many red states, like mine, no longer require licenses or concealed carry permits. It’s a literal free for all.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,321
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Jan 25, 2024 4:40:57 GMT
I would think they would have to pass training and also apply with the authorites for licenses and conseal permits, so there should not be any untrained person handed a gun. I Many red states, like mine, no longer require licenses or concealed carry permits. It’s a literal free for all. This is not something that should be taken lightly. Before any school staff person be armed, there needs to be a program to implement such and stringent rules adheard to. Classes, training, permits, or what ever it takes, but a few extra staff memebers with a weapon could save lives. Heck, could be the principal, the janitor, or the lunch cook, but they would have to pass the guidelines that the program sets forth for it to be implemented in the most safest way. No different tham secuity guards placed at school now. Those employees are usually hired out by a 3rd party. Have your own staff and you can control the program. I know some armed security guards that are pretty out there with attitudes of I'm cool, I carry a gun or other mannerisms not worthy of carring a weapon.
Yes, there are countries that have less weapons, but the United States would never make that change, so do what we have to do at the moment to protect the children or any human being.
|
|
|
Post by Laurie on Jan 25, 2024 4:45:22 GMT
What is bizarre to me is that this is a very small school. Granted crime is bad in Sioux City, however, this school is not really in a “bad” area. It basically sits in the Menards parking lot. Until I read this tonight I thought that building was just a preschool. I don’t understand where their perceived threat fear is coming from.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,321
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Jan 25, 2024 4:50:33 GMT
What is bizarre to me is that this is a very small school. Granted crime is bad in Sioux City, however, this school is not really in a “bad” area. It basically sits in the Menards parking lot. Until I read this tonight I thought that building was just a preschool. I don’t understand where their perceived threat fear is coming from. It can happen any where or any day or any time. You must not have been a scout. The Girl Scout Motto is "Be Prepared." Better to be safe than sorry.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 25, 2024 4:57:40 GMT
Many red states, like mine, no longer require licenses or concealed carry permits. It’s a literal free for all. This is not something that should be taken lightly. Before any school staff person be armed, there needs to be a program to implement such and stringent rules adheard to. Classes, training, permits, or what ever it takes, but a few extra staff memebers with a weapon could save lives. Heck, could be the principal, the janitor, or the lunch cook, but they would have to pass the guidelines that the program sets forth for it to be implemented in the most safest way. No different tham secuity guards placed at school now. Those employees are usually hired out by a 3rd party. Have your own staff and you can control the program. I know some armed security guards that are pretty out there with attitudes of I'm cool, I carry a gun or other mannerisms not worthy of carring a weapon.
Yes, there are countries that have less weapons, but the United States would never make that change, so do what we have to do at the moment to protect the children or any human being.
This is based on the assumption that armed school resource officers make schools safer, which isn't necessarily true. School resource officers can reduce some violence, but there is little actual evidence that they prevent mass shootings or reduce gun violence in schools. www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/maryland-resource-officers-praised-no-proof-they-make-schools-safer/Amid nationwide concern about school shootings and other violent incidents, all 24 Maryland school districts have employed school resource officers at some time since the 2016-2017 school year, and all but one retain them still.
But now, at least five years on, the state says it has no proof that resource officers make schools safer.www.npr.org/2018/03/08/591753884/do-police-officers-in-schools-really-make-them-saferthere is no evidence to show that expanding law enforcement by adding SROs actually results in safer schools says Marc Schindler, head of the Justice Policy Institute.justicepolicy.org/research/policy-brief-2020-the-presence-of-school-resource-officers-sros-in-americas-schools/jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2776515armed guards were not associated with significant reduction in rates of injuries; in fact, controlling for the aforementioned factors of location and school characteristics, the rate of deaths was 2.83 times greater in schools with an armed guard present edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai21-476.pdfwww.statesman.com/story/news/politics/politifact/2022/06/01/fact-check-do-armed-campus-police-prevent-school-shootings/9961676002/www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/The-Facts-About-Dangers-of-Added-Police-in-Schools_The-Sentencing-Project.pdf
|
|
|
Post by snugglebutter on Jan 25, 2024 4:59:45 GMT
Its not. Everyone in every role can screw up. So if you just have PD and they screw up, what's the alternative. Nothing, but tradegdy. Have an alternative and just maybe a life can be saved. Or maybe it will cost more lives. Because these people don’t have the time to be properly trained. Or to keep up the training. Or the job experience to get used to high stress situations like an active shooter situation. It’s placing armed weapons in the school, in the hands of amateurs. There is a lot more that could go wrong than could go right.
We just had a situation 1-2 years ago here in Texas where a superintendent left his gun in an elementary school bathroom, and it was discovered by a young child. Thankfully nothing happened but it could have been tragic.
|
|
valincal
Drama Llama
Southern Alberta
Posts: 5,778
Jun 27, 2014 2:21:22 GMT
|
Post by valincal on Jan 25, 2024 5:00:20 GMT
What is bizarre to me is that this is a very small school. Granted crime is bad in Sioux City, however, this school is not really in a “bad” area. It basically sits in the Menards parking lot. Until I read this tonight I thought that building was just a preschool. I don’t understand where their perceived threat fear is coming from. It can happen any where or any day or any time. You must not have been a scout. The Girl Scout Motto is "Be Prepared." Better to be safe than sorry. I was a Girl Scout too, and I’ve never ever felt like I needed to carry a gun. 🙄
|
|
|
Post by Laurie on Jan 25, 2024 5:05:12 GMT
What is bizarre to me is that this is a very small school. Granted crime is bad in Sioux City, however, this school is not really in a “bad” area. It basically sits in the Menards parking lot. Until I read this tonight I thought that building was just a preschool. I don’t understand where their perceived threat fear is coming from. It can happen any where or any day or any time. You must not have been a scout. The Girl Scout Motto is "Be Prepared." Better to be safe than sorry. Yeah I understand that. Hell whenever I go somewhere I have an escape plan in my head. I have been by this school and like I said previously I didn’t even realize it was more than a preschool. Also, given what I know about Sioux City and their schools this is the last school I would have expected to implement this. Other schools there have had legit problems and threats so I could at least see where they would be reacting out of a place of fear. P.S. for the record I was in Girl Scouts and was a leader when my oldest dd was in it. I stopped though when I saw how much they exploited the girls during nut sales and cookie sales. It is shameful how much the girls get for their troop. So while I was part of the organization I don’t say that proudly.
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Jan 25, 2024 5:08:32 GMT
In the heat of the action, how is a SWAT officer going to know that the person they see through a window, from a few yards away, holding a gun, is a good guy or a bad guy? Or, what if the officer burst through a door and see Mrs. Brown, the 1st grade teacher, standing there with a gun in her hand. Will he ask questions first or shoot first? So much can go wrong!
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Jan 25, 2024 5:10:51 GMT
Also, given what I know about Sioux City and their schools this is the last school I would have expected to implement this. Other schools there have had legit problems and threats so I could at least see where they would be reacting out of a place of fear. All it takes is one loner, who does not feel accepted. You don't need problem kids in a school to have a tragedy happen.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,321
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Jan 25, 2024 5:16:56 GMT
It can happen any where or any day or any time. You must not have been a scout. The Girl Scout Motto is "Be Prepared." Better to be safe than sorry. I was a Girl Scout too, and I’ve never ever felt like I needed to carry a gun. 🙄 I think you missed the point. You don't need to carry a gun, but you do need to be prepared for other things in your life to prevent undesirable consequenses; like gett your car serviced to you don't break down on a highway. We all need to be prepared a much as we can to navigate life.
|
|
mamallama
Full Member
Posts: 148
Sept 14, 2018 7:30:33 GMT
|
Post by mamallama on Jan 25, 2024 8:02:37 GMT
I’m from a small town and know the teachers and staff at the schools pretty well. There are teachers or stuff in every school that I know have been hunters for years and really know gun safety. I would be comfortable with specific teachers carrying but I have also spoken to teachers about the subject. The one in particular that I feel has lifelong experience with guns (high school teacher) said he absolutely wouldn’t want to carry. He said it’s too much of a responsibility, the amount of training he would want would be huge and he just doesn’t feel it’s a good idea. That made me rethink how I felt about it.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jan 25, 2024 13:22:26 GMT
Its not. Everyone in every role can screw up. So if you just have PD and they screw up, what's the alternative. Nothing, but tradegdy. Have an alternative and just maybe a life can be saved. No, the alternative is common sense gun safety laws. Waiting periods, backgrounds checks, close the gun show loop hole, minimum age, banning high capacity magazines, secure storage etc. And then to actually enforce those laws would be a great start.
|
|
|
Post by Peace Sign on Jan 25, 2024 14:03:24 GMT
more guns for everyone!!! i wouldn't be surprised if the NRA is pushing this stupidity.
1. unconscious bias could provoke, no...WILL provoke problems. it will happen. and 2. so Mrs. Brown has to live with the fact that she killed a former student last week? I don't think Mrs. Brown wants that or knows what she's getting in to.
This came up in our district (suburb of Columbus Ohio), which has had a couple of knives and guns brought to school, and the board quickly said "NO" not happening. My children would be out in a hot second if teachers were armed.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Jan 25, 2024 14:04:54 GMT
Looking at other wealthy countries, the difference is pretty obvious. It's the guns and always has been. If more guns were the answer or the only solution to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, we would be the safest country in the world. Indeed. And when there's a school shooting and armed teachers couldn't stop the deaths what next...arm the kids?
|
|
craftymom101
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,786
Jul 31, 2014 5:23:25 GMT
|
Post by craftymom101 on Jan 25, 2024 15:11:50 GMT
As a former teacher and adamantly against arming educators, I have a lot of questions about this new policy:
1. Who is purchasing the firearms? Are they privately owned or owned by the school district? 2. Who carries the liability insurance if a firearm is discharged accidentally? 3. What happens if a teacher's weapon is taken/stolen? Who is responsible? 4. What (if any) training is done before the district allows a teacher to carry a gun at school? 5. If a student takes control of a teacher-owned gun and that gun is used in a crime, who is liable? Is the teacher liable and can face prison? 6. If an armed teacher fails to act during a school shooting, can s/he be held liable for the deaths of teachers and/or students?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 25, 2024 15:26:08 GMT
As a former teacher and adamantly against arming educators, I have a lot of questions about this new policy: 1. Who is purchasing the firearms? Are they privately owned or owned by the school district? 2. Who carries the liability insurance if a firearm is discharged accidentally? 3. What happens if a teacher's weapon is taken/stolen? Who is responsible? 4. What (if any) training is done before the district allows a teacher to carry a gun at school? 5. If a student takes control of a teacher-owned gun and that gun is used in a crime, who is liable? Is the teacher liable and can face prison? 6. If an armed teacher fails to act during a school shooting, can s/he be held liable for the deaths of teachers and/or students? Another - when and how often will teachers do the kind of training that would actually allow them to engage a shooter with a high powered rifle, and who will pay for it? Will the teachers be compensated for that time or are we just adding to the growing list of unpaid duties? Does the presence of armed teachers mean we can stop putting 5 year olds through active shooter drills? Or does it mean we now also have to train 5 year olds on what to do if one of their classmates gets ahold of the teacher’s gun? People who think guns are the answer have rarely considered the actual scope of the problem IMO. We could solve this issue without arming teachers and creating additional issues if we wanted to, but the gun lobby has convinced some people that will never happen and the only answer is more guns.
|
|
|
Post by Restless Spirit on Jan 25, 2024 17:10:24 GMT
I’m in Indiana.
Part of an OP/ED in the Indy Star in April 2023 re: Indiana HB 1177 for funding for arming and training teachers.
In Part:
“ Teachers are not soldiers. In Indiana, educators are already underpaid and lack the resources needed for what they are tasked to do. We in the legislature cannot also ask teachers to be on the front lines, protecting their classrooms from armed intruders. The amount of training that this bill would require them to have to carry a handgun in their classroom would also not equip them with the skills they would need to be effective in high-stress situations, which could lead to more students getting injured or, God forbid, killed. Likewise, if a teacher leaves the classroom to pursue an active shooter, who will be in the classroom to protect his or her students?”
The bill Passed and was signed into Law in July 2023.
In additional, a new Indiana Senate bill aims to require every school district in the state to enact a policy restricting cellphone use during classroom instruction. That sounds good in theory doesn’t it. However, to achieve this, schools will purchase Yondr phone pouches. The pouches work by schools setting up “phone free spaces” in their buildings, where students cell phones are locked up in portable pouches. Students can carry the pouches with them throughout the day, but phones can only be accessed with the use of a special un-locking device. Locally, one school system just approved the purchase of cell phone pouches and they will be tested in four schools-2 middle schools and two high schools
So essentially, if anything happens, the students will not be able to contact anybody on the outside and there will be no video proof. Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.
|
|
|
Post by wholarmor on Jan 25, 2024 17:24:47 GMT
Looking back to when my kids were in school, I'd have a hard time picking any teacher that I would feel the least bit comfortable carrying a gun in school. Any that I felt would be level-headed enough to do it, I know for a fact could probably not shoot a person if it came down to it. And the ones that were always hot to say they wanted to be armed in the school, where the absolute last person I would trust with a firearm. I have plenty of guns at my disposal. I do not carry. Hy husband does not carry. If someone came in my house, I doubt I could fire upon them, and even if I could - I would have to get to, and unlock two safes to get a gun and the ammo. Trust me - the guy that really REALLY wants to be armed to protect you, and talks about it a lot, is not the guy you want armed to protect you. The guy (and I am using guy in a gender neutral term) that you would never guess is armed and never talks about being armed, or guns in general, is the guy you want protecting you. They don't just pick anyone and they also go through training. Even police who are "well-trained" and practice more than the average teacher would make mistakes when put under pressure. No. Thank. You.
|
|
|
Post by wholarmor on Jan 25, 2024 17:30:23 GMT
Looking at other wealthy countries, the difference is pretty obvious. It's the guns and always has been. If more guns were the answer or the only solution to a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun, we would be the safest country in the world. Indeed. And when there's a school shooting and armed teachers couldn't stop the deaths what next...arm the kids? Reminds me of "When kids are hitting each other with sticks on the playground, is the answer to give all the kids sticks?"
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Jan 25, 2024 17:39:51 GMT
Like the Ulvade police force? Because the PD did not do what they needed to do, had a teacher or other staff memeber been armed, maybe there wouldn't have had so many deaths. I can’t believe this is a serious comment. At least I don’t want to. But, sure…Ms. Frizzle will take out the bad guy when all the officers with years of training and experience are too afraid to do so. 🙄🤦🏼♀️
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,322
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Jan 25, 2024 18:28:28 GMT
Exactly. They were heavily armed and trained and had tactical gear, and were still afraid to engage the shooter with an AR-15. But Mrs. Brown who teaches social studies is going to take out someone with an AR just using her purse pistol. That makes sense. Its not like you pick any random staff member. The ones that need to be armed, need to be vetted extensively and trained.
No it is not the answer, but if whackos even thought there were guns in the school to fight back, maybe some of them would stay away. Nothing is going to solve this problem. Taking gun rights away from people will not fix this, because no matter what, the whacko will get their hands on a gun one way or another.
What if armed teacher is not in the vicinity of the shooter? Are they going to leave students and prowl around the building playing Rambo?
|
|
|
Post by picotjo on Jan 25, 2024 18:31:16 GMT
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,322
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Jan 25, 2024 18:32:23 GMT
I don't care how much training you have. I don't care if you have hunted extensively. Animal prey aren't armed and you shoot them from a distance. It is a whole different thing we are face to face with an active shooter.
|
|
anaterra
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,111
Location: Texas
Jun 29, 2014 3:04:02 GMT
|
Post by anaterra on Jan 25, 2024 18:39:52 GMT
The only answer to the above questions that i know is in our school district... the "guardian" staff member carries their own weapon... they are given a stipend or bonus.. i dont know they correct term but they are given money to take safety trainings and it also covers ammo to train and if they have to use the weapon at school... no answer to who is tracking the trainings... or where or how...
Other questions that were asked before this all went down had no real concise answers... what happens if a student gets the weapon??? To be determined... what happens if staff doesn't respond properly..to be determined???
Sooo yeah it was really reassuring to the general public when our schools became guardian.... lol
Its such bullshit!! But Billy Bob and Joe Willy would've been there in a hot second and handled that Uvalde situation... and yeah its stereotypical.... but those guys do exist here!!
|
|
|
Post by Tamhugh on Jan 25, 2024 19:57:21 GMT
Exactly. They were heavily armed and trained and had tactical gear, and were still afraid to engage the shooter with an AR-15. But Mrs. Brown who teaches social studies is going to take out someone with an AR just using her purse pistol. That makes sense. Its not like you pick any random staff member. The ones that need to be armed, need to be vetted extensively and trained.
No it is not the answer, but if whackos even thought there were guns in the school to fight back, maybe some of them would stay away. Nothing is going to solve this problem. Taking gun rights away from people will not fix this, because no matter what, the whacko will get their hands on a gun one way or another.
The people who commit school shootings don’t care about getting shot. I would be willing to bet that most of them are expecting to die in the school. They just want to go out in a huge blaze of glory. I have spent the past 28 years working in public education and the day they start arming our staff, I am retiring. We have an SRO and I am perfectly ok with him having a gun. Teachers and staff? No way in Hell.
|
|