|
|
Post by Tearisci on Mar 26, 2024 14:14:51 GMT
Wow, my FB feed is filled with 'news' about the raid on Diddy's home in Florida on suspicion of sex trafficking. This report says that Prince Harry could somehow be involved. Whether or not that turns out to be true, it will be interesting to see what other names comes out of the documents. Page Six |
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Mar 26, 2024 14:16:46 GMT
Your link comes back to this thread.
|
|
oh yvonne
Prolific Pea
Posts: 8,003
Jun 26, 2014 0:45:23 GMT
|
Post by oh yvonne on Mar 26, 2024 14:20:40 GMT
Who's Harry?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tearisci on Mar 26, 2024 14:21:37 GMT
Fixed thank you!
Prince Harry- I ran out of characters!
|
|
|
|
Post by compeateropeator on Mar 26, 2024 14:24:15 GMT
All I have seen so far is that they raided 2 of Sean Combs’ houses at the same time, LA and Miami maybe? The Harry element is interesting. All kinds of breaking news today…truthfully I so much prefer dull and slow news days. 😔
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,535 
|
Post by pinklady on Mar 26, 2024 14:55:28 GMT
Guess this is one way of getting everyone to stop talking about Kate. 🙄
|
|
oh yvonne
Prolific Pea
Posts: 8,003
Jun 26, 2014 0:45:23 GMT
|
Post by oh yvonne on Mar 26, 2024 14:55:50 GMT
I'm thinking they are looking for clicks with the Prince Harry accusation.
I know he was photographed hanging out with the Kardashian mom's boyfriend, which I thought was bizarre. I think they went on a trip somewhere?
I doubt PH would be dumb enough to get involved with a scandal like being involved in a trafficking ring with Sean Combs.
|
|
|
|
Post by busy on Mar 26, 2024 15:14:27 GMT
I'm thinking they are looking for clicks with the Prince Harry accusation. I know he was photographed hanging out with the Kardashian mom's boyfriend, which I thought was bizarre. I think they went on a trip somewhere? I doubt PH would be dumb enough to get involved with a scandal like being involved in a trafficking ring with Sean Combs. Yeah, that headline is trash. It goes on to say he’s mentioned in relation to the concert for Diana he hosted many years ago. He is not accused of anything. |
|
|
|
Post by librarylady on Mar 26, 2024 15:42:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 26, 2024 15:50:11 GMT
It wouldn't the first time a royal was connected in one way or another to sex trafficking, so I am not surprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Mar 26, 2024 15:59:57 GMT
Guess this is one way of getting everyone to stop talking about Kate. 🙄 And in the photo of Harry with Combs and another guest, William was in the background. It looks like his name was just used/dropped to draw interest. |
|
|
|
Post by Tearisci on Mar 26, 2024 16:03:57 GMT
Page six isn't the most reputable so i'm just posting what I found. Made me think of Prince Andrew.
|
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Mar 26, 2024 16:17:21 GMT
It wouldn't the first time a royal was connected in one way or another to sex trafficking, so I am not surprised. And this is exactly the same way the accusations against Andrew started - an access to royalty scheme. |
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 26, 2024 16:28:00 GMT
Guess this is one way of getting everyone to stop talking about Kate. 🙄 And in the photo of Harry with Combs and another guest, William was in the background. It looks like his name was just used/dropped to draw interest. They used his name because it literally in the court documents on page 63. |
|
|
|
Post by questioning on Mar 26, 2024 16:35:21 GMT
All kinds of breaking news today…truthfully I so much prefer dull and slow news days. 😔 Agree with this on many topics. And I'd rather learn about it once it's fully vetted and developedn. |
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Mar 26, 2024 16:41:06 GMT
And in the photo of Harry with Combs and another guest, William was in the background. It looks like his name was just used/dropped to draw interest. They used his name because it literally in the court documents on page 63. Yes, to draw interest as indicated in the article I quoted. And not because he was involved in nefarious goings on. Eta: I can see why you might have been confused as to what I was saying. I was referring to the people in the document that used his name, not the people in the article. |
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 26, 2024 16:42:48 GMT
They used his name because it literally in the court documents on page 63. Yes, to draw interest as indicated in the article I quoted. And not because he was involved in nefarious goings on. You see it as drawing in interest. I see it as reporting what was in the documents. |
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Mar 26, 2024 16:44:06 GMT
Yes, to draw interest as indicated in the article I quoted. And not because he was involved in nefarious goings on. You see it as drawing in interest. I see it as reporting what was in the documents. I was editing as you were replying. They used Harry’s name to draw interest to the parties is what I was referring to. |
|
