zztop11
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,505 
|
Post by zztop11 on Jun 13, 2015 19:34:26 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 17, 2024 0:20:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 19:36:49 GMT
No, but I wouldn't pay $900 for any purse.
|
|
SabrinaP
Pearl Clutcher
Busy Teacher Pea
Posts: 4,361
Location: Dallas Texas
|
Post by SabrinaP on Jun 13, 2015 19:37:38 GMT
I can't imagine having the money to pay that much for one purse, but if I had the money and wanted it, sure it's cute.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoP on Jun 13, 2015 19:39:01 GMT
No Like ashley wouldn't pay $900 for any bag - but if someone was kind enough to gift me one  I would probably graciously accept |
|
caro
Drama Llama
Refupea 1130
Posts: 5,222
|
Post by caro on Jun 13, 2015 19:39:48 GMT
No I would not.
|
|
lesley
Drama Llama
My best friend Turriff, desperately missed.
Posts: 7,194
Location: Scotland, Scotland, Scotland
|
Post by lesley on Jun 13, 2015 19:40:57 GMT
If I had that much cash kicking around, sure. Not for that bag, though - it doesn't look its price. (If I'm spending that much, I want it to look as though it cost that much!)  |
|
|
|
Post by KikiPea on Jun 13, 2015 19:42:53 GMT
No, but I would NEVER pay that much for any purse. I'm lucky if I buy one that costs over $50.
I wouldn't even pay $50 for that one, because I don't like it at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by amblet on Jun 13, 2015 19:43:16 GMT
No not for that purse. I don't think I would for any purse but the verdict is still out on that.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jun 13, 2015 19:44:07 GMT
No, but I wouldn't pay $900 for any purse.  Me neither. I'm cheap thrifty. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 17, 2024 0:20:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 19:44:33 GMT
Not that particular bag no, it looks kind of plasticky.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spongemom Scrappants on Jun 13, 2015 19:47:17 GMT
I don't care for the particular bag. So, no. But for a bag I loved? Probably.
|
|
|
|
Post by scrappysurfer on Jun 13, 2015 19:49:38 GMT
If money were no object, yes I would. Vintage Chanel, in a heartbeat.
But not that one.
|
|
smartypants71
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,722
Location: Houston, TX
|
Post by smartypants71 on Jun 13, 2015 19:49:58 GMT
I have before but probably wouldn't do it now. I draw the line at about $400
|
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Jun 13, 2015 19:51:34 GMT
If I like the purse and if I had unlimited funds I'd buy what I like without looking at price.
|
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Jun 13, 2015 19:51:40 GMT
Probably not, but that would be because it isn't really my style. I tend to like a less traditional (read: hippie girl) bags.
|
|
|
|
Post by bothmykidsrbrats on Jun 13, 2015 19:52:01 GMT
I might pay that much for a bag, if money was no object, but not that one.
|
|
|
|
Post by beachbum on Jun 13, 2015 19:53:06 GMT
Nope. I'm pretty sure if you added up how much all the purses in my closet cost it would not total $900. I'm pretty cheap, I'm retired and don't need a purse that often. Heck, I bet I use a beach bag more than my purse!!
|
|
|
|
Post by cadoodlebug on Jun 13, 2015 20:00:00 GMT
What a bargain, marked down from $1400+. Nope, I rarely spend over $50 on a purse. I'm not a purse ho, it's just a means to carry my wallet, lipstick and eye glasses around. ![]() |
|
|
|
Post by grace2882 on Jun 13, 2015 20:01:21 GMT
No way! I would never spend that much for any purse. I have never owned a name brand purse and I have no desire to do so.
|
|
|
|
Post by mom on Jun 13, 2015 20:03:48 GMT
Yes I have paid over $900 for a purse but I would not buy that purse for any amount of money.
|
|
|
|
Post by missfrenchjessica on Jun 13, 2015 20:05:27 GMT
Nope.
I doubt I'd spent that much on any bag, even if I had the money.
I'm not super attached to my purses.
They serve a function.
I get the one that holds all my crap and does it while looking as pretty as I can afford.
Don't know if I've spent more than $60 on a purse.
They're just not my thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by leannec on Jun 13, 2015 20:08:37 GMT
No, but I wouldn't pay $900 for any purse. Same here ... I'll admit that I have two Coach bags but they are not new and will not be replaced anytime soon ... and didn't cost anywhere near $900  |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Jun 17, 2024 0:20:08 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2015 20:09:35 GMT
Not that purse but others yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by ~summer~ on Jun 13, 2015 20:21:42 GMT
Not that one in particular but I do like Lanvin.
|
|
gina
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,229
|
Post by gina on Jun 13, 2015 20:24:38 GMT
Nope. I don't even like to pay more than $40 for a purse. lol I've been carrying around the same Coach one for YEARS because I love it (it was a gift) and would never buy one for myself. Purses (and sunglasses for that matter) are just not something I spend $ on.
|
|
jayfab
Drama Llama
procastinating
Posts: 5,536
|
Post by jayfab on Jun 13, 2015 20:34:14 GMT
If I like the purse and if I had unlimited funds I'd buy what I like without looking at price. Same here. But I would really have to like it a LOT as I don't always use a purse. For something else that costs a lot but others think frivolous, yep, if I had mega bucks I would do what I please with those bucks. |
|
|
|
Post by doesitmatter on Jun 13, 2015 20:36:43 GMT
No, but I wouldn't pay $900 for any purse. |
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
|
Post by oldcrow on Jun 13, 2015 20:37:29 GMT
No Like ashley wouldn't pay $900 for any bag - but if someone was kind enough to gift me one I would probably graciously accept  |
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
|
Post by oldcrow on Jun 13, 2015 20:40:33 GMT
I have before but probably wouldn't do it now. I draw the line at about $400 Wow |
|
oldcrow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,828
Location: Ontario,Canada
|
Post by oldcrow on Jun 13, 2015 20:41:47 GMT
Yes I have paid over $900 for a purse but I would not buy that purse for any amount of money. Double wow. |
|
I would probably graciously accept 
Me neither. I'm 
