samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,914
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Oct 2, 2015 23:19:34 GMT
Looking for advice... I had two surgeries, one laproscopic and a myomectomy (abdominal incision) to remove fibroids about 8 years ago. The main goal of the myomectomy was to remove fibroids near the uterine lining, which could hinder implantation. This procedure was successful and resulted in twins- yeah! I had Mirena #2 inserted in June and had the worst two periods of my life. With Mirena #1, almost no periods. I had an IUD string check in between awful periods and Mirena is in place and we saw two larger fibroids on ultrasounds. The ob/gyn suggested that hysterectomy would be an option. I contacted my PCP for advice and she said they like to wait 3-6 months with an IUD, but if bleeding is bad than hysterectomy is an option. I also contacted my previous fibroid/IVF physician via email (moved out of state) and he was vague about treatment. Anyone have experience with this? I am 47, so thinking about a hysterectomy leaving the ovaries. Hoping for minimal invasive procedure (vaginally or laproscopic removal vs. abdominal incision). What about recovery time, etc. TIA!
|
|
melissa
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,912
Jun 25, 2014 20:45:00 GMT
|
Post by melissa on Oct 2, 2015 23:38:50 GMT
Your PCP said they like to wait 3-6 months with an IUD. Does that mean wait 3-6 months to see how your body eventually adjusts? If so, you will have an adequate picture by the 4 month mark. A string check is helpful, but perhaps an ultrasound to check on the location/orientation in the uterus might be helpful, especially if you have a 3rd bad month.
The decision between abdominal, vaginal and lap-assisted vaginal approaches is one that your doctor can best discuss with you. It will depend on the size of your uterus and the previous surgeries. You had a myomectomy, so you've had previous abdominal surgery. If you had a c/section for the twins, there can be other issues. These 2 possibilities may very well eliminate a vaginal hyst from the possibilities. Depending on the size of the uterus and the size of the fibroids, lap-assisted may be the best choice as it is less invasive, so easier recovery. Of course, the size of your uterus and fibroids can make it so that isn't even a possibility today.
At 47, unless there is a reason, the ovaries would be left intact. However, today, I would ask that the tubes go with the uterus. They will serve no function and there is a growing body of evidence that, at least in some cases, the fallopian tubes may actually be the origin for ovarian cancer.
|
|