Hillary fans, are you guys getting paid by the thread?

Every time I turn around there is another "Trump said this!" thread or a "Why Hillary is better than Trump!" thread. Seriously, you guys are looking desperate.   Now the Hillary backers are so desperate they are even saying Trump is crazy because nothing else has worked.

Doesn't it give you pause to think just how bad Hillary is that a guy like Trump is running about even with her in the polls?

She is running on another 4 years of Obama.  When I think about that, I just cringe.  That is the last thing I want.  And clearly, that is the last thing more than 40% of the country wants.  Around 70% believe the country is going in the wrong direction.

Who has benefitted the most from the Obama presidency?  The top 1%. money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/news/economy/income-inequality-obama/

Do you know that about 40% of the country thinks we are still in a recession?  It's no wonder, Obama is "solidly on track to be the only president in U.S. history to never have a single year when the U.S. economy grew by at least three percent.  And unlike many presidents, he has had two terms in which to try to accomplish that feat." www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/07/painful-to-watch-this-is-the-weakest-u-s-economic-recovery-since-1949.html

So under Hillary, will we invest in more lame stimulus programs?  Maybe buy more companies on the taxpayer dime that will subsequently enrich the principals and then go bankrupt?  (Solyndra, anyone, and 5 more like it?)

Are we headed for more secret deals with countries like Iran, where the administration gets a big kick out of lying to us (and trying to cover up some of the lies), dealing with dangerous governments that spend the billions we give them to develop weapons to be used against our allies and ourselves?  (And does anyone else wonder if the Clinton Foundation got a "donation" somewhere along the way in that deal?),

Are we headed for more policies like Obamacare where the administration gets a big kick out of lying to us and the exchanges are failing?  (Bet they will delay announcement of policy increases until after the election.) www.politico.com/story/2016/04/obamacare-rate-hikes-a-looming-political-headache-for-democrats-222663

Are we going to continue with environmental plans that go beyond common sense?  Where we will spend billions of dollars and everyone, especially the poor and those on fixed incomes, will suffer the most so that we can save 0.018 degrees. That’s 18 one-thousands of a degree -- over a period of 85 years??? townhall.com/columnists/dougdomenech/2015/09/24/the-coming-national-energy-tax-will-hurt-the-poor-and-rich-alike-n2056445

Will a Hillary Whitehouse be behind prosecuting people with dissenting opinions on climate change, making expressing an opinion a legally punishable offense or even a “crime against humanity?” as Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) urges?  www.cato.org/blog/sen-whitehouse-bring-rico-charges-against-climate-wrongthink

Will a Hillary Whitehouse continue with Obama's policy of if you don't like the numbers change the metrics?  He talks about deportations being up, but a "deportation" under Obama is stopping a person at the border, bussing them 200 miles, and then releasing them back across the border. 

People talk about how great it is that Hillary has foreign policy experience with her Secretary of State position.  But the Russian reset was a disaster and the Middle East is much worse off because of her direct policies.  (Libya/Benghazi)

I also think about how the press has remained pretty quiet about so many of the things that have transpired under Obama.  After all, they helped elect him, their personal politics run that way, so they sure aren't going to speak up and say "Hey, wait a minute, that's not right!" about pretty much anything, evidently.

If I understand a couple of provisions of the TPP correctly, it's a terrible deal for the U.S.  One provision, I believe, says that when handing out contracts, the government will no longer need to consider "Made in America" first.  The other provision is that there will be a tribunal with people from competing countries that will get to make all sorts of decisions about how we manufacture our own products and the labor we use to do so.  I'm all for trade, it's expanding markets, but how is any of this good for Americans and the U.S. labor force?  Isn't the president supposed to be looking out for us first?  Hillary was for it until she was against it.  And one of her best friends says "no worries, she'll flip (and be for it) as soon as she's elected." (Terry McAuliffe)

I could go on and on and on about the things a third Obama term and a Hillary presidency could bring us that worry the hell out of me.  But I just thought I would throw these out there so that when you go to start your next thread about how great Hillary is or how awful Trump is, just think about how bad Hillary is perceived by millions of Americans and how much people don't WANT a third Obama term that the race is as close as it is.  Her staff outnumber his about 10 to 1; she has spent millions in negative advertising, he has spent $0, and yet he continues to poll quite evenly with her.

www.nytimes.com/2016/07/31/opinion/sunday/the-trouble-for-hillary.html?ref=opinion&_r=1: