MerryMom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,539 
|
Post by MerryMom on Dec 2, 2016 17:29:41 GMT
for Clinton, then why is he filing to block recounts?
Why are his Super-PAC's filing to block the recount?
Wondering minds want to know how Trump justifies his rhetoric against his actions?
|
|
Montannie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,486
Location: Big Sky Country
|
Post by Montannie on Dec 2, 2016 17:31:53 GMT
Just like facts, logic no longer matters, either.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Dec 2, 2016 18:49:42 GMT
If Clinton claims there was no voter fraud and that she'd accept the results of the election AND she conceded, why is she joining in on Jill Stein's efforts?
Why is Jill Stein continuing when the Green Party has disowned her claiming her actions are frivolous?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 16, 2024 11:55:34 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2016 18:55:25 GMT
If Clinton claims there was no voter fraud and that she'd accept the results of the election AND she conceded, why is she joining in on Jill Stein's efforts? Why is Jill Stein continuing when the Green Party has disowned her claiming her actions are frivolous? You didn't answer the original question. |
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Dec 2, 2016 22:38:21 GMT
If Clinton claims there was no voter fraud and that she'd accept the results of the election AND she conceded, why is she joining in on Jill Stein's efforts? Why is Jill Stein continuing when the Green Party has disowned her claiming her actions are frivolous? Not sure you actually were looking for answers but here ya go... Why is Jill Stein continuing when the Green Party has disowned her claiming her actions are frivolous? From the Detroit Free Press It's official: The campaign of Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has requested a recount of the nearly 4.8 million ballots cast for president in the state of Michigan. So why is she doing it? The number of blank ballots in Michigan's presidential election results were a "red flag" to her.
"In part, Michigan has this very high level of under votes; that is, blank ballots," Stein said during an interview today on "Detroit Today with Stephen Henderson" on WDET radio.
If Clinton claims there was no voter fraud and that she'd accept the results of the election AND she conceded, why is she joining in on Jill Stein's efforts? In a post on Medium, Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Erik Elias wrote that "regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented" in any recount proceedings. It was the first time anyone from the Clinton camp had publicly weighed in on the potential recounts.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Dec 2, 2016 23:06:41 GMT
If people ask questions about Trump's statements and/or activities, why can't others answer without deflecting to Clinton/liberals/the media/Sanders/Stein/the moon's position in relation to other celestial bodies/etc.?
Just answer a question about Trump by explaining why Trump said or did what he said or did. Or don't reply. Goodness knows I couldn't come up with an explanation for why he says/does most of the stuff he says/does.
The desperate attempt to make Trump somehow look good by comparing him to anyone else is really quite lame. Just like Trump's Tweets aren't distracting people from his actions, bringing up anything-but-Trump isn't distracting people from the fact that you can't, or refuse to, give an explanation.
Even my 85yo Trump-supporting FIL is getting the picture now. No one is forcing Trump to Tweet. No one is forcing Trump to appoint certain people to his advisory & transition committees and cabinet. No one is forcing Trump to release YouTube videos instead of going in front of journalists and actually answering questions in an open forum. No one is forcing Trump to let his children attend meetings with foreign dignitaries (some of whom have a substantial amount of Trump money/business in their countries). No one is forcing Trump to have phone conversations with world leaders BEFORE receiving any briefing(s) from the State Department.
|
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Dec 2, 2016 23:18:36 GMT
And for Pete's sake, no one is forcing Trump to go on his ridiculous victory tour. WTactualF The man needs constant ego stroking.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Dec 2, 2016 23:21:55 GMT
If people ask questions about Trump's statements and/or activities, why can't others answer without deflecting to Clinton/liberals/the media/Sanders/Stein/the moon's position in relation to other celestial bodies/etc.? Because the same logical question would apply to each candidate. When both go back on what they say, why is it "deflection" to point out that fact when one political side chooses to only focus on their opponent. Now my question is, why not hold Hillary to the same standards you like to hold Trump? Especially when both do the same thing. |
|
TheOtherMeg
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,541
Jun 25, 2014 20:58:14 GMT
|
Post by TheOtherMeg on Dec 2, 2016 23:29:07 GMT
This thread wasn't a question about Hillary. That's my point. WHY does every Trump thing have to be related to a Hillary thing?
Can he not be taken on his own?
|
|
pyccku
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,817
|
Post by pyccku on Dec 2, 2016 23:38:52 GMT
This thread wasn't a question about Hillary. That's my point. WHY does every Trump thing have to be related to a Hillary thing? Can he not be taken on his own? No, he can not. He's like a binary star, forever gravitationally locked with her. Without her, he would simply spiral off into nothingness, lost to the depths of space.  Save |
|
|
|
Post by peasapie on Dec 3, 2016 0:03:11 GMT
This thread wasn't a question about Hillary. That's my point. WHY does every Trump thing have to be related to a Hillary thing? Can he not be taken on his own? Great point. Classroom teachers know the answer to this question. It is ALWAYS (repeat, always) the other kid's fault. Except when they are only kidding, in which case anything they said or did is immediately expunged. Crooked adults get very good at this technique, as they have had much practice. Honest adults don't have the experience to know how to counter it. (Answer: don't be sidetracked by the bait and switch.) SaveSave |
|
My original pea date was November 1999 and my number was 1803
