|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Mar 7, 2017 16:32:05 GMT
I'm FUMING. Pea LIVID. He is such an insensitive assholian fucker. "But access for lower income Americans doesn't equal coverage," Camerota said. "Well, we're getting rid of the individual mandate. We're getting rid of those things that people said that they don't want," Chaffetz replied. "Americans have choices, and they've got to make a choice. So rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care. "They've got to make those decisions themselves," Chaffetz added. God dammit. LOW INCOME DOES NOT MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!! There are many elderly who are low income that cannot afford healthcare. There are many single mothers working multiple jobs who cannot afford healthcare. There are many single adults who cannot afford healthcare. There are many families who cannot afford it. And this stupid, insensitive fuck says that people need to decide between iPhones and choosing medical coverage? Does he freaking even know how much medicines cost? I know people who have to choose between food and medicine. Or utilities and healthcare. God dammit this pisses me off.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,464
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Mar 7, 2017 16:41:11 GMT
As he enjoys the government health care provided at the expense of taxpayers.
He is wrong about so many things on so many levels.
|
|
quiltedbrain
Full Member
Posts: 429
Jun 26, 2014 3:34:53 GMT
|
Post by quiltedbrain on Mar 7, 2017 16:42:02 GMT
LOW INCOME DOES NOT MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!! Thank you for saying this! Every last word of your post is the truth. What kind of life do people lead that they think not buying an iPhone is going to make even a dent in covering medical expenses WITH OR WITHOUT health insurance coverage? I want to live in that kind of la la land, where I don't have to understand how the real world works. Just when I think I might have recovered enough from the election to be able to begin looking for some common ground with Republicans again, one of them goes and says dumb shit like this. How can I not see them as "bad guys" when they think this way??? No understanding, no empathy, and no tolerance for anything different than the way they lead their lives. Obviously, I'm pissed too.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 7, 2017 16:43:07 GMT
Sometimes, he is not wrong. We've paid medical/dental bills for SIL more than once, but she always seems to have money for a new tattoo, for motorcycle payments, and to get her nails done. I'm sure we all know someone like that.
Unfortunately, though, some people use an example like my SIL as an excuse to pull the safety net out from everyone who actually needs it, and Chaffetz is one of those people. It's - dare I say it - deplorable.
I do wonder how they're going to keep prices down without the individual mandate. Healthy people paying premiums is what makes health insurance work for everyone.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 16:44:56 GMT
Funny you mention him: www.crowdpac.com/campaigns/181376/the-us-congress-needs-a-caring-physician" Why you should support Kathryn Allen As a family physician, I have spent my 30 year professional career caring for my patients and 26 years in a nurturing relationship with my husband and 3 step-children. Now it is time to care for our country. I believe that the democratic protections we have taken for granted are under threat. The very nature of honesty and integrity has been under assault. Truth is flat-lining and needs CPR. There is an objective reality out there, and, as a woman of science, I intend to protect that reality. My current representative in Congress, Jason Chaffetz, has been deaf to the concerns of his constituents and has claimed that they are “paid protestors.” " Support away. Please try to send money or donate your time to her and others' campaigns. They likely won't change. They can be voted out, though.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 16:51:52 GMT
PS papercrafteradvocate"LOW INCOME DOES NOT MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!!" Should be LOW INCOME DOES NOT *ALWAYS* MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!! Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. And even those "irresponsible" are "irresponsible" because they are often uneducated or uneducable about how life works, how money works, etc. They are born into poverty or are born into neglect and never learn or can't be taught (thanks to low IQ) how it all works.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 16:59:30 GMT
I do wonder how they're going to keep prices down without the individual mandate. Healthy people paying premiums is what makes health insurance work for everyone. But they don't - they just pay per visit and pay the penalty. It's far cheaper than paying a monthly premium.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 7, 2017 17:07:22 GMT
I do wonder how they're going to keep prices down without the individual mandate. Healthy people paying premiums is what makes health insurance work for everyone. But they don't - they just pay per visit and pay the penalty. It's far cheaper than paying a monthly premium. Exactly. But with this plan, they can do that and pay no penalty, which means even less money in the coffers for subsidies ... but Trump promised us that the new plan would be cheaper. How's that going to work? Seems to me costs will rise.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 17:11:33 GMT
But they don't - they just pay per visit and pay the penalty. It's far cheaper than paying a monthly premium. Exactly. But with this plan, they can do that and pay no penalty, which means even less money in the coffers for subsidies ... but Trump promised us that the new plan would be cheaper. How's that going to work? Seems to me costs will rise. But not for a while. It'll be Bush all over again where things look awesome on top and underneath the structures are crumbling and it takes years for the effects of stupid decisions to come to the top (hello, housing bubble). That's the thing w/breaking the government - it takes years to see the effects, and years and years more to clean it up afterward (if possible at all). In the meanwhile things look hunky-dunky and the rot festers unseen.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Mar 7, 2017 17:18:48 GMT
But they don't - they just pay per visit and pay the penalty. It's far cheaper than paying a monthly premium. Exactly. But with this plan, they can do that and pay no penalty, which means even less money in the coffers for subsidies ... but Trump promised us that the new plan would be cheaper. How's that going to work? Seems to me costs will rise. ^^^^^ THIS. the reason the 'old plan' wasn't working was that not enough healthy people chose to buy insurance and just pay the penalty, right?? and now people can choose not to have it, and instead of a penalty, they won't be getting a tax break. But they weren't getting the tax break, before, and they managed... so why would people choose to spend $$ on health insurance now, then? They won't!
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Mar 7, 2017 17:23:09 GMT
I am sure millions of Americans would happily turn their iphone's over for decent health care.
The analogy is stupid, and unrealistic.
The cost of an iphone, or a tattoo is a few hundred dollars, the cost of health care for me is $600 a month with a HUGE deductible, more "affordable" with the ACA then before but still a huge percentage of my take home pay.
Income shaming must stop.
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Mar 7, 2017 17:24:45 GMT
So, does that mean he is going to make sure that health expenses cost no more than $35 per month ($750/24=$31.25 - approx. monthly pmt for an iphone)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 17:26:55 GMT
Unless it didn't make its way to this final draft the Republican Plan does have an employee mandate but they aren't calling it that.
If you don't have continuous coverage, or have a gap in coverage for more than 2 months, the insurance companies can (will) put up to a 30% surcharge on your premium.
Here is a better explanation from a Vox article I was reading....
"Here’s how it works: If a worker goes straight from insurance at work to her own policy, her insurer has to charge her a standard rate — it can’t take the cost of her condition into account.
But if she had a lapse in coverage longer than 63 days — perhaps she couldn’t afford a new plan between jobs — and went to the individual market later, insurers could charge her a 30 percent premium surcharge. She would need to pay that higher premium for a full year before returning to the standard rate.
A Congressional aide clarified that this surcharge would be the same for both healthy and sick people; insurers could not use it to turn away people they expect to have significantly higher medical costs.
This might end up having unintended consequences, because only the people who really need insurance — and who have high medical costs — may want to pay the surcharge. Healthy people might be more comfortable staying out of the individual market for longer, perhaps until they get a job that offers coverage. That could drive up premiums for everybody."
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 17:27:15 GMT
the cost of health care for me is $600 a month with a HUGE deductible, more "affordable" with the ACA then before but still a huge percentage of my take home pay. Try 18k a year. No payment from employer.
|
|
|
Post by ktdoesntscrap on Mar 7, 2017 17:36:34 GMT
the cost of health care for me is $600 a month with a HUGE deductible, more "affordable" with the ACA then before but still a huge percentage of my take home pay. Try 18k a year. No payment from employer. That's a lot of money. For just one person? That is about what I would have to spend for my deductible to kick in. I work for a small company 4 people. I am the only one who doesn't have insurance from a spouse. I am also the only single person, and the only woman...
|
|
blue tulip
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,984
Jun 25, 2014 20:53:57 GMT
|
Post by blue tulip on Mar 7, 2017 17:37:24 GMT
hahahahaha.. like the cost of an iphone and monthly plan are anywhere CLOSE to comparable to health insurance?!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 17:40:44 GMT
From the same Vox article this on about Medicaid which shows me the Republicans don't "get it" when it comes to those considered low income....
"In 2020, enrollment in the Medicaid expansion will “freeze” and states with no longer be able to sign new enrollees up for the program. Legislators expect that enrollment would slowly decline, as enrollees’ incomes change and they shift off the program."
As enrollees income changes and they shift off Medicaid.
i wish it was true that there would be enough folks who's income increased enough that they wouldn't need Medicaid and that it would make a difference but that is not the reality we live in.
|
|
amom23
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,330
Member is Online
Jun 27, 2014 12:39:18 GMT
|
Post by amom23 on Mar 7, 2017 17:41:41 GMT
Chaffetz is major dick who needs to get voted out of office!
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Mar 7, 2017 17:43:10 GMT
Yes, because health care is only ~800 dollars a year. Such a simple decision to choose health care coverage over iPhones.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 17:47:25 GMT
Try 18k a year. No payment from employer. That's a lot of money. For just one person? That is about what I would have to spend for my deductible to kick in. I work for a small company 4 people. I am the only one who doesn't have insurance from a spouse. I am also the only single person, and the only woman... Family coverage.
|
|
|
Post by friendly on Mar 7, 2017 18:19:45 GMT
We need a single payer system just like every other western nation. I would gladly pay more in taxes if I didn't have to worry about going bankrupt when someone in my family got sick. Health care is a human right. We (the US) pays the highest healthcare costs in the world.
|
|
smginaz Suzy
Pearl Clutcher
Je suis desole.
Posts: 2,606
Jun 26, 2014 17:27:30 GMT
|
Post by smginaz Suzy on Mar 7, 2017 18:29:56 GMT
PS papercrafteradvocate "LOW INCOME DOES NOT MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!!" Should be LOW INCOME DOES NOT *ALWAYS* MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!! Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. And even those "irresponsible" are "irresponsible" because they are often uneducated or uneducable about how life works, how money works, etc. They are born into poverty or are born into neglect and never learn or can't be taught (thanks to low IQ) how it all works. I don't equate poverty with intelligence or responsibility.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 18:33:00 GMT
Unless it didn't make its way to this final draft the Republican Plan does have an employee mandate but they aren't calling it that. If you don't have continuous coverage, or have a gap in coverage for more than 2 months, the insurance companies can (will) put up to a 30% surcharge on your premium. Here is a better explanation from a Vox article I was reading.... "Here’s how it works: If a worker goes straight from insurance at work to her own policy, her insurer has to charge her a standard rate — it can’t take the cost of her condition into account. But if she had a lapse in coverage longer than 63 days — perhaps she couldn’t afford a new plan between jobs — and went to the individual market later, insurers could charge her a 30 percent premium surcharge. She would need to pay that higher premium for a full year before returning to the standard rate. A Congressional aide clarified that this surcharge would be the same for both healthy and sick people; insurers could not use it to turn away people they expect to have significantly higher medical costs. This might end up having unintended consequences, because only the people who really need insurance — and who have high medical costs — may want to pay the surcharge. Healthy people might be more comfortable staying out of the individual market for longer, perhaps until they get a job that offers coverage. That could drive up premiums for everybody." Isn't this what's happening under the ACA anyways?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 18:35:32 GMT
PS papercrafteradvocate "LOW INCOME DOES NOT MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!!" Should be LOW INCOME DOES NOT *ALWAYS* MEAN IRRESPONSIBLE WITH MONEY!!! Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. And even those "irresponsible" are "irresponsible" because they are often uneducated or uneducable about how life works, how money works, etc. They are born into poverty or are born into neglect and never learn or can't be taught (thanks to low IQ) how it all works. I don't equate poverty with intelligence or responsibility. Sometimes it is. And intelligence is often equated w/"responsibility". Not necessarily academic intelligence, but emotional intelligence - which is just as important in life.
|
|
|
Post by terri on Mar 7, 2017 18:42:08 GMT
I can barely muster a reply as this upsets me so much. I take 16 medicines a day in order to just function and do the things he probably can do without a second thought (eating, sleeping, etc.). I would be grateful for one month where my medical care only costs the equivalent of an iPhone. He has no idea what he is talking about, and is a jerk for saying something so insensitive.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Mar 7, 2017 18:51:56 GMT
He seems to have forgotten -- in 2017, the necessities are expensive, but the luxuries are cheap.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 18:53:27 GMT
Unless it didn't make its way to this final draft the Republican Plan does have an employee mandate but they aren't calling it that. If you don't have continuous coverage, or have a gap in coverage for more than 2 months, the insurance companies can (will) put up to a 30% surcharge on your premium. Here is a better explanation from a Vox article I was reading.... "Here’s how it works: If a worker goes straight from insurance at work to her own policy, her insurer has to charge her a standard rate — it can’t take the cost of her condition into account. But if she had a lapse in coverage longer than 63 days — perhaps she couldn’t afford a new plan between jobs — and went to the individual market later, insurers could charge her a 30 percent premium surcharge. She would need to pay that higher premium for a full year before returning to the standard rate. A Congressional aide clarified that this surcharge would be the same for both healthy and sick people; insurers could not use it to turn away people they expect to have significantly higher medical costs. This might end up having unintended consequences, because only the people who really need insurance — and who have high medical costs — may want to pay the surcharge. Healthy people might be more comfortable staying out of the individual market for longer, perhaps until they get a job that offers coverage. That could drive up premiums for everybody." Isn't this what's happening under the ACA anyways? Yes. However the Republicans boasted they would bring down premiums. This does not do it. For the record I think there should be stiffer penalties for those who chose not to purchase insurance. The reality is those who don't have insurance know if they break a bone they can get medical care in the emergency room and if they can't pay for the care they won't be turned away. And we all pay for it.
|
|
|
Post by coffeetalk on Mar 7, 2017 19:28:54 GMT
"Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds the criticsms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed." Herman Melville.
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,643
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Mar 7, 2017 19:53:24 GMT
I would like to know what plan Chaffetz is on that only costs an iPhone. I'm sure everybody would love those rates!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 13, 2024 15:47:47 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2017 20:32:12 GMT
Maybe instead of choosing between healthcare and phones (you know, for security, job access, kid access, etc.) maybe the choice should be between healthcare and Mar-A-Lago trips and securing second full-time residences, and corporate tax loopholes, and investment income taxed at half the rate of working income?!?!??!
How about those choices, Jason?
|
|