|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 25, 2018 14:07:20 GMT
Here is a thread where we can begin our discussion of the book. The goal was to finish Chapter 3 by 8/29, but if you would like to begin discussing early, please do!
I’d like to set some norms for our discussion, if that’s okay?
- Please keep discussion on topic as much as possible. - Please be honest, open, and remember that we learn more by listening than by speaking. - Please do not call upon or tag women of color on this board to explain things to you. It is not their job to explain all this to us, but we welcome their discussion if they choose to participate. When they do, we listen. We can’t expect them to do this labor for us, though.
Thank you for participating.
|
|
kibblesandbits
Pearl Clutcher
At the corner of Awesome and Bombdiggity
Posts: 3,305
Aug 13, 2016 13:47:39 GMT
|
Post by kibblesandbits on Aug 25, 2018 14:09:07 GMT
I anticipate my book arriving by Monday and I'll get to reading ASAP. I'll be out of the country for the last few chapters - but I want to read along as much as I can.
thank you for starting this.
|
|
|
Post by dulcemama on Aug 25, 2018 14:37:29 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable.
But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her.
So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real".
Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 25, 2018 14:49:37 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable. But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her. So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real". Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that. I haven’t started reading yet (my goal is to read our chapters today & tomorrow), but I saw your question and it reminded me of the PBS resources on race. Our sociology classes actually use this site. Maybe this will help? It’s an older resource, but addresses some of your questions. I’ll try and tease out some of the most salient, concise points in a bit. First...coffee. Thank you for asking our first question! PBS: Race, The Power of An Illusion
|
|
|
Post by gryroagain on Aug 25, 2018 16:14:46 GMT
I took some notes while reading! From the intro, the concept that white as an us/group was interesting. I don’t think of myself that way, because I’m the majority I imagine. It is interesting my kids do, they point out things “white people do” and are comfortable with that. Because they grew up primarily overseas as a minority, so they can see it? Or perhaps must more self aware? I’m not sure. Also intro- white progressives. Hello, me I will admit to feeling a bit surly like “well of course I’m different”. Of course I think that, which is why I need the book! Ch 1 I recently read Prairie Fires (about Laura Ingalls Wilder) so the meritocracy and individualism talk resonated. It’s a like reoccurring myth we as white Americans cannot let go of, even though it is false. Also I have faced institutional racism in my weird little world as an expat so duh I am totally better at not being racist...but actually that experience here has nothing at all to or is comparable to the experiences of POC in the US and as a white American in America it really is not relevant or helpful. This was challenging to think about. Ch 2 “The power of our questions to shape the knowledge we validate”- wow. That is something to ponder. “If poor whites were focused on feeling superior to those below them in status, they were less focused on those above”- isnt this the truth. I have many family members and friends who oppose capital gains taxes, etc...but they haven’t got a pot to piss in and will never pay them. But maybe someday, and they want to protect that chance, or believe they may be the upper class someday. Mostly they wantfeverently to not be lumped in with poor people of color, when in reality they are all struggling. If we can’t get together to struggle, it only helps the oppressors. Very interesting aboutPOC and systemic racism, POC cannot be systemically racist as whites co tell all the systems. I never thought about that, but it’s true. A POC can be racist, but they can’t influence or control the power system. They are not really comparable, due to that. ...and that’s as far as I got. I felt u co for table reading which I think is the point, and hopefully my random notes make sense.
|
|
|
Post by dulcemama on Aug 25, 2018 16:51:11 GMT
Thanks for the link, Sock. Helping a bit.
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 25, 2018 22:16:29 GMT
I started on the Kindle version and am into Ch 2. The first was a bit of a hard read. I found myself feeling defensive, as in, am I supposed to feel bad for being white? Apologetic? LOTS of room to think here.
Chapter 2 is more in line with what I know. Not a lot of time to delve into detail today but I wanted to mark my place and let you know I'm reading along!
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,661
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Aug 26, 2018 21:32:38 GMT
She was just on booktv. Wow!
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,661
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Aug 26, 2018 21:33:58 GMT
I started on the Kindle version and am into Ch 2. The first was a bit of a hard read. I found myself feeling defensive, as in, am I supposed to feel bad for being white? Apologetic? LOTS of room to think here. Chapter 2 is more in line with what I know. Not a lot of time to delve into detail today but I wanted to mark my place and let you know I'm reading along! It does make me feel defensive.
|
|
|
Post by prettyprettypaper on Aug 26, 2018 21:46:25 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable. But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her. So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real". Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that. In my Sociology class, an example of race vs. ethnicity was "Asian vs. Japanese". My understanding was that race had more to do with the physical similarities while ethnicity had more to do with cultural.
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 26, 2018 22:05:08 GMT
OK, I had a couple points I wanted to discuss and now can not find them in my kindle. That's annoying. I do prefer regular books for book discussions but too late.
If you are feeling defensive while reading, just keep at it with an open mind and try to absorb what the author is saying without arguing your side in your head. I found myself getting bogged down by details a couple times, such as when the author makes the case that white people saw Jackie Robinson as the first black man talented enough to break the color barrier in major league baseball. I for one have never heard any such explanation, and I can't imagine any white people racist or not who believe that. Obviously black athletes were shut out because they were black, not because they weren't good enough. I suppose old people might have been raised that way to protect white men's view of themselves as superior to black men in all endeavors. I don't know. I certainly was taught, by my family and in school, that racism kept him out and he was one of the first to help break down that barrier.
But there is where I was getting caught up in MY OWN EXPERIENCE, which is a very normal thing to do but won't necessarily allow for growth and learning. I'm starting Ch 3 and I'll try to make better use of the bookmark feature though I always seem to mess it up, to me kindles aren't the most intuitive gadgets when you're trying to do anything more than simply read.
|
|
|
Post by dulcemama on Aug 27, 2018 15:01:07 GMT
OK, I had a couple points I wanted to discuss and now can not find them in my kindle. That's annoying. I do prefer regular books for book discussions but too late. If you are feeling defensive while reading, just keep at it with an open mind and try to absorb what the author is saying without arguing your side in your head. I found myself getting bogged down by details a couple times, such as when the author makes the case that white people saw Jackie Robinson as the first black man talented enough to break the color barrier in major league baseball. I for one have never heard any such explanation, and I can't imagine any white people racist or not who believe that. Obviously black athletes were shut out because they were black, not because they weren't good enough. I suppose old people might have been raised that way to protect white men's view of themselves as superior to black men in all endeavors. I don't know. I certainly was taught, by my family and in school, that racism kept him out and he was one of the first to help break down that barrier. But there is where I was getting caught up in MY OWN EXPERIENCE, which is a very normal thing to do but won't necessarily allow for growth and learning. I'm starting Ch 3 and I'll try to make better use of the bookmark feature though I always seem to mess it up, to me kindles aren't the most intuitive gadgets when you're trying to do anything more than simply read. I think that what she is saying is that the way we talk about, not just the way we think about it, re-enforces the idea that it is a meritocracy and that just isn't true. I struggled with this one too but more from the point of view that I'm not sure how to talk about it. If we say that whites finally allowed a black player into the major leagues, then it sounds like whites are claiming all the credit. But on the other hand, it plants the idea that white people need to be the allies of blacks in a culture where blacks are disadvantaged right from the start.
But on the other hand, as the author states, saying that Robinson broke the color barrier re-enforces the idea that it is a meritocracy which it is not. I am not sure how we say it in a more nuanced way. I do know that how we talk about things is at least as important (or maybe more important) than what we actually think. It is what we send out into the world.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 29, 2018 22:33:45 GMT
OK, I had a couple points I wanted to discuss and now can not find them in my kindle. That's annoying. I do prefer regular books for book discussions but too late. If you are feeling defensive while reading, just keep at it with an open mind and try to absorb what the author is saying without arguing your side in your head. I found myself getting bogged down by details a couple times, such as when the author makes the case that white people saw Jackie Robinson as the first black man talented enough to break the color barrier in major league baseball. I for one have never heard any such explanation, and I can't imagine any white people racist or not who believe that. Obviously black athletes were shut out because they were black, not because they weren't good enough. I suppose old people might have been raised that way to protect white men's view of themselves as superior to black men in all endeavors. I don't know. I certainly was taught, by my family and in school, that racism kept him out and he was one of the first to help break down that barrier. But there is where I was getting caught up in MY OWN EXPERIENCE, which is a very normal thing to do but won't necessarily allow for growth and learning. I'm starting Ch 3 and I'll try to make better use of the bookmark feature though I always seem to mess it up, to me kindles aren't the most intuitive gadgets when you're trying to do anything more than simply read. Oooh, did you do chapter 3 yet? The part about younger people and racial socialization (especially the survey)... Man, that was a lot to handle. I’m going to post a couple of questions in a post below.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 29, 2018 22:39:26 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable. But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her. So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real". Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that. I’d like to circle back to this. What did you think of DiAngelo’s inclusion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’s quote (Chapter 1): “The idea of racial inferiority was created to justify unequal treatment; belief in racial inferiority is not what triggered unequal treatment. Nor was fear of difference. As Ta-Nehisi Coates states, “But race is the child of racism, not the father.” 6 He means that first we exploited people for their resources, not according to how they looked. Exploitation came first, and then the ideology of unequal races to justify this exploitation followed.” Specifically, “Race is the child of racism, not the father.” This quote in particular really struck me, as I had not considered this framing of race as a social construct in these words. What did you think? Did this help you understand or consider the idea of race as a social construct?
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,661
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Aug 29, 2018 22:48:30 GMT
I don't have the book, but have been watching the author and others discuss on "Youtube". Now some of this I feel like is over my head. I did not go to college and only have a High School degree. But what got me was that she said "That by 3 years of age all children know it's better to be white than black" That has to be social construct, right? (if I'm using the word right)
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 29, 2018 23:08:43 GMT
I don't have the book, but have been watching the author and others discuss on "Youtube". Now some of this I feel like is over my head. I did not go to college and only have a High School degree. But what got me was that she said "That by 3 years of age all children know it's better to be white than black" That has to be social construct, right? (if I'm using the word right) Yes! The word "construct" in this case can be defined as: "an idea or theory containing various conceptual elements, typically one considered to be subjective and not based on empirical evidence." So in this case, race is a concept, or construct, built by white culture to the benefit of white culture. Basically, there's no genetic foundation for race; there are adaptive characteristics based on environment. However, people have been socialized (taught) that there are racial differences among people. Would you like to share some of the YouTube links you've found discussing the book? More resources are better.
|
|
|
Post by busy on Aug 29, 2018 23:25:37 GMT
I am just starting my reading and only in the intro (intending to get through the first 3 chapters tonight) and the diversity training sessions she describe ring so true for me... but with men and D&I training in tech. Racial diversity is definitely an issue there too, but gender diversity gets more attention and holy hell do men get pissed about that. They see themselves as naturally deserving of the roles, and can't imagine that women are equally qualified - any woman getting a job MUST be getting it for quota reasons or because they flirted or slept with someone. The sense of inherent superiority - "me are better at this kind of work" - is mind-boggling. Lots of parallels with the white fragility concept when talking about racial diversity.
As a side note, I'm going to a conference next week that Ijeoma Oluo (author of "So You Want to Talk About Race?") is speaking at and I'm really excited to hear her.
I'll be back with better considered thoughts when I'm done with the chapters.
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,661
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Aug 29, 2018 23:53:04 GMT
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,661
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Aug 30, 2018 0:04:12 GMT
I agree with this. People have to have away to justify how "the others" are treated. Otherwise how could you not see yourself as a monster.
And if you have done any research with DNA you would know there is no such thing as race.
|
|
|
Post by sabrinae on Aug 30, 2018 0:11:31 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable. But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her. So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real". Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that. I’d like to circle back to this. What did you think of DiAngelo’s inclusion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’s quote (Chapter 1): “The idea of racial inferiority was created to justify unequal treatment; belief in racial inferiority is not what triggered unequal treatment. Nor was fear of difference. As Ta-Nehisi Coates states, “But race is the child of racism, not the father.” 6 He means that first we exploited people for their resources, not according to how they looked. Exploitation came first, and then the ideology of unequal races to justify this exploitation followed.” Specifically, “Race is the child of racism, not the father.” This quote in particular really struck me, as I had not considered this framing of race as a social construct in these words. What did you think? Did this help you understand or consider the idea of race as a social construct? That quote really struck me and for me encapsulated how we came To treat people differently based on their skin color. There had to be a “reason” to treat people badly and exploit them and their resources. Skin color and race are an easy target to make it comfortable to do horrible things to people because they’re the “other”.
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 30, 2018 0:21:28 GMT
OK, I had a couple points I wanted to discuss and now can not find them in my kindle. That's annoying. I do prefer regular books for book discussions but too late. If you are feeling defensive while reading, just keep at it with an open mind and try to absorb what the author is saying without arguing your side in your head. I found myself getting bogged down by details a couple times, such as when the author makes the case that white people saw Jackie Robinson as the first black man talented enough to break the color barrier in major league baseball. I for one have never heard any such explanation, and I can't imagine any white people racist or not who believe that. Obviously black athletes were shut out because they were black, not because they weren't good enough. I suppose old people might have been raised that way to protect white men's view of themselves as superior to black men in all endeavors. I don't know. I certainly was taught, by my family and in school, that racism kept him out and he was one of the first to help break down that barrier. But there is where I was getting caught up in MY OWN EXPERIENCE, which is a very normal thing to do but won't necessarily allow for growth and learning. I'm starting Ch 3 and I'll try to make better use of the bookmark feature though I always seem to mess it up, to me kindles aren't the most intuitive gadgets when you're trying to do anything more than simply read. Oooh, did you do chapter 3 yet? The part about younger people and racial socialization (especially the survey)... Man, that was a lot to handle. I’m going to post a couple of questions in a post below. I did and I'm into chapter 4 but I find I can't remember what I wanted to talk about until I pick up the book...I think I am trying to absorb too much info at once, writing papers and taking tests for my research class. I read for myself when I'm going to sleep so naturally I'm forgetting what I wanted to talk about! I'll try to do better.
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 30, 2018 1:18:23 GMT
Oooh, did you do chapter 3 yet? The part about younger people and racial socialization (especially the survey)... Man, that was a lot to handle. I’m going to post a couple of questions in a post below. I did and I'm into chapter 4 but I find I can't remember what I wanted to talk about until I pick up the book...I think I am trying to absorb too much info at once, writing papers and taking tests for my research class. I read for myself when I'm going to sleep so naturally I'm forgetting what I wanted to talk about! I'll try to do better. We’ll be here when you’re ready! I’m reading in the kindle app on my iPad, highlighting and making notes. It would be harder on a regular Kindle, and I think I’d probably keep notes separately on paper then...
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 30, 2018 1:19:52 GMT
I am just starting my reading and only in the intro (intending to get through the first 3 chapters tonight) and the diversity training sessions she describe ring so true for me... but with men and D&I training in tech. Racial diversity is definitely an issue there too, but gender diversity gets more attention and holy hell do men get pissed about that. They see themselves as naturally deserving of the roles, and can't imagine that women are equally qualified - any woman getting a job MUST be getting it for quota reasons or because they flirted or slept with someone. The sense of inherent superiority - "me are better at this kind of work" - is mind-boggling. Lots of parallels with the white fragility concept when talking about racial diversity. As a side note, I'm going to a conference next week that Ijeoma Oluo (author of "So You Want to Talk About Race?") is speaking at and I'm really excited to hear her. I'll be back with better considered thoughts when I'm done with the chapters. I’m really jealous that you get to hear Ijeoma Oluo, but excited to hear about her speech! I hope you’ll share on this board (if not pertinent to this thread/topic).
|
|
|
Post by SockMonkey on Aug 30, 2018 1:29:17 GMT
In Chapter 3, DiAngelo describes how structures of white supremacy are adaptive and change in order to maintain inequality (Ch 3 intro). She outlines three kinds of racism: - Colorblind Racism: in which white people pretend not to notice race/racism - Aversive Racism: in which white people engage in racism that allows them to maintain positive self image by rationalizing, avoiding conversations about race, or attributing racism to other factors - Cultural Racism: Here DiAngelo discusses the difference between “backstage” and “front stage” speech/behavior, in which racism is more comfortable in all-white spaces and white people will speak differently than they would in spaces where they are engaging with people of color
In considering these three facets of racism, can you reflect and think of a time you did or said something that would fall under one of these facets? (You don’t need to share here unless you want to, but it’s powerful to reflect.) Have you witnessed something that you would classify as one of these? How did you respond? Would you respond differently now?
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 30, 2018 1:50:28 GMT
Thank you--you reminded me of a couple thoughts I had. Aversive racism would definitely apply to me, in the form of avoiding talking about the issue when the conversation turns that direction. We probably have all had moments around other white people when a racist comment is made. Say you're at work. Do you call them out? Make your displeasure known and then move on, or do you have it out? Do you ignore it because you have a million tasks still to complete? Do you rationalize it away because she has black friends and maybe she didn't "mean it that way"? Say it's a patient. Do you give them a pointed stare? Ignore the comment? Tell them what you really think of them? When you hear an old person call your coworker "that little colored gal, what a sweetheart" and you know she means well but what do you say? You are there in a professional capacity. How can you educate without alienating? What should that conversation sound like? What about when a comment is directed at you by a member of another race, saying you're probably a racist. How do you avoid feeling resentment?
These are not necessarily all my own experiences, just feeling my way around what aversive racism is and looks like.
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 30, 2018 2:04:26 GMT
Also re: the other two types, I have never done the "I don't see color" thing. I was always keenly aware of the differences between black and white. When I was little I very much wanted to be black. I watched every black TV show I could and strongly identified with black characters on other shows.
But, I was still being given the version of blackness available to white people. I was raised by liberals who made it clear that racism was bad but I certainly wasn't steered toward celebrating blackness. I just felt comforted by black faces and voices. Is that because of racist stereotypes like Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima, the kindly caretakers who just loved the white people they were enslaved by? Food for thought.
The third type... Yes, I have found myself wanting black people around me to not assume I'm a racist just because I'm white and we live in Trump country. That could sometimes, I suppose, make me appear overly friendly. That's a tough one. It ends up like "ok, act natural" which isn't what I want.
My best friend is a black woman and we've been friends for years. She and I don't have this uneasiness between us, obviously, but her family was a little slow to accept me as part of the group. I definitely felt like I wanted everyone to know I AM NOT A RACIST! So it feels awkward. Again, very tough thing for us to know what is the right action because we're self-cobscious about race (well, if you care at all). This is only getting worse. In the 80s and 90s I was younger and had more black friends and didn't feel the tensions the way I do now--i was actually probably just blissfully unaware.
|
|
|
Post by dulcemama on Aug 30, 2018 15:22:02 GMT
O.K., kicking off the discussion. I need help understanding the idea of race as a social construct. I have heard this before and understand that, scientifically speaking, there is no physical difference in races. I also understand a specific race cannot be identified by certain characteristics and that who belongs to what race is debatable. But here is what trips me up. People identify with their race in a way that seems very integral to their identity, not as something imposed from the outside. I have a friend who is of mixed race but looks very white. Even so, she identifies as a person of color. This is something that she is unable to explain in any way other than that it Just "feels" right to her. So, am I just confusing race with ethnicity? Or maybe I hear "social construct" and interpret that as "not real". But clearly it is real in some sense because here we are talking about it and it holds tremendous power in our culture and what are we dealing with if it isn't "real". Can someone help me out with this. I feel like my brain has just lifted the edge of this consept but I can't get any further than that. I’d like to circle back to this. What did you think of DiAngelo’s inclusion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’s quote (Chapter 1): “The idea of racial inferiority was created to justify unequal treatment; belief in racial inferiority is not what triggered unequal treatment. Nor was fear of difference. As Ta-Nehisi Coates states, “But race is the child of racism, not the father.” 6 He means that first we exploited people for their resources, not according to how they looked. Exploitation came first, and then the ideology of unequal races to justify this exploitation followed.” Specifically, “Race is the child of racism, not the father.” This quote in particular really struck me, as I had not considered this framing of race as a social construct in these words. What did you think? Did this help you understand or consider the idea of race as a social construct? You know, I totally get that racial inferiority/superiority are social constructs. But the idea of race its self is the struggle. I understand that there is no physical/scientific difference in the races but it seems to me that there is some type of mental/identity thing regarding race that can be very powerful and personal for people. And race is clearly a powerful force in our culture so there is something real about it. I do better if I think of it as a socially constructed reality.
And, if it helps at all, I struggle with the idea that gender is a social construct as well.
|
|
|
Post by sabrinae on Aug 30, 2018 17:26:02 GMT
I’d like to circle back to this. What did you think of DiAngelo’s inclusion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’s quote (Chapter 1): “The idea of racial inferiority was created to justify unequal treatment; belief in racial inferiority is not what triggered unequal treatment. Nor was fear of difference. As Ta-Nehisi Coates states, “But race is the child of racism, not the father.” 6 He means that first we exploited people for their resources, not according to how they looked. Exploitation came first, and then the ideology of unequal races to justify this exploitation followed.” Specifically, “Race is the child of racism, not the father.” This quote in particular really struck me, as I had not considered this framing of race as a social construct in these words. What did you think? Did this help you understand or consider the idea of race as a social construct? You know, I totally get that racial inferiority/superiority are social constructs. But the idea of race its self is the struggle. I understand that there is no physical/scientific difference in the races but it seems to me that there is some type of mental/identity thing regarding race that can be very powerful and personal for people. And race is clearly a powerful force in our culture so there is something real about it. I do better if I think of it as a socially constructed reality.
And, if it helps at all, I struggle with the idea that gender is a social construct as well.
Race being a social construct does not mean it isn’t real. A social construct is still real. It just means it’s been created by society as a way to organize society. And it can be changed. Does that help?
|
|
|
Post by Zee on Aug 30, 2018 17:27:53 GMT
Another observation for myself, I don't feel this anxiety to "make a good impression" or let everyone know I'm not a racist in a professional setting, only in a social or casual setting. As a nurse or patient it rarely enters my mind that I would even need to do that. That's something I never thought about or realized.
Thanks again sockmonkey for starting this discussion and thanks for the links
|
|
|
Post by chances on Aug 30, 2018 17:56:00 GMT
I’d like to circle back to this. What did you think of DiAngelo’s inclusion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’s quote (Chapter 1): “The idea of racial inferiority was created to justify unequal treatment; belief in racial inferiority is not what triggered unequal treatment. Nor was fear of difference. As Ta-Nehisi Coates states, “But race is the child of racism, not the father.” 6 He means that first we exploited people for their resources, not according to how they looked. Exploitation came first, and then the ideology of unequal races to justify this exploitation followed.” Specifically, “Race is the child of racism, not the father.” This quote in particular really struck me, as I had not considered this framing of race as a social construct in these words. What did you think? Did this help you understand or consider the idea of race as a social construct? You know, I totally get that racial inferiority/superiority are social constructs. But the idea of race its self is the struggle. I understand that there is no physical/scientific difference in the races but it seems to me that there is some type of mental/identity thing regarding race that can be very powerful and personal for people. And race is clearly a powerful force in our culture so there is something real about it. I do better if I think of it as a socially constructed reality.
And, if it helps at all, I struggle with the idea that gender is a social construct as well.
A social construct is real, but only when people in a society agree that it is real. Currency is also a social construct. If one day people stopped believing it had value, it would just be pretty pretty paper. Another example is that people have strong racial or ethnic identities but then move to countries where they aren't recognized. For example, I have Nigerian friends who are deeply attached to their Igbo identity (the way your friends are attached to their identities). But in U.S. society most people don't know Igbo from Yoruba. No government forms make those distinctions and people in this society just regard them as "black". The societal agreement makes it real.
|
|