|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 2:15:38 GMT
Kyle Griffin.. “DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP ACTED ILLEGALLY? 64% Probably 32% Probably not DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP ACTED UNETHICALLY? 72% Probably 25% Probably not Pew Research poll” IF only they would ALL remember come November 3, 2020!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 2:27:17 GMT
More on dt's Federal reserve nominee Stephen Moore: Trump's Federal Reserve pick linked to indicted boyfriend of Russian agentStephen Moore created a controversial political group with Paul Erickson, who is charged with fraud and whose girlfriend, Maria Butina, pleaded guilty to infiltrating the conservative movement Donald Trump’s new nominee for the Federal Reserve Board created a controversial political group with Paul Erickson, a conservative operative charged with fraud whose girlfriend pleaded guilty to being a Russian agent.Stephen Moore and Erickson founded the not-for-profit Citizens for the Republic to advocate for Reaganite policies during the 2008 election, according to records from the time. Moore was president and Erickson was executive director. ** “I haven’t seen much of Paul since he was with the Romney campaign in 2012,” Moore said. Asked if he had seen Erickson or spoken to him during the 2016 election, Moore said: “No, he seemed to have dropped off the map. Did get a Christmas card from him!”In December 2018, Butina pleaded guilty to working to infiltrate the American conservative movement as an agent for the Russian government. She is the only Russian convicted by the US for interfering in the 2016 election. ** Moore once denounced soccer as socialist, was blacklisted by the Kansas City Star for making too many errors in an article, and was accused by the Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman of not being able to count.** Link: www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/22/stephen-moore-federal-reserve-paul-erickson-maria-butina
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 3:21:26 GMT
Colby Itkowitz...
”Trump mocks asylum seekers, mimicking them saying, "I am very afraid for my life, I’m afraid for my life." Then he says, "it’s a big fat con job."
This from the little coward who was so afraid it took him almost 2 years before he visited our troops in a war zone.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 4:38:53 GMT
Oh, baby.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Mar 29, 2019 5:05:58 GMT
Colby Itkowitz... ”Trump mocks asylum seekers, mimicking them saying, "I am very afraid for my life, I’m afraid for my life." Then he says, "it’s a big fat con job." This from the little coward who was so afraid it took him almost 2 years before he visited our troops in a war zone. Jeez. The never-ending revolting-ness of this (and I use the term somewhat carelessly) man.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,744
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Mar 29, 2019 5:07:00 GMT
Kyle Griffin.. “DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP ACTED ILLEGALLY? 64% Probably 32% Probably not DO YOU BELIEVE TRUMP ACTED UNETHICALLY? 72% Probably 25% Probably not Pew Research poll” another to go in the "obviously" file. except I still can't comprehend how the "probably not" numbers are even that high.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Mar 29, 2019 9:43:40 GMT
More on dt's Federal reserve nominee Stephen Moore: Also this: Stephen Moore, whom President Donald Trump said he’ll nominate for a seat on the Federal Reserve, owes more than $75,000 in taxes and other penalties, according to the U.S. government. A federal tax lien filed in the circuit court for Montgomery County, Md., where Moore owns a house, says that the government won a judgment against Moore for $75,328.80. The January 2018 filing said it was for unpaid taxes from the 2014 tax year and could accrue additional penalties and other costs. per Bloomberg & Fortune 3/27/2019 Only the best....
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Mar 29, 2019 10:28:10 GMT
The video which Zingermack posted above does not show that the Letter from the Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee requesting Chairman Schiff's resignation was read during an unrelated Committee Hearing. The letter: republicans-intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hpsci_gop_letter_to_chairman_-_29_march_19.pdfThe Members who signed it GOP Reps. Devin Nunes (Calif.), Michael Conaway (Texas), Michael Turner (Ohio), Brad Wenstrup (Ohio), Chris Stewart (Utah), Rick Crawford (Ark.), Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), Will Hurd (Texas), and John Ratcliffe (Texas) The Republican members are upset that Schiff continues to pursue these matters, despite, as they claim, the Mueller investigation has absolved Trump of any collusion. However, no one (but Barr and his minions) has actually seen the full investigation, only a 4 page summary of the 300 plus page report. And the report may contain information, facts, and documentation of what may be an impeachable issue, which is a decision which must be left to Congress. Let's not forget that Nunes made a midnight run to the WH with information while he was Chairman of the same committee. According to reports, Schiff was unaware/unprepared for the request (again, woorth noting, which was made during another, completely unrelated committee meeting), and yet he was able to tick off the list of suspicious activity that still remains a concern. And Schiff is one of the four Democrats who is fully entitled to receive all intelligence briefings, unedited. It appears that this stunt, by the Republicans, is another attempt to control the narrative, that the Mueller report completely absolves trump. If the report truly find no evidence, or suspicion of wrongdoing that would subject trump to impeachment hearings, then it would of been released in full, and Fox News would be reciting it on a non=stop loop, rather by cherry picking parts of Barr's report. Frankly, Barr summarizing the report is akin to having a gang member charged with a crime, and having a jury of his peers (fellow gang Members) determine his guilt. I admire Schiff for his intelligence, and honor, which is greater than the collective Republican members of Congress.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 14:15:35 GMT
Watching Rachel.
It seems that within a couple of days after Starr released his report, copies of the report and all evidence was released to both the Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Two days later the report was released to the public.
There is absolutely no reason why it will take “weeks” for Barr to even release the entire report and evidence to Congress.
Which would lead one to wonder what are they hiding? Now.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 14:18:56 GMT
Katie Rogers... ”Trump: "It's interesting. Robert Mueller was a god to the Democrats. He was a god to them until he said 'no collusion.' They don't like him so much now." trump at his “massage my ego” rally. Well, we really don’t know what all is in the report to get all hostile, or not, with Mueller because trump’s latest stooge is not releasing the entire report to anyone. Just his take. I like Mueller perfectly fine, it is Barr's four pages I have an issue with! And they still have not commented about the FACT that we have not run into to streets to protest as dt said his people would do or worse!!p Steve King went so far as to post about civil war!
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Mar 29, 2019 15:45:14 GMT
When we boot him out of office, I swear the man can get a gig as a stand up comedian. I think sometimes that he actually WANTED TO BE a stand-up comedian... he loves doing his usual schtick for his audiences, and getting laughs with his stupid, un-funny lines.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Mar 29, 2019 16:15:39 GMT
Lol! Love this tweet 😂😂😂😂😂😂
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Mar 29, 2019 16:17:36 GMT
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Mar 29, 2019 16:21:08 GMT
No words.... 🤪🤪🤪🤪🙄🙄
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 16:49:38 GMT
But but but................ he is proposing cutting the funds 90% "“And I'm going to get, in honor of my friends, full funding of $300 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative,” he continued. In the president’s budget proposal for the next fiscal year, which was unveiled earlier this month, the Trump administration proposed a $270 million cut to the $300 million Great Lakes Restoration Initiative according to The Detroit Free Press." Lies, leaks, gone!!
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Mar 29, 2019 16:50:07 GMT
Again....omg....if there was a Nobel prize for stupidity, he'd win hands down.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 16:52:14 GMT
Again....omg....if there was a Nobel prize for stupidity, he'd win hands down. He could fill in with his hot air! Lies. Leaks, gone!!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 17:16:52 GMT
Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) said in an interview that aired Friday on "Rising" that being the minority party in the House will present a bit of a hindrance to Republicans looking to investigate the origins of special counsel Robert Mueller's federal investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 presidential election. "Being in the minority certainly does make this a more difficult task because we already have Democrats, leading Democrats, coming out, saying that this is not the end of the investigation, that they're going to keep pursuing this," Hice told hosts Shermichael Singleton and Jamal Simmons on "Rising." thehill.com/hilltv/rising/436462-gop-rep-says-being-in-the-minority-will-make-it-difficult-for-republicans-to* Shall we say Merrick Garland? You had your chance to investigate your people/for what ever you wanted for the last how many years, 6? You had 2 full years to look into Russia's meddling, but did nothing!! Mostly saying it didn't happen at all! Nunes leaks, hiding in the bushes, what else? You all didn't do too much, did you?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 17:32:05 GMT
trump..
”The DEMOCRATS have given us the weakest immigration laws anywhere in the World. Mexico has the strongest, & they make more than $100 Billion a year on the U.S. Therefore, CONGRESS MUST CHANGE OUR WEAK IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW, & Mexico must stop illegals from entering the U.S....
”through their country and our Southern Border. Mexico has for many years made a fortune off of the U.S., far greater than Border Costs. If Mexico doesn’t immediately stop ALL illegal immigration coming into the United States throug our Southern Border, I will be CLOSING.....
“....the Border, or large sections of the Border, next week. This would be so easy for Mexico to do, but they just take our money and “talk.” Besides, we lose so much money with them, especially when you add in drug trafficking etc.), that the Border closing would be a good thing!”
trump is going to be in Southern California for a fund raiser next week. I wonder, when talking about closing the border next week, we will get a photo op of him standing at one of the chech points with his arm raised in the “stop” position? I would not put it past him thinking it would be “ratings gold”.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Mar 29, 2019 17:58:33 GMT
trump.. ”The DEMOCRATS have given us the weakest immigration laws anywhere in the World. Mexico has the strongest, & they make more than $100 Billion a year on the U.S. Therefore, CONGRESS MUST CHANGE OUR WEAK IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW, & Mexico must stop illegals from entering the U.S.... ”through their country and our Southern Border. Mexico has for many years made a fortune off of the U.S., far greater than Border Costs. If Mexico doesn’t immediately stop ALL illegal immigration coming into the United States throug our Southern Border, I will be CLOSING..... “....the Border, or large sections of the Border, next week. This would be so easy for Mexico to do, but they just take our money and “talk.” Besides, we lose so much money with them, especially when you add in drug trafficking etc.), that the Border closing would be a good thing!” trump is going to be in Southern California for a fund raiser next week. I wonder, when talking about closing the border next week, we will get a photo op of him standing at one of the chech points with his arm raised in the “stop” position? I would not put it past him thinking it would be “ratings gold”. He has absolutely no clue of the uproar he would cause were he to CLOSE the border. Do dt! Let the people down there go ballistic.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 18:22:07 GMT
Having said that, way too many people are either making the mistake or pushing the premise that trump is just like all the other presidents or political candidates. I've never said Trump himself is just like all the other presidents. What I said was people are going off the deep end with the claims about him just as they did with Obama. "Trump is colluding with Russia" with a lot of people saying they had "evidence" to back it up. They didn't. The same thing when Obama was "going to have an ISIS flag flying over the White House" "he's going to declare martial law and remain as the president" "he wasn't born here" with a lot of people showing the "evidence" to back it up. None of it true. Trump is Hitler. Obama is Hitler. Same shit, different day. Nobody has to make things up about trump, no one has to start a misinformation campaign against him. And yet they do. Harvard has done a study saying so, left leaning journalists are starting to speak up and we've seen the evidence for ourselves. So when you read stuff on this thread about trump, 99.9% of what is said is based on what he has said or what he has done. I think you really believe that, but it isn't factually true. So often it is based on your interpretation of what he's said. Not his actual words.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 18:34:15 GMT
Stating a fact about it does not mean he admires it. As a matter of fact, stating that it isn't something he'd like to do pretty much negates that idiotic tweet and your point for posting it. 99.9% @fred?
|
|
sassyangel
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,456
Jun 26, 2014 23:58:32 GMT
|
Post by sassyangel on Mar 29, 2019 18:42:04 GMT
Again....omg....if there was a Nobel prize for stupidity, he'd win hands down. Ugh. As opposed to his presidency... which blows every. single. day. 😐
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 18:54:43 GMT
Having said that, way too many people are either making the mistake or pushing the premise that trump is just like all the other presidents or political candidates. I've never said Trump himself is just like all the other presidents. What I said was people are going off the deep end with the claims about him just as they did with Obama. "Trump is colluding with Russia" with a lot of people saying they had "evidence" to back it up. They didn't. The same thing when Obama was "going to have an ISIS flag flying over the White House" "he's going to declare martial law and remain as the president" "he wasn't born here" with a lot of people showing the "evidence" to back it up. None of it true. Trump is Hitler. Obama is Hitler. Same shit, different day. Nobody has to make things up about trump, no one has to start a misinformation campaign against him. And yet they do. Harvard has done a study saying so, left leaning journalists are starting to speak up and we've seen the evidence for ourselves. So when you read stuff on this thread about trump, 99.9% of what is said is based on what he has said or what he has done. I think you really believe that, but it isn't factually true. So often it is based on your interpretation of what he's said. Not his actual words. I think I need to be a little clearer here. Those on the left do not need to make things up or twist words about trump as the right did with President Obama and Hillary on way too many occasions. We can and do post a direct quote or tweet from trump and offer our observation /opinion. Again, we don’t have to make things what when it comes to trump. He is very helpful in that regards. In fact some, especially on the right, may think he is too helpful. Now you may not like our opinion/observation or even interpretation of his words and actions. That is certainly your right and feel free to come here and defend his words and actions at anytime.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 19:05:00 GMT
I've never said Trump himself is just like all the other presidents. What I said was people are going off the deep end with the claims about him just as they did with Obama. "Trump is colluding with Russia" with a lot of people saying they had "evidence" to back it up. They didn't. The same thing when Obama was "going to have an ISIS flag flying over the White House" "he's going to declare martial law and remain as the president" "he wasn't born here" with a lot of people showing the "evidence" to back it up. None of it true. Trump is Hitler. Obama is Hitler. Same shit, different day. And yet they do. Harvard has done a study saying so, left leaning journalists are starting to speak up and we've seen the evidence for ourselves. I think you really believe that, but it isn't factually true. So often it is based on your interpretation of what he's said. Not his actual words. I think I need to be a little clearer here. Those on the left do not need to make things up or twist words about trump as the right did with President Obama and Hillary on way too many occasions. We can and do post a direct quote or tweet from trump and offer our observation /opinion. Again, we don’t have to make things what when it comes to trump. He is very helpful in that regards. In fact some, especially on the right, may think he is too helpful.Now you may not like our opinion/observation or even interpretation of his words and actions. That is certainly your right and feel free to come here and defend his words and actions at anytime. I should probably be clear too. We also can and have posted direct quotes from Obama and Hillary where they lie, divide and have really bad policy and offer enough that there is no need to make anything up. Somebody on this thread said "It's something every day with this administration." The same exact thing was said during Obama's. The problem with your interpretation of his words are that you interpret it into something it isn't. As I showed above on Imsirus' post. This board is full of those examples. Enough to obliterate your 99.9% accuracy claim.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 19:42:06 GMT
I think I need to be a little clearer here. Those on the left do not need to make things up or twist words about trump as the right did with President Obama and Hillary on way too many occasions. We can and do post a direct quote or tweet from trump and offer our observation /opinion. Again, we don’t have to make things what when it comes to trump. He is very helpful in that regards. In fact some, especially on the right, may think he is too helpful.Now you may not like our opinion/observation or even interpretation of his words and actions. That is certainly your right and feel free to come here and defend his words and actions at anytime. I should probably be clear too. We also can and have posted direct quotes from Obama and Hillary where they lie, divide and have really bad policy and offer enough that there is no need to make anything up. Somebody on this thread said "It's something every day with this administration." The same exact thing was said during Obama's. The problem with your interpretation of his words are that you interpret it into something it isn't. As I showed above on Imsirus' post. This board is full of those examples. Enough to obliterate your 99.9% accuracy claim. Please do provide direct quotes from President Obama and Hillary. I have spent sooo much time asking those who slammed them on vague references to provide the quotes or facts with few results. But keep in mind, I’m getting really good at tracking things down and will check your sources and the accuracy of your claim. As to your example. Let’s look at it. Using machine guns “It’s a very effective way of doing it” when talking about stopping migrants crossing the border. Really, you don’t have a problem with him thinking it’s an effective way of stopping migrants by shooting them or at them? Followed by “and I wouldn’t want to do it”. Which comes across as while I wouldn’t want to do it, I could. Those are his words. Now make a strong case that it isn’t what he means. Go for it. I would be interested to know how you see those comments. Keeping in mind, these comments are from the President of the United States, not some has been reality tv actor. They carry weight. Some wackos may take him at his word that it’s an “effective way” to handle migrants on the Southern Border and decide to hang out there with their AK-15’s and shoot at any migrant they see trying to cross the border and maybe kill a couple, including children. You ok with that? Come on, tell me how I’m misinterpreting his words.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 20:01:02 GMT
linkNPR... ”Attorney General William Barr has told congressional leaders he anticipates being able to give them a redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's report on his investigation into Russia's interference with the 2016 presidential election by "by mid-April, if not sooner."” A “redacted” version of the report to Congress? They are so hiding something. Think about this for a second. It is the House Judiciary Committee that draws up articles of impeachment against a president. A investigation was done for Nixon and Clinton. And in both cases, unredacted copies of the complete investigations were given to the Judiciary Committe within days of the completion. The Clinton one included copies of the evidence that went into the report. They are hiding something for sure.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 19, 2024 21:16:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2019 20:17:13 GMT
How it works: "So, Koch went in search of an operational strategy — what he has called a “technology” — of revolution that could get around this hurdle. He hunted for 30 years until he found that technology in Buchanan’s thought. From Buchanan, Koch learned that for the agenda to succeed, it had to be put in place in incremental steps, what Koch calls “interrelated plays”: many distinct yet mutually reinforcing changes of the rules that govern our nation. Koch’s team used Buchanan’s ideas to devise a roadmap for a radical transformation that could be carried out largely below the radar of the people, yet legally. The plan was (and is) to act on so many ostensibly separate fronts at once that those outside the cause would not realize the revolution underway until it was too late to undo it. Examples include laws to destroy unions without saying that is the true purpose, suppressing the votes of those most likely to support active government, using privatization to alter power relations — and, to lock it all in, Buchanan’s ultimate recommendation: a “constitutional revolution.”... or example, here are the names of 15 of the most important Koch-funded, Buchanan-savvy organizations each with its own assignment in the division of labor: There’s Americans for Prosperity, the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the American Legislative Exchange Council, the Mercatus Center, Americans for Tax Reform, Concerned Veterans of America, the Leadership Institute, Generation Opportunity, the Institute for Justice, the Independent Institute, the Club for Growth, the Donors Trust, Freedom Partners, Judicial Watch — whoops, that’s more than 15, and it’s not counting the over 60 other organizations in the State Policy Network. This cause operates through so many ostensibly separate organizations that its architects expect the rest of us will ignore all the small but extremely significant changes that cumulatively add up to revolutionary transformation. " truthout.org/articles/misinforming-the-majority-a-deliberate-strategy-of-right-wing-libertarians/
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Mar 29, 2019 20:27:38 GMT
Having said that, way too many people are either making the mistake or pushing the premise that trump is just like all the other presidents or political candidates. I've never said Trump himself is just like all the other presidents. What I said was people are going off the deep end with the claims about him just as they did with Obama. "Trump is colluding with Russia" with a lot of people saying they had "evidence" to back it up. They didn't. The same thing when Obama was "going to have an ISIS flag flying over the White House" "he's going to declare martial law and remain as the president" "he wasn't born here" with a lot of people showing the "evidence" to back it up. None of it true. Trump is Hitler. Obama is Hitler. Same shit, different day. Nobody has to make things up about trump, no one has to start a misinformation campaign against him. And yet they do. Harvard has done a study saying so, left leaning journalists are starting to speak up and we've seen the evidence for ourselves. So when you read stuff on this thread about trump, 99.9% of what is said is based on what he has said or what he has done. I think you really believe that, but it isn't factually true. So often it is based on your interpretation of what he's said. Not his actual words. Wrong. The majority IS based on his exact words and actions. Just because YOU don’t read the facts and what he does or says does not make it less true. And I wasn’t aware that you received your own personal copy of Mueller’s report...because the world has only heard from Barr—and not Mueller. So, without Mueller’s actual report and not a politically slanted synopsis, no one really knows except Mueller and his team. So you might want to heed your own advice you big old hypocrite—wait for the facts to roll in and not just a political appointees summary as what is what and no by what appears to be a very slanted interpretation of his report.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Mar 29, 2019 20:36:11 GMT
His entire administration is just dumb...
|
|