oh yvonne
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 8,111
Jun 26, 2014 0:45:23 GMT
|
Post by oh yvonne on Aug 12, 2020 18:59:42 GMT
back to add that I've read the rest of the thread and you all have given me food for thought as well. I hadn't thought of the landslide aspect of it.
|
|
tracylynn
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,905
Jun 26, 2014 22:49:09 GMT
|
Post by tracylynn on Aug 12, 2020 19:16:37 GMT
Apparently I do have to point it out if I take what you wrote at face value. And I have no interest in reading your explanation of how you are going to decide to vote third party or whatever you are going to do. This election is about saving the country. There are two choices and only two choices. Either for or against the country. This year, this election, is not like past elections. This is rally around the flag election. Not only does Biden have to win, he literally has to win by a landslide because trump has been laying the groundwork that if he doesn’t win, he will claim the election was rigged. What if the election is close and trump refuses to accept the results of the election if Biden wins? One of the reasons this country has lasted as long as it has is because of regular elections and the peaceful transfer of power from one president to another. What do you think would happen to this country if trump refuses to concede the election? If his supporters refuse to accept the outcome? With trump there is a real possibility of this happening if he doesn’t win. And I don’t even want to think about what will happen if he does win. To avoid these possibilities means all hands on deck and we vote for Biden in numbers that give him a convincing win. And what do you think would happen to this country if Trump wins again? You think those against him are going to accept that without continuing to riot as they are apparently still doing? I shudder at the thought. I'm not voting for Trump, and in my very blue state it doesn't matter what my vote is so I'll vote third party probably. I like Joe. But Kamala? Oh no. Nope. Can I ask why you don't like Kamala? I honestly would like to know.
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama

Posts: 6,653
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Aug 12, 2020 19:23:16 GMT
It's extremely unfortunate that you feel the need to be so condescending. I don't need you to "point out" or "explain" anything to me. I answered the question that was asked. Not that it's any of your business, but I'll explain. Do I think my third party vote will get that someone elected? No. But I need to vote my conscience and not just strategy, and some day someone has to be the first person outside the two-party system to win, and that will never happen if we keep buying into the lie that this is the way it has to be forever. My sending a message that the two-party system isn't good enough is part of my long-term thinking, not this particular election. I agree with MissJen. It’s incredibly condescending to assume somebody who doesn’t vote Biden is an idiot. I am no idiot. I voted third party in the last election because I felt I needed to make a point that we need more than a Democrat or Republican to vote for. Quite frankly, I know I won’t be voting for Biden. Not sure yet if I will vote Trump or third party but I also live in a state where it doesn’t matter. Hate me and judge me, but I may actually vote Trump this election. I don’t love it but this is my right to vote as I see fit. I hate the choices in front of me. I hate the world of politics. This is so deeply disturbing on every level. What point did you actually make in 2016 with your third party vote? The only point you made was to prove you don't give a shit about human rights, environmental rights, women rights or even the foundation of our country, i.e. the Constitution. Way to go!
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Aug 12, 2020 20:34:24 GMT
I see the point you all are making and I agree with much. However, I disagree with the concept that there's something (someone?) better waiting in 2024 or 2028. I really don't think there is. We're just going to get more of the same. Both parties have given us mediocre choices for years. So while I do understand the "wait til next time" argument, I also see the "try to stem the tide sooner than later" side of things. I'm not sure that waiting is going to behoove us either. If you got the impression from my post that something better might be waiting in 2024 or 2028, I wanted to re-iterate, I expect the exact opposite. Someone way worse than Trump is coming from the GOP, and at some point we have to decide that the threat to an actual democracy is a real "clear and present danger." I would rather people get on board now, because in 4 or 8 years they will be even more emboldened, and more organized and proficient than this bunch and we won't have time for people to come to terms that while some are waiting on a unicorn, a raging bull is on course to trample anything in its path, including people waiting on unicorns. We aren't going to get "more of the same," if this continues. We will have more dismantling of the ways our society functions, and the consequences will extend far beyond Trump's targets of choice: brown immigrants. On another forum I read, a Disney forum, people were fully supportive that the National Guard should go full Kent State on protesters to shut this down. It's not just racism and sexism anymore, its dissenters need to be locked up, and if people get killed in the process, so be it, and these aren't just fringe opinions. That includes media, that includes political adversaries, that includes people on the street holding signs and chanting for social justice. "That can't happen here," "Those things won't happen to me," doesn't mean things can't happen. See: pandemic. Your long game only works if that's the long game we're actually playing. FWIW, I actually think that situations like we have now, actually become catalysts for substantive change. I don't believe we would have National marriage equality, if California's Prop 8 hadn't passed, pissing off enough people who had the privilege of not having to worry about the implications in their own lives, to the point of actually doing something. The debate has been do Democrats have to be moderate to appeal to wayward Republicans or go full-on Progressive. I think a similar thing is happening now, and the answer is more progressive action. But it's not going to be instantaneous. It's going to be in local government, State representation, Congressional (like the Squad) and lastly President / VP. It's "ground up" not "trickle down" progressive action. But all of this requires the presence of a National, functional democracy. We don't have this. We can see some of the damage, but in all ares of the federal government, with sycophants running more and more I don't think we can even appreciate the scope of damage to places like the State department, education, health & human services, the Justice department etc. As bad as we think things are, it's already worse. Plus, pandemic, raging unemployment, pending housing and food insecurity on a massive scale.
|
|
|
Post by maryland on Aug 12, 2020 20:59:20 GMT
I like Biden, so I am happy with whoever he chooses! Even if I didn't like Biden, I would pick anyone over Trump who could care less about lives and the economy!
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Aug 12, 2020 21:55:34 GMT
a National, functional democracy. We don't have this. We can see some of the damage, but in all ares of the federal government, with sycophants running more and more I don't think we can even appreciate the scope of damage to places like the State department, education, health & human services, the Justice department etc. As bad as we think things are, it's already worse. Plus, pandemic, raging unemployment, pending housing and food insecurity on a massive scale. sadly, I agree with this.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 12, 2020 22:04:55 GMT
I see the point you all are making and I agree with much. However, I disagree with the concept that there's something (someone?) better waiting in 2024 or 2028. I really don't think there is. We're just going to get more of the same. Both parties have given us mediocre choices for years. So while I do understand the "wait til next time" argument, I also see the "try to stem the tide sooner than later" side of things. I'm not sure that waiting is going to behoove us either. If you got the impression from my post that something better might be waiting in 2024 or 2028, I wanted to re-iterate, I expect the exact opposite. Someone way worse than Trump is coming from the GOP, and at some point we have to decide that the threat to an actual democracy is a real "clear and present danger." I would rather people get on board now, because in 4 or 8 years they will be even more emboldened, and more organized and proficient than this bunch and we won't have time for people to come to terms that while some are waiting on a unicorn, a raging bull is on course to trample anything in its path, including people waiting on unicorns. We aren't going to get "more of the same," if this continues. We will have more dismantling of the ways our society functions, and the consequences will extend far beyond Trump's targets of choice: brown immigrants. On another forum I read, a Disney forum, people were fully supportive that the National Guard should go full Kent State on protesters to shut this down. It's not just racism and sexism anymore, its dissenters need to be locked up, and if people get killed in the process, so be it, and these aren't just fringe opinions. That includes media, that includes political adversaries, that includes people on the street holding signs and chanting for social justice. "That can't happen here," "Those things won't happen to me," doesn't mean things can't happen. See: pandemic. Your long game only works if that's the long game we're actually playing. FWIW, I actually think that situations like we have now, actually become catalysts for substantive change. I don't believe we would have National marriage equality, if California's Prop 8 hadn't passed, pissing off enough people who had the privilege of not having to worry about the implications in their own lives, to the point of actually doing something. The debate has been do Democrats have to be moderate to appeal to wayward Republicans or go full-on Progressive. I think a similar thing is happening now, and the answer is more progressive action. But it's not going to be instantaneous. It's going to be in local government, State representation, Congressional (like the Squad) and lastly President / VP. It's "ground up" not "trickle down" progressive action. But all of this requires the presence of a National, functional democracy. We don't have this. We can see some of the damage, but in all ares of the federal government, with sycophants running more and more I don't think we can even appreciate the scope of damage to places like the State department, education, health & human services, the Justice department etc. As bad as we think things are, it's already worse. Plus, pandemic, raging unemployment, pending housing and food insecurity on a massive scale. I really can’t like this post enough!
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Aug 12, 2020 22:27:04 GMT
If you got the impression from my post that something better might be waiting in 2024 or 2028, I wanted to re-iterate, I expect the exact opposite. Someone way worse than Trump is coming from the GOP, and at some point we have to decide that the threat to an actual democracy is a real "clear and present danger." I would rather people get on board now, because in 4 or 8 years they will be even more emboldened, and more organized and proficient than this bunch and we won't have time for people to come to terms that while some are waiting on a unicorn, a raging bull is on course to trample anything in its path, including people waiting on unicorns. We aren't going to get "more of the same," if this continues. We will have more dismantling of the ways our society functions, and the consequences will extend far beyond Trump's targets of choice: brown immigrants. On another forum I read, a Disney forum, people were fully supportive that the National Guard should go full Kent State on protesters to shut this down. It's not just racism and sexism anymore, its dissenters need to be locked up, and if people get killed in the process, so be it, and these aren't just fringe opinions. That includes media, that includes political adversaries, that includes people on the street holding signs and chanting for social justice. "That can't happen here," "Those things won't happen to me," doesn't mean things can't happen. See: pandemic. Your long game only works if that's the long game we're actually playing. FWIW, I actually think that situations like we have now, actually become catalysts for substantive change. I don't believe we would have National marriage equality, if California's Prop 8 hadn't passed, pissing off enough people who had the privilege of not having to worry about the implications in their own lives, to the point of actually doing something. The debate has been do Democrats have to be moderate to appeal to wayward Republicans or go full-on Progressive. I think a similar thing is happening now, and the answer is more progressive action. But it's not going to be instantaneous. It's going to be in local government, State representation, Congressional (like the Squad) and lastly President / VP. It's "ground up" not "trickle down" progressive action.But all of this requires the presence of a National, functional democracy. We don't have this. We can see some of the damage, but in all ares of the federal government, with sycophants running more and more I don't think we can even appreciate the scope of damage to places like the State department, education, health & human services, the Justice department etc. As bad as we think things are, it's already worse. Plus, pandemic, raging unemployment, pending housing and food insecurity on a massive scale. I typed out and deleted something similar to this because I was having a hard time verbalizing what you have stated so perfectly here above. If we truly want change and viable alternate parties, we need to work on that change at the grassroots level, in state and local government elections. It’s not going to happen overnight starting at the highest levels of government. It just isn’t.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 19:49:23 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 2:19:47 GMT
I see the point you all are making and I agree with much. However, I disagree with the concept that there's something (someone?) better waiting in 2024 or 2028. I really don't think there is. We're just going to get more of the same. Both parties have given us mediocre choices for years. So while I do understand the "wait til next time" argument, I also see the "try to stem the tide sooner than later" side of things. I'm not sure that waiting is going to behoove us either. If you got the impression from my post that something better might be waiting in 2024 or 2028, I wanted to re-iterate, I expect the exact opposite. Someone way worse than Trump is coming from the GOP, and at some point we have to decide that the threat to an actual democracy is a real "clear and present danger." I would rather people get on board now, because in 4 or 8 years they will be even more emboldened, and more organized and proficient than this bunch and we won't have time for people to come to terms that while some are waiting on a unicorn, a raging bull is on course to trample anything in its path, including people waiting on unicorns. We aren't going to get "more of the same," if this continues. We will have more dismantling of the ways our society functions, and the consequences will extend far beyond Trump's targets of choice: brown immigrants. On another forum I read, a Disney forum, people were fully supportive that the National Guard should go full Kent State on protesters to shut this down. It's not just racism and sexism anymore, its dissenters need to be locked up, and if people get killed in the process, so be it, and these aren't just fringe opinions. That includes media, that includes political adversaries, that includes people on the street holding signs and chanting for social justice. "That can't happen here," "Those things won't happen to me," doesn't mean things can't happen. See: pandemic. Your long game only works if that's the long game we're actually playing. FWIW, I actually think that situations like we have now, actually become catalysts for substantive change. I don't believe we would have National marriage equality, if California's Prop 8 hadn't passed, pissing off enough people who had the privilege of not having to worry about the implications in their own lives, to the point of actually doing something. The debate has been do Democrats have to be moderate to appeal to wayward Republicans or go full-on Progressive. I think a similar thing is happening now, and the answer is more progressive action. But it's not going to be instantaneous. It's going to be in local government, State representation, Congressional (like the Squad) and lastly President / VP. It's "ground up" not "trickle down" progressive action. But all of this requires the presence of a National, functional democracy. We don't have this. We can see some of the damage, but in all ares of the federal government, with sycophants running more and more I don't think we can even appreciate the scope of damage to places like the State department, education, health & human services, the Justice department etc. As bad as we think things are, it's already worse. Plus, pandemic, raging unemployment, pending housing and food insecurity on a massive scale. I think this is a really thoughtful post and I am mulling a lot of it over. Thank you for engaging me respectfully and giving me some food for thought and not just dismissing me. I've actually become a moderate largely due to two peas. In my 20s, I was a ragingly conservative Republican. Someone, it might have been elaine told me (paraphrased), "you'll moderate as you age" and I remember being very indignant and countering with "how dare you think you know my mind better than I do. I don't intend to change." How prideful and how wrong I was! Over the years peas have given me a LOT of things to think about and I've changed on a lot of things. But none of the ideas that challenged my thinking came from people who had the attitude of "I'm not even going to bother with you because your mind can't possibly be changed."
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Aug 13, 2020 6:19:40 GMT
I think this is a really thoughtful post and I am mulling a lot of it over. Thank you for engaging me respectfully and giving me some food for thought and not just dismissing me. I've actually become a moderate largely due to two peas. In my 20s, I was a ragingly conservative Republican. Someone, it might have been elaine told me (paraphrased), "you'll moderate as you age" and I remember being very indignant and countering with "how dare you think you know my mind better than I do. I don't intend to change." How prideful and how wrong I was! Over the years peas have given me a LOT of things to think about and I've changed on a lot of things. But none of the ideas that challenged my thinking came from people who had the attitude of "I'm not even going to bother with you because your mind can't possibly be changed." Thank you. My first Presidential election was 1996, and I voted for Bob Dole. I thought I was a moderate, economic conservative Republican. My DH recently got a Facebook request from a college friend of mine (I don't do Facebook), who was such a religious conservative that he believed the dinosaurs didn't exist as the Earth was only 6000 years old. A friend and I celebrated his Student Government win by getting drunk with his dorm cluster roommates. The only time in my life, I have gotten intentionally drunk, lol. This friend, and one of my similarly minded dorm cluster roommates sat in my dorm room reading the Bible to each other praying for my soul. He's a raging Progressive now! So yeah, it happens.  I believed that this county valued human beings (even though that definition has certainly changed over the years), but essentially the Founding Fathers beliefs in "natural rights." I believed that even though we couldn't force the World to accept our ideals toward freedom and equality, and run their Government a certain way, we have the power to determine what happened to the lives within our purview. Citizens and the non-Citizens we interact with, because when you believe humans have value, it doesn't matter where their home is, it matters what you do in your home. When I think about systemic injustice, not only does it mean how one person treats another, it's also how a person justifies their actions or more importantly inaction. It took me awhile to make the connection that the things we tell ourselves are "differences of political opinion," is the system doing its job in perpetuating the injustice, which allows the Haves benefits they wish to keep (who wouldn't). Not believing in climate change, endangers the lives of everyone on this planet. I've never seen anyone talk about a pending birth or learning someone has a serious medical issue without their number one thought being a desperate wish for good health. But healthcare is not a basic human right? This pandemic reinforces that the health of strangers affects us all. And dozens of other thoughts that I realized ultimately come down to, "if I believe you have value, I have to try to make sure you have this." Where the mountain that must be climbed to obtain "this," is expensive, difficult, painful, requiring hard work and sacrifice that most of us can't conceive of because life is not that easy for the majority of us. Why mentally pile on things that are out of our control? We have to function, so we tell ourselves things that sound logical, so we can tuck it away and focus on what's in front of us. I feel it's a lot like taking The Matrix's red pill. It's struggle, struggle, struggle, and then *click* and once you start seeing, you can't unsee. It multiplies, and suddenly you realize, you're a thousand miles away from where you used to be. Not just a step or two. This is why I stopped believing in the "moderate" silent majority. The choice isn't really conservative, liberal, Democrat, Republican. It's a belief more along the lines of, should the world be cruel or not, and do people deserve its cruelty? I can't find the moderate position for cruelty. Sometimes cruel stuff happens, we aren't at the pinnacle of civilization yet. But when we have the recognition, and the choice and we let the cruelty happen in our own home? What we call moderate or independent, I think is more about psychology. Who can argue with the middle? It's so much easier to take the blue pill. Plus, it is scary to accept change of that magnitude. How could I have been *that* wrong about so much? And radical is such a negative word. I still believe the Democrats are horrible at messaging, become susceptible to *squirrel*, end up in the weeds and so much more, so a lot of times it's hard to support political candidates. Democrats must get better, but cruelty is not an option. As I've gotten older, I've lost the tolerance for keeping my mouth shut about it, even though I hate confrontation. I've typed more than I meant to, and I need to go to bed, so I hope this has been more food for thought. The easiest option is to stay where one is. Physically and mentally. Learning, challenging, growing...I've never felt it hasn't been worth it, even if it is at times, like now, it's uncomfortable and soul crushing.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Aug 13, 2020 15:24:06 GMT
I feel it's a lot like taking The Matrix's red pill. It's struggle, struggle, struggle, and then *click* and once you start seeing, you can't unsee. It multiplies, and suddenly you realize, you're a thousand miles away from where you used to be. Not just a step or two. This is why I stopped believing in the "moderate" silent majority. The choice isn't really conservative, liberal, Democrat, Republican. It's a belief more along the lines of, should the world be cruel or not, and do people deserve its cruelty? I can't find the moderate position for cruelty. Sometimes cruel stuff happens, we aren't at the pinnacle of civilization yet. But when we have the recognition, and the choice and we let the cruelty happen in our own home? VERY eloquently put. I agree with this outlook, although it's a struggle to hold these values sometimes, since I am married to a conservative (Reagan-era) Republican who doesn't realize the Republican party is NOT that any longer. eta: I don't mean it's a struggle to have those values, it's a struggle to get someone else to see things the way I do when they are so very different in their views (the 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps' mentality is very pervasive in the conservative beliefs).
|
|
peppermintpatty
Pearl Clutcher
Refupea #1345
Posts: 4,209
Jun 26, 2014 17:47:08 GMT
|
Post by peppermintpatty on Aug 13, 2020 18:53:14 GMT
It's extremely unfortunate that you feel the need to be so condescending. I don't need you to "point out" or "explain" anything to me. I answered the question that was asked. Not that it's any of your business, but I'll explain. Do I think my third party vote will get that someone elected? No. But I need to vote my conscience and not just strategy, and some day someone has to be the first person outside the two-party system to win, and that will never happen if we keep buying into the lie that this is the way it has to be forever. My sending a message that the two-party system isn't good enough is part of my long-term thinking, not this particular election. Apparently I do have to point it out if I take what you wrote at face value. And I have no interest in reading your explanation of how you are going to decide to vote third party or whatever you are going to do. This election is about saving the country. There are two choices and only two choices. Either for or against the country. This year, this election, is not like past elections. This is rally around the flag election. Not only does Biden have to win, he literally has to win by a landslide because trump has been laying the groundwork that if he doesn’t win, he will claim the election was rigged. What if the election is close and trump refuses to accept the results of the election if Biden wins? One of the reasons this country has lasted as long as it has is because of regular elections and the peaceful transfer of power from one president to another. What do you think would happen to this country if trump refuses to concede the election? If his supporters refuse to accept the outcome? With trump there is a real possibility of this happening if he doesn’t win. And I don’t even want to think about what will happen if he does win. To avoid these possibilities means all hands on deck and we vote for Biden in numbers that give him a convincing win. Trump can scream, kick and cry all he wants. If he loses, there is a transfer of power on Jan 21 that he cannot stop or change. He can dig his fat ass into the carpet and refuse to leave but at that point, he has zero power and no one has to listen to him anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 19:49:24 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 19:20:23 GMT
I'd vote for him with a slug as a running mate. So... Seriously I'm quite happy with his pick. As much as this Michigander loves Whitmer, many here do not and he needs MI so I'm glad she wasn't his pick. Plus we need her here! Whitmer honestly should stay in Michigan because they really need her. I grew up in Grand Rapids and having a strong Governor like that is really necessary because of the weird pockets of red/racism in Michigan. It's kind of a relief that they have a strong Governor now. (I had to move out of state to Los Angeles because Governor Snyder dismantled the Michigan Film industry and left me jobless.)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Aug 18, 2025 19:49:24 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2020 20:20:07 GMT
Apparently I do have to point it out if I take what you wrote at face value. And I have no interest in reading your explanation of how you are going to decide to vote third party or whatever you are going to do. This election is about saving the country. There are two choices and only two choices. Either for or against the country. This year, this election, is not like past elections. This is rally around the flag election. Not only does Biden have to win, he literally has to win by a landslide because trump has been laying the groundwork that if he doesn’t win, he will claim the election was rigged. What if the election is close and trump refuses to accept the results of the election if Biden wins? One of the reasons this country has lasted as long as it has is because of regular elections and the peaceful transfer of power from one president to another. What do you think would happen to this country if trump refuses to concede the election? If his supporters refuse to accept the outcome? With trump there is a real possibility of this happening if he doesn’t win. And I don’t even want to think about what will happen if he does win. To avoid these possibilities means all hands on deck and we vote for Biden in numbers that give him a convincing win. Trump can scream, kick and cry all he wants. If he loses, there is a transfer of power on Jan 21 that he cannot stop or change. He can dig his fat ass into the carpet and refuse to leave but at that point, he has zero power and no one has to listen to him anymore. I have no doubt there is. But what happens if trump keeps insisting the election was rigged and he’s not leaving the White House. What do you think his well armed supporters would do to show their support for “their guy”? My guess is wouldn’t be pretty.
|
|