janeliz
Drama Llama
I'm the Wiz and nobody beats me.
Posts: 5,645
Jun 26, 2014 14:35:07 GMT
|
Post by janeliz on Nov 15, 2021 22:03:24 GMT
DH and I have had a lot of conversations about this, we don't see eye to eye on a lot of this. While Kyle may have gone there to "help" and there was video of him helping along with others, my question, which stumped DH was, How did Kyle get separated from the group of people trying to help and into a situation where he was then a possible "target" for others? I believe he was alone and moving down the street in his quest to protect the automotive shop when he and Rosenbaum crossed paths. Then things went haywire from there. The New Yorker did a great piece, “Kyle Rittenhouse, American Vigilante”, that details that night along with the months after when conservative opportunists and hangers-on inserted themselves into the case. If you can read it online, I highly recommend it.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 15, 2021 22:04:44 GMT
Maybe Kyle Rittenhouse was just another idiot that fell for the left-wing media (CNN/MSNBC/NYT/WaPO) narrative that the fiery, violent, deadly riots last year were nothing more than "peaceful protests." I mean...people here were saying (believing?) that, maybe he did too. You'll probably just dismiss this as left wing media which is a very convenient way to ignore facts you don't agree with, don't like or don't fit your narrative. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/12/critics-claim-blm-was-more-violent-than-1960s-civil-rights-protests-thats-just-not-true/Research has found that the 2020 protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. Here at the Monkey Cage, political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman reported that their Crowd Counting Consortium (CCC) found that less than 4 percent of the summer’s protests involved property damage while 1 percent involved police injuries. Other data collections similarly found that 95 percent were peaceful. acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/this-summers-black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelming-peaceful-our-research-finds/Police and counterprotesters sometimes started violence In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters. Here is what we have found based on the 7,305 events we’ve collected. The overall levels of violence and property destruction were low, and most of the violence that did take place was, in fact, directed against the BLM protesters. First, police made arrests in 5 percent of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5 percent of these events. Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters. The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests. www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news-and-ideas/black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelmingly-peaceful-our-research-findswww.npr.org/2021/05/25/999841030/black-lives-matter-fights-disinformation-to-keep-the-movement-strongwww.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/10/24/trump-claims-blm-protests-violent-but-majority-peaceful/3640564001/Just more proof that if a lie is told enough times by the former president and/or Fox News, people believe it.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 15, 2021 22:06:20 GMT
So my question is, how do we change our laws such that a person who unnecessarily puts themselves into a dangerous situation and then uses deadly force to "protect" themselves does not get away with murder? Can any of Kyle's supporters here see the potential for our current laws to continue be misused by people just looking to shoot someone? When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 15, 2021 22:14:26 GMT
So my question is, how do we change our laws such that a person who unnecessarily puts themselves into a dangerous situation and then uses deadly force to "protect" themselves does not get away with murder? Can any of Kyle's supporters here see the potential for our current laws to continue be misused by people just looking to shoot someone? When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Phooey.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Nov 15, 2021 22:17:35 GMT
When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Phooey.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Nov 15, 2021 22:22:42 GMT
So my question is, how do we change our laws such that a person who unnecessarily puts themselves into a dangerous situation and then uses deadly force to "protect" themselves does not get away with murder? Can any of Kyle's supporters here see the potential for our current laws to continue be misused by people just looking to shoot someone? Why are you holding Kyle to a different standard than the other people who were there? Every one of them chose to unnecessarily put themselves in a dangerous situation. Some people went there to protest our unjust justice system, yes. But some of the went there to riot. Some went to loot. Some went because they were excited by violence and burning and stealing. You have no idea who is who. We don’t punish people for thoughts. The fact of the matter is Kyle had just as much right to be there as anyone else, so we can’t punish him for being there. That’s why his decision to go there wasn’t part of the trial. Because that wasn’t criminal. If that were criminal, round up and punish everyone who went there.
|
|
|
Post by myshelly on Nov 15, 2021 22:23:49 GMT
When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Phooey. What part are you calling phooey? That is literally, exactly what that witness said on the stand. Did you watch his testimony?
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 15, 2021 22:33:47 GMT
What part are you calling phooey? That is literally, exactly what that witness said on the stand. Did you watch his testimony? I read his testimony and I watched the video of the chase not once but twice. And in my opinion it wasn’t self defense. He set off a chain of events that night that ultimately led to him shooting three people two of them who died. As much as he wants to portray it, he’s no victim. And he should be held accountable for his actions that night and not be given a pass because he cried and claimed he was a victim.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 15, 2021 23:02:41 GMT
I have not been following this trial closely, although I have been reading about it. I watched this clip that the prosecution showed, and it was hard to tell who was who, but.. did Rittenhouse fire on one of the victims after he was already on the ground? It looks that way.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 15, 2021 23:44:30 GMT
So my question is, how do we change our laws such that a person who unnecessarily puts themselves into a dangerous situation and then uses deadly force to "protect" themselves does not get away with murder? Can any of Kyle's supporters here see the potential for our current laws to continue be misused by people just looking to shoot someone? When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Great. So I can take my pistol to the H‑E‑B to protect the place from Billy Bob with his open carry rifle, do something to antagonize him, and when he swings his gun my way I can shoot him. It will be self defense. I’ve figured out how we can turn Texas blue, one stupid ammosexual at a time. And it will all be perfectly legal.
|
|
anonaname
Full Member
Posts: 256
Aug 18, 2021 0:04:22 GMT
|
Post by anonaname on Nov 16, 2021 0:28:26 GMT
When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Phooey. That's some high quality "analysis", lol.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Nov 16, 2021 0:35:28 GMT
Why did the judge dismiss the gun charge? Because of the Rule of Lenity. Yes, some of the judge’s rulings and admonitions might be biased, but setting aside the emotions and politics, I think in this instance he really had no choice but to dismiss the charge. They themselves (judge and four lawyers) cannot agree on the interpretation of the exemptions portion of Wisconsin’s open-carry law because of how badly-written it is, and on top of that there was no definitive answer from the LEO as to whether the rifle should be considered a long gun or a short gun. Is hunting the only exemption to a 16- or 17-year-old carrying a long gun? Or does the law, due to its vagueness, create ambiguity wherein other exemptions may be valid depending on whether it’s a short or long gun? If five legal minds cannot satisfactorily interpret the statute and its subsections, how can one expect a jury to understand it? And in instances of ambiguity such as this, the resolution has to be in favor of the defendant. It is what it is. I went to the Wisconsin statute as I was surprised that it was dismissed as it seemed like a no brainer that if nothing else minor possessing dangerous firearm would hold - it's a freaking mess. Basically they exempted long guns.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 16, 2021 12:16:11 GMT
Maybe Kyle Rittenhouse was just another idiot that fell for the left-wing media (CNN/MSNBC/NYT/WaPO) narrative that the fiery, violent, deadly riots last year were nothing more than "peaceful protests." I mean...people here were saying (believing?) that, maybe he did too. You'll probably just dismiss this as left wing media which is a very convenient way to ignore facts you don't agree with, don't like or don't fit your narrative. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/12/critics-claim-blm-was-more-violent-than-1960s-civil-rights-protests-thats-just-not-true/Research has found that the 2020 protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. Here at the Monkey Cage, political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman reported that their Crowd Counting Consortium (CCC) found that less than 4 percent of the summer’s protests involved property damage while 1 percent involved police injuries. Other data collections similarly found that 95 percent were peaceful. acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/this-summers-black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelming-peaceful-our-research-finds/Police and counterprotesters sometimes started violence In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters. Here is what we have found based on the 7,305 events we’ve collected. The overall levels of violence and property destruction were low, and most of the violence that did take place was, in fact, directed against the BLM protesters. First, police made arrests in 5 percent of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5 percent of these events. Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters. The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests. www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news-and-ideas/black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelmingly-peaceful-our-research-findswww.npr.org/2021/05/25/999841030/black-lives-matter-fights-disinformation-to-keep-the-movement-strongwww.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/10/24/trump-claims-blm-protests-violent-but-majority-peaceful/3640564001/Just more proof that if a lie is told enough times by the former president and/or Fox News, people believe it. Of course not everybody out protesting turned to looting, violence, and arson. The facts remain that the riots are on track to be the most costly in our history, upwards of $1 billion. There were riots in at least 140 cities, national guard was activated in 21 states, hundreds and hundreds of businesses were burned and/or looted. That's just after George Floyd's death. Then there's Kenosha. Don't forget Portland and Seattle.
We may be a big country, but the violence, death and destruction was felt from coast to coast, and it was real. Leave it to CNN and MSNBC to send in their clowns to declare peaceful rioting while standing in front of burning buildings.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 16, 2021 12:25:59 GMT
You'll probably just dismiss this as left wing media which is a very convenient way to ignore facts you don't agree with, don't like or don't fit your narrative. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/12/critics-claim-blm-was-more-violent-than-1960s-civil-rights-protests-thats-just-not-true/Research has found that the 2020 protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. Here at the Monkey Cage, political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman reported that their Crowd Counting Consortium (CCC) found that less than 4 percent of the summer’s protests involved property damage while 1 percent involved police injuries. Other data collections similarly found that 95 percent were peaceful. acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/this-summers-black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelming-peaceful-our-research-finds/Police and counterprotesters sometimes started violence In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters. Here is what we have found based on the 7,305 events we’ve collected. The overall levels of violence and property destruction were low, and most of the violence that did take place was, in fact, directed against the BLM protesters. First, police made arrests in 5 percent of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5 percent of these events. Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters. The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests. www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news-and-ideas/black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelmingly-peaceful-our-research-findswww.npr.org/2021/05/25/999841030/black-lives-matter-fights-disinformation-to-keep-the-movement-strongwww.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/10/24/trump-claims-blm-protests-violent-but-majority-peaceful/3640564001/Just more proof that if a lie is told enough times by the former president and/or Fox News, people believe it. Of course not everybody out protesting turned to looting, violence, and arson. The facts remain that the riots are on track to be the most costly in our history, upwards of $1 billion. There were riots in at least 140 cities, national guard was activated in 21 states, hundreds and hundreds of businesses were burned and/or looted. That's just after George Floyd's death. Then there's Kenosha. Don't forget Portland and Seattle.
We may be a big country, but the violence, death and destruction was felt from coast to coast, and it was real. Leave it to CNN and MSNBC to send in their clowns to declare peaceful rioting while standing in front of burning buildings.
Did you actually look at or read any of the links I posted? None of them were from CNN or MSNBC. The majority of the articles were posted after the riots after careful analysis of the data. Yes, there was violence and looting. No one is disputing that. But not to the extent that right wing news media reported.
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,525
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Nov 16, 2021 12:40:57 GMT
You'll probably just dismiss this as left wing media which is a very convenient way to ignore facts you don't agree with, don't like or don't fit your narrative. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/12/critics-claim-blm-was-more-violent-than-1960s-civil-rights-protests-thats-just-not-true/Research has found that the 2020 protests were overwhelmingly peaceful. Here at the Monkey Cage, political scientists Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman reported that their Crowd Counting Consortium (CCC) found that less than 4 percent of the summer’s protests involved property damage while 1 percent involved police injuries. Other data collections similarly found that 95 percent were peaceful. acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/this-summers-black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelming-peaceful-our-research-finds/Police and counterprotesters sometimes started violence In fact, the Black Lives Matter uprisings were remarkably nonviolent. When there was violence, very often police or counterprotesters were reportedly directing it at the protesters. Here is what we have found based on the 7,305 events we’ve collected. The overall levels of violence and property destruction were low, and most of the violence that did take place was, in fact, directed against the BLM protesters. First, police made arrests in 5 percent of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5 percent of these events. Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later. Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters. The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests. www.radcliffe.harvard.edu/news-and-ideas/black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelmingly-peaceful-our-research-findswww.npr.org/2021/05/25/999841030/black-lives-matter-fights-disinformation-to-keep-the-movement-strongwww.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/nation/2020/10/24/trump-claims-blm-protests-violent-but-majority-peaceful/3640564001/Just more proof that if a lie is told enough times by the former president and/or Fox News, people believe it. Of course not everybody out protesting turned to looting, violence, and arson. The facts remain that the riots are on track to be the most costly in our history, upwards of $1 billion. There were riots in at least 140 cities, national guard was activated in 21 states, hundreds and hundreds of businesses were burned and/or looted. That's just after George Floyd's death. Then there's Kenosha. Don't forget Portland and Seattle.
We may be a big country, but the violence, death and destruction was felt from coast to coast, and it was real. Leave it to CNN and MSNBC to send in their clowns to declare peaceful rioting while standing in front of burning buildings.
I'd be greatly interested in a list of the 140 cities as well as the hundreds and hundreds of destroyed businesses. From balanced sources. Also what qualifies as rioting because in my small city, they said there were rioters when the extent of shenanigans was maybe blocking an intersection for a few minutes. Our protests were entirely peaceful and we were surrounded by supportive clergy. I'm definitely not an expert but I thought of rioting as what we saw on January 6th, as in beating the shit out of cops with Trump flags and then literally spreading shit in the Capitol.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 16, 2021 12:42:07 GMT
Of course not everybody out protesting turned to looting, violence, and arson. The facts remain that the riots are on track to be the most costly in our history, upwards of $1 billion. There were riots in at least 140 cities, national guard was activated in 21 states, hundreds and hundreds of businesses were burned and/or looted. That's just after George Floyd's death. Then there's Kenosha. Don't forget Portland and Seattle.
We may be a big country, but the violence, death and destruction was felt from coast to coast, and it was real. Leave it to CNN and MSNBC to send in their clowns to declare peaceful rioting while standing in front of burning buildings.
Did you actually look at or read any of the links I posted? None of them were from CNN or MSNBC. The majority of the articles were posted after the riots after careful analysis of the data. Yes, there was violence and looting. No one is disputing that. But not to the extent that right wing news media reported. My initial comment was:
"Maybe Kyle Rittenhouse was just another idiot that fell for the left-wing media (CNN/MSNBC/NYT/WaPO) narrative that the fiery, violent, deadly riots last year were nothing more than "peaceful protests." I mean...people here were saying (believing?) that, maybe he did too."
What I said about CNN/MSNBC directly is correct--they stood in front of fires burning declaring the riots as mostly peaceful. Maybe YOU think burning buildings, looting, rioting, etc. is mostly peaceful. I don't.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 16, 2021 12:45:10 GMT
Of course not everybody out protesting turned to looting, violence, and arson. The facts remain that the riots are on track to be the most costly in our history, upwards of $1 billion. There were riots in at least 140 cities, national guard was activated in 21 states, hundreds and hundreds of businesses were burned and/or looted. That's just after George Floyd's death. Then there's Kenosha. Don't forget Portland and Seattle.
We may be a big country, but the violence, death and destruction was felt from coast to coast, and it was real. Leave it to CNN and MSNBC to send in their clowns to declare peaceful rioting while standing in front of burning buildings.
I'd be greatly interested in a list of the 140 cities as well as the hundreds and hundreds of destroyed businesses. From balanced sources.
Adding:
And, per the NYT:
"In cities across the United States, tens of thousands of people have swarmed the streets to express their outrage and sorrow during the day. That has descended into nights of unrest, with reports of shootings, looting and vandalism in some cities.
Since the death of Mr. Floyd, protests have erupted in at least 140 cities across the United States, and the National Guard has been activated in at least 21 states."
If you want more specifics, you'll have to dig deeper.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 16, 2021 15:19:54 GMT
I'd be greatly interested in a list of the 140 cities as well as the hundreds and hundreds of destroyed businesses. From balanced sources.
Adding:
And, per the NYT:
"In cities across the United States, tens of thousands of people have swarmed the streets to express their outrage and sorrow during the day. That has descended into nights of unrest, with reports of shootings, looting and vandalism in some cities.
Since the death of Mr. Floyd, protests have erupted in at least 140 cities across the United States, and the National Guard has been activated in at least 21 states."
If you want more specifics, you'll have to dig deeper.
What responsibility do you think police and military should bear for the financial cost where they were the ones who instigated violence? How much taxpayer money do you think has been spent defending police who killed black people with excessive force in the line of duty? How many families have been driven into poverty by the loss of a breadwinner at the hands of violent police? How much taxpayer money spent on unjust incarceration? With conservatives, it's always somebody else's fault. You all don't take responsibility for the damage our police and military do here and abroad, and you're mad when the victims and their supporters fight back in a way you don't like. You applaud those who go in to shoot them (or separate them from their families, or detain them indefinitely, or bomb them into oblivion) when they fight back. It's easy for you to say, oh, violence isn't the answer and you need to work for change peacefully. But you all are systematically rigging our political system in your own favor, making peaceful change impossible. Don't be surprised when violence is the response. People will only be oppressed for so long before they fight back.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:50:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2021 16:01:43 GMT
It's easy for you to say, oh, violence isn't the answer and you need to work for change peacefully. But you all are systematically rigging our political system in your own favor, making peaceful change impossible. Don't be surprised when violence is the response. People will only be oppressed for so long before they fight back. I respect you very much. I disagree that violence is the answer unless you don't live in a democracy, which we still do, tenuously. Your quote above could be the justification for 1/6/21 insurrectionists.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 16, 2021 16:21:19 GMT
It's easy for you to say, oh, violence isn't the answer and you need to work for change peacefully. But you all are systematically rigging our political system in your own favor, making peaceful change impossible. Don't be surprised when violence is the response. People will only be oppressed for so long before they fight back. I respect you very much. I disagree that violence is the answer unless you don't live in a democracy, which we still do, tenuously. Your quote above could be the justification for 1/6/21 insurrectionists. Except that the affluent white people who stormed the capitol on 1/6 are the very opposite of oppressed. Maybe it will come to civil war, IDK. I know I'm tired of conservatives telling everyone else that violence isn't the answer unless they're the ones committing violence. Then it's "self defense." They are stacking the deck against us to make peaceful solutions impossible.
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Nov 16, 2021 16:29:52 GMT
So my question is, how do we change our laws such that a person who unnecessarily puts themselves into a dangerous situation and then uses deadly force to "protect" themselves does not get away with murder? Can any of Kyle's supporters here see the potential for our current laws to continue be misused by people just looking to shoot someone? When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Is it self defense if I break into my neighbor’s house and I only shoot him after he throws a brick at md and points a gun at me? Kyle crossed state lines with a weapon with the intent of indulging his absurd male power fantasy. How lucky for him that opportunity so miraculously presented itself.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 16, 2021 16:43:23 GMT
Adding:
And, per the NYT:
"In cities across the United States, tens of thousands of people have swarmed the streets to express their outrage and sorrow during the day. That has descended into nights of unrest, with reports of shootings, looting and vandalism in some cities.
Since the death of Mr. Floyd, protests have erupted in at least 140 cities across the United States, and the National Guard has been activated in at least 21 states."
If you want more specifics, you'll have to dig deeper.
What responsibility do you think police and military should bear for the financial cost where they were the ones who instigated violence? How much taxpayer money do you think has been spent defending police who killed black people with excessive force in the line of duty? How many families have been driven into poverty by the loss of a breadwinner at the hands of violent police? How much taxpayer money spent on unjust incarceration? With conservatives, it's always somebody else's fault. You all don't take responsibility for the damage our police and military do here and abroad, and you're mad when the victims and their supporters fight back in a way you don't like. You applaud those who go in to shoot them (or separate them from their families, or detain them indefinitely, or bomb them into oblivion) when they fight back. It's easy for you to say, oh, violence isn't the answer and you need to work for change peacefully. But you all are systematically rigging our political system in your own favor, making peaceful change impossible. Don't be surprised when violence is the response. People will only be oppressed for so long before they fight back. Jason Van Dyke was arrested, tried and convicted for killing Laquan McDonald.
Derek Chauvin was arrested, tried and convicted for killing George Floyd.
More than 675 people from 40 different states have been charged following the Capitol attack.
Is justice always fair, absolutely not. However, immediate lashing out by rioting, looting, burning, attacking and killing before all of the facts can even be determined isn't the way. I'll never condone, justify or condone any of that.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 16, 2021 16:51:00 GMT
When you're outnumbered 3 against one, with a mob forming behind the 3, they're also armed too, they threatened to kill him twice, he was bashed in the head with a skateboard twice, had a running kick to the face, (the guy was off the ground completely as his feet made contact to Kyle's face), they chased him, advanced on him and POINTED A GUN AT KYLE. On video. The "victim"/aggressor/witness for the prosecution testified that he only got shot after he pointed his gun at Rittenhouse and advanced on him. Also on video. It was self defense. Is it self defense if I break into my neighbor’s house and I only shoot him after he throws a brick at md and points a gun at me? Kyle crossed state lines with a weapon with the intent of indulging his absurd male power fantasy. How lucky for him that opportunity so miraculously presented itself. NO, he didn't. OMG, the media has been pushing distorted and made up facts from the beginning and people don't know or don't care to stay up to date on the actual facts. Stay away from CNN/MSNBC, etc.
I'm not defending Rittenhouse, but damn get the facts straight.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Nov 16, 2021 16:51:01 GMT
Rittenhouse was not faced by 3 people. Period, end of story.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 16, 2021 17:07:41 GMT
What responsibility do you think police and military should bear for the financial cost where they were the ones who instigated violence? How much taxpayer money do you think has been spent defending police who killed black people with excessive force in the line of duty? How many families have been driven into poverty by the loss of a breadwinner at the hands of violent police? How much taxpayer money spent on unjust incarceration? With conservatives, it's always somebody else's fault. You all don't take responsibility for the damage our police and military do here and abroad, and you're mad when the victims and their supporters fight back in a way you don't like. You applaud those who go in to shoot them (or separate them from their families, or detain them indefinitely, or bomb them into oblivion) when they fight back. It's easy for you to say, oh, violence isn't the answer and you need to work for change peacefully. But you all are systematically rigging our political system in your own favor, making peaceful change impossible. Don't be surprised when violence is the response. People will only be oppressed for so long before they fight back. Jason Van Dyke was arrested, tried and convicted for killing Laquan McDonald.
Derek Chauvin was arrested, tried and convicted for killing George Floyd.
More than 675 people from 40 different states have been charged following the Capitol attack.
Is justice always fair, absolutely not. However, immediate lashing out by rioting, looting, burning, attacking and killing before all of the facts can even be determined isn't the way. I'll never condone, justify or condone any of that.
"Immediate" lashing out? This has been going on since slavery ended (and that was a whole other injustice of its own). A few killers brought to justice among the many is just a drop in the bucket and these things continue to happen. How many centuries do you think is the appropriate interval to wait for justice?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 16, 2021 17:21:59 GMT
Is it self defense if I break into my neighbor’s house and I only shoot him after he throws a brick at md and points a gun at me? Kyle crossed state lines with a weapon with the intent of indulging his absurd male power fantasy. How lucky for him that opportunity so miraculously presented itself. NO, he didn't. OMG, the media has been pushing distorted and made up facts from the beginning and people don't know or don't care to stay up to date on the actual facts. Stay away from CNN/MSNBC, etc.
I'm not defending Rittenhouse, but damn get the facts straight.
I love how you ignore the rest of her factually correct statement and pick on the one thing that isn’t.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Nov 16, 2021 17:22:01 GMT
Jason Van Dyke was arrested, tried and convicted for killing Laquan McDonald.
Derek Chauvin was arrested, tried and convicted for killing George Floyd.
More than 675 people from 40 different states have been charged following the Capitol attack.
Is justice always fair, absolutely not. However, immediate lashing out by rioting, looting, burning, attacking and killing before all of the facts can even be determined isn't the way. I'll never condone, justify or condone any of that.
"Immediate" lashing out? This has been going on since slavery ended (and that was a whole other injustice of its own). A few killers brought to justice among the many is just a drop in the bucket and these things continue to happen. How many centuries do you think is the appropriate interval to wait for justice? Emmet Till
|
|
rodeomom
Pearl Clutcher
Refupee # 380 "I don't have to run fast, I just have to run faster than you."
Posts: 3,675
Location: Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma
Jun 25, 2014 23:34:38 GMT
|
Post by rodeomom on Nov 16, 2021 17:33:16 GMT
NO, he didn't. OMG, the media has been pushing distorted and made up facts from the beginning and people don't know or don't care to stay up to date on the actual facts. Stay away from CNN/MSNBC, etc.
I'm not defending Rittenhouse, but damn get the facts straight.
I love how you ignore the rest of her factually correct statement and pick on the one thing that isn’t. We know that's what Kyle and his friend said. But we also know they both lie.
|
|
anonaname
Full Member
Posts: 256
Aug 18, 2021 0:04:22 GMT
|
Post by anonaname on Nov 16, 2021 17:35:06 GMT
NO, he didn't. OMG, the media has been pushing distorted and made up facts from the beginning and people don't know or don't care to stay up to date on the actual facts. Stay away from CNN/MSNBC, etc.
I'm not defending Rittenhouse, but damn get the facts straight.
I love how you ignore the rest of her factually correct statement and pick on the one thing that isn’t. Pardon me, but, Rittenhouse did in fact NOT cross state lines with a weapon. In fact, it was his friend Dominick David Black that both bought and transported the weapon. leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-kyle-rittenhouse-did-not-cross-state-lines-with-an-ar-15.htmlnightnurse said: Is it self defense if I break into my neighbor’s house and I only shoot him after he throws a brick at md and points a gun at me?
Kyle crossed state lines with a weapon with the intent of indulging his absurd male power fantasy. How lucky for him that opportunity so miraculously presented itself.And what "factually correct statement" are you saying she missed? Everything she said barring the comment about the gun is conjecture, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 16, 2021 17:35:08 GMT
Conservative David French in The Atlantic:
|
|