|
Post by cindyupnorth on Mar 18, 2022 14:27:31 GMT
A friend is a law firm administrator and has trouble filling open positions as are most firms in her (large) city. There is a huge battle out there right now over associates! Not just associates. My dd is a paralegal. Her new law firm told her to say a price. They met and increased it. She also has full paid benefits. I think people realized during the pandemic that things can be simpler, and things will still be ok. We got by hoarding TP and not working every day, and using our pantries, and we still were ok. That there is more to life then a low paying job, that treats you shitty. There is more out there. I know I was thinking of not retiring for another 5 yrs. But now I've started to cut back. I want to enjoy my time before I'm too old to do things.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Mar 18, 2022 14:30:46 GMT
But his managers never schedule him for the same days or same hours. He never knows his schedule for the next week until Saturday morning. I've said this forever. It's not just the PAY, it's the SCHEDULE. Employers insist on these variable schedules that make it impossible to take one of these shitty jobs and take another job "on the side", or do school "on the side" or help co-parent "on the side" because you never know from week to week what the shitty job's hours are goign to be. If employers would stop insisting that everyone take these variable schedules and let the parents (say) work from 9-12 only or on MWF only, etc. and make it THEIR business to jigsaw employees schedules together for coverage, instead of making it the employees responsibility to jigsaw their lives' schedules together, I bet they'd find MANY MORE people willing to work for minimum wage. This has been an issue for a long, long time and Covid has only exacerbated the problem. It’s the primary reason why I never got a second part time job after I had my kid (I also work part time for my DH as a bookkeeper/office manager and there’s no getting out of that job, LOL). It’s nearly impossible to find anything where management understands people have a life outside of their crappy part time job.
|
|
|
Post by bossymom on Mar 18, 2022 14:32:06 GMT
After 32 years of working full time, (40-50 hrs) I am now part time by choice. Due to demand I am making the same for part time work as my prior job. Better work life balance.
People whose jobs can be done remotely are demanding just that. And moving on if that is revoked or not an option. Employers would do well listening to their employees - and following up with changes in the workplace.
Experienced accountants are in demand. I’ll bounce if the job turns into something I can’t stand.
|
|
quiltedbrain
Full Member
Posts: 429
Jun 26, 2014 3:34:53 GMT
|
Post by quiltedbrain on Mar 18, 2022 15:41:07 GMT
My DH is a retail store manager. He's worked retail his whole life and he is good at his job. Being a store manager is perfect for his skill set and personality. During the height of the pandemic he was managing a small grocery store, similar in set up to Aldi (but unfortunately not paying as well as Aldi). That store closed due to poor decisions by corporate from before Covid hit. His store was the top performing store in the state and one of the highest in the company, but when the rest of the stores in the state were bleeding money, they decided to close all stores in the state.
He moved on to store manager position with another chain, this time a store that carries more home goods, furniture, electronics, etc. The store was without a manager for months and although it had been high performing in the past, the store was a mess when he started. That was in November so for the first couple of months, the goal was just to survive the holidays. They pay him well, but lower level employees are not paid a livable wage. And corporate decided to not keep the $2 bump in pay when the federal subsidy for it ended. He has struggled to keep employees and to get the store back to a good place (although the last time I was in the store, it was night and day from when he started...DH is too hard on himself, he wants it perfect now!)
From a management position, my DH often feels his hands are tied by corporate. He wants to pay people well, so that they have that motivation to stay, but corporate decides pay rates. He wants to give people consistent hours, but corporate sets labor budgets and they change from week to week. After many years, DH has finally set a boundary for himself that he will not make up gaping holes in the labor budget by working those hours himself since he's salaried. So that means often the store has only the amount of employees they have to have to be open.
IMO, the fault for labor shortages in retail fall completely at the feet of those in the corporate offices making decisions that only look at increasing the bottom line. A lot of those corporate folks haven't actually worked in a store in years, if ever, and have no idea what its really like. They also don't see employees as humans. I understand Amazon has been devastating, but treating people like crap is not the answer!
And this has resulted in jobs that are seen as disposable by the employees who are willing to work them, because that's how corporate treats them. It doesn't matter which chain it is, they are all like this, except possibly Costco, who I keep nagging DH to apply to.
DH frequently has employees who don't come in for shifts because they don't feel like it (note I did not say they were sick), or they got their tax return or another "windfall," or they just never show up and won't return calls so he has no idea what happened. Employees know that they can leave this job and get another at another place when they need to, cause this stupid set up has made employers desperate and willing to overlook things that would be a no go in other settings. And let me be crystal clear, I don't fault the employees for this, not one bit! Why invest in a system that won't invest in you?
So all that to say, labor shortages in retail and food service (fast food in particular) aren't going anywhere anytime soon cause the old white guys in charge are not likely to change their ideas on how things should be run. As customers, lower your expectations unless you enjoy being frustrated, and VOTE, VOTE, VOTE for things that will force the old white guys to change (a livable wage that adjusts with inflation, legislation that puts an end to the get your schedule a week at a time BS, legislation that supports unions, etc).
|
|
RosieKat
Drama Llama
PeaJect #12
Posts: 5,538
Jun 25, 2014 19:28:04 GMT
|
Post by RosieKat on Mar 18, 2022 15:52:09 GMT
She's still had issues with them wanting to schedule her during the day when she's in class, and she has to tell them no. I definitely agree this seems to be a problem. My DD is in high school, doesn't get out of school till 4:20 and the soonest she can physically get to her job is 4:45. She is a swim instructor, so classes/shifts go in 30 minute increments. She keeps getting pinged during the day "Can you take a 4:15 class today?" Um, no. (To be fair, they keep having people call out last minute and are probably desperate, and DD is one of the favorite teachers - also, they don't get mad when she says no, but still...) Teens and college kids stepped out of the workforce (or didn't step into it) Definitely agree with that around here. There are two definite groups, the ones that work their butts off and the ones who have seen that for whatever reason, they don't need to work. (Not criticizing, both options can be perfectly valid depending on your circumstances.) It seems there used to be a 3rd middle ground with kids who dabbled in a very part time job, and now there isn't. I'm trying to hire rising HS seniors and college students for our part time summer camp. Due to the nature of the job and the fact that it does have a kind of weird schedule, it has never had a swarm of applicants, but we've always had plenty. I convinced our director that we'd need to substantially raise our pay rates this year, even though it's a nonprofit charity, so we went from about $12 per hour to about $15 per hour with very clearly defined work hours. Well, by now we'd usually have about 20 applicants or more. We have 6. I've said this forever. It's not just the PAY, it's the SCHEDULE. Employers insist on these variable schedules that make it impossible to take one of these shitty jobs and take another job "on the side", or do school "on the side" or help co-parent "on the side" because you never know from week to week what the shitty job's hours are goign to be. If employers would stop insisting that everyone take these variable schedules and let the parents (say) work from 9-12 only or on MWF only, etc. and make it THEIR business to jigsaw employees schedules together for coverage, instead of making it the employees responsibility to jigsaw their lives' schedules together, I bet they'd find MANY MORE people willing to work for minimum wage. YES! That's one of the reasons I demanded that we define our hours up front for our workers! There is nothing that I can do about having sort of weird hours for the camp, but I can make sure those hours are defined up front. It's just like I tell the people we hire, it doesn't matter so much to me if you need to be off on June 22 and 23 and July 17, if I know that up front and can plan for it. It's when you tell me "oh, I'm going to be off this Thursday and Friday, tee hee!" that there's a problem. (And due to the nature of the job, we don't have other employees we can call in last minute, and it's seasonal so if we chose to fire them, we'd just shoot ourselves in the foot. I try to go at it from a mutual respect angle. It mostly works.)
|
|
Ryann
Pearl Clutcher
Love is Inclusive
Posts: 2,591
Location: PNW
May 31, 2021 3:14:17 GMT
|
Post by Ryann on Mar 18, 2022 16:11:56 GMT
But beyond the retiring employees, I think there are some that just realized they could happily get by without working----at least for other people. The people working an extra part time job for "fun" money, people who started successful businesses of their own during the pandemic, 2 working adult households who learned that their overall income didn't dip down as much as they expected it would if one adult didn't work, etc. When people go 2 years with reduced spending due to a lack of open places to spend, they may start to realize that they can live without things that they previously thought they needed. And that they are happier not going in to their old job anymore. This is me. I had put in my notice in February 2020. My last day of work was March 5, 2020 - completely unrelated to the pandemic. The plan was I quit my job, we go on vacation, come home and I relax for a couple months, then start looking for a job in May/June. We got home from vacation on March 14, 2020 - EVERYTHING changed while we were floating on a ship in the sea! There were no jobs to be had come May/June; I looked for a looong time. Eventually the conversation shifted to me not going back to work at all and being a SAHW until my wife retires next year. I'm now 2 years into my "retirement" and couldn't be happier.
|
|
|
Post by its me mg on Mar 18, 2022 16:15:10 GMT
I was wondering this too. Now that the extra unemployment is gone, how are these people living? I guess they must have adjusted to a lower income household.. or won the lotto! Or they have found jobs with employers who treat them right. Great. But in the meantime doesn't Toyota still call you expecting the car payment? How do you send T-mobile a check every month? Dig your heels in, fight for what's right but I really have a hard time believing they're just sitting at home waiting for the perfect opportunity to strike.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 18, 2022 16:29:30 GMT
Or they have found jobs with employers who treat them right. Great. But in the meantime doesn't Toyota still call you expecting the car payment? How do you send T-mobile a check every month? Dig your heels in, fight for what's right but I really have a hard time believing they're just sitting at home waiting for the perfect opportunity to strike. Lots of people exist without a car payment. And they use pay as you go phones or simply don’t have one. To your point, they may not be sitting at home. They may be doing under the table work like lawn care, odd jobs, or cleaning, they may have taken in kids for day care so their neighbors can work, or they may be driving for the rideshare or delivery companies. There’s a woman in my neighborhood who started a cottage cooking industry and sells plates of homemade Persian food since she lost her job in 2020. People do all kinds of things that don’t show up officially as employment.
|
|
dithinnc
Shy Member
Posts: 13
Oct 4, 2019 17:16:33 GMT
|
Post by dithinnc on Mar 18, 2022 16:43:58 GMT
I will second the statement - "They are looking for jobs"
My DS 17 tried last spring to get a job as a grocery store checker. There were four stores in our area with big banners saying they needed people. He had several friends who worked in one store - so he focused on that one. He applied and waited Dressed up and went in to introduce himself. Got a first interview and then waited to be called for a second interview. Dressed up again and went back to follow up. By chance, the manager was there and recognized him from the HS swim team. No second interview needed and he started a week later. But the process took four weeks.... And ultimately got hired... because he was on a teammate of the manager's son....
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on Mar 18, 2022 17:23:29 GMT
Or they have found jobs with employers who treat them right. Great. But in the meantime doesn't Toyota still call you expecting the car payment? How do you send T-mobile a check every month? Dig your heels in, fight for what's right but I really have a hard time believing they're just sitting at home waiting for the perfect opportunity to strike. "Have found" means that they have a job. "Looking for" means they may not have a job or they may have a job.
|
|
maryannscraps
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,791
Aug 28, 2017 12:51:28 GMT
|
Post by maryannscraps on Mar 18, 2022 18:10:06 GMT
I've said this forever. It's not just the PAY, it's the SCHEDULE. Employers insist on these variable schedules that make it impossible to take one of these shitty jobs and take another job "on the side", or do school "on the side" or help co-parent "on the side" because you never know from week to week what the shitty job's hours are goign to be. If employers would stop insisting that everyone take these variable schedules and let the parents (say) work from 9-12 only or on MWF only, etc. and make it THEIR business to jigsaw employees schedules together for coverage, instead of making it the employees responsibility to jigsaw their lives' schedules together, I bet they'd find MANY MORE people willing to work for minimum wage. YES! That's one of the reasons I demanded that we define our hours up front for our workers! There is nothing that I can do about having sort of weird hours for the camp, but I can make sure those hours are defined up front. It's just like I tell the people we hire, it doesn't matter so much to me if you need to be off on June 22 and 23 and July 17, if I know that up front and can plan for it. It's when you tell me "oh, I'm going to be off this Thursday and Friday, tee hee!" that there's a problem. (And due to the nature of the job, we don't have other employees we can call in last minute, and it's seasonal so if we chose to fire them, we'd just shoot ourselves in the foot. I try to go at it from a mutual respect angle. It mostly works.) Yep. My son puts his orchestra rehearsals in the work calendar 6 weeks in advance (which is as far as you can.) Then on Saturday, they tell him he has to close on Tuesday and Thursday evenings and can't have those times off. He really doesn't understand why they bother to ask him to submit it if they don't even consider. He's a part time, low paid employee. He doesn't really need the job, but he loves the work, the products, and the customers. He's probably going to end up quitting soon, and corporate will complain that the young people have no work ethic. He's not giving up on his music career for that.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 18, 2022 18:42:00 GMT
YES! That's one of the reasons I demanded that we define our hours up front for our workers! There is nothing that I can do about having sort of weird hours for the camp, but I can make sure those hours are defined up front. It's just like I tell the people we hire, it doesn't matter so much to me if you need to be off on June 22 and 23 and July 17, if I know that up front and can plan for it. It's when you tell me "oh, I'm going to be off this Thursday and Friday, tee hee!" that there's a problem. (And due to the nature of the job, we don't have other employees we can call in last minute, and it's seasonal so if we chose to fire them, we'd just shoot ourselves in the foot. I try to go at it from a mutual respect angle. It mostly works.) Yep. My son puts his orchestra rehearsals in the work calendar 6 weeks in advance (which is as far as you can.) Then on Saturday, they tell him he has to close on Tuesday and Thursday evenings and can't have those times off. He really doesn't understand why they bother to ask him to submit it if they don't even consider. He's a part time, low paid employee. He doesn't really need the job, but he loves the work, the products, and the customers. He's probably going to end up quitting soon, and corporate will complain that the young people have no work ethic. He's not giving up on his music career for that. Exactly the reason why my college freshman has yet to have a “real” job. Rehearsal comes first. She is able to do some babysitting and pet sitting, but then she still runs into people who are mad that she’s not available at the drop of a hat. It’s frustrating. I was able to do all my music stuff in high school, college, and grad school and still hold down a variety of low-wage jobs because employers understood that my availability was what it was, and they worked with that. I don’t know why that’s impossible these days.
|
|
|
Post by cindyupnorth on Mar 18, 2022 18:47:17 GMT
I think it harkens back to how we are raised, in the 80s, and 90s. You work. You go to college, or not, but either way, you get a job out of HS or college. The employer is the boss. They controlled everything. People are just done with that. THey want what the managers and directors had. Time off, time off to go to their kids things, to pick their kids up from school, to have every holiday off, to not work wkends, to get paid well, etc, etc, whatever is important to you. They are done with the "you are easily replaced" mentality that a lot of employers had. The mentality NOW is...no, I am not easily replaceable. appreciate me.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Mar 18, 2022 19:02:18 GMT
But his managers never schedule him for the same days or same hours. He never knows his schedule for the next week until Saturday morning. I've said this forever. It's not just the PAY, it's the SCHEDULE. Employers insist on these variable schedules that make it impossible to take one of these shitty jobs and take another job "on the side", or do school "on the side" or help co-parent "on the side" because you never know from week to week what the shitty job's hours are goign to be. If employers would stop insisting that everyone take these variable schedules and let the parents (say) work from 9-12 only or on MWF only, etc. and make it THEIR business to jigsaw employees schedules together for coverage, instead of making it the employees responsibility to jigsaw their lives' schedules together, I bet they'd find MANY MORE people willing to work for minimum wage. Yes. That kind of scheduling makes childcare a struggle. It makes parents trying to work opposite shifts struggle. It makes people without their own transportation struggle. It cuts back on the ability of employees to have a 2nd job or further their education. I worked that kind of job in my late teens/early 20s, and that scheduling was my number 1 reason for being glad when I was at a point where I could apply for something else.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Mar 18, 2022 23:57:01 GMT
Great. But in the meantime doesn't Toyota still call you expecting the car payment? How do you send T-mobile a check every month? Dig your heels in, fight for what's right but I really have a hard time believing they're just sitting at home waiting for the perfect opportunity to strike. Lots of people exist without a car payment. And they use pay as you go phones or simply don’t have one. To your point, they may not be sitting at home. They may be doing under the table work like lawn care, odd jobs, or cleaning, they may have taken in kids for day care so their neighbors can work, or they may be driving for the rideshare or delivery companies. There’s a woman in my neighborhood who started a cottage cooking industry and sells plates of homemade Persian food since she lost her job in 2020. People do all kinds of things that don’t show up officially as employment. Yes, this. One of my siblings works for the city (outdoors) and gets laid off in the wintertime because his department physically can’t do the work below 50° or in inclement weather/snow. He has done all kinds of odd jobs in the off season including maintenance at his ex’s restaurant, screen printing t-shirts, selling baked goods, etc. to scrape together enough extra cash to get by. We also know several self employed people who are gig workers on the side driving for Uber, Door Dash, etc. when their own business is slow.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Mar 19, 2022 0:07:45 GMT
She's still had issues with them wanting to schedule her during the day when she's in class, and she has to tell them no. I definitely agree this seems to be a problem. My DD is in high school, doesn't get out of school till 4:20 and the soonest she can physically get to her job is 4:45. She is a swim instructor, so classes/shifts go in 30 minute increments. She keeps getting pinged during the day "Can you take a 4:15 class today?" Um, no. (To be fair, they keep having people call out last minute and are probably desperate, and DD is one of the favorite teachers - also, they don't get mad when she says no, but still...) I dealt with that when I was in college in the early 90’s and I think it’s gotten way worse. I was taking a full course load of credits and told my boss I could only work 20 hours a week because I always had a crapton of homework. I was routinely scheduled for 32-34 hours every week. It was brutal.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2022 0:15:25 GMT
I think it harkens back to how we are raised, in the 80s, and 90s. You work. You go to college, or not, but either way, you get a job out of HS or college. The employer is the boss. They controlled everything. People are just done with that. THey want what the managers and directors had. Time off, time off to go to their kids things, to pick their kids up from school, to have every holiday off, to not work wkends, to get paid well, etc, etc, whatever is important to you. They are done with the "you are easily replaced" mentality that a lot of employers had. The mentality NOW is...no, I am not easily replaceable. appreciate me. Well, no. I never had an employer who expected me to skip class or rehearsal to keep my job. When I took the job I gave them my schedule and that was that unless I chose to pick up an extra shift. I started working in 1989 when I turned 16. It’s not a matter of “appreciate me.” Literally I got one job because I was available on Wednesday nights and Sunday mornings when everyone else had church stuff. The reason I was available was because I had no rehearsals at those days/times because, again, church stuff. There was never any expectation that I skip rehearsal on Monday to cover a shift.
|
|
|
Post by **GypsyGirl** on Mar 19, 2022 1:22:45 GMT
I left the workforce for five years back in the early 2000s because I couldn’t earn enough, even with a master’s degree, to offset the cost of two kids in daycare. I was fortunate that my husband’s job paid well enough to keep us off of benefits, though just barely. If he had lost his job or simply decided to leave, I would definitely have needed benefits because i couldn’t afford day care on the wage I could earn at that time. Same situation in the late 80's, early 90's. I would have been working to pay for daycare, even though I have a college degree. We were fortunate to have DH's salary as a professional.
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Mar 19, 2022 2:05:27 GMT
I think it harkens back to how we are raised, in the 80s, and 90s. You work. You go to college, or not, but either way, you get a job out of HS or college. The employer is the boss. They controlled everything. People are just done with that. THey want what the managers and directors had. Time off, time off to go to their kids things, to pick their kids up from school, to have every holiday off, to not work wkends, to get paid well, etc, etc, whatever is important to you. They are done with the "you are easily replaced" mentality that a lot of employers had. The mentality NOW is...no, I am not easily replaceable. appreciate me. When I was hired I never thought of it as the employer controlling everything. I was offered an hourly pay/salary with set days/hours and accepted if it worked for me. There was a mutual respect and agreement involved. Neither of my young adults has had set days/hours, let alone vacation or benefits, with a job. Well, one has now since she moved to BC. Everything quiltedbrain wrote sadly rings true for people I know in the retail sector, especially managers working insane hours to fill the gaps. How does anyone try to piece together a living wage with 1-3 part-time jobs if your schedule for all 3 comes out on the same day? How do you listen to your boss complain about not being able to find people when you are only scheduled for 4 hour shifts 3 days a week and desperately want more?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2022 2:16:41 GMT
I left the workforce for five years back in the early 2000s because I couldn’t earn enough, even with a master’s degree, to offset the cost of two kids in daycare. I was fortunate that my husband’s job paid well enough to keep us off of benefits, though just barely. If he had lost his job or simply decided to leave, I would definitely have needed benefits because i couldn’t afford day care on the wage I could earn at that time. Same situation in the late 80's, early 90's. I would have been working to pay for daycare, even though I have a college degree. We were fortunate to have DH's salary as a professional. Mine was financing cars at Don McGill Toyota and then 9/11 happened and the tech bubble burst and no one was buying cars. It was touch and go there for a while! We probably did qualify for assistance at some point. (That’s when he started his MBA, but not everyone can just do that.)
|
|
|
Post by **GypsyGirl** on Mar 19, 2022 2:57:24 GMT
Mine was financing cars at Don McGill Toyota and then 9/11 happened and the tech bubble burst and no one was buying cars. It was touch and go there for a while! We probably did qualify for assistance at some point. (That’s when he started his MBA, but not everyone can just do that.) Those were tough times for so many. Ya'll are very resilient though and seem to have come through!
|
|
|
Post by Jennifer C on Mar 19, 2022 12:48:25 GMT
My dd19 first job in College was as a hostess/cashier at a very popular nationwide restaurant in her college town. She was hired as evening staff, let them know her school schedule during the interview and enjoyed her job.
She lasted 2 months because she was told she needed to work days and she was scheduled to be in class days. The area supervisor wanted the staff to rotate schedules every few months so they could have knowledge of all shifts. She said about 10 kids left. The supervisor said young kids just do not want to work.
The manager was upset, his restaurant ran very well, but had his hands tied because the change came from corporate.
My dd now has a job working for the school.
Jennifer
|
|
|
Post by zima on Mar 19, 2022 14:15:39 GMT
The supervisor said young kids just do not want to work. More like the supervisors just do not want to work. They don't want to work at scheduling employees in ways that are mutually beneficial for the business AND the employee. They'd rather rag on the workers than take responsibility for making their shitty part-time, low pay, low benefits jobs work for students, parents, sandwich-generation workers, etc.
|
|
RedSquirrelUK
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,899
Location: The UK's beautiful West Country
Aug 2, 2014 13:03:45 GMT
|
Post by RedSquirrelUK on Mar 19, 2022 14:24:24 GMT
Well….. Some of them: -died of Covid -retired early -discovered during lay offs that they could make ends meet on a single income and were happier -couldn’t return because day cares had to reduce their capacity and there aren’t enough spots open - couldn’t return because reduced capacity meant that day cares had to hike up their fees and they can’t afford it now -are now providing day care for a family member in because of the above scenarios -couldn’t return because their school district couldn’t get their act together in any predictable way so they’re bouncing between in-person and homeschooling their kid -have a medically fragile family member in their home and are desperately trying to keep them safe -returned to school while the works was on hold and are finishing up a degree -got promoted into higher positions that were vacated by all of the people listed above And a few just don’t want to work. But I truly think that’s a pretty small margin. All that plus: - those who got Covid and never recovered enough to work again - those who got sick with something that wasn't Covid, but couldn't get timely treatment because of Covid, and are still not well enough to work - those who will still get Covid and become medically unfit to work This isn't going to get any better for a long time. ETA: I love your new avatar candleangie!
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,087
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Mar 19, 2022 15:10:28 GMT
So many of these low-wage jobs in retail and fast food have been filled by part-time employees for too long, simply to avoid having to pay benefits.
My DD left a restaurant last fall to work for a hospital instead. It fits more with her career goals now that she has added an associate's degree in nutrition to her associates in culinary (graduation in May--yay!!!). She only had to work every other weekend at the hospital in a training role for the new children's hospital that is opening soon, and they agreed to call her for extra shifts during the week if they were short-staffed, but no pressure or obligation to accept extra work. She worked a more reasonable schedule than the restaurant which allowed her to get back on track with her fitness goals, and she actually made more per hour running food trays than she made sweating in a hot kitchen.
One of the biggest gripes she had with her restaurant job was the unpredictable hours. Chef had the same core kitchen staff for the past two years, and he could have easily come up with a schedule that worked every week, giving the staff the ability to plan their lives. Instead, they had to wait until Monday to get the schedule that started TUESDAY. For DD, sometimes she was on the schedule for 3 days, and sometimes for 5. She never knew ahead of time. She could request time off, but he often forgot about it (DD started sending him reminder texts on Sundays when she had requested time off for the next week). For the fall semester, she fortunately was not taking any classes that caused problems, but it made it difficult to even schedule doctor appointments until after the schedule came out.
If you create a schedule and stick to it, employees will plan around it. When an unavoidable conflict comes up, it is then reasonable to ask the employee to try to arrange a shift change.
And I know people who had it way worse than DD. They are sometimes told to be on call for days at a time in case someone doesn't show up and the boss needs a replacement. In one of the more egregious cases I know of, the no-show employee faced fewer consequences than the employee who violated the on-call rule!
And don't get me started on mandatory overtime on just 30-minutes notice. Or driving 30 minutes to get to work, only to be sent home after clocking in for an hour or two and then being sent home because the store isn't busy enough.
All of these policies benefit the employer and harm the employee. Since the job is rarely full-time, the employee may need a second job to make ends meet. Or the employee accepted the part-time position because of other commitments (kids, relative needing care). But the randomness of the schedule, overtime, and being sent home makes it impossible to do both.
Higher pay helps retain employees for a good employer. But it won't necessarily help if the workplace has these types of toxic policies/practices in place.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,087
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Mar 19, 2022 15:21:21 GMT
I think it harkens back to how we are raised, in the 80s, and 90s. You work. You go to college, or not, but either way, you get a job out of HS or college. The employer is the boss. They controlled everything. People are just done with that. THey want what the managers and directors had. Time off, time off to go to their kids things, to pick their kids up from school, to have every holiday off, to not work wkends, to get paid well, etc, etc, whatever is important to you. They are done with the "you are easily replaced" mentality that a lot of employers had. The mentality NOW is...no, I am not easily replaceable. appreciate me. I agree with a lot of this, but I would like to add that even though the boss was in control, policies were reasonable. Even as a teen working in a grocery store in the late 70's/early 80's, I had a set schedule. My original schedule for summer was 4:00 pm to 1:00 am Sun-Thurs, which I LOVED! All day off to enjoy the summer and weekends to boot! They hired another girl from my class who complained that I always got the "good hours," and they started rotating my shift with hers (10:00 am -7:00 pm Wed-Sat), which kinda sucked. However, I got my schedule at the beginning of the summer, and I knew exactly when I was working. It was also 40 hours, so I wasn't looking for another job to supplement. During the school year, I generally worked Fri-Sun (again, set hours), although I got time off if there was a football game or band competition. The owner's daughter was in the band with me, so he was completely on board. I never had to tell him "appreciate me" because I already knew that he did. And it wasn't uncommon for other employers in the area. I always used to stop in to see the old boss until he retired a few years ago and sold the store. Even when I lived out of state, he always asked my mom about me and how I was doing.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,087
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Mar 19, 2022 15:24:33 GMT
My husband coordinates adjunct professors at our school and it has been really difficult to get people to agree to do it this past year. Adjuncts are not well-compensated, and often have another job, so in the past, did it out of interest, prestige, or service. I think people have reoriented in my profession and want to spend less time on that kind of work. Which is reasonable. UCLA did not get the memo.
|
|
|
Post by busy on Mar 19, 2022 16:18:51 GMT
Get a PhD and have significant teaching experience, work for free. Sure.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Mar 19, 2022 18:17:19 GMT
The workers are here. We are job searching. This was my son last Spring & Summer. So many businesses were saying that they were desperate for employees, yet my son, and several other kids we know that are about his age, all found actually getting a job was really difficult. It was like businesses were putting up signs saying "We're hiring! No experience necessary! Any hours! Please!!" and then these kids wouldn't even get a response when they tried to set up interviews, and when they finally had interviews, they wouldn't ever hear back, either. And they were a varied group, so it wasn't like they all happened to be one "type" that employers didn't want. This was what my DD found
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Mar 19, 2022 18:57:20 GMT
My husband coordinates adjunct professors at our school and it has been really difficult to get people to agree to do it this past year. Adjuncts are not well-compensated, and often have another job, so in the past, did it out of interest, prestige, or service. I think people have reoriented in my profession and want to spend less time on that kind of work. Which is reasonable. UCLA did not get the memo. Please tell me that isn’t real. Or that it’s a posting meant to be used by a postdoctoral fellow in return for a tuition waiver.
|
|