Race not a factor in hammer beating death of man? Really?

I agree with you that parents absolutely cannot determine what their kids will do.  BUT, when it turns out your kid was a complete thug and there is proof that what they did was wrong, but you still insist on blaming everyone but your child for their demise, then I don't think it's so far fetched to think that there wasn't a whole lot of actual parenting going on when you're willing to just turn a blind eye to it.

We're not talking mass murders. There's a difference between thugs or cops killing an individual and a psychotic mass murderer. Surely even you with your "Obama can do no wrong" mindset can see that

He was also really supportive after Aurora, which involved people we knew. I'm still grateful for that.

I like President Obama, and while yes, he did show up for Sandy Hook and Aurora and other tragedies of the like, in a way I have to agree with Lauren on this one. I think he should have stayed out of the Mike Brown incident. This was not a racially motivated case, it was a case of an officer being put in a position to defend himself. There was no reason for the President to be there. Very different, in my opinion, from the other two situations mentioned.

He has never expressed his outrage. That's my point

I understand I went completely off topic here since I was referring strictly to the Michael Brown incident.  I'm not willing to make a judgement on the hammer case until the dust has settled and the proof has come out.  I don't think anyone should for that matter.

ETA:  When I said that I agreed with Lauren, I meant that I felt as though she was referring to Obama showing up for the Brown case being a wrong move.  Maybe I misunderstood what she was eluding to.

I already said that was wrong. How many times do I need to?

Let me get this straight. The President NEVER expresses his out rage when a white man is killed by a black man.

But you can't or won't offer an example of such a killing that you feel the President should have expressed his outrage over.

What am I missing here?

I think the question you might ponder before you make your irresponsible remarks is this. If there had been a killing as high profile as Michael Brown that involved riots and the parties involved were not black would the President have expressed his outrage? I say he would because as President he would be expected to. Just like he did over the killings at Sandy Hook and Aurora.

High profile events that involve mass killings and a killing that generates riots across the country will always require comments by the President regardless of the race of the folks involved. I will say it again. It is what we expect our President to do.

So unless you have a specific high profile example of a event involving a black man killing a white man that generated riots that the President DID NOT comment on or express his outrage about you are blowing smoke. IMO

You got that right. THAT is the question to ask.

Provide us with an example of a crime that has been committed by a black man on a white person, where you think justice has not been served.

How many black men, who have killed white men are:

a. Not Charged with a crime?
b. If charged, found not guilty?


They have suspects in custody who will be charged for the murder of the Bosnian immigrant. Justice is going to be served. 

I am baffled and saddened that people don't recognize there is an inequality of justice against persons of color in our society.   

Riiiiggght. Racial injustice only occurs in everyone's imagination.

I know exactly what you mean; we see it all the time on the fake "war on women" that liberals froth about.