|
Post by infochick on Jul 18, 2022 16:48:09 GMT
The thread about printing photos from iPhones made me think about printing photos at home. I see that lots of Peas do their own photo printing. Right now I send my photos out to be printed, but I can definitely see the appeal of having a photo printer at home and would like to ask a few questions from those of you that print at home: 1) What printer do you use? 2) How does the quality compare to "professionally" printed photos? Any issues like fading, off colours, etc.? 3) How does it compare, cost wise to sending out to print photos with paper, ink, etc.? 4) Do you print all your photos at home, or only some? Thanks!
|
|
christinec68
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,437
Location: New York, NY
Jun 26, 2014 18:02:19 GMT
|
Post by christinec68 on Jul 18, 2022 17:03:03 GMT
1. I have an Epson PM400.
2. The quality is outstanding. I haven't experienced any fading or things like that. It sets up easily and I don't have issues when I pull out after not printing for a while.
3. I am sure I am spending more per print - probably in the 35-40 cent range. But I only print what I plan to scrapbook and there are no shipping costs. When I used to order online, I would sometimes get multiple sizes and/or color & B/W print for options, but I don't do that anymore. Plus, I don't have to wait.
4. Except for odd sized or larger prints, I print exclusively at home.
The only negative for me is when I want to move a sticker or drop something on the print, the image lifts off. Most of the times it's not an issue since I'm usually just making a small shift but a couple of times I dropped a sticker on the page and had to reprint the picture.
Getting this printer was a game changer for me. I can't say enough good things about it.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Jul 18, 2022 17:04:27 GMT
to me, nothing compares compares to the quality of professionally printed photos. these days it's so easy to upload your photos to services and pick them up or have them mailed. i haven't printed photos at home in years and i'm sure technology has improved but nothing compares to the quality of outside printing. the prices have drastically reduced that it doesn't even seem worth it to print at home.
|
|
jediannie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,104
Jun 30, 2014 3:19:06 GMT
|
Post by jediannie on Jul 18, 2022 17:04:48 GMT
1. My printer is an Epson XP-8500. 2. The quality is pretty amazing. I haven't noticed any fading or off colors with the prints I've done. 3. Cost is a bit more than getting them professionally but the convenience of printing at home is worth it to me. 4. I print about 70% at home and 30% professionally. I usually print professionally when I have a major project to print.
|
|
|
Post by cmpeter on Jul 18, 2022 17:50:35 GMT
Epson PictureMate 400. I’ve only been using it for 2 1/2 years, so no reviews on longevity yet. But, the print quality is excellent.
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 6,302
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Jul 18, 2022 18:14:46 GMT
1) What printer do you use? I have a Canon Selphy CP1300
2) How does the quality compare to "professionally" printed photos? Any issues like fading, off colours, etc.? I have been printing at home for years (like about 7 with my the small Canon Selphy's and prior to that a larger Canon photo printer) and there have never been issues. No fading, no colors off, etc.
3) How does it compare, cost wise to sending out to print photos with paper, ink, etc.? I have no idea. Let me look at that real quick. ETA: between .26 and .30 each print. Here a 4x6 professionally printer is .32 - .33 cents each. Again, while very close, I prefer to control my printing.
4) Do you print all your photos at home, or only some? All. That way I can control the quality, cropping, and size. I like being able to print 2x3 - 4x6 size photos. I have no need for larger photos.
|
|
|
Post by caspad on Jul 18, 2022 19:04:36 GMT
1) Epson PM-400 or Epson Photo R300 for larger than 5x7. I had a Canon Selphy before the Picturemate and I did not care for the qualoity of the prints. I've been very happy with the Picturemate since 2015.
2) The quality is pretty close to a good photo lab. Close enough for most projects that I do. I haven't had any issues with fading in photos that are in frames and exposed to sunlight. I've been using the Epson Photo R300 since 2004 with Epson Premium or Ilford photo papers.
3) Getting photos off my computer is my biggest creative hurdle. The benefit for me is to be able to pick a photo, print it and use it. It probably costs more in $ in the long run but for me it is efficiency over economy.
4) Almost all at home unless it is a large project or lots of enlargements and then I'll order from Persnickety.
|
|
|
Post by Linda on Jul 18, 2022 19:07:47 GMT
I'm guessing technology has improved but the photos my mum printed at home...didn't stand the test of time (she was printing at home from about 2010-2016 maybe?) and they are all fading
|
|
|
Post by infochick on Jul 18, 2022 21:15:52 GMT
Thanks for the feedback, everyone! I am thinking I may want a photo printer. It might not replace all of my printing--I tend to print photos in large batches, but sometimes I want to print one or two, or wish I had something in a different size and it would be really great to be able to print those at home.
|
|
|
Post by riversong1963 on Jul 18, 2022 22:17:40 GMT
1. I have an Epson PM400. 2. The quality is outstanding. I haven't experienced any fading or things like that. It sets up easily and I don't have issues when I pull out after not printing for a while. 3. I am sure I am spending more per print - probably in the 35-40 cent range. But I only print what I plan to scrapbook and there are no shipping costs. When I used to order online, I would sometimes get multiple sizes and/or color & B/W print for options, but I don't do that anymore. Plus, I don't have to wait. 4. Except for odd sized or larger prints, I print exclusively at home. The only negative for me is when I want to move a sticker or drop something on the print, the image lifts off. Most of the times it's not an issue since I'm usually just making a small shift but a couple of times I dropped a sticker on the page and had to reprint the picture. Getting this printer was a game changer for me. I can't say enough good things about it. I highly recommend UnDu for those pesky sticker mishaps. It shouldn't damage your photos.
|
|
christinec68
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,437
Location: New York, NY
Jun 26, 2014 18:02:19 GMT
|
Post by christinec68 on Jul 18, 2022 23:12:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BSnyder on Jul 18, 2022 23:35:04 GMT
I use the Epson PM 400, too. I could never get photos processed to look as good as they do on my screen from conventional photo printing online services. I did a comparison of many a few years ago. And the difference between colors by different processors was jarring. I do love the quality of Persnickety, but they can be pricy, so I reserve them for ordering just a few times per year.
I love the quality of my prints with the PM-400. I am happy the colors and the crispness, really close to what I see on my screen. It may not be as cost effective as sending photos out when there are sales or deals, but I am much happier with the results. It also allows me to print in the size I want, when I want it, instead of living with what I got or having to figure out sizing when ordering. Because I am not a chronological scrapper, I also need flexibility in my photo choices. Another reason outside printing doesn’t work for me. Flexibility and overall quality outweighs the small cost difference.
|
|
pantsonfire
Drama Llama
Take a step back, evaluate what is important, and enjoy your life with those who you love.
Posts: 6,302
Jun 19, 2022 16:48:04 GMT
|
Post by pantsonfire on Jul 19, 2022 1:05:51 GMT
I have been printing at home since about 2004 or 2005 and all of my photos are still as crisp and clear as they were the day I printed them.
I think ink and photo paper quality plays a key role in that.
|
|
|
Post by scrapcat on Jul 19, 2022 1:41:01 GMT
1) What printer do you use? I have a Canon Pixma (MP560) that is 10+ years old?! And I recently acquired a neglected Canon Selphy 900 my Mom had. My Pixma has been on the fritz lately with the feeder, but I really don't want to replace it while it still prints just fine. Sometimes that poor feeding thinks its detecting a jam, so I have to try a few times before it prints.
2) How does the quality compare to "professionally" printed photos? Any issues like fading, off colours, etc.? I've found you have to get to know how photos appear on phone/computer, wherever you print from, and different editing that can compensate. I almost always brighten and increase contrast on all photos. I did a test with the same photo, I printed from both of my printers and also ordered it from Mpix. I took note of which photos came out cooler or warmer, sharper, better blues, etc. In that instance I actually prefer my Canon Pixma photo best, which surprised me. But now I know the Selphy photos tend to be whiter/brighter, more washed and cool, so I can adjust the editing if I know I am printing on there.
3) How does it compare, cost wise to sending out to print photos with paper, ink, etc.? Not sure. I do buy the real Canon ink and paper - I usually wait for sales/deals around the holidays & stock up. I will order from mpix or persnickety when they have sales.
4) Do you print all your photos at home, or only some? Most. Especially now that I do the Heidi Swapp blur books style, I am usually printing mini photos, like 4-6 on a 4x6, so they are tiny anyways. If I have a real special photo, or something I want larger, I may send out. But I would say I only get maybe 30-50 prints a year now, and probably only like 10-20 in the past year or so since I print at home more.
|
|
|
Post by chaosisapony on Jul 19, 2022 3:09:21 GMT
I purchased an Epson Eco Tank printer this year, the ET 8500. It was expensive but man, the quality is fantastic and no matter how many photos I print the ink levels never seem to drop. I use the Epson branded photo paper and I haven't worked out the cost per sheet but ink wise it is 4 cents per 4x6 print. The printer has a lot of functions, most of which I'll probably never use, and is very easy to use. I definitely recommend it for anyone looking to get away from buying ink cartridges but that hates dye sub quality like me.
|
|
Ryann
Pearl Clutcher
Love is Inclusive
Posts: 2,643
Location: PNW
May 31, 2021 3:14:17 GMT
|
Post by Ryann on Jul 19, 2022 4:05:55 GMT
I don’t pre-plan my printing, so using a professional printer and batching photos has never worked for me.
I’m very pleased with the ease of use, quality and ability to print as many or few photos as I need with the Epson PM-400. If and when it dies I will gladly replace it with another.
|
|
|
Post by kimba on Jul 19, 2022 11:43:00 GMT
Epsom PM 400 last summer, game changer!! I love that I can print a pic at demand and use it on a layout immediately. This has really amped up my memory keeper-I'm really enjoying printing daily pics for that-usually collage a few pics on a 4x6 card stock.
If I am doing a bigger project, like WITL or DD, I will use Persnickety Prints for a big batch.
|
|
camcas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,160
Jun 26, 2014 3:41:19 GMT
|
Post by camcas on Jul 19, 2022 14:10:15 GMT
I have a HP sprocket 4x6 and a 2x3 and an very happy with both
|
|
JRock
Full Member
Posts: 115
Jan 2, 2019 13:53:33 GMT
|
Post by JRock on Jul 19, 2022 15:54:26 GMT
1. I have an Epson PM400. 2. The quality is outstanding. I haven't experienced any fading or things like that. It sets up easily and I don't have issues when I pull out after not printing for a while. 3. I am sure I am spending more per print - probably in the 35-40 cent range. But I only print what I plan to scrapbook and there are no shipping costs. When I used to order online, I would sometimes get multiple sizes and/or color & B/W print for options, but I don't do that anymore. Plus, I don't have to wait. 4. Except for odd sized or larger prints, I print exclusively at home. The only negative for me is when I want to move a sticker or drop something on the print, the image lifts off. Most of the times it's not an issue since I'm usually just making a small shift but a couple of times I dropped a sticker on the page and had to reprint the picture. Getting this printer was a game changer for me. I can't say enough good things about it. Basically all of this goes for me as well! I love the freedom of printing what I want, when I want. I do a lot of collaging of photos to get smaller sizes and if I don't like the way something came out I can easily re-do it at home. Because I don't have to try to plan all my layouts far in advance, I overall waste FAR fewer photos. With not having to leave my house, I am not really concerned about the cost. Time is money and I commit less time overall to the process of getting my photos. I previously had a Cannon Selphy and hated it. I never was pleased with the quality and hated how the edges of the photos had the perforations on them. It is entirely possible the quality could have been resolved if I had learned more about settings I suppose but I'm much happier with my Epson and I definitely scrap a lot more thanks to printing at home.
|
|
|
Post by scrappyem on Jul 19, 2022 16:18:33 GMT
I'm another Epson PM 400 user 95% of the time. I'd never get any scrapping done if I had to wait to get my prints back. That said, Persnickety quality is better. I just don't have it together enough to scrap that way.
|
|
|
Post by wallyagain on Jul 19, 2022 16:52:01 GMT
I debated this issue until Costco closed their local Photo Lab. I was impatient and the Epson Picturemate was not available, so I went with the Canon Selphy.
I print WAY less photos than I used to, so even though the per print cost is more, it probably is pretty close due to not having prints I didn’t use. I do not plan ahead, so I like the ability to print and scrap right away. I have been doing a Project Life album and I print a week at a time. If I sent them out to print, by the time I got them back, I’d have changed my mind and want other pictures.
The quality of the print is good enough for me, and when I look back at the work I’ve done, I am happy to have those memories.
I am not super worried about longevity, I don’t think my boys will keep these albums.
|
|
|
Post by jjpeapea on Jul 19, 2022 17:41:54 GMT
wallyagain said a lot of my experience - Canon Selphy, I like that if I drop some water or something on them, they don't get ruined because they are a dye process, not an ink process. I like the flexibility to print the picture I need to do a challenge. My albums and pages are just reminders for myself. That being said, I do my Project Life monthly - I look over my photos for the month, make a sketch of the pockets I want to use, and crop (Microsoft Photos) and arrange (PhotoSheet). I send them to Persnickety where I had bought photo credits, so like 19 cents each but add on at least another 35 cents each for shipping. Like scrapcat, sometimes I oversaturate the colors, knowing my Selphy will mute them a bit. I like that if I forgot to upload a photo or change my mind I can just print one off on the Selphy.
|
|
|
Post by scrappersue on Jul 19, 2022 20:20:27 GMT
I had a selphy it was good, but it didn't print true 4x6 and you had to use it's paper. When it died I bought an Epson PM 400. I can print on any type of paper (cardstock for journaling), matte, glossy, etc and up to 5x7.
I did a test and sent out photos to all the "usual" processors - Costco, Amazon(which is Snapfish), Shutterfly, Walgreens and Perskicky. I wanted to see how "off" printing at home was. Surprise - my Epson PM 400 prints were the best out of all of them. I was blown away. Took my prints to a crop to have other look and they thought the same. So I LOVE my Epson PM 400!!
Also yes, I believe it is more expensive, but I only print what I am going to use on my page. And if I need to print a bunch to give my mom from vacation I do send those out, because she doesn't care about the quality as much as I do. I have 9 or 10 scrapping friends who have now also bought the PM400 and love it.
|
|
gb2015
Full Member
Posts: 165
May 5, 2020 13:29:23 GMT
|
Post by gb2015 on Jul 19, 2022 23:29:13 GMT
I print at home using an HP ENVY Pro 6400 series printer, HP paper, and the HP Instant Ink program. I'm honestly quite pleased with the quality and haven't seen any fading or issues like that, although it's admittedly only been 3 years of use. Like wallyagain, I'm not super worried about longevity in a KEEP THESE FOREVER sense, so take that with a grain of salt, but I do have to say that printing from home, for me - no matter what printer is used - is a total game changer as far as productivity. Like, it CHANGED THE GAME for me when I didn't have to send out for every image. I was skeptical before I made the switch, but now I quite literally could not go back. If my photo printer died today I would immediately buy another one, it's that big of a difference. I will occasionally order from Persnickety for big projects or larger than 8.5x11 prints, but that's rare for me.
|
|
kitbop
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,629
Jun 28, 2014 21:14:36 GMT
|
Post by kitbop on Jul 20, 2022 0:25:19 GMT
I did most of my printing at home from 2006-2010 on an HP printer. Those prints are still vibrant and amazing; makes me think I should have stuck with HP.
Now I have a Canon ecpo-tank G3060. Bought it to replace a Canon Pixma MG510 (or something like that) which stopped printing properly (way off colours) even with real inks and a good head cleaning. I am happy with the prints from my new one, and I couldn't even tell you how much the prints cost - so far, I haven't had to refill any of the tanks and I've had it for about 10 months? It's SO frugal! I buy off-brand (Amazon) photo paper to save extra $$ but will buy real Canon inks.
It does NOT equate to lab prints. I still prefer Costco prints - and have now confirmed that those ordered online through Costco are the same wonderful quality they have always been. So I plan to continue batch uploading the majority of my photos and print occasionally at home.
|
|
Chinagirl828
Drama Llama
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,688
Jun 28, 2014 6:28:53 GMT
|
Post by Chinagirl828 on Jul 21, 2022 9:54:02 GMT
1. My printer is an Epson XP-8500. 2. The quality is pretty amazing. I haven't noticed any fading or off colors with the prints I've done. 3. Cost is a bit more than getting them professionally but the convenience of printing at home is worth it to me. 4. I print about 70% at home and 30% professionally. I usually print professionally when I have a major project to print. Change the printer to an Epson XP-8600 and this is me. I use genuine Epson paper and inks and haven't had any issues with fading. I used off brand paper and inks on my previous (Epson) printer and those have discoloured. I also love the flexibility of printing at home. For things like Sketchtember or Dec daily, or when I can't wait to scrap an event that just happened, being able to print at home is invaluable. I send out larger orders to print (usually for my vacation albums) but I always end up printing more photos than I use because I print some of them in 4x6 and 3x4 when I'm not sure what I will want for the finished page. I find having an idea of what the page will look like helps me make better choices, so as others have said, any savings I get from printing professionally are probably negated by the images I've printed but don't end up using.
|
|