|
Post by bc2ca on Aug 19, 2022 15:01:15 GMT
I think we have all dealt with quiet quitting (in my opinion bare minimum or slackers) since school with group projects. They ride the coattails of those putting in more effort and get rewarded. Respectfully, I think you have missed the point. There will always be slackers. The quiet quitters are the ones who led the group projects and took that attitude into the work force. Now they are waking up to the reality that no matter how much they give, the employer will take and expect more. So they quietly back down to doing their job. Not slacking. Just doing the job they are paid to do. I actually think there's value in prioritizing your non work life. I know I hear my generation dissing this concept, but I feel like in many cases, it's a good thing. Are you wanting to 'climb the corporate ladder'?  to both points. And the concept of climbing the corporate ladder has changed dramatically for the work place. I once worked for a company where most people retired after 40 years. By the time I came in, the reality of computerization meant at least half the corporate support jobs and "ladder" disappeared. There was no longer any loyalty to keeping people employed and those with career ambitions were more successful if they moved out of that company. Jobs were rarely posted internally first and the whole career/succession planning division of HR disappeared. The employer used the word coasting and the employees used the words doing their job description on 40 hours a week, no more. I think it's very telling that employer and employee have different definitions of what quiet quitting is.  How often have we known employees to do the work of 1.5-2 people as the employer doesn't replace someone who leaves? The quiet quitters are holding the line of doing the job of 1 person. My personal life has benefited greatly from this change, and strangely enough, my career has not suffered. Great to hear! Exactly. If people have to work longer extra hours to cover the basic running of a company, then the employee is not the problem, the employer should hire the correct number of employees to do the job in normal hours. These employees are working their 40 hours, that's not lazy. It is saying I won't be exploited so that the CEO can buy another holiday home because it's not the employee who gets the big big bonuses.  There is no trickle down reward for most employees. DH & I have been talking a lot about this as he is the guy who gave everything to every job and our 2 young adults who witnessed it will never give the way he did. I can't tell you how many years I knew he came home because of the dirty dishes and laundry he left behind. Most of my daily conversations were when he was on the road between job sites and meetings. A couple weeks ago we were at a local venue for a play and he marveled that we'd never been there before. DS and I looked at each other and I gently said "this is where DS's 8th grade graduation was held. It is also where DD's high school talent show was held for three years." He has quietly quit his job but isn't ready to admit it.
|
|
|
Post by beepdave on Aug 19, 2022 15:02:28 GMT
My DS is 29 and working a 'real' job with a lot of responsibility. He is really all about the work-life balance and won't put his company email on his phone or be available on Slack after work hours. I never realized it was something with this generation but it's very interesting! I'm 48 and won't put my work email on my phone. I actually just had a customer ask me to text her because she's off today.  Not going to happen. I replied to her email with the answer to her question, though. I will not give a customer my cell number. I haven't done it in the 10.5 years I've been here.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Aug 19, 2022 15:08:05 GMT
Regarding your last paragraph- I don’t think it’s about taking it easy, it’s about working hard, to the best of your ability, diligently and with focus - while you’re being paid. Once those hours are up it’s your time not your employer’s. If that leaves jobs unfinished then the company needs more employees as someone else said upthread.I've seen examples of this at employer after employer... I remember one previous boss (the business owner) actually *said* it out loud-- when a technician left, he would just give the OTHER techs more work. If/when they got to their 'breaking' point with the amount of work they got done, THEN he would look at hiring someone to replace the person who left. That is CRAP. In FDA-regulated companies, there is a concept of 'management responsibility' where it is REQUIRED to have adequate staffing and training to perform the tasks required. And it's upper management's responsibility to make sure they are adequately staffed. But employers STILL 'get away' with piling more work on less people. They may say it's because they can't hire people, the pandemic, etc. but when someone can make more $$ per hour at a fast-food place than doing the VERY hard, physical work my company was asking them to do (along with the no-notice weekend work, long hours, etc.) then there is really something wrong with the COMPANY, not with the workers. eta: and perhaps it also depends on the size / management structure and the compensation structure of the company. Other than the very first company I worked for (thousands of employees), there WAS no "corporate ladder" to climb. The more recent companies I've worked for have all had between 50-200-ish employees... there are office / management people, and there are production employees. There is very little 'upward mobility' at a place like that unless someone else actually LEFT the company and you wanted to apply for their job.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,919
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Aug 19, 2022 15:09:11 GMT
I can’t say I blame the younger generation and I understand the disaffection. It used to be that people could rely on one job for many years, and even for their entire career, and the reward was a decent life. Being able to purchase a house, pay bills, raise children, save for retirement; in other words, achieving the markers of a middle class life.
Most of the younger people I know now are saddled with huge school loans, facing a housing market with prices beyond their reach, facing another possible recession where their jobs could be eliminated in a heartbeat, etc, no matter how much they hustle. Wages have not kept up as the cost of living has rapidly increased.
Corporate America has always been about the bottom line and anyone who thinks they’re irreplaceable because of how many hours they put into work hasn’t paid attention to what happened to the generations prior to theirs. In the Great Recession alone, we lost close to 9 million jobs, and vast numbers of people were not able to recover fully. The financial damage it wrought on Millennials and Gen X, the hardest hit, is still resonating to this day. Is it any wonder Gen Z doesn’t consider work as the be-all-end-all?
|
|
casii
Drama Llama

Posts: 5,588
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Aug 19, 2022 15:10:58 GMT
My kids are definitely on board with this. They are hard workers and get the job done, but their job isn't their life. My DS has a new team lead that's very metrics focused and is hyper monitoring everything. DS is a troubleshooter for 2 companies his company serves and sometimes that leads to him down a rabbit hole of forensic work for possible lawsuits, fraud, etc. That takes away from the metric values this new lead is focused on, so DS is at the point where he's looking to completely switch departments. Good for him.
Now my Gen X DH gives his company wayyyyy more than they deserve but he also truly enjoys his job. He doesn't want or need downtime. This would be great if he weren't married to someone who gets annoyed when he is taking work calls well into the evening or he's checking emails at all hours even on vacation. I take a full lunch and I silence notifications after hours. He never does.
|
|
Kerri W
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,836
Location: Kentucky
Jun 25, 2014 20:31:44 GMT
|
Post by Kerri W on Aug 19, 2022 15:14:48 GMT
This is a really interesting topic! I've definitely noticed it in my adult children--in that they value their non-work lives more than their careers. My son especially vocal (to me) about "if they want more, they need to pay me more". It's so different than my work ethic at their age, which was "If I'm on the clock, I should be working". I'd find busy work, feeling guilty if I coasted. I just can't let go of the idea that if you are on the clock, you SHOULD be working. You shouldn't be coasting. If your task is done, you should ask for another. I think that is vastly different than being pushed to go go go and sacrifice personal time to your job. I work for two entrepreneurs. They "work" in one way or another 24 hours a day. It was a struggle in the beginning for them to realize I would give them my full attention and effort while I was at work, but they hired me to work Mon-Fri 9-4. I am not available outside of those hours. That is not even something they consider for themselves so it was an adjustment in thinking. BUT...I also let them know if my workload is light and I can take on something else during those hours. I don't spend time on personal calls or on social media when I'm working. I give them what they pay me for.
|
|
artbabe
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,844
Jun 26, 2014 1:59:10 GMT
|
Post by artbabe on Aug 19, 2022 15:15:27 GMT
In recent years we've seen a difference in our new teachers. They don't give up several days of their summer to set up a classroom. They follow the contract hours and they use their personal days. Some teachers have been critical of that, but I think that might be the key to longevity in our profession. I think teachers too are some of the most abused white collar workers out there as far as expectation and workload vs. Adequate compensation goes. I was going to mention that, too. It isn't just the workload- it is the emotional investment we are supposed to be putting into the kids. And I do have a lot of emotional investment- I work with children, not widgets. But I'll admit to not putting in the hours, money, or the emotional investment that I used to. My first 5 years of teaching I'd stay after work, often until 8-9 o'clock. I'd worry about the kids all of the time I wasn't at work. After 28 years I've learned to compartmentalize a lot more. I leave work at work. It doesn't mean I don't care deeply about my kids, I do. It just means I'm careful to take care of my needs and not let my profession consume me. I don't start this school year until this coming Monday morning. The kids come on Wednesday. I'm enjoying my last weekday of summer vacation today and not thinking about school. All of the issues will be there Monday- I'll deal with them then.
|
|
|
Post by fredfreddy44 on Aug 19, 2022 15:16:33 GMT
MY 23 yo son just joined the workforce as a back end programmer. He had two offers: one in the midwest which had a 100% in office policy, made no bones that he would work 50 hours a week minimum, had lots of mandatory ra-ra time,etc; the other was here in the Silicon Valley which has complete flexible work location, he gets one Friday off a month and his birthday as holidays, and he has only worked maybe 42 hours a week so far. Obviously he chose option 2. His free time is very important and while he likes his work, his music and hobbies are his life.
ETA: The salaries were close and his money would have gone farther in the mid west, but in the end, his free time won out.
|
|
wellway
Prolific Pea
 
Posts: 9,203
Jun 25, 2014 20:50:09 GMT
|
Post by wellway on Aug 19, 2022 15:16:35 GMT
I really need my eyes checked. I thought that said quiet quilting. jeremysgirl . 🤣😂 well if you want we can talk about quiet quilting too. Well, I just finished a block and realised the last long join was threadless as it had pulled out so there was nothing quiet about my reaction!
|
|
luckyjune
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,788
Location: In the rainy, rainy WA
Jul 22, 2017 4:59:41 GMT
|
Post by luckyjune on Aug 19, 2022 15:26:31 GMT
I don't think quiet quitting is a bad idea at all.
This generation figured out that the "Work hard, give freely of your time, and it will pay off!" crap we were raised with isn't true in today's world. Or maybe it has never been true. Anyway, good for them for figuring it out and having the guts to say, "That's not in my contract."
Know your value and act accordingly. I'd sure do things differently if I were to go back to the classroom.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on Aug 19, 2022 15:56:16 GMT
If you are doing the job you are paid for, meeting targets, not coasting, isn't that quiet efficiency rather than quiet quitting?
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Aug 19, 2022 15:58:46 GMT
I am a retire/rehire SLP. We are short-handed at the moment, and it will be a very busy year. One thing that I am happy about is that I am paid hourly.
Sure, I’ll bring work home on the weekends when I have to. But I get to bill for it, and that makes it a bit easier. I would love to get everything done at work, but when I write IEPs and ETRs, I need a block of time, and quiet. It isn’t always possible at school.
|
|
Ryann
Pearl Clutcher
Love is Inclusive
Posts: 2,871
Location: PNW
May 31, 2021 3:14:17 GMT
|
Post by Ryann on Aug 19, 2022 16:04:07 GMT
The end of February 2020 I quit my accounting job and had been unemployed through May of this year. I'm currently working again at the same company in the same department doing a different accounting job, but my approach to working there is quite different this time around.
I only work part time and will not work beyond my 20 hours a week no matter how much they want more. When I worked there before I always worked more than my stated hours. Always. Not working full time does not equal "not a team player". My current job doesn't have recurring tasks, I handle special projects. I'm finding I have few if any hard deadlines, which makes it easy to not get sucked into a "hustle" mentality. I work from home now, so I'm more productive and get to skip out on most of the rah-rah stuff, which I really don't enjoy. I think quiet quitting is a smarter way to work.
|
|
|
Post by hopechest on Aug 19, 2022 16:14:35 GMT
I'm 50 years old, so solidly Gen X. I was raised to work very hard and always give 110% to your job. I have always gone above and beyond and done whatever it takes.
I have really been working on myself in the last several months. I am getting to the place where I realize that the attitude of "ms. dependable" is really a weakness and not the strength I have always taken it for. I was listening to the podcast "we can do hard things" (which is 1000% the best podcast on the planet) and there was an episode with Brene Brown. They were talking about Brene's ability to "dig deep and always get the job done" as a superpower. The conversation circled around and the (paraphrased) statement of "that dig deep has to come from somewhere. What you are actually doing is taking soil from places it rightfully belongs - family, health, friends, etc. It sounds much less benevolent to say I rob soil from important aspects of my life to fill the one hole for instant gratification". That thought hit me right between the eyes.
I have stopped working weekends and nights after my kiddo is in bed. I'm trying to prioritize my health and my family as much as I prioritize my job.
The biggest change at work that I've noticed is : absolutely nothing. No one has come to me and complained that I wasn't here on a Saturday, just like they didn't praise me when I was. I spend more time with my family. Now I am a work in progress. I still do the extras, but not all the time. I am making me as much as a priority to take care of as I do EVERYTHING else. I have some younger co-workers that are in the "if you want more, pay more" category and I do sometimes still struggle with thinking less of them or think they're lazy. It's hard to unwind all of that indoctrination we've had our whole life.
I feel like all things this is a pendulum. We swung hard to one side in the 80-90's with "work work work" and I feel now we've swung hard to the other side. I suspect that in the next decade, we'll find a middle ground
|
|
|
Post by gar on Aug 19, 2022 16:20:12 GMT
If you are doing the job you are paid for, meeting targets, not coasting, isn't that quiet efficiency rather than quiet quitting? They're quitting doing the extra unpaid overtime etc.
|
|
|
Post by mbanda on Aug 19, 2022 16:22:14 GMT
I definitely relate to this article right now! I'm at the point in my life (age 50) where I'm not interested in putting in extra effort or going above & beyond. I get my assignments and projects done but I'm not volunteering for more projects. I did do that for years and when I was in sales in benefitted me greatly with added commissions! Now that I shifted roles and am not a direct seller I am no longer taking calls or answering emails on vacations and after hours. I'm for sure not interested in company happy hours, kickball, etc especially if the activity is outside of working hours.
I've been with this company for 19 years and I get 6 weeks of PTO and I take every single day....I know several people that never/rarely use their PTO and they hold it up as a badge of honor...I don't get that at all! They also make comments to me about using my PTO - damn right I'm going to take it, I've earned it!!
|
|
|
Post by lbp on Aug 19, 2022 16:38:00 GMT
I started doing that this year. I am 61, V.P. of the company and have worked myself half to death to get this position. I hate it. I had never heard the phrase "quiet quitting" I've been calling it coasting. I am coasting in this job for 3 more years and then I am out of here! Selling my shares of company stock and probably work somewhere like a plant nursery, craft store, etc... because I would probably go crazy staying home all day.
My DS is 30- He is definitely NOT a quiet quitter! It seems he is on the phone and computer 24/7. He also was given a very substantial raise this year for his over and beyond work.
|
|
|
Post by gillyp on Aug 19, 2022 16:40:18 GMT
If you are doing the job you are paid for, meeting targets, not coasting, isn't that quiet efficiency rather than quiet quitting? They're quitting doing the extra unpaid overtime etc. I took the impression that they had never started doing that in the first place! I get your point though.
|
|
|
Post by craftmepink on Aug 19, 2022 16:57:34 GMT
I don't understand why they call it quiet quitting when people are just doing their jobs and deciding not to go above and beyond.
Good for the younger generations striving for a better work/life balance. I'm a millennial and I've seen first hand how companies could care less about their employees.
Two of my coworkers died a couple months apart a couple years ago. I remember how stressed out they were about their jobs. We had a horrible manager. And when they died, the company sent out a short email and that was it. A couple weeks later, they were both replaced. Horrible manager is still there. One had been with the company for over 20 years and the other for 10 years. Sad thinking about how the last months of their life was spent stressing about a job that didn't care about them at all.
|
|
|
Post by fkawitchypea on Aug 19, 2022 17:05:07 GMT
My situation is a bit different because I work for government but I have definitely found myself relaxing a bit and not working as hard. I have become very jaded about government work and being at the mercy of politicians who decide if we get a measly 2% raise each year and what we have to give up to get it. We cannot hire staff because entry level staff are so poorly paid that target pays more. I manage a department that deals with the public and we are all burnt out listening to businesses cry poverty and yell at us about the unfairness of it all but then fail to read the detailed instructions written to be understood by someone with an 8th grade education and then yell at us some more when it doesn’t go their way. I’m burnt out and fed up and I get paid exactly the same whether I make my unit’s monthly quota or exceed it.
|
|
|
Post by disneypal on Aug 19, 2022 17:13:19 GMT
It's so different than my work ethic at their age, which was "If I'm on the clock, I should be working". I'd find busy work, feeling guilty if I coasted. Same here...my very first job was at a fast food restaurant as a teen. During times when we were slow and had no customers, our manager would say "If you have time to lean, you have time to clean" and he was right...there was ALWAYS something that needed to be done - always. You could sweep, mop, organize the condiments, refill the paper products, there was always something to be done and I felt like if they were paying me, I should give it my all...now did I have a work-life balance then? Of course, with that kind of job and as a teen, when you left, you left and lived your life. I do agree that people should have a good work-life balance. If you are paid to do a 40 hour job, then do it - but you should work and give it 100% during that 40 hours, not just the bare minimum. I think you owe it your employer. But that doesn't mean you have to give them 45, 50 or 60 hours...but find ways to improve their processes, give suggestions, do something that isn't your assigned job duty. Like you, I would feel guilty if I didn't stay busy at work or give it my all. IMO, a person can do more than the bare minimum and still maintain a good work-life balance.
|
|
QueenoftheSloths
Drama Llama

Member Since January 2004, 2,698 forum posts PeaNut Number: 122614 PeaBoard Title: StuckOnPeas
Posts: 5,955
Jun 26, 2014 0:29:24 GMT
|
Post by QueenoftheSloths on Aug 19, 2022 17:24:01 GMT
I just can't let go of the idea that if you are on the clock, you SHOULD be working. You shouldn't be coasting. If your task is done, you should ask for another. I think that is vastly different than being pushed to go go go and sacrifice personal time to your job. I agree with you. That is what a work ethic is. Work life balance goes both ways. Work time is work time, life time is life time. If you're buying a machine to jiggle your mouse to make it look like you are at your desk working from home, you are a cheat.
|
|
vexedangel
Full Member
 
Posts: 408
Nov 4, 2018 20:14:04 GMT
|
Post by vexedangel on Aug 19, 2022 17:31:05 GMT
I agree re: jiggling the mouse, but I think there are a ton of us out here working our butts off during work hours and then done at end of day. That's what I'm talking about for me--and that is a boundary I have set for myself that is not unreasonable. I literally have a contract with my hours and days. I honor the contract.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Aug 19, 2022 17:34:22 GMT
...but find ways to improve their processes, give suggestions, do something that isn't your assigned job duty. Like you, I would feel guilty if I didn't stay busy at work or give it my all. if the management doesn't want this or doesn't take these suggestions, then I'm not going to spend any more mental energy or time trying to give them ideas for ways to improve. I don't feel guilty about that any longer. And depending on the job / position / company, there is ALWAYS paperwork, filing, etc. that NEVER goes away. There may literally NEVER be a 'caught up' time, ever. My previous job was like that, due to the # of employees who would start and quit within a few days-- the paperwork that was generated would NEVER stop. There WAS no being 'caught up' or being 'finished' with it. EVER. I didn't feel guilty giving myself a mental break now and then from the tedium of doing all that data entry, either. Work time is work time, life time is life time. There's plenty of time 'wasted' at work with social chit-chat amongst offices, social gossip between managers before / after / during meetings, etc. I've seen plenty of it (that's one of the things that irritates me most about meetings-- when they start late and/or go long because of off-topic conversations.) I'll generalize and say that most people, even those executives who are old-school wanting warm bodies at desks all day long, do NOT do 8 hours worth of actual work in their workday, either.
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,493
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Aug 19, 2022 17:35:01 GMT
In recent years we've seen a difference in our new teachers. They don't give up several days of their summer to set up a classroom. They follow the contract hours and they use their personal days. Some teachers have been critical of that, but I think that might be the key to longevity in our profession. A few years ago, my grandson's World History teacher told me that she does not give homework because then she would have to grade papers at home and she's not giving up home time with her family.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Aug 19, 2022 17:38:24 GMT
I just can't let go of the idea that if you are on the clock, you SHOULD be working. You shouldn't be coasting. If your task is done, you should ask for another. I think that is vastly different than being pushed to go go go and sacrifice personal time to your job. I agree with you. That is what a work ethic is. Work life balance goes both ways. Work time is work time, life time is life time. If you're buying a machine to jiggle your mouse to make it look like you are at your desk working from home, you are a cheat. Some people can't do that. I'm in a union and there are rules about what I am allowed to do. Now helping someone out on occasion, I can do that. And my work is very task based. So I may have a full plate from 7-noon and then two hours idle time and then it picks back up for another 3. I like the flexibility. Doesn't mean I'm not working, means that 1)my work is flexible 2) my work is limited and specific and 3) some of my workload is seasonal.
|
|
|
Post by imkat on Aug 19, 2022 17:38:24 GMT
My POV as a salaried employee managing other salaried employees: Working hard for 40 hours - Good Not working hard for 40 hours - Not Good Being inflexible and refusing to ever work more than 40 hours when needed periodically - Not Good Working 40+ hours consistently - Not good if not by choice, without reward, or causing stress or burnout
|
|
snyder
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,493
Location: Colorado
Apr 26, 2017 6:14:47 GMT
|
Post by snyder on Aug 19, 2022 17:48:24 GMT
But I know his position is subject to the same work rules as mine is and he's clearly putting in more than 40 hours. Could it be your boss is on salary rather than hourly. Salary meant you worked to get the job done, no matter the hours and hourly meant you were paid for every minute you worked. I don't remember all the details, but where I worked, they evaluated every position and determined if it qualified for hourly or salary per the labor law guidelines. I know on the supervisor level, you had to supervise 2 or more emplooyees and be able to hire and fire to be considered salary. Being slaray was a drag at times because I did take my work home many a times, but I could also take an afternoon off and not be docked for those hours.
|
|
QueenoftheSloths
Drama Llama

Member Since January 2004, 2,698 forum posts PeaNut Number: 122614 PeaBoard Title: StuckOnPeas
Posts: 5,955
Jun 26, 2014 0:29:24 GMT
|
Post by QueenoftheSloths on Aug 19, 2022 17:54:43 GMT
I agree with you. That is what a work ethic is. Work life balance goes both ways. Work time is work time, life time is life time. If you're buying a machine to jiggle your mouse to make it look like you are at your desk working from home, you are a cheat. Some people can't do that. I'm in a union and there are rules about what I am allowed to do. Now helping someone out on occasion, I can do that. And my work is very task based. So I may have a full plate from 7-noon and then two hours idle time and then it picks back up for another 3. I like the flexibility. Doesn't mean I'm not working, means that 1)my work is flexible 2) my work is limited and specific and 3) some of my workload is seasonal. Nowhere did I say I think people have to work 8 uninterrupted hours.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Aug 19, 2022 18:04:28 GMT
I just can't let go of the idea that if you are on the clock, you SHOULD be working. You shouldn't be coasting. If your task is done, you should ask for another. I think that is vastly different than being pushed to go go go and sacrifice personal time to your job. I agree with you. That is what a work ethic is. Work life balance goes both ways. Work time is work time, life time is life time. If you're buying a machine to jiggle your mouse to make it look like you are at your desk working from home, you are a cheat. these statements all sound to me like, 'when you're at work, you should be working' aka '8 hours of uninterrupted work' ...whether that is your work, helping someone else with their work, finding busywork, etc. Not agreeing with those sentiments doesn't makes me a slacker- not every job can be like that, and not every employer is appreciative of it even if you did do it.
|
|