|
|
Post by onelasttime on Dec 13, 2023 17:36:58 GMT
That could be problematic depending on their decisions. First One… The Reckunt… ”The U.S. Supreme Court will take up a case on whether mifepristone, a key abortion drug, will continue to be widely available. The justices are not reviewing a broader challenge of the FDA’s initial approval of mifepristone in 2000.”; x.com/therecount/status/1734968707661615296?s=61&t=j45uMgNk1i8O0YllKF58nw |
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Dec 13, 2023 17:42:21 GMT
The second potentially problematic case… ABC News.. ”BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court has announced it will be taking up a major challenge to a felony obstruction statute the Justice Department has used against more than 300 defendants in their investigation of the Jan. 6 assault on the U.S. Capitol.” x.com/abc/status/1734959145353130249?s=61&t=j45uMgNk1i8O0YllKF58nw |
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Dec 13, 2023 17:48:48 GMT
I'd like them to outlaw Viagra. If they can't get it up, oh well. Women should unite to ban it and watch the ancient male politicians lose their minds. I'd pay to see that.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Dec 13, 2023 19:46:10 GMT
So how do you think they will rule? They certainly created a mess with their last ruling involving women’s health.
Washington Post…
”Breaking news: The Supreme Court announced that it will decide whether to limit access to an abortion drug, returning the polarizing issue of reproductive rights to the high court for the first time since the conservative majority overturned Roe v. Wade.”
|
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Dec 14, 2023 10:14:09 GMT
*For the first, they are going to rule the way they are bought & paid to rule.
*For the 2nd eh the rich people might let that one slide since it doesn’t involve them, have to keep up appearances & all.
|
|
