|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 20, 2024 0:54:10 GMT
Project 2025 is a plan that has its roots with the Heritage Foundation. The plan is for conservatives to take over the Federal Government after trump wins reelection.
From Project 2025 Website…..
“This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative administration: a policy agenda, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook.”
In order to facilitate this plan they have written a book called “Mandate for Leadership”.
From an article about goals of Conservative Leadership…
”This is why the conservative movement is coming together to prepare for the next conservative administration. Heritage is convening the conservative movement behind the policies to ensure that the next president has the right policy and personnel necessary to dismantle the administrative state and restore self-governance to the American people. Me: Does anyone have a clue to what this even means?
Anyway, the reason I brought this what has to do with another thread I started about who is aging biter Rob Lowe or Tom Cruise. Poor Tom the majority have said Rob is aging better. But as always when one brings up the name Tom Cruise they also say “cult” because of his membership in Scientology.
But it occurred to me after reading about Project 2025 and their plans for the Federal Government if dumpster don should win one could make a strong case today’s conservative religion right could also be seen as a cult.
They have a set of beliefs they feel everyone should abide by regardless if you as individual agree with them or not.
I’m going to post some articles about 2025 that make me think if trump wins and these guys get a foot in the door they will try change the Federal Government into something that honestly doesn’t address the needs of the people but instead will pave the way for more Americans getting hurt by the actions of others. An example would be eliminating the EPA or the Department of Education.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 20, 2024 1:21:06 GMT
link. From the Heritage Foundation…. “ Project 2025…” ”KEY TAKEAWAYS It’s past time to lay the groundwork for a White House more friendly to the right. The policy book Mandate for Leadership represents the work of more than 350 leading conservatives and outlines a vision of conservative success. The usual suspects in the permanent political class will be ready for the next conservative administration. Will we be ready for them? With the Biden administration half over and with the immediate dangers inherent to one-party rule in Washington behind us for now, it’s past time to lay the groundwork for a White House more friendly to the right. For decades, as the left has continued its march through America’s institutions, conservatives have been outgunned and outmatched when it comes to the art of government. One reason is because the Republican establishment never moved on from the 1980s. Beltway conservatives still prioritize supply-side economics and a bellicose foreign policy above all else. Belief in small government, strangely enough, has manifested itself in a belief among some conservatives that we should lead by example and not fill all political appointments. Belief in the primacy of the national security state has caused conservative administrations to defer political decisions to the generals and the intelligence community. The result has been decades of disappointment. Fortunately, this situation is changing. The conservative movement increasingly knows what time it is in America. More and more of our politicians are willing to use the government to achieve our vision, because the neutrality of “keeping the government out of it” will lose every time to the left’s vast power. The calls for a “new Church Committee” represent a momentous shift in energy; while conservatives used to lament liberal Sen. Frank Church’s original project as a kooky leftist attack against “The Brave Men And Women of Our Intelligence Community,” we’re now the ones agitating for Congress to go after the three-letter agencies. This new vigor of the right can be found at Project 2025. Organized by the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 has brought together 45 (and counting) right-of-center organizations that are ready to get into the business of restoring this country through the combination of the right policies and well-trained people. The Project’s foundation is built on four interconnected pillars. The first pillar, the upcoming production of the policy book Mandate for Leadership, represents the work of more than 350 leading conservatives and outlines a vision of conservative success at each federal agency during the next administration. Presidential candidates won’t be able to ignore what the conservative movement demands in this book. The second is our online personnel database. This “Conservative LinkedIn” will launch in March and will provide an opportunity for rock-solid conservatives to place themselves in contention for roles in the next administration. This pillar will bring Mr. (and Mrs.) Smith to Washington. The third is our Presidential Administration Academy. When conservatives do finally make it into an administration, they often don’t know what to do or how to seize the gears of power effectively. Through their action, inaction, and their encyclopedic knowledge of volumes of technicalities about the federal workforce, certain career federal employees are masterful in tripping us up. Our interactive, on-demand training sessions will change that. They will turn future conservative political appointees into experts in governmental effectiveness. The fourth and final pillar of Project 2025 is our Playbook, which will take the policy ideas expressed in Mandate for Leadership and transform them into an implementation plan for each agency to advocate to the incoming administration. What regulations and executive orders must be signed on Day One? Where are the greatest needs for more political appointees? How can we effectively use the mechanisms of government to face our most challenging problems? Our Playbook will put our movement to work answering questions like these. In November 2016, American conservatives stood on the verge of greatness. The election of Donald Trump to the presidency was a triumph that offered the best chance to reverse the left’s incessant march of progress for its own sake. Many of the best accomplishments, though, happened only in the last year of the Trump administration, after our political appointees had finally figured out the policies and process of different agencies, and after the right personnel were finally in place. The usual suspects in the permanent political class will be ready for the next conservative administration. Will we be ready for them? That’s where Project 2025 comes in. We have two years, and one chance, to get this right.”
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 20, 2024 1:24:09 GMT
From Project 2025…. link“ About Project 2025Building now for a conservative victory through policy, personnel, and training. The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025. It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration. This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative administration: a policy agenda, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook. The project is the effort of a broad coalition of conservative organizations that have come together to ensure a successful administration begins in January 2025. With the right conservative policy recommendations and properly vetted and trained personnel to implement them, we will take back our government. The 2025 Presidential Transition Project is being organized by The Heritage Foundation and builds off Heritage’s longstanding “Mandate for Leadership,” which has been highly influential for presidential administrations since the Reagan era. Most recently, the Trump administration relied heavily on Heritage’s “Mandate” for policy guidance, embracing nearly two-thirds of Heritage’s proposals within just one year in office. Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) during the Trump administration, serves as the director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. Spencer Chretien, former special assistant to the president and associate director of Presidential Personnel, serves as associate director of the project.”
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Mar 20, 2024 1:35:08 GMT
linkFrom Mandate for Leadership… ”Policy Agenda This book is an invitation for you the reader—Mr. Smith, Mrs. Smith, and Ms. Smith—to come to Washington or support those who can. Our goal is to assemble an army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared conservatives to go to work on Day One to deconstruct the Administrative State. This book is the product of more than 400 scholars and policy experts from across the conservative movement and around the country. Contributors include former elected officials, world-renowned economists, and veterans from four presidential Administrations. This is an agenda prepared by and for conservatives who will be ready on Day One of the next Administration to save our country. The Heritage Foundation is once again facilitating this work, but as our dozens of partners and hundreds of authors will attest, this book is the work of the entire conservative movement. The next conservative President will enter office on January 20, 2025, with a simple choice: greatness or failure. It will be a daunting test, but no more so than every other generation of Americans has faced and passed. The Conservative Promise represents the best effort of the conservative movement in 2023—and the next conservative President’s last opportunity to save our republic.“ From the Foreword A PROMISE TO AMERICA Kevin D. Roberts, PhD Forty-four years ago, the United States and the conservative movement were in dire straits. Both had been betrayed by the Washington establishment and were uncertain whom to trust. Both were internally splintered and stra- tegically adrift. Worse still, at that moment of acute vulnerability and division, we found ourselves besieged by existential adversaries, foreign and domestic. The late 1970s were by any measure a historic low point for America and the political coa- lition dedicated to preserving its unique legacy of human flourishing and freedom. Today, America and the conservative movement are enduring an era of division and danger akin to the late 1970s. Now, as then, our political class has been discred- ited by wholesale dishonesty and corruption. Look at America under the ruling and cultural elite today: Inflation is ravaging family budgets, drug overdose deaths continue to escalate, and children suffer the toxic normalization of transgender- ism with drag queens and pornography invading their school libraries. Overseas, a totalitarian Communist dictatorship in Beijing is engaged in a strategic, cultural, and economic Cold War against America’s interests, values, and people—all while globalist elites in Washington awaken only slowly to that growing threat. Moreover, low-income communities are drowning in addiction and government dependence. Contemporary elites have even repurposed the worst ingredients of 1970s “radical chic” to build the totalitarian cult known today as “The Great Awokening.” And now, as then, the Republican Party seems to have little understanding about what to do. Most alarming of all, the very moral foundations of our society are in peril. Yet students of history will note that, notwithstanding all those challenges, the late 1970s proved to be the moment when the political Right unified itself and the country and led the United States to historic political, economic, and global victories. The Heritage Foundation is proud to have played a small but pivotal role in that story. It was in early 1979—amid stagflation, gas lines, and the Red Army’s inva- sion of Afghanistan, the nadir of Jimmy Carter’s days of malaise—that Heritage launched the Mandate for Leadership project. We brought together hundreds of conservative scholars and academics across the conservative movement. Together, this team created a 20-volume, 3,000-page governing handbook containing more than 2,000 conservative policies to reform the federal government and rescue the American people from Washington dysfunction. It was a promise from the conservative movement to the country—confident, specific, and clear. Mandate for Leadership was published in January 1981—the same month Ronald Reagan was sworn into his presidency. By the end of that year, more than 60 percent of its recommendations had become policy—and Reagan was on his way to ending stagflation, reviving American confidence and prosperity, and winning the Cold War. The bad news today is that our political establishment and cultural elite have once again driven America toward decline. The good news is that we know the way out even though the challenges today are not what they were in the 1970s. Conservatives should be confident that we can rescue our kids, reclaim our culture, revive our economy, and defeat the anti-American Left—at home and abroad. We did it before and will do it again. As Ronald Reagan put it: Freedom is a fragile thing and it’s never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by way of inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation[.]1 This is the duty history has put before us and the standard by which our gen- eration of conservatives will be judged. And we should not want it any other way. The legacy of Mandate for Leadership, and indeed of the entire Reagan Rev- olution, is that if conservatives want to save the country, we need a bold and courageous plan. This book is the first step in that plan.”
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 20, 2024 1:56:35 GMT
In 900 pages, there are a lot of alarming sections. I posted this before, but I think it got lost in a discussion of the use of the word bloodbath. In short, the plans will decimate the federal government, eliminate entire departments (Departments of Education and Commerce) defund others (FBI, Department Justice) and consolidate executive powers. Conservatives want to fire a significant number of federal workers and replace them with those loyal to Trump. The plan will activate the military domestically under the Insurrection Act. The plan will reverse any progress made on climate change. The foreword is very anti LGBTQ and the plan is to declare married heterosexuality the only valid form of sexual orientation and identity and strip legal protections against discrimination for the LGBTQ community. There are sections on abortion and pushing abortion bans at every level. Conservatives will make abortion drugs illegal. They declare life begins at conception, potentially creating problems for contraception like IUDs. Promoting nuclear families and eliminating discrimination against LGBTQ individualsPromoting a nuclear family would be fine if that's all that they wanted to do. But they won't stop there. Thomas and Alito have made it clear that they would like to undo marriage equality and conservatives will not stop until they achieve that. Project 2025 makes it clear that they will remove protections for the LGBTQ community against discrimination. https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf. - page 451 Goal #3: Promoting Stable and Flourishing Married Families. Families comprised of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society. Unfortunately, family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are fraught with agenda items focusing on “LGBTQ+ equity,” subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage. These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families.https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-18.pdf. page 584 Sex Discrimination. The Biden Administration, LGBT advocates, and some federal courts have attempted to expand the scope and definition of sex discrimination, based in part on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. Bostock held that “an employer who fires someone simply for being homosexual or transgender” violates Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination. The Court explicitly limited its holding to the hiring/firing context in Title VII and did not purport to address other Title VII issues, such as bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes, or other laws prohibiting sex discrimination. Notably, the Court focused on the status of the employees and used the term “transgender status” rather than the broader and amorphous term “gender identity.”
Restrict the application of Bostock. The new Administration should restrict Bostock’s application of sex discrimination protections to sexual orientation and transgender status in the context of hiring and firing.
Withdraw unlawful “notices” and “guidances.” The President should direct agencies to withdraw unlawful “notices” and “guidances” purporting to apply Bostock’s reasoning broadly outside hiring and firing.
Rescind regulations prohibiting discrimination on the basisof sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, and sex characteristics. The President should direct agencies to rescind regulations interpreting sex discrimination provisions as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, sex characteristics, etc.Abortion bans and potentially limiting access to contraceptionConservatives have been very clear about their plans for total abortion bans and voted against protecting access to contraception. Under project 2025, abortion medications would be banned and contraception and insurance companies would no longer be required to cover contraception. The Heritage foundation and the other conservatives assert that that abortion is not health care. Women being denied medically necessary abortions and women denied medical care for miscarriages would disagree. Women in Alabama trying to conceive through IVF would also disagree. All of these tragic situations are predictable outcomes of a policy that recognizes life at conception. page 450 From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity and worth, and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development, race, or abilities. The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care.https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-14.pdf. page 458 Since its approval more than 20 years ago, mifepristone has been associated with 26 deaths of pregnant mothers, over a thousand hospitalizations, and thousands more adverse events, but that number does not account for all complications. Of course, this does not count the hundreds of thousands to millions of babies whose lives have been unjustly taken through chemical abortion. FDA should therefore:
Reverse its approval of chemical abortion drugs because the politicized approval process was illegal from the start.
Eliminating the Department of educationOne of the departments, Project 2025 proposes to eliminate is the Department of Education. You only have to look at Florida and Texas to see what Republican governors can do to public education. The Department of Education is necessary to protect the rights of students with disabilities to ensure access to a free and appropriate education. The Department of Education also oversees federal financial aid, distributes and monitors the funds. https://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf page 319 Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated.
I read some of the document, but it's difficult to read through. The conservative view of solutions in search of a problem and their massive bias is intolerable and hard to read. The forward alone is infuriating. Also, 900 pages and some of it is really dry, bureaucratic language. There's a lot of information on the dangers of Project 2025. I thought these summaries were helpful. www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/09/19/project-2025-trump-reagan-00115811newrepublic.com/article/178848/ban-abortion-trump-lgbtq-project-2025www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/conservatives-aim-to-restructure-u-s-government-and-replace-it-with-trumps-visionamp.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/27/project-2025-dismantle-us-climate-policy-next-republican-presidentwww.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/05/trump-revenge-second-term/www.nytimes.com/2024/01/21/magazine/heritage-foundation-kevin-roberts.html
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 20, 2024 2:19:38 GMT
Consolidating executive power and Schedule FSection F refers to an executive order that Trump signed during his last days in office and contains the plans of Trump and his advisors to gut the federal government by changing career service employees to at will employees, giving Trump the ability to easily fire them. Trump and his advisors plan a major restructuring of the federal government, making it favorable to him. The plans will allow him to consolidate power and vastly expand executive powers. Some of the other problems with Project 2025 - Consolidating power in the executive branch, decimating the federal government, eliminating entire departments and changing career civil service employees to at will, giving the President the power to fire them. Project 2025 proposes shrinking the federal government and eliminating departments like Commerce, Education, FBI, ATF, IRS and Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Among other responsibilities, NOAA, the census bureau and the Patent and Trademark Office all fall under the Department of Commerce. Regarding federal employees, Section F has been in the news fairly frequently. It's not a secret that Trump plans to reclassify career civil servants as at will employees. Trump wants the ability to easily fire any federal employee that he wants. Look what he's doing to the RNC as a preview of what would happen if Trump is re-elected. He will fire as many people as he can and replace them with people loyal to him. We're not talking about the roughly 400 political appointees that change with each administration. We're talking about the 2 million people across federal government, across all of the different agencies. This is not about firing people who are not doing their jobs. This is about a loyalty pledge to Trump. The Heritage Foundation has already started screening potential employees so they will be ready on day 1 if Trump is re-elected. The questions are centered around your personal ideology vs experience and background. Giving any president, Republican or Democrat, that much control is dangerous. If you dig a little deeper, Project 2025 plans to make government research conform with their idealogy. This explains it better than I can. www.nytimes.com/2024/02/29/opinion/project-2025-trump-administration.htmlBut there is a difference between fostering a work force that is accountable to the president and simply politicizing all aspects of the executive branch, including areas that require specific expertise. “Mandate for Leadership” leans toward the politicizing approach.
At the E.P.A., for example, the document calls for a new science adviser and at least six new appointees charged with reforming the agency’s scientific research; qualifications for those roles should stress managerial skills rather than “personal scientific output.” Throughout the book, descriptions of new research agendas are often paired with the explicit findings that such research should yield, whether on the mental and physical damage that abortion inflicts on women or the pernicious impact of taxes and regulations on minority-owned businesses. Later, tucked into a discussion of the National Institute of Standards and Technology at the Commerce Department — yes, the weeds are tall and scratchy here — the document urges a new administration to ensure that “any research conducted with taxpayer dollars serves the national interest in a concrete way in line with conservative principles.” It’s an effective sleight of hand: politicizing government-funded scientific research by tying the national interest to conservative priorities.
With the exception of far right extremists, no one is praising or cheering Schedule F/ Project 2025/ Agenda 47 as the answer to all of our problems. Most of the reactions to the plans are warnings and criticism of the dangers and highlights of the extreme ideas. www.npr.org/2023/12/06/1217562544/trump-and-insiders-craft-plans-for-unprecedented-powerwww.nytimes.com/article/trump-2025-second-term.htmlwww.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/us/politics/trump-plans-2025.htmlwww.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2023/09/trump-desantis-republicans-dismantle-deep-state/675378/www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/betrayed-trump-second-administration-loyalists-loyalty-rcna136257www.axios.com/2023/11/13/trump-loyalists-2024-presidential-electionwww.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47/agenda47-president-trumps-plan-to-dismantle-the-deep-state-and-return-power-to-the-american-peopleMore on Project F specifically www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/conservatives-aim-to-restructure-u-s-government-and-replace-it-with-trumps-visionwww.npr.org/2023/08/07/1192432628/conservatives-mull-how-2nd-trump-presidency-could-reshape-the-federal-governmentwww.brookings.edu/articles/the-risks-of-schedule-f-for-administrative-capacity-and-government-accountability/www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-schedule-f-executive-order-stop-civil-servants-government-rcna128003www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-plan-gut-civil-service-triggers-pushback-by-unions-democrats-2023-12-22/www.axios.com/2022/07/22/trump-presidency-schedule-f-federal-employeeswww.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/29/schedule-f-trump-civil-service-politics/thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3858995-trump-and-the-future-of-the-civil-service/
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 20, 2024 2:52:23 GMT
Project 2025 is a plan that has its roots with the Heritage Foundation. The plan is for conservatives to take over the Federal Government after trump wins reelection. From Project 2025 Website….. “This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative administration: a policy agenda, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook.” In order to facilitate this plan they have written a book called “Mandate for Leadership”. From an article about goals of Conservative Leadership… ”This is why the conservative movement is coming together to prepare for the next conservative administration. Heritage is convening the conservative movement behind the policies to ensure that the next president has the right policy and personnel necessary to dismantle the administrative state and restore self-governance to the American people. Me: Does anyone have a clue to what this even means?Anyway, the reason I brought this what has to do with another thread I started about who is aging biter Rob Lowe or Tom Cruise. Poor Tom the majority have said Rob is aging better. But as always when one brings up the name Tom Cruise they also say “cult” because of his membership in Scientology.
But it occurred to me after reading about Project 2025 and their plans for the Federal Government if dumpster don should win one could make a strong case today’s conservative religion right could also be seen as a cult.
They have a set of beliefs they feel everyone should abide by regardless if you as individual agree with them or not.
I’m going to post some articles about 2025 that make me think if trump wins and these guys get a foot in the door they will try change the Federal Government into something that honestly doesn’t address the needs of the people but instead will pave the way for more Americans getting hurt by the actions of others. An example would be eliminating the EPA or the Department of Education.
They claim to want to give power back to the American people, but that's not really what the document does. It doesn't even dismantle the federal government, it just includes plans for massive reform to better suit their needs. They want to politicize the federal government to benefit them. Self governance might refer to gaining control of the Justice Department and eliminating the FBI or a massive reorganization to make it loyal to them.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 20, 2024 3:30:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by AussieMeg on Mar 20, 2024 4:01:40 GMT
This is the first I've heard of Project 2025. It's terrifying! So much chatter about it on X! A little bit of support (WTF?!) and (thankfully) a whole lot of push back.
The Heritage Foundation = The American Taliban
|
|
|
Post by candleangie on Mar 20, 2024 5:15:41 GMT
It’s like the Rajneeshis, in an enormous scale. Horrifying.
|
|