|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 13:58:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by **GypsyGirl** on Apr 11, 2024 14:03:09 GMT
While I think it is a needed change, I doubt it makes much difference TBH. People who want to obtain guns are going to get them. There are so many individuals who sell/trade guns under the radar. I just don't see it making much of a dent.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 14:21:00 GMT
While I think it is a needed change, I doubt it makes much difference TBH. People who want to obtain guns are going to get them. There are so many individuals who sell/trade guns under the radar. I just don't see it making much of a dent. You are correct that we're too far gone for this by itself to make much of a dent. More action is needed. It is my hope, though, that over time if fewer guns are sold to people who should not have them, fewer will be stolen or otherwise make their way onto the streets to be used by criminals. IMO legislation like this needs to be coupled with safe storage laws that prosecutes people whose guns are used in crimes by friends/family members and strong red flag laws, as well as an expanded universal background check system and national gun registration.
|
|
River
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,590
Location: Alabama
Jun 26, 2014 15:26:04 GMT
|
Post by River on Apr 11, 2024 14:39:56 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down.
I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun.
|
|
amom23
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,446
Jun 27, 2014 12:39:18 GMT
|
Post by amom23 on Apr 11, 2024 14:41:04 GMT
Good! At least the administration is trying to do something. We know the GOP could care less about gun violence.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 14:52:05 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. It's unclear to me from the article, but it seems like the sales to friends would also be required to go through a background check. I get that this is not an immediate fix. The idea is to reduce the ways a criminal or abuser can most easily get a gun and, over time, reduce the number of guns in circulation, particularly on the street. This is a problem decades in the making and it's going to take at least that long to turn it around.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 14:58:50 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. I live in Texas, and I'm always surprised when stats about gun ownership are released. We're always told everyone here owns a gun, but I don't personally know anyone who does except DH (unloaded, locked away, no ammunition in the house). And stats indicate that maybe a third of Texans actually live in a household with a gun. www.texastribune.org/2022/07/28/texas-gun-stats/Of course, the statistics are squishy because neither the state nor the federal government actually registers or tracks gun ownership. They're based on polls and surveys. But it's still surprising to me.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 15:10:40 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. I agree with this. Those who aren't supposed to have them aren't ever going to get them legally. Period. They will always go under the law, around the law, and over the law to get them. I do think this is a good first step though.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 15:15:19 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. I live in Texas, and I'm always surprised when stats about gun ownership are released. We're always told everyone here owns a gun, but I don't personally know anyone who does except DH (unloaded, locked away, no ammunition in the house). And stats indicate that maybe a third of Texans actually live in a household with a gun. www.texastribune.org/2022/07/28/texas-gun-stats/Of course, the statistics are squishy because neither the state nor the federal government actually registers or tracks gun ownership. They're based on polls and surveys. But it's still surprising to me. Yeah, I think that is probably an under reported number, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Apr 11, 2024 15:16:28 GMT
I think half of states already require this - I know mine does. I always thought the loophole was stupid, so glad it will be nationwide.
|
|
River
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,590
Location: Alabama
Jun 26, 2014 15:26:04 GMT
|
Post by River on Apr 11, 2024 15:29:06 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. It's unclear to me from the article, but it seems like the sales to friends would also be required to go through a background check.
I get that this is not an immediate fix. The idea is to reduce the ways a criminal or abuser can most easily get a gun and, over time, reduce the number of guns in circulation, particularly on the street. This is a problem decades in the making and it's going to take at least that long to turn it around. From the article I read this morning... www.al.com/news/2024/04/president-joe-biden-moves-to-add-background-checks-for-all-gun-sales.htmlPresident Joe Biden on Thursday announced an executive action that will require all gun sellers to conduct a background check. Currently, a 1993 law requires anyone wishing to purchase a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer to pass a background check. But loopholes allow many online purchases, gun show purchases and transfers to occur without background checks. “This single gap in our federal background check system has caused unimaginable pain and suffering,” Vice President Kamala Harris told media, referencing the upcoming 25 year anniversary of the Columbi shooting and other recent deadly shootings. Under new White House regulation, it will not matter if guns are “sold on the internet, at a gun show, or at a brick-and-mortar store: if you sell guns predominantly to earn a profit,” you must be licensed, and you must conduct background checks, federal officials said Wednesday. “I’ll say in the years to come, I do believe countless families and communities will be spared the horror and the heartbreak of gun violence by this new rule,” Harris said. Federal officials say the rule is not a universal background check. In 2022, Alabama became the 25th state to have permitless carry – sometimes referred to as “constitutional carry” -- despite concerns expressed by many law enforcement officers, including sheriffs, who are typically a strong GOP ally. In 2023, more than 40,000 people died in the United States from gun-related injuries, and gun injuries became the leading cause of death among children in Alabama. Federal officials said 60% of recipients of trafficked firearms were previously convicted felons; and hundreds of traffic guns were directly linked to murders and shootings. “Gun violence has devastated families across the country. For many, this has meant the loss of a parent, child, student, fellow officer or friend. And for their communities, this has meant persistent grief and lasting fear,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said. This year, the legislature has largely avoided debate about whether to loosen or strengthen state gun laws, but a group of mayors has asked to increase the penalty for firing a gun into an occupied home, business, or vehicle. Local officials have also asked the state to take action on Glock switches, which convert a handgun into an automatic weapon. State Rep. Philip Ensler has introduced a bill in the legislature that would prohibit people from owning parts to convert a weapon into a machine gun. The new federal rule will make clear the circumstances in which a person is “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms and required to obtain a federal firearms license, in order to increase compliance with the federal background check requirement for firearm sales by federal firearms licensees.
The Final Rule goes into effect 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. _____________________ I'm all for new laws and doing anything we can to help with gun violence even if it saves just one life, so don't get me wrong when I say "however". LoL However, if it's as the bolded statement above, that is not going to do anything at all for the friends and family trading and selling guns. I certainly can't come up with a solution for that issue. I'm all for laws even if I don't believe they will do any good.
|
|
3boysnme
Full Member
Posts: 405
Aug 1, 2023 13:28:26 GMT
|
Post by 3boysnme on Apr 11, 2024 16:15:53 GMT
I'm all for it. Yes, the GOP will bitch and moan, but something needs to be done. I've said it before (well, maybe not here) that if they experienced more tragedies from guns, they'd more likely to do all that can be done. I'm not wishing on anyone to be murdered by a person with a gun, but unfortunately, the school shootings, and other mass shootings don't seem to affect the ones who are against gun laws.
For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished. The parents of the boy who shot up a school in Michigan were sentenced 10-15 years. They may not have sold the gun to their son, but they made it easy for him to access it. So likewise, if a family member gave their child a gun, and he/she uses it in a crime, they should also be punished. Not sure how that would be enforced, but I'm thinking through registration? I'm not a gun owner, so I'm not even sure what the registration would show.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 18:59:13 GMT
I'm all for it. Yes, the GOP will bitch and moan, but something needs to be done. I've said it before (well, maybe not here) that if they experienced more tragedies from guns, they'd more likely to do all that can be done. I'm not wishing on anyone to be murdered by a person with a gun, but unfortunately, the school shootings, and other mass shootings don't seem to affect the ones who are against gun laws. For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished. The parents of the boy who shot up a school in Michigan were sentenced 10-15 years. They may not have sold the gun to their son, but they made it easy for him to access it. So likewise, if a family member gave their child a gun, and he/she uses it in a crime, they should also be punished. Not sure how that would be enforced, but I'm thinking through registration? I'm not a gun owner, so I'm not even sure what the registration would show. Yes, registration would help with that. It's one of the reasons Rs are so opposed to it.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Apr 11, 2024 19:08:19 GMT
I think this is a good first step but also hope it includes direct sales from friends and family. And then those who don’t follow it need to be charged if their gun is used in a shooting.
|
|
teddyw
Drama Llama
Posts: 7,156
Jun 29, 2014 1:56:04 GMT
|
Post by teddyw on Apr 11, 2024 19:24:02 GMT
I do think this is great and definitely needs to be done. However, I also agree with GypsyGirl in thinking it won't make a whole lot of difference. I live in the south, solid red state where guns are a plenty. Most guys from ages 17 to 100 own 3 or more guns whether they are hunting guys or not. Most are obtained through friends, friends of friends or relatives through selling, trading, or just being past down. I feel like the guns being bought from licensed dealers and people that would be required to do the background check are already by people that could pass the background. I truly don't think that people who can't pass the background check are just going to throw their hands up and say oh well, guess I can't get a gun. I agree with this. Those who aren't supposed to have them aren't ever going to get them legally. Period. They will always go under the law, around the law, and over the law to get them. I do think this is a good first step though. My friend used to work security for gun shows. It never failed a few felons who weren’t allowed to own guns always tried to buy them there. They almost always came across people who had warrants out for their arrest too.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 19:25:30 GMT
I'm all for it. Yes, the GOP will bitch and moan, but something needs to be done. I've said it before (well, maybe not here) that if they experienced more tragedies from guns, they'd more likely to do all that can be done. I'm not wishing on anyone to be murdered by a person with a gun, but unfortunately, the school shootings, and other mass shootings don't seem to affect the ones who are against gun laws. For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished. The parents of the boy who shot up a school in Michigan were sentenced 10-15 years. They may not have sold the gun to their son, but they made it easy for him to access it. So likewise, if a family member gave their child a gun, and he/she uses it in a crime, they should also be punished. Not sure how that would be enforced, but I'm thinking through registration? I'm not a gun owner, so I'm not even sure what the registration would show. Why? Just because I sold a gun to someone I know and 10 years down the road they commit a crime, why should I be held responsible? I completely understand selling to someone underage and being held accountable. But if I sell to another adult in good faith, and later down the road they do something, that is on them. Now obviously if I know they have mental health challenges they should not be sold to. But another capable adult selling to another capable adult? And before anyone calls me a MAGA friend, I am not. But I am a licensed gun owner who is all for having a strict background check, who advocates for everyone to lock up every gun and ammo separately and absolutely out of the reach of anyone who is not an adult with training.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 19:27:44 GMT
I'm all for it. Yes, the GOP will bitch and moan, but something needs to be done. I've said it before (well, maybe not here) that if they experienced more tragedies from guns, they'd more likely to do all that can be done. I'm not wishing on anyone to be murdered by a person with a gun, but unfortunately, the school shootings, and other mass shootings don't seem to affect the ones who are against gun laws. For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished. The parents of the boy who shot up a school in Michigan were sentenced 10-15 years. They may not have sold the gun to their son, but they made it easy for him to access it. So likewise, if a family member gave their child a gun, and he/she uses it in a crime, they should also be punished. Not sure how that would be enforced, but I'm thinking through registration? I'm not a gun owner, so I'm not even sure what the registration would show. Why? Just because I sold a gun to someone I know and 10 years down the road they commit a crime, why should I be held responsible? I completely understand selling to someone underage and being held accountable. But if I sell to another adult in good faith, and later down the road they do something, that is on them. Now obviously if I know they have mental health challenges they should not be sold to. But another capable adult selling to another capable adult? And before anyone calls me a MAGA friend, I am not. But I am a licensed gun owner who is all for having a strict background check, who advocates for everyone to lock up every gun and ammo separately and absolutely out of the reach of anyone who is not an adult with training. Yes, I think the liability should come if it could be shown that you knew they were mentally unstable, planning a crime, or otherwise unfit for gun ownership.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Apr 11, 2024 19:44:25 GMT
Definitely a step in the right direction.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 19:53:11 GMT
Why? Just because I sold a gun to someone I know and 10 years down the road they commit a crime, why should I be held responsible? I completely understand selling to someone underage and being held accountable. But if I sell to another adult in good faith, and later down the road they do something, that is on them. Now obviously if I know they have mental health challenges they should not be sold to. But another capable adult selling to another capable adult? And before anyone calls me a MAGA friend, I am not. But I am a licensed gun owner who is all for having a strict background check, who advocates for everyone to lock up every gun and ammo separately and absolutely out of the reach of anyone who is not an adult with training. Yes, I think the liability should come if it could be shown that you knew they were mentally unstable, planning a crime, or otherwise unfit for gun ownership. But that's not what was said. What was said: For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished.I agree. If you knowing sell to someone who is mentally unstable, planning a crime, and unfit then yes. Be held accountable. But none of those qualifiers were listed.
|
|
scrappinmama
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,120
Jun 26, 2014 12:54:09 GMT
|
Post by scrappinmama on Apr 11, 2024 20:04:50 GMT
It's doing something. That in itself is progress. I hope this leads to more sensible gun laws in the future. Our children deserve it. We all do!
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 20:27:25 GMT
Yes, I think the liability should come if it could be shown that you knew they were mentally unstable, planning a crime, or otherwise unfit for gun ownership. But that's not what was said. What was said: For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished.I agree. If you knowing sell to someone who is mentally unstable, planning a crime, and unfit then yes. Be held accountable. But none of those qualifiers were listed. I understand. I’m agreeing with you and adding the qualifiers. I would further add that if you leave a gun in a place where it can be easily accessed or stolen by someone and it is used in a crime, there should be a way to hold you accountable. People have to stop leaving their gun in the console of their car and being surprised when it’s stolen.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 20:37:51 GMT
But that's not what was said. What was said: For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished.I agree. If you knowing sell to someone who is mentally unstable, planning a crime, and unfit then yes. Be held accountable. But none of those qualifiers were listed. I understand. I’m agreeing with you and adding the qualifiers. I would further add that if you leave a gun in a place where it can be easily accessed or stolen by someone and it is used in a crime, there should be a way to hold you accountable. People have to stop leaving their gun in the console of their car and being surprised when it’s stolen. 100%
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Apr 11, 2024 20:48:01 GMT
I'm all for it. Yes, the GOP will bitch and moan, but something needs to be done. I've said it before (well, maybe not here) that if they experienced more tragedies from guns, they'd more likely to do all that can be done. I'm not wishing on anyone to be murdered by a person with a gun, but unfortunately, the school shootings, and other mass shootings don't seem to affect the ones who are against gun laws. For family and friends who are trading or selling guns to their family and friends, if a gun was used in a crime that they had traded or sold to the person, they should also be punished. The parents of the boy who shot up a school in Michigan were sentenced 10-15 years. They may not have sold the gun to their son, but they made it easy for him to access it. So likewise, if a family member gave their child a gun, and he/she uses it in a crime, they should also be punished. Not sure how that would be enforced, but I'm thinking through registration? I'm not a gun owner, so I'm not even sure what the registration would show. Why? Just because I sold a gun to someone I know and 10 years down the road they commit a crime, why should I be held responsible? I completely understand selling to someone underage and being held accountable. But if I sell to another adult in good faith, and later down the road they do something, that is on them. Now obviously if I know they have mental health challenges they should not be sold to. But another capable adult selling to another capable adult? And before anyone calls me a MAGA friend, I am not. But I am a licensed gun owner who is all for having a strict background check, who advocates for everyone to lock up every gun and ammo separately and absolutely out of the reach of anyone who is not an adult with training. I think all gun sales should go through licensed dealers so appropriate background checks should be done. As an individual, I do not have access to the databases that would preclude someone from owning a guns, so would never sell one to anyone. There's a whole lot we don't know about our friends and family and if we want to get serious about having strict background checks, stopping private sales would be a huge step in making sure those checks are actually done.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Apr 11, 2024 20:58:21 GMT
Why? Just because I sold a gun to someone I know and 10 years down the road they commit a crime, why should I be held responsible? I completely understand selling to someone underage and being held accountable. But if I sell to another adult in good faith, and later down the road they do something, that is on them. Now obviously if I know they have mental health challenges they should not be sold to. But another capable adult selling to another capable adult? And before anyone calls me a MAGA friend, I am not. But I am a licensed gun owner who is all for having a strict background check, who advocates for everyone to lock up every gun and ammo separately and absolutely out of the reach of anyone who is not an adult with training. I think all gun sales should go through licensed dealers so appropriate background checks should be done. As an individual, I do not have access to the databases that would preclude someone from owning a guns, so would never sell one to anyone. There's a whole lot we don't know about our friends and family and if we want to get serious about having strict background checks, stopping private sales would be a huge step in making sure those checks are actually done. In theory I agree with you. I just don't think that will ever happen, even if laws were passed. I know DH and I have never bought or sold a gun that wasn't from a federal licensed gun dealer. But I know people who will *always* find a way to trade and sell their guns.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Apr 11, 2024 23:08:45 GMT
I think all gun sales should go through licensed dealers so appropriate background checks should be done. As an individual, I do not have access to the databases that would preclude someone from owning a guns, so would never sell one to anyone. There's a whole lot we don't know about our friends and family and if we want to get serious about having strict background checks, stopping private sales would be a huge step in making sure those checks are actually done. In theory I agree with you. I just don't think that will ever happen, even if laws were passed. I know DH and I have never bought or sold a gun that wasn't from a federal licensed gun dealer. But I know people who will *always* find a way to trade and sell their guns. Sure - just as there are always people who break and circumvent laws and they should be prosecuted - particularly if that gun is then used in a crime. People will also continue to drink and drive - I'm glad that we now prosecute those who think that's acceptable, particularly when they then kill people
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Apr 11, 2024 23:13:55 GMT
And there will always be people who commit murder, despite what the law says. But we continue to have laws against murder.
I think a few more laws around gun purchases/transfers and gun ownership is a step in the right direction. But let’s be real, this Supreme Court will likely toss out every gun law that comes their way. Sad to say.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Apr 11, 2024 23:23:36 GMT
|
|
iowgirl
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,314
Jun 25, 2014 22:52:46 GMT
|
Post by iowgirl on Apr 11, 2024 23:26:55 GMT
I think every gun that is owned should require an insurance policy. Or an umbrella type policy to cover multiple guns. You have to pass the background check to purchase, and you have to have proof of insurance - just like owning a car. Will that stop all gun violence? No. It might help with restitution to victims, and it sure as hell might make it hard for some people to own a gun that shouldn't.
I am saying this as an owner of several firearms, not including my husbands or my kids (although I did purchase my kids' firearms as gifts for them).
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Apr 11, 2024 23:39:21 GMT
I also think we need to eliminate immunity for gun manufacturers. If gun manufacturers were held accountable, there would be an incentive to do more to make guns safer like fingerprint locks, a 6 digit code etc. We have the technology to lock phones, we could do that for guns, too.
Class action lawsuits against the tobacco industry prompted a shift in advertising and public health efforts to stop smoking. Car manufacturers developed safety innovations like air bags, anti-lock brakes, brighter and more brake lights etc partly because of civil litigation.
Some states are starting to roll back protection for gun manufacturers, but a federal change would be more effective.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Apr 11, 2024 23:40:57 GMT
Just popping back in to add how many lives could be saved with red flag laws. I hope we can get those added at some point. As the mother of a mentally ill young adult who has one suicide attempt behind her already, I wish there was a way for me to go to court and say “this person should not legally purchase a gun.” As it stands, despite her mental health history and hospitalization, she could go buy one tomorrow.
While it’s true that people who are suicidal will find a way, no way is as effective and immediate as a gun.
|
|