|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 11, 2024 19:09:40 GMT
No lie with Brian Tyler Cohen…. ”GOP Senator Katie Britt is introducing an anti-abortion bill that would register and track pregnant women in a federal database. This comes after Trump said he would allow laws “monitoring” women’s pregnancies so they can know if they get an abortion. huffpost.com/entry/katie-br…” And there is the woman from the Heritage Foundation that has a plan to get rid of birth control by only allowing couples to have sex when they are trying to create a baby. I already posted this little nugget in the miscellaneous thread. x.com/noliewithbtc/status/1789322970545995994?s=61&t=j45uMgNk1i8O0YllKF58nwIs she the one that had had “kitchen table” speech after the State of the Union address? A response…. ”How about a federal database for Republicans who hide their own abortions, then push their hypocritical "Christian" views on everyone else? The creepy, weird shit never ends with these people.. 🙄” Another response. “This is forcing religious beliefs which is against the Constitution. Our beliefs vary when it comes to when a fetus is considered a living human being. You can't make laws about this when there isn't a set belief by everyone. There are also too many varying situations in pregnancy.. like when a fetus dies in the womb, and it could be far along in the pregnancy when that happens, therefore it doesn't make sense to have laws across the board. It's a complicated issue that should be left to a woman and her medical team. Roe v Wade never should have been overturned and those Republicans justices lied during their hearings saying it was settled law!” |
|
|
|
Post by littlemama on May 11, 2024 19:47:00 GMT
Tracking certain citizens, hmmm. Sounds a lot like Nazi Germany.
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 11, 2024 19:57:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 11, 2024 20:00:33 GMT
And then there is this from The Recount… ”Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL) says he’s filing an impeachment resolution against President Biden because he restricted some bombs to Israel for “political gain.” “He wants to win Michigan, he wants to pander to the radical left... Now with the quid pro quo, it should be quid pro Joe.” Seriously? x.com/therecount/status/1789034525202231709?s=61&t=j45uMgNk1i8O0YllKF58nw |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 11, 2024 20:19:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 11, 2024 21:49:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on May 11, 2024 21:59:57 GMT
These people have issues. And yet people vote for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by lisae on May 11, 2024 22:17:57 GMT
This would be a violation of HIPPA, not that I expect any of these people to understand this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on May 11, 2024 22:22:17 GMT
This would be a violation of HIPPA, not that I expect any of these people to understand this. It would be a violation of HIPAA if doctors reported pregnancies to this site. As awful as the idea is, that doesn't seem to be what they're suggesting. |
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on May 11, 2024 22:49:34 GMT
And what of those women that have a miscarriage they now have to answer questions about if it was a true miscarriage. Wasn’t there a woman in Texas that was thrown in jail because they didn’t think she had a miscarriage but had had an abortion ? This just gets crazier by the day. I am sure many of us if we didn’t have one have known women that have and many that have had multiple miscarriages. I can’t imagine after all the emotions that go with that having a government entity asking more questions about it. I just saw someone post their rainbow baby after having well over ten I think it was in the high teen miscarriages. I can’t imagine the loss they had been through and still keep trying.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 11, 2024 23:08:51 GMT
And what of those women that have a miscarriage they now have to answer questions about if it was a true miscarriage. Wasn’t there a woman in Texas that was thrown in jail because they didn’t think she had a miscarriage but had had an abortion ? This just gets crazier by the day. I am sure many of us if we didn’t have one have known women that have and many that have had multiple miscarriages. I can’t imagine after all the emotions that go with that having a government entity asking more questions about it. I just saw someone post their rainbow baby after having well over ten I think it was in the high teen miscarriages. I can’t imagine the loss they had been through and still keep trying. Unfortunately the medical term is, spontaneous abortion. |
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on May 11, 2024 23:09:55 GMT
And what of those women that have a miscarriage they now have to answer questions about if it was a true miscarriage. Wasn’t there a woman in Texas that was thrown in jail because they didn’t think she had a miscarriage but had had an abortion ? This just gets crazier by the day. I am sure many of us if we didn’t have one have known women that have and many that have had multiple miscarriages. I can’t imagine after all the emotions that go with that having a government entity asking more questions about it. I just saw someone post their rainbow baby after having well over ten I think it was in the high teen miscarriages. I can’t imagine the loss they had been through and still keep trying. Unfortunately the medical term is, spontaneous abortion. True. Let’s hope this doesn’t pass and no one needs to worry about this. |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 11, 2024 23:12:19 GMT
Yes, Katie Britt was the respoder to the SOTU address in her kitchen. With her stupid grin on her face..
Here is the tweet I posted in misc thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 11, 2024 23:18:09 GMT
Britt has other issues too!!
|
|
RosieKat
Drama Llama
PeaJect #12
Posts: 5,561 
|
Post by RosieKat on May 11, 2024 23:20:37 GMT
This would be a violation of HIPPA, not that I expect any of these people to understand this. It would be a violation of HIPAA if doctors reported pregnancies to this site. As awful as the idea is, that doesn't seem to be what they're suggesting. Like they wouldn't be willing to just get rid of a pesky law that gets in their way? |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 11, 2024 23:28:20 GMT
It would be a violation of HIPAA if doctors reported pregnancies to this site. As awful as the idea is, that doesn't seem to be what they're suggesting. Like they wouldn't be willing to just get rid of a pesky law that gets in their way? If TFG is elected, there will only be his choice of government. There will be no rules in the citizens' favor including most of his followers, but they do not understand that. If TFG is able to get rid of us, his followers will be left holding the bag of poop. They will be in the streets fending for themselves. They will get no help! |
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on May 12, 2024 0:11:27 GMT
This is just another GOP ploy to force women to have unwanted pregnancies. And boy howdy; they are not being subtle about it.
From The Guardian:
The bill specifically forbids any entity that “performs, induces, refers for, or counsels in favor of abortions” from being listed in the database, which would in effect eliminate swaths of OB-GYN services and sexual health clinics across the country.
The website would direct users to enter their personal data and contact information, and although Britt’s communications director said the site would not collect data on pregnant people, page three of the bill states that users can “take an assessment through the website and provide consent to use the user’s contact information” which government officials may use “to conduct outreach via phone or email to follow up with users on additional resources that would be helpful for the users to review”.
Critics have noted that the database of “pregnancy support centers” would provide misleading information in an effort to dissuade women from seeking abortions. Axios noted that the bill would also provide grants to anti-abortion non-profit organizations.
|
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on May 12, 2024 0:19:16 GMT
Part of the database would be resources like CPCs, or Crisis Pregnancy Centers. About those-they are frequently run by Christian, anti-abortion groups. More on CPCs: www.acog.org/advocacy/abortion-is-essential/trending-issues/issue-brief-crisis-pregnancy-centersTLDR- “ CPC is a term used to refer to certain facilities that represent themselves as legitimate reproductive health care clinics providing care for pregnant people but actually aim to dissuade people from accessing certain types of reproductive health care, including abortion care and even contraceptive options. Staff members at these unregulated and often nonmedical facilities have no legal obligation to provide pregnant people with accurate information and are not subject to HIPAA or required by law to maintain client confidentiality. Many CPCs are affiliated with national organizations that provide funding, support, and training to advance a broadscale antiabortion agenda.i, ii, iii Data from the Center for Countering Digital Hate show that CPCs are using digital marketing tactics to target people seeking information about abortion care. According to the data, 71% of CPCs use deceptive means such as spreading thoroughly debunked misinformation and 38% do not clearly state on their home page that they do not provide abortion care.viii These methods make it harder for people to get reliable information about an important decision that will affect their health and their lives. By using deception, delay tactics, and disinformation, CPC staffs undermine the tenets of informed consent and patient autonomy and impede access to comprehensive, ethical care. By using deception, delay tactics, and disinformation, CPC staffs undermine the tenets of informed consent and patient autonomy and impede access to comprehensive, ethical care.” |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 12, 2024 0:20:42 GMT
Haven't they had those pregnancy support centers around or near Planned Parent centers, where those odd centers lured people in and provided untrue info? Even to the point of painting their buildings sort of pink to draw people away from the Planned Parent Centers? mollycoddle you said it better with more info then I did! Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by jill8909 on May 12, 2024 1:40:00 GMT
if i were of child bearing age I would move to a blue state if feasible, just to be sure to get good prenatal care. it's nuts
|
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on May 12, 2024 12:12:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on May 12, 2024 13:18:26 GMT
Ane they knock Biden!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on May 12, 2024 17:40:50 GMT
This is a perfect example of another trait the Republicans are exhibiting. The “photo-op” party held a photo-op to announce a bill they were bringing to the House Floor… Aaron Rupar…. ”Speaker Mike Johnson: "We all know, intuitively, that a lot of illegals are voting in federal elections. But it's not been something that's easily provable. We don't have that number." Sounds legit.” & The Recount….. ”Reporter: “Are you saying that there are currently non-U.S. citizens voting in federal elections? ... Do you have an estimate of how many?” House Speaker Mike Johnson: “It's not been something that is easily provable. We don't have that number.” Two things… 1. There is already a bill that makes it illegal for non-citizens to vote. 2. They have no proof but they just know it’s happening. But they have no proof. This morning on Jan Psaki’s show…. ”.@jrpsaki: “Non-citizens can't vote! That's already a crime. At best, this Republican legislative push is a solution looking for a problem. But more alarming: It's intended to sow the seeds of doubt about our country’s elections, should Donald Trump lose.” 🦨  💯 times! IMO from now until the election the Republicans are going to do shit like this to as Jan says “sew the seeds of doubt” for the 2024 general election. trump tried to “steal” the 2020 election and failed. Look at that experience as a trial run that “they” learned from and now have a better idea of what they need to do to be successful at this year’s election. Far fetched? Maybe or maybe spot on. |
|
💯 times!