|
|
Post by librarylady on Jun 13, 2024 15:48:53 GMT
Said the man filing the case did not have standing to do so.
|
|
naby64
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,418 
|
Post by naby64 on Jun 13, 2024 15:55:58 GMT
In something my DD just sent me it said a broken clock is right twice a day. So at least they got this one right.
|
|
3boysnme
Full Member
Posts: 405
Aug 1, 2023 13:28:26 GMT
|
Post by 3boysnme on Jun 13, 2024 16:34:13 GMT
I couldn't believe they ruled that way! naby64 you are so right! Given their past rulings, it is a welcomed surprise! Oh, and the correct quote is a BROKEN clock is right twice a day. SCOTUS is definitely broken! |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 13, 2024 17:25:23 GMT
I'm pleased that they recognized that the administration and FDA are the correct ways to petition for changes in drug rules, and not through the courts. Courts should not be making any medical decisions for anyone (ahem, Texas).
|
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Jun 13, 2024 17:31:54 GMT
FOR NOW.
They are waiting for someone with standing. Ugh. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 13, 2024 17:39:25 GMT
FOR NOW. They are waiting for someone with standing. Ugh. Sorry. Curious who would have standing in a case like this. |
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,305
|
Post by lindas on Jun 13, 2024 18:07:17 GMT
FOR NOW. They are waiting for someone with standing. Ugh. Sorry. Curious who would have standing in a case like this. Since the case was about the drug not being safe I would think that if anyone was physically harmed or died from taking the drug then their loved ones would have standing. |
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jun 13, 2024 18:22:38 GMT
Unanimous - taking the win.
|
|
3boysnme
Full Member
Posts: 405
Aug 1, 2023 13:28:26 GMT
|
Post by 3boysnme on Jun 13, 2024 18:45:37 GMT
Curious who would have standing in a case like this. Since the case was about the drug not being safe I would think that if anyone was physically harmed or died from taking the drug then their loved ones would have standing. Studies show it is safer that abortion procedures or even childbirth. It is considered safer than Viagra. I don't see anyone trying to ban Viagra. I would think that would be the drug to ban before Mifepristone if you're talking about safety and not wanting people physically harmed or dead. |
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 13, 2024 19:48:52 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2024 20:03:18 GMT
An abusive patriarchy husband whose wife has taken Mifepristone with good cause, files because his wife did it. He becomes the injured party.
Remember their goal is CONTROL of women!
|
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jun 13, 2024 21:46:08 GMT
Yes, exactly. The states of Missouri, Kansas and Idaho are all suing. The states will claim they have standing because they have been harmed because the government regulations conflict with their restrictive abortion bans & laws. Most likely, the conservative justices will rule the states have standing and use the opportunity to limit abortion and limit the powers of the federal government. Win-win for the conservatives. Regrettably, this was a very narrow decision and will not protect access to the drugs. The Supreme Court left in place the restrictive bans on medication in more than 12 Republican states with near total bans. This feels like throwing the dog a bone similar to the decision last year on voting rights in Alabama. The conservatives gave the liberals something in the middle of all of their far right rulings so they could claim, look we're not partisan. I have a bad feeling about all of the rulings we're waiting for, especially Trump's immunity case. Although I don't like him, I do like this part of the decision written by Kavanaugh www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion-pill-mifepristone-ruling.htmlHe added, “A plaintiff ’s desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue.”
www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/abortion-pill-mifepristone-scotus.htmlFor the time being, access to the abortion pill is preserved. But make no mistake: This was a narrow, procedural win for reproductive rights. In the bigger picture, the anti-abortion forces feel the wind is at their backs. It is up to the majority of Americans who support abortion rights to turn out at the polls this fall, and every year, to demonstrate what protecting equality and bodily autonomy really means. |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2024 21:55:44 GMT
Kavanaugh may be getting nervous about inquiries concerning his paid off mortgage, credit card bills etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 13, 2024 22:06:18 GMT
Yes, exactly. The states of Missouri, Kansas and Idaho are all suing. The states will claim they have standing because they have been harmed because the government regulations conflict with their restrictive abortion bans & laws. Most likely, the conservative justices will rule the states have standing and use the opportunity to limit abortion and limit the powers of the federal government. Win-win for the conservatives. Regrettably, this was a very narrow decision and will not protect access to the drugs. The Supreme Court left in place the restrictive bans on medication in more than 12 Republican states with near total bans. This feels like throwing the dog a bone similar to the decision last year on voting rights in Alabama. The conservatives gave the liberals something in the middle of all of their far right rulings so they could claim, look we're not partisan. I have a bad feeling about all of the rulings we're waiting for, especially Trump's immunity case. Although I don't like him, I do like this part of the decision written by Kavanaugh www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/us/politics/supreme-court-abortion-pill-mifepristone-ruling.htmlHe added, “A plaintiff ’s desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue.”
www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/abortion-pill-mifepristone-scotus.htmlFor the time being, access to the abortion pill is preserved. But make no mistake: This was a narrow, procedural win for reproductive rights. In the bigger picture, the anti-abortion forces feel the wind is at their backs. It is up to the majority of Americans who support abortion rights to turn out at the polls this fall, and every year, to demonstrate what protecting equality and bodily autonomy really means.Yes. Kavanaugh's ruling seems to be written in such a way as to give future plaintiffs a roadmap to getting what they want. |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jun 13, 2024 23:08:49 GMT
A side note, but one of the frustrating things about the abortion debate is the false Republican narrative that abortions happen up to the moment of birth and even sometimes after. I agree, I really like her response to Kennedy's question. disrespectful to womenSheldon Whitehouse @senwhitehouse
At my hearing on the freedom to travel for abortion care, Senator Kennedy asked our witnesses to respond to a sensationalized, highly unrealistic hypothetical aimed at stoking fear.
Ms. Frye’s response says it all. |
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jun 13, 2024 23:38:23 GMT
Well done and he did not interrupt her, which he too often does!
|
|
