|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 25, 2024 23:52:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 25, 2024 23:55:47 GMT
Vance only offered a selective list.. ETA: I should have mentioned that this was part of his listing of unmarried 'childless cat ladies'
Vance mentioned Vice President Kamala Harris, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg specifically. But he failed to mention the fact that some major right-wing pundits — including author Ann Coulter and the late radio host Rush Limbaugh — haven't had biological children. ***
USA Today's Natalie Neysa Alund reports, "The video had more than 25 million views on X as of Wednesday, (July 24), and Vance's 'childless cat ladies' comments had sparked an uproar from Swiftie fans and beyond…. Swift, who endorsed now-President Joe Biden and Harris back in 2020, has not yet endorsed anyone for president in 2024."
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
Posts: 5,844
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Jul 26, 2024 0:36:28 GMT
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 seriously, how long before Trump tells him you’re fired?
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 2:50:25 GMT
This is sad. Gabby Giffords speaks about how IVF was stolen from them when she was shot. They were in the process... x.com/GabbyGiffords/status/1816625196331352545Democratic Florida Senate candidate Mike Harvey responded to Giffords with his support, calling her and Kelly’s family “a true American success story.” “For anyone, especially a low hanging freshman senator, to say anything else isn’t just an insult, it’s evil,” Harvey wrote. “The type of evil you can’t pray for, it’s the kind you have to cast out.” Vance... May he rot somewhere very hot!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 4:15:57 GMT
Say what?? Vance is going have women checked with a stick +/- before they can leave their state.. Or to have federal posses to make sure women don't leave the state for nefarious reason. Black women ? Oh right the replacement workers... The account that shared the audio called it a "stunning leak," and slammed the Ohio senator for calling for a "federal response to stop women from traveling from red states to blue states to receive reproductive healthcare." x.com/MumOf2RatBags/status/1816676015957246421x.com/Folkmusings_/status/1816654886655893995
|
|
dawnnikol
Prolific Pea
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
'A life without books is a life not lived.' Jay Kristoff
Posts: 8,351
Sept 21, 2015 18:39:25 GMT
|
Post by dawnnikol on Jul 26, 2024 10:59:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Jul 26, 2024 13:33:43 GMT
I just have to wonder, why are idiots like Vance so stupid as to not think that 'childless cat ladies' --and men, and everyone else who isn't married with 2.4 kids and a dog- are STILL THEIR CONSTITUENTS TOO.
So what's the point of saying all legislators should be married with children to 'relate' to their constituents?? That's just such FAULTY LOGIC!!! But then again, I forget sometimes- they've never been logical- just evil.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 13:51:31 GMT
Re: whether Harris can be on the upcoming ballots. Speaker Johnson thinks not. 48 of 50 states have responded that they have no rules to support Johnson's claims.. A new survey of election law in all 50 states apparently destroys House Speaker Mike Johnson's claims about Vice President Kamala Harris' eligibility for the ballot. The Louisiana Republican argued that legal "impediments" in some states would prevent Democrats from switching out President Joe Biden as the nominee after he withdrew from the race, but election authorities from both parties in at least 48 states told CNN that no obstacles would prevent Harris from appearing on ballots if she becomes the official presidential nominee. *** "You can even fundraise off of a lawsuit, even if you're not going to ultimately win. To this point we know that Trump allies certainly have discussed the potential legal implications of switching to Harris. At this point it's unclear if there'll be challenges, but it appears pretty clear from our reporting that, on this issue, they would not be successful." Experts told CNN that there would be no issue with Harris appearing on the ballot because Biden was never named as the official nominee and Democrats never submitted his name to the states as their nominee. “Political parties nominate their presidential and vice-presidential candidates at their conventions and then inform the State Board of Elections of those persons’ names," said Patrick Gannon, spokesperson for the bipartisan North Carolina State Board of Elections. "The Democratic Party has not yet had its convention, nor has it informed the State Board of its presidential and vice-presidential candidates’ names." www.rawstory.com/kamala-harris-ballot/
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
Posts: 5,844
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Jul 26, 2024 14:02:36 GMT
|
|
dawnnikol
Prolific Pea
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_green.png)
'A life without books is a life not lived.' Jay Kristoff
Posts: 8,351
Sept 21, 2015 18:39:25 GMT
|
Post by dawnnikol on Jul 26, 2024 15:21:20 GMT
I saw a comment that said "This is not who we are... in front of company" and it's absolutely correct. This is who you are and who you've supported. You should be fucking mad. ![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTWsW5WWIAAWMsS?format=jpg&name=medium)
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Jul 26, 2024 18:30:08 GMT
Re: whether Harris can be on the upcoming ballots. Speaker Johnson thinks not. 48 of 50 states have responded that they have no rules to support Johnson's claims.. A new survey of election law in all 50 states apparently destroys House Speaker Mike Johnson's claims about Vice President Kamala Harris' eligibility for the ballot. The Louisiana Republican argued that legal "impediments" in some states would prevent Democrats from switching out President Joe Biden as the nominee after he withdrew from the race, but election authorities from both parties in at least 48 states told CNN that no obstacles would prevent Harris from appearing on ballots if she becomes the official presidential nominee. *** "You can even fundraise off of a lawsuit, even if you're not going to ultimately win. To this point we know that Trump allies certainly have discussed the potential legal implications of switching to Harris. At this point it's unclear if there'll be challenges, but it appears pretty clear from our reporting that, on this issue, they would not be successful." Experts told CNN that there would be no issue with Harris appearing on the ballot because Biden was never named as the official nominee and Democrats never submitted his name to the states as their nominee. “Political parties nominate their presidential and vice-presidential candidates at their conventions and then inform the State Board of Elections of those persons’ names," said Patrick Gannon, spokesperson for the bipartisan North Carolina State Board of Elections. "The Democratic Party has not yet had its convention, nor has it informed the State Board of its presidential and vice-presidential candidates’ names." www.rawstory.com/kamala-harris-ballot/So along those lines once they announce at convention and tell the state board it’s a done deal. So has the Republican Party done this? Is Vance really locked in then?
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Jul 26, 2024 18:36:00 GMT
So I saw a post on Twitter from the New Yorker that said that Vance was raised by a single mom for a while then raised by grandparents and he was abusive. He said that was a better life than the chaos of living with his single mom. His grandparents remained married- got pregnant when she was 13 and he was 16 and moved to Ohio. So for him this is NORMAL. Violence and abuse should never be considered normal or ok. I had wondered before reading this if he is abusive now I really wonder since so many abusers come from a home where it occurred.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 20:39:34 GMT
Re: whether Harris can be on the upcoming ballots. Speaker Johnson thinks not. 48 of 50 states have responded that they have no rules to support Johnson's claims.. A new survey of election law in all 50 states apparently destroys House Speaker Mike Johnson's claims about Vice President Kamala Harris' eligibility for the ballot. The Louisiana Republican argued that legal "impediments" in some states would prevent Democrats from switching out President Joe Biden as the nominee after he withdrew from the race, but election authorities from both parties in at least 48 states told CNN that no obstacles would prevent Harris from appearing on ballots if she becomes the official presidential nominee. *** "You can even fundraise off of a lawsuit, even if you're not going to ultimately win. To this point we know that Trump allies certainly have discussed the potential legal implications of switching to Harris. At this point it's unclear if there'll be challenges, but it appears pretty clear from our reporting that, on this issue, they would not be successful." Experts told CNN that there would be no issue with Harris appearing on the ballot because Biden was never named as the official nominee and Democrats never submitted his name to the states as their nominee. “Political parties nominate their presidential and vice-presidential candidates at their conventions and then inform the State Board of Elections of those persons’ names," said Patrick Gannon, spokesperson for the bipartisan North Carolina State Board of Elections. "The Democratic Party has not yet had its convention, nor has it informed the State Board of its presidential and vice-presidential candidates’ names." www.rawstory.com/kamala-harris-ballot/So along those lines once they announce at convention and tell the state board it’s a done deal. So has the Republican Party done this? Is Vance really locked in then? His mother was a serious addict. At the RNC the other night he announced she has been clean and sober for, I forget the exact years, thinking either 10 or 14 years. Just not sure. But she wasan addict for a long time or off and on for a long time
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 26, 2024 20:55:29 GMT
“Punish the things we think are bad,” including not having kids.
Keep talking, JD.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 26, 2024 20:58:43 GMT
Vance spent most of his childhood/adolescence in a suburb of Cleveland and apparently someone in the family had enough to pay for his golf lessons.
Appalachian state electeds are saying “He isn’t one of us.”
Drug addiction and abuse happen at all socioeconomic levels, it’s true, but let’s not pretend you grew up barefoot in the holler, JD. That’s just another lie along the lines of Trump pretending he’s self-made.
|
|
|
Post by coaliesquirrel on Jul 26, 2024 21:04:11 GMT
Say what?? Vance is going have women checked with a stick +/- before they can leave their state.. Or to have federal posses to make sure women don't leave the state for nefarious reason. Black women ? Oh right the replacement workers... The account that shared the audio called it a "stunning leak," and slammed the Ohio senator for calling for a "federal response to stop women from traveling from red states to blue states to receive reproductive healthcare." x.com/MumOf2RatBags/status/1816676015957246421x.com/Folkmusings_/status/1816654886655893995What an evil idiot. HTF is that even supposed to work somewhere like, for instance, KC where while both states on the border are technically red, one people like to call an "abortion Mecca" - but people drive back and forth between states all day long in just regular life?
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 21:07:44 GMT
I thank the childless people who helped pay for my public education for 12 years. I thank the childless people who helped pay for my DS's public education for 15 years. The following is from a Charlie Kirk interview of Vance, 2021 ish.. Donald Trump's pick for his vice presidential running mate once argued that Americans without children should pay a higher tax rate than those who have children, according to a report. *** The report goes on to provide a transcript in which Vance is asked by Kirk, "What are you going to do to change this conversation?" "Everything we have to do should be about moving ideas from unthinkable, to sensible, to popular, to policy," the host said. The report says that, in response, "Vance, who at the time had not yet officially launched his 2022 Senate campaign, suggested that the country needed to 'reward the things that we think are good' and 'punish the things that we think are bad'-- before suggesting that individuals without children should be taxed at a higher rate than those with children." "So, you talk about tax policy, let's tax the things that are bad and not tax the things that are good," Vance purportedly said. "If you are making $100,000, $400,000 a year and you've got three kids, you should pay a different, lower tax rate than if you are making the same amount of money and you don't have any kids. It's that simple."www.rawstory.com/vance-higher-tax-rate-childless-americans/
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Jul 26, 2024 21:10:27 GMT
So along those lines once they announce at convention and tell the state board it’s a done deal. So has the Republican Party done this? Is Vance really locked in then? His mother was a serious addict. At the RNC the other night he announced she has been clean and sober for, I forget the exact years, thinking either 10 or 14 years. Just not sure. But she wasan addict for a long time or off and on for a long time Well being an addict is not the norm so a bit different than most single moms. He had a shitty childhood and worse than most but still no reason to encourage a woman to stay in a violent situation.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 21:10:34 GMT
Vance spent most of his childhood/adolescence in a suburb of Cleveland and apparently someone in the family had enough to pay for his golf lessons. Appalachian state electeds are saying “He isn’t one of us.” Drug addiction and abuse happen at all socioeconomic levels, it’s true, but let’s not pretend you grew up barefoot in the holler, JD. That’s just another lie along the lines of Trump pretending he’s self-made. His 'memaw' wasn't so poor with NINETEEN LOADED GUNS all over the house .
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 21:18:20 GMT
His mother was a serious addict. At the RNC the other night he announced she has been clean and sober for, I forget the exact years, thinking either 10 or 14 years. Just not sure. But she wasan addict for a long time or off and on for a long time Well being an addict is not the norm so a bit different than most single moms. He had a shitty childhood and worse than most but still no reason to encourage a woman to stay in a violent situation. His childhood was not as bad as he seems to think it was .
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jul 26, 2024 21:49:32 GMT
I thank the childless people who helped pay for my public education for 12 years. I thank the childless people who helped pay for my DS's public education for 15 years. The following is from a Charlie Kirk interview of Vance, 2021 ish.. Donald Trump's pick for his vice presidential running mate once argued that Americans without children should pay a higher tax rate than those who have children, according to a report. *** The report goes on to provide a transcript in which Vance is asked by Kirk, "What are you going to do to change this conversation?" "Everything we have to do should be about moving ideas from unthinkable, to sensible, to popular, to policy," the host said. The report says that, in response, "Vance, who at the time had not yet officially launched his 2022 Senate campaign, suggested that the country needed to 'reward the things that we think are good' and 'punish the things that we think are bad'-- before suggesting that individuals without children should be taxed at a higher rate than those with children." "So, you talk about tax policy, let's tax the things that are bad and not tax the things that are good," Vance purportedly said. "If you are making $100,000, $400,000 a year and you've got three kids, you should pay a different, lower tax rate than if you are making the same amount of money and you don't have any kids. It's that simple."www.rawstory.com/vance-higher-tax-rate-childless-americans/This is already our tax policy essentially. You don't pay a lower tax rate, but dependent deductions lowers your tax bill and your effective tax rate.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 26, 2024 21:57:28 GMT
Darcy Collins. Yes true but I am sure his punishment will cost us far more,!!
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jul 26, 2024 22:01:40 GMT
Darcy Collins . Yes true but I am sure his punishment will cost us far more,!! I don't have the energy to see what he was actually proposing (making the huge assumption that it was an actual proposal and not just random sound bites). Just wanted to point out that parents already pay less than single people as there's a lot of confusion about the tax code.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 26, 2024 22:36:26 GMT
I thank the childless people who helped pay for my public education for 12 years. I thank the childless people who helped pay for my DS's public education for 15 years. The following is from a Charlie Kirk interview of Vance, 2021 ish.. Donald Trump's pick for his vice presidential running mate once argued that Americans without children should pay a higher tax rate than those who have children, according to a report. *** The report goes on to provide a transcript in which Vance is asked by Kirk, "What are you going to do to change this conversation?" "Everything we have to do should be about moving ideas from unthinkable, to sensible, to popular, to policy," the host said. The report says that, in response, "Vance, who at the time had not yet officially launched his 2022 Senate campaign, suggested that the country needed to 'reward the things that we think are good' and 'punish the things that we think are bad'-- before suggesting that individuals without children should be taxed at a higher rate than those with children." "So, you talk about tax policy, let's tax the things that are bad and not tax the things that are good," Vance purportedly said. "If you are making $100,000, $400,000 a year and you've got three kids, you should pay a different, lower tax rate than if you are making the same amount of money and you don't have any kids. It's that simple."www.rawstory.com/vance-higher-tax-rate-childless-americans/This is already our tax policy essentially. You don't pay a lower tax rate, but dependent deductions lowers your tax bill and your effective tax rate. Yep, true. What I find disturbing is his intention to "punish" the childless with higher taxes - presumably with an even higher rate. Government policy should not be designed or said to "punish" anyone except criminals.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 26, 2024 23:19:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 26, 2024 23:22:34 GMT
That’s about right…
Ron Filipkowski…
”Vance is such a dysfunctional political candidate and f*cked up human that he can’t figure his own way out of this mess and the Trump campaign can only offer up advisors to help who are used to babysitting a malignant narcissist and staging fake events.”
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 27, 2024 1:48:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2024 2:22:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Jul 27, 2024 2:25:05 GMT
I was just coming to say this. This isn’t the first time he had said this.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 27, 2024 2:38:42 GMT
|
|