Cant’t Sue Disney Ever if You Sign Up For Disney+

I think it is so full of shit!

Adding that to why I will never step foot in a Disney park again nor get Disney+.

I think there is a huge difference between watching Disney streaming shows and going to a restaurant in the amusement park that the Disney plus agreement should not be binding for park attendees. If it is ultimately a jury trial and I was on that jury, I would keep that petty attempt in mind.

FYI, the restaurant in question isn't in an theme park.  It's in Disney's shopping district and a third party (2 people from Dublin, Ireland) who leases space, and operates the restaurant

That's part of why this reaction by Disney is so over the top. They have a built in excuse that it's not *their* restaurant.

Putting that in the Disney+ agreement, to any average user, is going to mean something along the lines of "Oh, my streaming service wasn't working for 3 months, and I want a refund, and Disney won't give me one, but I can't sue them for it, because of the terms of agreement."

It's utter rot to try to make it seem like it means anything beyond that.

I don't see how that will fly. Subscribing to Disney+ is totally unrelated to park activity. They can try, I guess, but I can't see a judge dismissing that case on that basis.

i learned this yesterday!! sneaky disney.  i suspect that's in many other streaming service agreements too.  so i guess i won't be able to sue amazon. LOL

What am I missing? Why Disney is being sued...just because they have deep pockets?  They don't own the restaurant so why go after Disney?  The issue is with the restaurant, the server and it's management.  It seems like Disney's ridiculous response is because them being sued is equally ridiculous. 

I don't understand that either.

This is what I found when googling. "Upon information and belief Disney had control over the menu of food offered, the hiring and training of the wait staff, and the policies and procedures as it pertains to food allergies at Disney Springs restaurants such as Raglan Road"

I wonder if any of that is true. It only says "belief" that Disney had control.

I can only speak on Tokyo Disneyland. You can get a printed day ticket to scan to enter, then if you want to do anything else without a phone you do have an option of going to the customer service desk at the front of the park and asking them to book things for you. How you would get dining bookings, anniversary passes, priority booking, standby passes and request lottery entries into any of the shows I would not have a clue… and good luck navigating the park without knowing how long the ride lines are as they can be 2 hours plus for multiple rides every day of the week.
And language barrier may also be a factor.
Basically they have made it possible BUT I would almost buy a burner phone in Japan rather than go to Tokyo Disney without one! We just get a Japanese wifi thing at the airport so our phones work instead 😁

I think I read that Disney got looped in because there was a blurb in a Disney Springs brochure that stated the restaurant was allergen free. But wouldn’t that info have to come from the restaurant itself? I’d think those brochures would have some printed disclaimer RE: reliability of information coming from outside companies that they don’t have control over. I don’t know how Disney could be held responsible anyway since they don’t own or operate the restaurant.