|
Post by epeanymous on Oct 1, 2024 17:12:12 GMT
This is unsurprising. The standardized tests we now use for "accountability" test reading through short passages; thus, many schools teach reading only or mostly through short passages. Couple that with rabid book-banning that has schools afraid to teach books that engage and challenge today's young people, and this is what we get. As some of you know, my large urban district was taken over by the state of Texas because of low test scores at one school out of 273. The state-imposed superintendent has now forced a curriculum on *all* schools that teaches reading only through - you guessed it - short passages. Libraries have been dismantled and librarians have been fired. Novel studies are no longer allowed at the middle or high school levels with the exception of AP classes. (One wonders how AP teachers will manage their curriculum in a few years when none of their students have ever read a novel for class before, until one realizes that part of the goal is to do away with AP classes and drive motivated families and students out of public schools.) So yeah, this is all part of the plan. Books are evil, knowledge is evil, challenging ideas are evil, college is evil. That's where all this is going. Unless we do something now. The first step needs to be to eliminate high-stakes standardized tests. This is not and should not be political, so I hope no one will mark it as such. This is a real and severe problem in American education today that needs to be addressed by everyone who cares about public schools. My two kids who have graduated high school took pretty much all honors and AP classes at the "best" of the public schools in my city in a school that definitely valued learning in a city that thinks of itself as smart and educated, and I was still surprised at how few entire books they were required to read. They definitely had a lot of work, but it was different than what I was required to do at my not-particularly-great high school in the 1980s. I do think it's because of the increased focus on standardized testing, including AP tests, that don't necessarily place a lot of weight on doing things like reading entire books. I will say, however, that I've been a professor teaching post-college students for 20 years now and that the "students haven't been required to read whole books or write long papers" is something that has been consistent throughout. In my first year of teaching, I ran a seminar with 20-page required papers, and one of my students -- who is now a judge! -- told me that the longest paper she'd written in undergrad (at the flagship state university in a big state) was five pages. ETA: I want to add, I don't dumb things down, at all. I demand a lot of my students, both in amount of work and in level of understanding. And you know what? They want that. They thrive on high expectations. I'm not convinced any of this is about the students themselves.
|
|
Ryann
Pearl Clutcher
Love is Inclusive
Posts: 2,643
Location: PNW
May 31, 2021 3:14:17 GMT
|
Post by Ryann on Oct 1, 2024 17:26:18 GMT
Ds23 does read books. Both dh and I always each had a book that we were reading to ds until he started high school. We did continue to read to him in high school, but he had a lot more of his own reading to do in classes. Many of our friends have asked us how we are able to get our kid to listen to stories. We knew our household was different than most, and I think those differences made all the difference! We did not have broadcast tv. Therefore ds didn't watch a lot. We nearly always watched as a family, and we watched old timey tv shows that still had lessons to them, like Wild Wild West, Jim Bowie, and Bonanza. We also rented movies and did themed movie nights or would watch all movies a certain actor did. Ds did not have any gaming system, or hand held game devices. He got a phone at 12 and he and his best friend both asked if they could play Minecraft. We agreed with limits on time. Ds still only plays Minecraft, and not very often. He is not keen on social media either. Basically we did things that caused our kid to grow up much more like we had, than what his friends were experiencing. Ds is now 23 living on his own, and thanks us regularly for not letting him have "weapons of distraction" (his words). He appreciates that he is not a victim of short attention span theater, and credits that for launching into the adult world, while most of his friend group are still in the throes of failure to launch. My son reads books regularly, but still wishes we would come read to him!This is very sweet.
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on Oct 1, 2024 17:31:18 GMT
I remember my freshman year in college.. 1974/75.. eons ago and I took a senior level political science class. now I am a big reader.. but I did get slammed by being required to read 2-400 pages of a political science book every week. and write short papers on them. every week. some were easy reads.. "one flew over the cuckoo's" nest.. or 200 pages in "The Education of Henry Adams".. but many like hannah arendt were a big challenge.
I was glad for the challenge but boy.. I don't think anyone would teach like that again.. I did go back and read the whole "education of henry adams" about 10 yrs ago.. well worth my time. circa 1905.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 1, 2024 17:37:15 GMT
Exposure to other things is what broadens minds and drives the interest in learning more.
|
|
|
Post by melanell on Oct 1, 2024 17:48:40 GMT
As far as reading for pleasure, DH & I both do, and we have read---I couldn't even begin to guess how many books to our kids from birth until they stopped wanting us to read to them. (With my youngest that was about 12.5, and my eldest maybe 11 or 12.)
My eldest went through a phase when they had no interest in reading outside of assigned books, and now my youngest just told me that they don't have any books on their wish list for the holidays this year, which will be the first time that has ever happened. I imagine they will return to reading eventually. That's what happened with my oldest.
Even myself, who loves to read, took a bit of a break this year because I was working on other things in my free time. So I'm not concerned about my youngest wanting a reading break of their own outside of their assigned books.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Oct 1, 2024 18:03:30 GMT
I want to add, I don't dumb things down, at all. I demand a lot of my students, both in amount of work and in level of understanding. And you know what? They want that. They thrive on high expectations. I'm not convinced any of this is about the students themselves. I love this comment. I want to believe that most of these kids are innocent in this and not the driving force behind it. I remember my freshman year in college.. 1974/75.. eons ago and I took a senior level political science class. now I am a big reader.. but I did get slammed by being required to read 2-400 pages of a political science book every week. and write short papers on them. Same girl. 93-98. But same experience. I have degrees in poly sci and philosophy. I read *a lot*.
|
|
|
Post by Sorrel on Oct 1, 2024 18:05:25 GMT
I’m a public school speech therapist. For my students with delays in comprehension and vocabulary I use literature in my therapy, where I read to them and we work on answering questions, story retells and vocabulary. In the last few years, I have seen a steady decline in the ability to even sit and listen. Now just getting through a short 10 minute picture book is extremely difficult. And that’s with a group of 2 or 3 students. Even with engaging picture books, I get instant complaints of boredom. It doesn’t bode well. The decline in oral language and reading skills are highly correlated.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 1, 2024 18:22:10 GMT
Sorry I seem to be dropping littles blurbs sporadically here..
Just remembered. My mother and I lived with my grandparents. We read at the table after dinner every night, sometimes my books but more often theirs. Surely they suffered some while I plowed my way through theirs. They were so very patient with my reading. Of course, there was no internet, no TV yet, so we talked more too!
|
|
The Great Carpezio
Pearl Clutcher
Something profound goes here.
Posts: 3,019
Jun 25, 2014 21:50:33 GMT
|
Post by The Great Carpezio on Oct 1, 2024 18:36:11 GMT
Quick input: I do want us to be careful about the doom and gloom. On one hand there are concerns about "today's kids" and what is lost, but on the other hand, we need to realize that students of today do have different needs, as does society. I also think we do tend to over-romanticize our past, and we need to be careful with that.
I know many many adults who did not read for pleasure and do not read for pleasure now (Millenials, Xrs, boomers, and silent gen). I know some who used to read that don't now and those who did not read but read now. I read as a kid but I was not a voracious reader. I read about a book a month as a kid/tween/teen. I have read 52 books this year so far. I remember only reading maybe three novels as coursework in high school.
My 16-year-old boys don't read for pleasure. They read for school and "choice novels" in school and they like that, but they choose technology over reading at home; that said, they both know a ton more than I did at 16. They are a wealth of knowledge...not all of my students have that---I do think the environment makes more of a difference than being on technology--(Which in our case is book and vocab rich and full of real-world experiences in our home i.e. we made sure our kids traveled and went to culture-rich activities). Not all tech is the same either--My one son watches a ton of YouTube. We have had to weed through some misinformation over the years, but he has become pretty savvy with that now too. He really knows a lot about so much. It is crazy sometimes what he knows.
I really feel like I straddle this one. Every day I experience GenZ, and this year, I have the cusp of GenAlpha, who I have been lovingly calling my Honey Badgers...I ping-pong between being charmed and amazed to frustrated and utterly despondent.
|
|
|
Post by ScrapbookMyLife on Oct 1, 2024 18:47:21 GMT
I am an avid reader. I read daily, sometimes for hours.
I think for some, but not all.....instant gratification, over-scheduled, social media, and entitlement, all play a part.
Instant gratification. They want it done and over, now. They don't want to take the time necessary to read a whole book or listen a whole audio book. So they take short cuts > read the synopsis, the footnotes, etc...
Over scheduled. So many young people ore over-scheduled with various activities. Time is limited for everything that they need or want to get done. They don't want to take the time to be "forced" to read required reading, so they take every short cut possible and only do the bare minimum reading or audio listening.
Social media. Social media (facebook, tik tok, instagram, etc...) can be a distraction. For many (children, teenagers, adults) it takes priority above everything else. Some, but not all...people can't eat a meal, have a conversation, read, checkout at a store, without being on their phone or another device. Some, but not all Parents let children rule the home and Family lives. There are no boundaries (such as all homework and Schoolwork needs to be complete before any "fun" device activity takes place). The only device exception is >> if a device is need to complete School work. Most Parents don't have the time to "device babysit", meaning monitor the type of usage while Schoolwork is being done. While a children or teenager is supposed to be "doing homework". more than likely they scrolling social media.
How can one concentrate and absorb what they've read or listened to on audio, if they are simultaneously on social media? How can one fully engage in a conversation, if they are simultaneously on social media? How can one quickly complete a store transaction, if they are simultaneously on talking on their phone or scrolling social media?
Entitlement. Entitlement has taken over. Entitled students get their helicopter parent to come to (or email) the School, to excuse them from what is required (my special snowflake doesn't want to read THAT BOOK or do THAT assignment.....so they shouldn't have to be because it's NOT fair to make them.....or they don't have time to read, because they need or want to participate in their over-scheduled activities so they don't have time to do the reading....so they should be excused, because it's not fair to make them do something they don't want to do.
Disclaimer: This is just my personal opinion and thoughts Disclaimer: This is a SOME, BUT NOT ALL....not everyone has this type of behavior or attitude.
|
|
|
Post by fiddlesticks on Oct 1, 2024 19:11:39 GMT
We homeschool our 15 DD because of some severe learning disabilities but she DEVOURS audiobooks. When she talks with her friends at dance none of them have novels they are reading for school but many of them read for pleasure but those that don't I think could easily get through high school without reading a book in its entirety.
When I was in the classroom 17 years ago, I remember sitting through a professional development and being told that we were "not allowed" to do read alouds any longer because it wasn't a good use of instructional time nor were we allowed to dedicate time to independent reading. Never mind, each kid had a book I know they could read independently because I knew my students and their reading level. I remember thinking, I won't last much longer in this profession. I had one more year in a classroom, then 5 more years as an instructional coach and then left teaching.
|
|
|
Post by jill8909 on Oct 1, 2024 19:15:19 GMT
a young (29) friend of mine quit teaching high school this year. Her reasons (wealthy suburb of Dallas):
- kids, even in AP classes, will not put down their phones in class. - they will NOT use a pencil or pen for any reason.
The principal backs them up and the parents are the worst defenders.
|
|
|
Post by 950nancy on Oct 1, 2024 19:21:05 GMT
Perhaps it is true in some schools, but I do not think in general it is true. I've been in education since the 80's and stuff like this comes out and people think it is everywhere. Do I wish we would up our expectations for our kids? Yes. Do I think people love to put down the next generation(s) and make sweeping statements? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by jeremysgirl on Oct 1, 2024 19:57:58 GMT
Perhaps it is true in some schools, but I do not think in general it is true. I've been in education since the 80's and stuff like this comes out and people think it is everywhere. Do I wish we would up our expectations for our kids? Yes. Do I think people love to put down the next generation(s) and make sweeping statements? Yes. I don't want to put down the next generation. This is an all of us problem. But that requires an all of us solution. There is good and bad in every generation. What bothers me is that take technology. We know what the benefits are. I surely don't want to do my finance job without excel. I like having access to news beyond a small town paper. But then we also clearly know that there were some things that were better 30 years ago, 50 years ago. It's because of technology that lies proliferate and spread to the point where people don't even have common sense enough to discern fact from fiction. I'm just saying that reading stuff like this, it infuriates me. And I want to know what I can do about it. Kids are kids. They take their lead from adults. I just want to do better for them. And if that means turning the clock back on some things, I'm ok with that.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Oct 1, 2024 20:23:09 GMT
Just another data point. My kids graduated from public high school 3 and 4 years ago. Both read a ton of complete novels in high school. One was in the International Baccalaureate program, the other Advanced Placement - for reference. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see both focus on standardized testing and social media etc impacting trends in general. But our relatively recent experience doesn't fit the extremes in the article.
I will say that my daughter in particular will tell you very, very few kids have read a lot of classic books and exposure to children's books is low. She was a super early, voracious reader and we didn't allow a lot of tv/computer time in elementary school. So she read everything - and quite a bit of classics as the reading level and maturity level was a better fit for her. She'll make references to her peers and so many haven't a clue - Secret Garden, Little Women, Black Beauty - if it wasn't a movie, most have never read any of them. We were also a read aloud family for a long time, so they had exposure to all the classic children's stories. I think a lot of parents stop reading to their kids pretty early - at least from what we've seen.
|
|
|
Post by agengr2004 on Oct 1, 2024 20:25:46 GMT
THIS! Does anyone else remember how popular Cliff's Notes used to be? Yeah, we didn't read those books either.
|
|
|
Post by ntsf on Oct 1, 2024 20:33:48 GMT
when I was a nanny before pandemic, one of my fav things was to read books out loud (books and poetry) to the kids.. they were in elementary school or younger but they all loved it.
it is a time investment.. but I have fond memories of my 2nd grade teacher reading "Mrs. Piggle Wiggle" books out loud to us during rainy seattle lunch times...
|
|
|
Post by tc on Oct 1, 2024 21:51:08 GMT
I haven't read all the replies but something occurred to me...I will own up to. Now, my son is neuro divergent. So take my observation with a grain of salt. I read all the time. Probably average an hour a day. But I read books on my tablet...rarely do I read a hard copy book. So am I *really* modeling desired behavior? All my son sees is me looking at a screen.
|
|
RosieKat
Drama Llama
PeaJect #12
Posts: 5,563
Jun 25, 2014 19:28:04 GMT
|
Post by RosieKat on Oct 1, 2024 22:47:07 GMT
“There’s no testing skill that can be related to … Can you sit down and read Tolstoy? ” he said. And if a skill is not easily measured, instructors and district leaders have little incentive to teach it. I honestly think this is a huge source of the problem. It's all about the test, test, test. Our experiences are limited, but pretty much in line with this article. DD is a senior at a large public HS. She is on-level, and has had to read a handful of complete books. However, the vast majority of reading they do seems to be long excerpts (i.e. a few chapters) or short stories. DD has dyslexia, so she does not read much for pleasure as it is actual work for her. She does sometimes, though, and does listen to some audiobooks. DS is a sophomore at a smaller charter HS. He completed 2 years of English last year while at an online school, and although reading was encouraged, no one actually verified it was done. Their in-class reading was all short passages, with the occasional short story or poem. This year he is in AP English and going in-person. They did have a book to read over the summer, but I'm actually not aware of reading they have been doing since then. I know they've been doing a lot of work, but I think most of it is more writing and mechanics and looking at word usage. He used to be a big reader, but that has declined sharply. However, he did ask for a copy of The Odyssey for his recent birthday and actually read it! I'm a voracious reader, so people not reading is so weird to me. DH has never been much of one (he's definitely 100% STEM brain). I don't think it's much of a coincidence that I'm the least ADHD-ish person in the family. (I suspect it's both cause and effect, to be fair, and then they feed each other.)
|
|
Sarah*H
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,030
Jun 25, 2014 20:07:06 GMT
|
Post by Sarah*H on Oct 2, 2024 0:11:40 GMT
I'm going to guess that the demographics of Two Peas and the people responding to this thread doesn't correlate well with the general population.
My kids are readers. My husband and I have a library room in our home and both of our kids have multiple bookshelves in their childhood bedrooms. My daughter spent several years as a moderator of a very large international book/reading message board. But do I think that No Child Left Behind was horrible for non-STEM related learning? Absolutely. I don't think the damage is limited to the ability to read a full book though. What about civics education? History? The arts? We will pay for this for generations.
|
|
|
Post by Texas Scrap on Oct 2, 2024 1:22:39 GMT
This is a really good conversation about an important topic. I have 2 college students - Freshman and Senior. I 100% see these issues going on from my experience being on a school board as well as seeing college kids around my kids struggling big time. But let me also share a really positive reading experience from my kids school. And this school is far from perfect, but this aspect I am really thankful for and proud of. And, I will also add, I read to my kids out loud through middle school. (Think Harry Potter, Wrinkle in Time, etc), we did summer reading program at library, etc, so lots of reading happened at home.
Both mine went to a private Christian school with strong reading programs from PK4 up. Librarian ran a “Quest for the Crown” program that you had to compete to join for Grades 3-5. I want to say they had to read between 20-30 books total for the competition. I LOVED this because everyone was encourages to read and try out and the entire school attended the 4 team competition. Lots of genres included, team work and learning to read for comprehension. Middle school had a book club and teachers required a solid amount of reading - I want to say 2-3 books each 9 weeks (4 nine weeks total) + summer reading that they could select from a list.
I will add, I see a real support for audio books in our school for kids who want or need to listen. I think this is fantastic. Even our AP teacher was supportive, especially for kids with learning challenges. Our school also includes graphic novels in both the Elementary and Middle schools. Again, let’s get kids reading how ever we can.
High School both were in honors/AP. I think the teacher matters tremendously here AND Admin giving teachers room to introduce and allow lots of different kinds of books. My kids were so fortunate to have an incredible AP teacher who was hard as nails, but in the best way. She wanted them to really explore the plot, stories, themes, meaning, etc. They had required reading each 9 weeks as well as an individual book of choice and a group book project that the group got to choose. All of these were complete novels - I don’t remember totals, but I am thinking 2 books a 9 weeks + selections, poems, etc. Also papers due every 9 weeks. AND, for AP test, they did do selected readings, AP test prep, etc. She managed to accomplish both. My kids got 4s and 5s of Lit and Lang AP tests.
They will both say they learned more from that teacher than any other in HS. And my kids are engineering and business majors, so these are not “Liberal Arts” kids so much as kids who loved a teacher who pushed them, taught them how to read in a way that invited critically thinking and reflection vs remembering what happened in chapter 2. She was so passionate about the power of a story.
The other side of this I really saw and felt as a school board member was parents. Parents who wanted their kids to get As, to not have to navigate uncomfortable characters or plot lines. Grade inflation is an issue because of parents 100%. I get it, you want your kid to do well, go to college, etc. I lived it - it is brutal to watch your kid fail, but if they are not held to a standard and expectation, and learn that they are capable of meeting those standards and expectations, they will die on the vine in college.
My kids are at a big state school where there it is still old school, weed out classes, lots of kids who were top 10% in high school show up and don’t know how to study, how to read, how to dig in and work hard and they fail out. The parents cry out and complain. These are the same parents who were rescuing them in high school from anything bad, hard, etc.
When I went to college, we were all told to look left and right and one of us would not be here in 4 years. I think this is still true (my kids go to my college), it’s just parents are unwilling to let their kids struggle and fail and refuse to see this is on the kid, not the school. I struggled a ton in college because I was not well prepared, but eventually I figured it out.
I do think the data shows that Gen Z is bringing crippling anxiety and fragility to college that is different than generations past. We can speculate on all of the causes. I think one is the unintended pressure the helicopter parents put on their kids prior to college to “succeed”. Yes, social media is a factor, but I think even bigger is that if parents rescued them before, if teachers hands were tied and they had to keep giving more chances, etc, at some point, these kids learn they are not capable for doing the hard thing, being independent, etc.
I have so much respect for anyone trying to teach right now. There is pressure from every direction, everyone has an opinion and we have lost sight of the value of struggling, imperfection and the fact that most real growth comes from struggle.
Sorry - I got in a soap box! I just really see the value my kids got from their school experience and it feels so relevant to the article.
|
|
|
Post by mammajamma on Oct 2, 2024 9:50:38 GMT
Thank you for posting the article. I saw it as a teaser on FB and I wasn’t able to read it.
I have been asking my niece (now a Junior) for years what she is reading in her literature class for books and she told me only passages and short stories. I have been mind boggled. She attends public school in DFW that is thought to be good. At least it’s an affluent neighborhood. My nieces don’t read any books over the summer either.
In my family, we read to our kids nightly for years and it’s expected 20-30 min a night of reading. Year around. My daughter (8th grade) has been homeschooled since 4th. Since 6th grade, she has taken some classes at a co-op for homeschoolers. Entire books are assigned. Last year in 7th grade, she read 10 full novels for that classes. Several of them were not long. I also have paid for her to have a private tutor from Outschool for 3 years who is a former librarian. They have book discussions year around. This is because I’m not always reading the book she is at the time.
I sometimes worry that my daughter isn’t reading the classic, older literature yet. She prefers the books written in the last 20 years. Currently she has been assigned/reading “Wolf Hollow.” She actually read that with tutor 2 years ago already. Except several years ago, she read several “Anne of Green Gables” books and “Little House on the Prairie”. But those books that I read in high school, she hasn’t gotten to those yet. I can’t say I enjoyed many of those high school assigned books (“Les Miserables,” “Watership Down,” “Tale of Two Cities,” and more). Math was my preference over literature.
I would love to understand how important it is to muddle through some of those older books we read in high school. Or - is it ok to read the more contemporary books of today?
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Oct 2, 2024 12:58:03 GMT
I can read. I can finish multiple books in 3 months, heck I can finish multiple books in 1 month.
But are they teaching the same tired books from 1988?
I was assigned the grapes of wrath 3 separate times ( long story not for this thread ) I haven’t read it cover to cover ever. It’s such a drag. There’s a couple of other books that are also ‘unfinishable’ imo
And while I have read it all the way thru and actually liked it, I have also been assigned that darn groundhog poem 3 times. It’s too much, how many times do they think I want to read about a dead groundhog.
While I know certain classics span the times, It has been more than 35 years I hope they are finding more/other impactful books to read.
I’m pretty sure I have ADD and while I do love reading, and have read books I can’t put down, I can get bored with certain styles ( Steinbeck or Dickens ) I can read a book straight thru staying up all night, or I can struggle to read each chapter. And I grew up pre home computers. So my brain isn’t conditioned to have info instantly. I can imagine growing up with computers and all the access to information that there is now and I’d have tried even less to read Grapes of wrath it’s just one of the crappiest books I’ve ever read.
Anyway, what I’m babbling on trying to say, I think that newer generations have different needs due to growing up their formative years with instant access to information. Their brains are wired differently, they aren’t going to read stuff that doesn’t engage with them. I didn’t, they definitely won’t.
My kids both can read but one likes it more than the other. Even then they’ll read cover to cover stacks of things that interest them and set aside what doesn’t. And I couldn’t argue with them. And they both passed AP English. Only one had to deal with the grapes of wrath.
Today’s youth aren’t any more or less intelligent than past generations, but they have had access to things we never did, they have also been front seat to all the worlds unprecedented events in a way that we never were. Getting info from the evening news or the news papers it was easier to be insulated from world events. Not like we didn’t know but that it was delayed and somewhat filtered by the time we had access. They know life is short and are less apt to ‘waste’ time on what doesn’t engage them or serve a current purpose for them. In a way they are less ‘leisurely’ than my generation. They have to be aware of things all the time, they are constantly assessing if each email, text, website is safe or has malware. It creates a constantly ‘on’ anticipation in a more primitive way than I ever was. I could sit & read a book thru without worrying if it would disappear because my library loan was over. I could read a magazine without worrying if it would brick my TV or shut down my communication. Even in their ‘leisure’ they have to be aware and alert in a way that their brains aren’t going to engage with things that don’t interest them or serve a purpose for them.
It’s not necessarily bad, but it is different.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Oct 2, 2024 13:18:55 GMT
Thank you for posting the article. I saw it as a teaser on FB and I wasn’t able to read it. I have been asking my niece (now a Junior) for years what she is reading in her literature class for books and she told me only passages and short stories. I have been mind boggled. She attends public school in DFW that is thought to be good. At least it’s an affluent neighborhood. My nieces don’t read any books over the summer either. In my family, we read to our kids nightly for years and it’s expected 20-30 min a night of reading. Year around. My daughter (8th grade) has been homeschooled since 4th. Since 6th grade, she has taken some classes at a co-op for homeschoolers. Entire books are assigned. Last year in 7th grade, she read 10 full novels for that classes. Several of them were not long. I also have paid for her to have a private tutor from Outschool for 3 years who is a former librarian. They have book discussions year around. This is because I’m not always reading the book she is at the time. I sometimes worry that my daughter isn’t reading the classic, older literature yet. She prefers the books written in the last 20 years. Currently she has been assigned/reading “Wolf Hollow.” She actually read that with tutor 2 years ago already. Except several years ago, she read several “Anne of Green Gables” books and “Little House on the Prairie”. But those books that I read in high school, she hasn’t gotten to those yet. I can’t say I enjoyed many of those high school assigned books (“Les Miserables,” “Watership Down,” “Tale of Two Cities,” and more). Math was my preference over literature. I would love to understand how important it is to muddle through some of those older books we read in high school. Or - is it ok to read the more contemporary books of today? It's totally OK to read more contemporary books. There's nothing inherently better about a well-written novel from 1830 than there is about a well-written novel from 2015, and students are often better able to connect with the more recent novels. Long form reading, however, IS important. Students need to understand how character development, structure, and theme work through the course of a longer work, in addition to other things I don't know about, I'm sure, because I'm not an English teacher. Our schools have long devalued the study of art in this way, though - completely missing that the ability to analyze a longer work and communicate about it translates to many important life and job skills. My daughter, for example, works as an HR data analyst at a large company. She consistently is tasked with reading long documents and comparing them with spreadsheet data, and then communicating clearly about trends and themes over time to a high-level audience. Her strong background in analyzing literature and historical documents and writing about them have contributed to making her a great fit for this job. I'll also say that even though we as a society tend to devalue the arts as a profession, the fact is that almost no one goes a single day without enjoying the work of an artist, whether through music, TV, film, visual art, or literature. It is prevalent everywhere we go. If we want to continue to be able to enjoy art, that starts with exposing young people not only to the art itself but how it is created, and analysis of what constitutes high-quality art. For literature, that has to include novel studies. Going back to your question about whether kids need to read older novels, I would say that it's important for them to have exposure to some of the works that have left their mark on our society and on future works of art. They should have some background in Shakespeare, and not just in a short passage, but in the history of that time and how his work has influenced the way we talk, think, and enjoy art in the modern day. Probably also Charles Dickens for those reasons. They should also have been exposed to Mozart and Beethoven, and DaVinci and Renoir as well - though that's often left to elementary music and art teachers (if they have them) and never touched on again. I will repeat what I said above - we need to be looking at what the best private schools do for their students and make that the goal. The advent of high-stakes standardized testing "accountability" has had the opposite effect of what was intended. It's caused public schools to dumb down the curriculum to nothing more than test prep, rather than allowing trained professional teachers to curate standards-based curricula that actually inspires learning. IMO when the government decided to go after the schools for "low performance," they went barking up the wrong tree. The problem was never the schools. The problem was and is poverty. Low academic performance is correlated more strongly with the family's SES status than any other single marker. Not because poor kids can't learn, but because Maslow's hierarchy is still applicable today. Kids who lack adequate food, shelter, and personal safety aren't in a place where they can think about their learning the way they need to. Anyway. Sorry you got this morning's novel on this topic.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Oct 2, 2024 14:19:07 GMT
I am but one high school English teacher in one high school in Minnesota, so do with that what you will. There is a lot of truth to that article, and Merge did a great job of explaining why; however, I do not think it is the norm for students to not read ANY novels. FYI: 9-11th grade lit and comp is 2 trimesters Our students get:--one in 9th: Of Mice and Men --two in 10th: Copper Sun (YA novel) and a small group choice novel (have to select from a small list) --two in 11th (True Diary of a Part-Time Indian and To Kill a Mockingbird) --"it depends" in 12th (0-10 depending on the course). I don't teach a full novel in Mythology as it doesn't really fit but we do read most of Neil Gaiman's Norse Mythology and most kids read the whole thing but they do have a choice. In Mass Comm, I teach "Ready Player One", Appreciation of Lit teaches a couple (Night and something else that is survival lit), Humanities teaches Kite Runner and I think something else. AP probably reads around 10 novels but that is 2-3 trimesters and the other senior lit classes are only one tri---they have a tri of Comp 12 as well. --we also read two full-length plays (Romeo and Juliet in 9th and The Crucible in 11th). Now, do all kids read them? No, but they are taught. I have more to say, but I only have a couple more minutes, so I will try to come back when I have time. I’m also in MN and that hasn’t been my kid’s experience at all. Granted, she has been in all advanced classes since 7th grade (they didn’t have the kids split out in 6th which was their first year post Covid) so I’m not sure what they do in general ed English, but she has had multiple full novels assigned in every grade since then. This year alone (9th) I know they are reading something like 4-5 of them in her English class including The Perks of Being a Wallflower, The Odyssey, Romeo and Juliet, To Kill a Mockingbird and possibly others. This is in addition to having choice books that they are to read for a minimum of 30 minutes a day outside of class time which has never been an issue for her. It just blows my mind that there are kids going into college today who have never read a full novel. I guess it shouldn’t though because there were kids in my high school class that were being offered full athletic scholarships who were barely going to graduate.
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,441
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Oct 2, 2024 14:48:37 GMT
I used to be a voracious reader. I am trying to get back into it. During the summer I read more. Once school starts, it depends. I joined a book club to force myself to read at least one book a month.
I have to put my phone away when I read otherwise I read a chapter and then get on my phone. The distraction is terrible. Before phones, I could sit and read for hours. When Stephen King's November 22nd, 1963 came out, I remember being so engrossed that I read for several hours on a Sunday to finish it. I don't know if I can do that now.
My kids used to all read. They did have to read novels in high school. Please throw "Huck Finn" out. I think "To Kill a Mockingbird" should be kept. I am all on board for more modern books. When I taught American Lit in the early 90s, we read "Jurassic Park". I had to teach "Grapes of Wrath" to juniors. That was a form of torture. However, now they hardly read. I got my oldest daughter a Kindle, at her request, for a gift because she wants to read again. She has been reading a lot more. I have no idea the last time my oldest child has read a book. My son, who graduates from college in December, has been trying to get back into reading. They all know they should. My husband was never a reader, but I did get him started on some books. He found an author he likes, but he has to have no distractions when he reads.
As a teacher, I can't stress the importance of reading. It helps in every aspect of education. I am finding kids can't read and follow directions. They do not take the time to comprehend what they are reading. It is sad and frustrating.
|
|
garcia5050
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,773
Location: So. Calif.
Jun 25, 2014 23:22:29 GMT
|
Post by garcia5050 on Oct 2, 2024 14:56:12 GMT
My kids are 19 and 21, and went to a decent public school in Los Angeles county. Neither took AP or honors classes. Each had to read 3 whole books per school year. They got to pick from a list. Three isn’t a whole lot, and it’s very different from what I experienced way back in the 80’s. My daughter enjoys reading, and always has a book in her hand. Not the boy.
|
|
|
Post by JustCallMeMommy on Oct 2, 2024 15:10:43 GMT
My daughter read one or two books a year as assigned reading. However, she is a voracious reader and always has one or more books going and has since the day she took the book we were reading a chapter of every night away from me so she could finish it faster. She also figured out pretty young that I would probably wait for a holiday to buy her the newest toy she wanted, but I would almost always get her a book when she asked.
She had a phone at an early age because I wanted to be able to reach her without going through her dad, but phone time has rarely overshadowed book time. Maybe her habits are partially because she had a phone before she was allowed on social media.
She did not have the level of required reading that I did in high school though. I had a teacher who required a bi-weekly one-page book review for every class he taught, and I had him every year of high school. That amount of reading is one of my favorite high school memories.
In the end, she was very prepared for college and has absolutely thrived in that environment. She would love a class like the one described, but she has been focused on science and music, and she tested out of college lit.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Oct 2, 2024 16:01:21 GMT
Thank you for posting the article. I saw it as a teaser on FB and I wasn’t able to read it. I have been asking my niece (now a Junior) for years what she is reading in her literature class for books and she told me only passages and short stories. I have been mind boggled. She attends public school in DFW that is thought to be good. At least it’s an affluent neighborhood. My nieces don’t read any books over the summer either. In my family, we read to our kids nightly for years and it’s expected 20-30 min a night of reading. Year around. My daughter (8th grade) has been homeschooled since 4th. Since 6th grade, she has taken some classes at a co-op for homeschoolers. Entire books are assigned. Last year in 7th grade, she read 10 full novels for that classes. Several of them were not long. I also have paid for her to have a private tutor from Outschool for 3 years who is a former librarian. They have book discussions year around. This is because I’m not always reading the book she is at the time. I sometimes worry that my daughter isn’t reading the classic, older literature yet. She prefers the books written in the last 20 years. Currently she has been assigned/reading “Wolf Hollow.” She actually read that with tutor 2 years ago already. Except several years ago, she read several “Anne of Green Gables” books and “Little House on the Prairie”. But those books that I read in high school, she hasn’t gotten to those yet. I can’t say I enjoyed many of those high school assigned books (“Les Miserables,” “Watership Down,” “Tale of Two Cities,” and more). Math was my preference over literature. I would love to understand how important it is to muddle through some of those older books we read in high school. Or - is it ok to read the more contemporary books of today? It's totally OK to read more contemporary books. There's nothing inherently better about a well-written novel from 1830 than there is about a well-written novel from 2015, and students are often better able to connect with the more recent novels. Long form reading, however, IS important. Students need to understand how character development, structure, and theme work through the course of a longer work, in addition to other things I don't know about, I'm sure, because I'm not an English teacher. Our schools have long devalued the study of art in this way, though - completely missing that the ability to analyze a longer work and communicate about it translates to many important life and job skills. My daughter, for example, works as an HR data analyst at a large company. She consistently is tasked with reading long documents and comparing them with spreadsheet data, and then communicating clearly about trends and themes over time to a high-level audience. Her strong background in analyzing literature and historical documents and writing about them have contributed to making her a great fit for this job. I'll also say that even though we as a society tend to devalue the arts as a profession, the fact is that almost no one goes a single day without enjoying the work of an artist, whether through music, TV, film, visual art, or literature. It is prevalent everywhere we go. If we want to continue to be able to enjoy art, that starts with exposing young people not only to the art itself but how it is created, and analysis of what constitutes high-quality art. For literature, that has to include novel studies. Going back to your question about whether kids need to read older novels, I would say that it's important for them to have exposure to some of the works that have left their mark on our society and on future works of art. They should have some background in Shakespeare, and not just in a short passage, but in the history of that time and how his work has influenced the way we talk, think, and enjoy art in the modern day. Probably also Charles Dickens for those reasons. They should also have been exposed to Mozart and Beethoven, and DaVinci and Renoir as well - though that's often left to elementary music and art teachers (if they have them) and never touched on again. I will repeat what I said above - we need to be looking at what the best private schools do for their students and make that the goal. The advent of high-stakes standardized testing "accountability" has had the opposite effect of what was intended. It's caused public schools to dumb down the curriculum to nothing more than test prep, rather than allowing trained professional teachers to curate standards-based curricula that actually inspires learning. IMO when the government decided to go after the schools for "low performance," they went barking up the wrong tree. The problem was never the schools. The problem was and is poverty. Low academic performance is correlated more strongly with the family's SES status than any other single marker. Not because poor kids can't learn, but because Maslow's hierarchy is still applicable today. Kids who lack adequate food, shelter, and personal safety aren't in a place where they can think about their learning the way they need to. Anyway. Sorry you got this morning's novel on this topic. I think my kids get a good education in their public schools, largely because they have really smart, motivated teachers who care about learning. One of the ongoing frustrations I've had, as a person who does care about equity, is that district central staff here often say that they are eliminated advanced options, alternative programming, enrichment, etc. in the name of equity when all they are doing is making it so that kids like mine who have resourced, savvy parents get what they need and kids who don't, don't. Bill Gates is responsible for a lot of suggestions for education reform that lean in the direction of big classes, lots of tech, complete standardization, and lots of high-stakes testing. You know where he sent his kids to school? The private school here that has tiny classes, a very traditional classical private-school curriculum, and pretty much no tech at all. It's . . . interesting, isn't it?
|
|
The Great Carpezio
Pearl Clutcher
Something profound goes here.
Posts: 3,019
Jun 25, 2014 21:50:33 GMT
|
Post by The Great Carpezio on Oct 2, 2024 18:03:51 GMT
I'm going to guess that the demographics of Two Peas and the people responding to this thread doesn't correlate well with the general population. My kids are readers. My husband and I have a library room in our home and both of our kids have multiple bookshelves in their childhood bedrooms. My daughter spent several years as a moderator of a very large international book/reading message board. But do I think that No Child Left Behind was horrible for non-STEM related learning? Absolutely. I don't think the damage is limited to the ability to read a full book though. What about civics education? History? The arts? We will pay for this for generations. Yeah, it is a little hard to have an accurate picture and discussion when everyone here seems to have kids who are gifted and in AP and/or special programs/schools, living in middle/upper middle class homes with literature rich cultures built into their childhood. (I include myself in this--not a criticism ---just an observation)
|
|